Birdseye(.digital) was created by With, a Strategic Consultancy founded to enable strategic sourcing and contract management excellence, to solve the most critical problems their clients had in value realization from strategic sourcing: post-signature execution. This, as we identified yesterday in our post on why aren’t you realizing the full value of your sourcing efforts, is one of the primary reasons that up to 40% of value identified during a sourcing project never materializes — as value realization requires proper Procurement (and a proper system), proper logistics (and a proper system), and proper contract execution management (and a system to support that).

Birdseye(.digital) was created for the

• Procurement Managers,
• Contract Managers
• Risk and Compliance Managers, and
• Legal Counsels and Advisors

who are responsible for managing the organization’s contracts, allowing them to get a 360 view of each contract as well as all contracts that fall under their purview and/or relate to a compliance requirement, risk, or obligation that they are responsible for.

So what is Birdseye(.digital)? It’s fundamentally a contract governance solution that allows you to define:

• the responsibilities (obligations) of the organization as tasks and action items
• the risks that need to be tracked and managed
• the supplier management and (re)qualification activities
• the stakeholder engagement and surveys

The primary components that allow this are:

• workflows
• risk matrices
• forms
• review/governance templates (scenarios)
• calendars
• dashboards

Workflows

When an obligation or action item is defined and assigned, the platform will track it, notify the appropriate stakeholders when it is coming due, kick off associated activities when a task is done or a status changes, and monitor those as well.

Risk Matrices

A user can associate all risks relevant to each (sub) contract, track their levels, track changes over time (during [regular] review schedules), define notifications on change, and associate mitigations. It can also define a custom risk matrix that derives a color-coded risk level from a combination of the risk probability and the impact of the risk occurrence for easy visual display and classification. This allows users to quickly see if there are any high or critical risks associated with a contract, whether or not mitigations have been defined, and compute an overall risk level of the contract, which can be monitored over time during regular reviews.

Forms

Just like modern RFP solutions, a user can build their own custom review/survey forms with ease and associate them with scenario templates, activities, or one-off projects. They can also attach files as needed.

Contract (Review/Governance) Templates (Scenarios)

The system allows administrators to define scenario templates that define, for a contract of a given type, what obligations and activities should be tracked, what reviews and surveys should be done, how often they should be done, and who should do them (by role). This means that governance for a contract is easily setup simply by selecting a scenario template when a contract is signed or input into the system post signature. Selecting a predefined scenario template from a single dropdown can setup all of the default management activity required over the contract lifecycle with a single click. An organization that takes the time to classify its contracts and management processes can manage contracts with utmost ease.

Dashboards

Of course Birdseye comes with a full suite of dashboards to get complete 360 insight into the contracts, with filter capability down to any subset, individual contract, or subcontract of interest. This allows all of its users to understand how a contract, supplier management effort, compliance initiative, or other activity is going. Since the platform can also be linked to a P2P or ERP system (Oracle, SAP, and any platform with an Open API that allows an invoice to be linked to a contract ID), it can also give you an update on total spend impacted by a contract, category, or initiative.

There are out-of-the-box activity dashboards for projects, contracts, relations (third parties which can be suppliers, consultants, etc.), and catalogues (of products or services that contracts can be linked to), as well as a customizeable activity dashboard for each user that can overview their contracts, projects, relations, reviews, action items, stakeholder contributions, etc. through drillable widgets that can be filtered on every dimension down to the raw data records, which can be popped up or exported as needed. These dashboards, in addition to standard metric/spend dashboards can also be of the Red/Amber/Green Traffic dashboard variety as well.

Calendars

Just like any good (project) management solution, a user can also get a calendar view of an activity, contract, or all of their tasks to easily determine what they have to do and when. The system was designed with management efficiency in mind, because the developers know that any system that is too unwieldy doesn’t get used, and, thus, the only way to extract all of the value out of a contract is to create a system that makes a user’s tasks as easy to identify, and do, as possible. The user can add tasks and activities as needed and customize their calendar to their liking.

Crossing the Ts

As for the basics, you can have as much metadata as you want associated with a contract, and add new metadata fields anytime you need to. In addition to easily being associated with a scenario template of choice, it can have as many tags as you like, be associated with a projected value, be associated with any parent or subcontracts, and have as many attachments (with versions) as required. In addition to the action items, risks, and obligations discussed, it can also have associated issues, rights, catalogues, invoices, reviews, stakeholders, and connected projects (such as reviewing all contracts with a generic force majeure clause). There are also checklists that can be associated with contracts and projects to help a user ensure they’ve dotted all the i’s and crossed all the t’s in the execution of the contract.

If the contract (template) is not created in the platform, when a user uploads an agreement, they use AI to identify all of the meta-data that is associated with a contract of the given type (using Google Gemini today, but future releases will allow users to choose between Google Gemini or Anthropic Claude, where they found the latter works better for organizations that contract in multiple languages), and not only allow the user to override anything it extracts (as it’s not perfect) but show the user its confidence ranking. The user can filter by confidence and only needs to review/validate low confidence options to have extremely high confidence in the auto-extracted metadata.

System Administration and Configuration

As we have hinted above when we noted that the user can add and track any metadata fields that they like, the system is very configurable and the administrator also has full control over:

• business unit hierarchy which can define visibility rights
• users who can be assigned very broad, or very narrow, roles
• tags that can be defined and modified as needed
• reviews and the processes and timelines they follows
• tasks and the basic templates and workflows
• email templates that are used for notifications
• currencies and mappings that are used if invoices are pulled in for spend tracking
• usage monitoring and define how to track who is, and is NOT, using the system
• folders and structure for contracts and attachments
• deleted record management as even deleted records are preserved for audit trails until a user with authority determines they can be permanently deleted

It’s a well thought out, usable, and fairly complete contract execution management system that goes well beyond just creation, storage, and signing … which we know is where many older generation contract lifecycle management solutions stop. The most important point to make is that they’ve found that their customers who fully embrace the solution see a 30% value increase from using the solution. Now, this shouldn’t be taken to mean that it can singlehandedly prevent the loss of the 30% to 40% of identified savings that is traditionally not realized after a sourcing event, but that it prevents about a third of that loss and, if combined with a good e-Procurement system and good logistics management, you might actually be one of the first organizations to realize almost all of the savings you negotiate (since a good e-Procurement systems typically increases savings capture by a third as well, and proper logistics paired with proper warehouse and inventory management saves a bundle as well). The 2X process efficiency alone that its clients see more than pays for the system, so imagine the results if you realize another 30% value on the identified savings of every sourcing project. (Combined with the 50% reduction in audit findings its clients also see, which increase drastically for any customer with an integrated P2P that ties invoices to contracts as they can check full payment compliance as often as they need to.) So if you are missing a birds-eye view into your contracts, maybe you should check out Birdseye(.digital).