Zumen, billing itself as the most comprehensive Source-to-Pay software for product manufacturing companies, purports to be the connect between the Part Life Cycle, Product Life Cycle and the Procurement Life Cycle and offer you one platform to manage your entire Source-to-Pay Process through their Direct Material Life Cycle Management platform.

So how does it stack up?

Well, let’s start with the basics. The Zumen platform offers core functionality in five areas:

New Product Development

To support new product development, they have modules centered around:

• product, part and material data
• product & infrastructure planning

The core of any direct sourcing platform is its pats management capability, and the Zumen platform can track all of your parts, all of their versions, all of their associated programs, all associated product and costing plans, all associated sourcing events, all awards, all procurements, and all associated drawings and documents. With respect to part data, you can not only track every related code and cost, but all associated materials. With respect to materials, you can also track estimates, supplier, and market commodity price data as well as associated scrap rates and scrap value. When it comes to building cost models for parts, which can include tooling costs, the platform also allows processes to be tracked in the norms master (with associated machines, norms, and units).

The platform goes beyond just tracking parts, but also tracks inventory, blocks (internal commitments), commitments (from awards/contracts), and production schedules around the parts.

In the Zumen platform, product development is governed by a program that tracks production sourcing, supplier management, strategic sourcing, and procurement. The platform supports the definition of full programs at the final good level, even if that is an automobile or piece of construction equipment with 10,000 parts, assembly level, or part level. Like any good product management platform, it supports versioning and a full history. Programs can be imported from the ERP or engineering systems (like Windchill) or created in the platform from scratch. BOMs are placed inside a product hierarchy of product sectors, product lines, model families, models, and/or other programs, as appropriate. The bill of materials will support as many levels as desired.

Bill of materials are very extensive and go beyond just basic specifications, but will also track all costs and commitments at each phase of the bill of material lifecycle based on the associated program. This can include estimated and actual costs during initial product planing, production sourcing (during initial development), strategic sourcing (for mass production), the current procurement cycle (if the costs are tagged to indices), alternate part costs if there are alternate parts defined, and (alternate) quotations if there are associated quotations from suppliers.

Moreover, from the currently active programs, the platform can automatically extract the current material requirements plan to get a complete overview of the material requirements at the base level across all of the bill of materials, including the current delivery dates, which can be amalgamated and modified in the material requirements plan.

Sourcing

• product costing and approvals
• request for purchase
• RFQ
• budgeting & spend management

Cost estimates can be as high level or as detailed as the user desires. They can be high level models that simply break down the cost into material costs, production costs, delivery costs, and tariffs, or detailed models that break out the cost associated with each material, production processing step, service, transport leg, and delivery/trade charge. This can include tooling cost breakdowns, assumed minimum order quantities (for economies of scale), packaging, internal rate on credit, and other related costs.

Once a cost plan is complete, often after one or more suppliers have returned a quotation in a (production) sourcing event, a product cost approval can be created for formal costing approval.

At any time, a user of the platform can request a part or program for purchase for production sourcing or full (strategic) sourcing, and it will kick of an RFQ. The request will be pre-populated with all of the part data, and all the user has to do is define the volume required (which could be as low as a single unit during R&D or initial production sourcing or as high as a few million units during strategic sourcing for mass production of the product over the next few years). For production sourcing, the annual volumes are automatcally derived based on the program definition or the annual operating plan. The RFQ will be instantiated from a template that can be linked to the appropriate program classification, and the documents associated with the relevant commodities will be pulled in automatically as well when the RFQ is constructed. The RFQ can be limited to a single supplier, all suppliers who can supply the part, or a chosen set of suppliers. All associated documents, compliance requirements, NDAs, delivery terms and conditions, etc. that have been configured in the platform will automatically be included, as will the default manufacturing locations for delivery and product encodings.

During a production sourcing event, the buyer can also include details on the program, estimated annual volumes, estimated delivery schedules, current (buyer) (program) cost estimates, any associated (child) part details of relevance, and other relevant data. With proper platform configuration, all of this can be automatically included. When a buyer creates a sourcing event, they can access the entire part history for reference. They can also associate (internal) sourcing criteria with an RFQ, and when a quotation is returned, evaluate each quotation, and see the sourcing evaluations and score side-by-side with the quotations. (They can also see which documents have been returned and access any documents they need to for quotation and criteria evaluation). Note that the quotations have full drill-down capability even in side-by-side mode, allowing you to drill down to components of interest and roll back up for high level (assembly) overviews.

