Not that long ago, SI published a piece that Procurement Should NOT Be Reimagined!. While there was little public response, there was some private response as some, like the doctor, wondered why some people were stating that Procurement needed to be reimagined (besides the mad marketers trying to spread the marketing madness) while a couple of old grey beards (who have been around since before S2P systems hit the scene) offered some deep insight having seen the progression of Procurement since the first custom Procurement solutions hit the market until the present day.

The insights centered around the facts that:

• grand proclamations make for grand marketing
• over complications of relatively simple processes makes for big consultancy projects (just because something requires a lot of steps or a lot of paperwork doesn’t mean that it’s complex, but if you think it does …)
• if you say it enough, Procurement Pros start to believe it
• if they believe it, don’t have the training to do the job, or, are just lazy, convincing management that it’s complex minimizes their accountability if they screw up (or don’t have the training to do it right)
• hiring overpriced consultants allows them to pass the buck

With the exceptions of:

• marketers wanting to add to the madness
• consultants wanting to make another six to eight figures

The two roots of the problem are that:

• many Procurement Pros, for one reason or another, believe it is complex
• some don’t want the responsibility or the workload (which can be heavy without the right system)

So why do they think it is complex?

The Procurement process is very involved. Even the identification of a new commodity vendor is quite a process. First you have to identify suppliers that supply a product that meets the specification. That means a lot of searches, a lot of specification reviews, and then the creation of a list of potential suppliers.

Then an RFP has to be created that defines all the specifications for the product, as well as all the requirements a supplier has to meet to be considered. This requires more work.

Then the winning supplier(s), and back-ups, have to be onboarded (in case negotiations fail with one or more of the winners), and, these days, that’s quite an ordeal. Verify the supplier’s business details, their insurance, their regulatory compliance, their risk profile, their banking information, etc. etc. etc.

Then, when you make the award, you have to populate the catalog, define the budget categories, preferred status, etc.; define the rules on who can buy/reserve from inventory; define the rules when the (combined) purchase orders are placed; define the approval rules/chains; etc. And then set up the invoice processing and verification rules, the matching rules, and the payment rules.

And then, when the orders come in, verify them, approve them, deal with the match discrepancies, authorize and make the payments, and then manage the inventory.

Nothing about this is complex, because, as we said, the foundations of Procurement and Purchasing haven’t changed since the first manual was published 137 years ago, its just that more steps were added and, more importantly, the introduction of bad Procurement systems that took a simple, but involved, process and turned it into a nightmare.

… to be continued.