When an RFQ is returned, be it for production sourcing or full strategic (multi-year) sourcing, you can see the full quotation from each supplier, and compare them side by side, as well as comparing them to estimates.

These quotations can be used to create budget items, populate budgets, and update budget cycles (as budgets can be over multiple periods and associated with multi-year production plans). Budgets in the system can be at the part or program level, and, like purchase requests and quotations, be approved before finalized.

Procurement

• purchase orders
• accounts payable

Once the quotations have been returned and an approval has been completed, the buyer can create the relevant purchase orders to begin the sourcing process. These will then be sent to the suppliers for acceptance and/or requests for modification (if they want/need to split shipments), and once the suppliers accept the purchase order, they can send advance shipping notifications (ASN) when they are ready to ship.

Once the parts have been shipped, the suppliers can flip the purchase order into an invoice and send it back to the buyer, who will then receive it in the accounts payable module for processing.

Analytics and (Production) Monitoring

The platform contains a number of built-in dashboards for monitoring parts, programs, RFQs, production plans, cost estimates, budgets, inventory, and other platform capabilities. One of the main dashboards is the production dashboard that allows you to track total production over time from global production down to an individual part through drill-downs.

The platform also has some basic spend (analysis) dashboards for total spend and program/product cost analysis which, like the other dashboards, can summarize spend at the highest level across a time period of interest and allow drill down to a single part for a single date, and everything in between. The dashboard can also allow a buyer to drill into changes in product cost breakdowns over time. There is a similar dashboard for direct material spend, which can be global, program level, plant level, across all materials, a category, or a single material. And, of course, a dashboard that lets you drill into spend by supplier.

There are also a number of built in analyses around product costs which include, but are not limited to, landed cost analysis, import cost analysis, currency trend analysis, spend by plant, share of business analysis, and overall product cost analysis.

Supplier Management

Supplier Management is centred around supplier onboarding, information, quality (PPAP/APQP), and performance management. You can onboard a supplier using a customized workflow that collects the corporate, capability, and compliance information that you need to work with a supplier.

The Big Q

The real question is, does the platform fulfill its promise?

Let’s consider a minimal product development, sourcing, and procurement cycle.

• Design
• Development Sourcing
• Design Finalization
• Sales Projection
• Demand Planning
• Production Planning
• Production Sourcing
• Procurement & Fulfillment
• Demand and Production Updates
• Part Replacements and Supply Base Modifications
• Service and Support

Through its new product development support, Zumen allows you to maintain product and part designs, including all historical versions, manage bill of materials in programs (and sub-programs), and ensure your sourcing initiatives are tied to design. With its RFQ support, deep cost models, and quotation comparison capability, development (and production) sourcing is well supported. You can import the projections from your ERP and do period based (month-over-month, etc.) demand planning and break that down into projection plans, which can be used to enhance production sourcing by providing potential suppliers with the demand breakdown over time. Once the awards have been made, they are tracked and purchase orders can be automatically or manually kicked off as needed. ASNs can be automatically received and tracked during fulfillment, demands and production plans can be tweaked at any time, part replacements tracked and associated with original parts, and associated services tied to the product/part awards.

Thus, Zumen really does manage the core part life cycle, product lifecycle, and procurement lifecycle in an end-to-end Direct Source-to-Pay platform and limits the number of additional best of breed platforms you will need to support your Source-to-Pay+ and supply chain management activities beyond the ERP/MRP and PLM. Key weaknesses are no scope 3 carbon tracking, which should be done at the part level to not only fully support EU requirements but allow for precise calculations, which is best done in the Source-to-Pay platform (and not a third party system) and supplier risk assessments (critical during qualification, and typically doesn’t live in a supplier discovery platform). While risk data should come from other platforms, the risk analysis should live in the supplier management platform to allow for not only performance tracking, but risk and compliance tracking. However, neither of these capabilities would be that difficult to build on the foundations they already have in place, so our bet would be that core capabilities for risk and carbon management will be added in over the next 12 to 24 months.

And, of course, if you are on the market for a new direct source-to-pay platform for product-development and direct product(ion) sourcing, Zumen is an option that you should add to your shortlist, especially in heavy machinery and manufactured parts industries (where the founder and his team have decades of experience).