Category Archives: Technology

If You Can’t Do The Job Without Tech …

Then you can’t do the job with tech.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. If you can’t do the job without tech, then you can’t do the job with tech.

All tech does is automate tasks and workflow processes and allow you to speed them up by a factor of 10 to 1,000,000 plus (depending on the tasks and workflow processes).

It doesn’t make tasks or processes better or worse (unless you Gen-AI, which typically makes it worse) — just faster (unless, of course, you change the process when you implement the tech and make the task or process better or worse).

Now, you’re probably asking why it’s not enough to design the process and simply install the tech. That’s because there’s a difference between designing a process and executing a process. Anyone can design a process at a high level given a highly set of requirements. Not anyone can execute. Among those, even less can execute it effectively.

Only those who can execute it effectively are fit to do the job, regardless of what tech the organization has or does not have. That’s because, if you don’t know how to do the job without tech (and certainly without AI), you don’t understand what the job really is. Business was conducted for thousands of years without modern tech, and computers only became generally available in big business in the 80s and mid-size businesses in the 90s and small businesses in the 2000s. That means everything you do today with modern tech was once done without modern tech (and, 150 years ago, without any tech that we would consider modern at all).

That understanding means you understand the core of the function. You know what has to be done, how, where the time suck is, what can be automated, how, and why. You also know how to verify correct automations has been implemented, and where the results require human interpretation, review, and decisions — and, if necessary, make those interpretations, review, and decisions.

Without that understanding, you can’t properly make use of tech and you definitely can’t make use of AI. Sure some tasks might be 10 to 1,000,000 times slower (and sourcing optimization will be out of the question, just a few bid comparisons), and you shouldn’t do them by hand unless necessary, but the point is you need to be able to — otherwise, you can never judge what the system does. Iin the age of hyper-fast LLM hallucinations, only good human decisions will allow your organization to succeed.

Why Your ProcureTech Initiative Will Fail … Part 1

We’ve written many series on best practice tech identification, tech selection, and tech implementation in the hopes of inverting the odds from an 80%+ chance of failure to an 80%+ chance of success, but given that failures are literally still happening on a daily basis, it seems that most people can’t be bothered to read best practice advice so today we’re going to flip the script and tell you all the reasons you’re going to fail and then you hope you go back and read the best practice advice we’ve freely given you (in series such as Successful Vendor Selection – The Series).

1. You Don’t Understand Your True Needs

You’ve never done a full end-to-end process analysis on your organization, you don’t understand how inefficient your processes are, what processes you actually need, why you need them, and how much better you could be doing. You just know that the KPI metrics you are tracking are not on par with industry averages based on what your overpriced consultants are telling you, that your balance sheet isn’t as good as best in class, and that you need to do something … and that something is get a shiny new tech toy that the overpriced consultants will help you select by telling you who to invite to your RFP. (And you should know all the problems with this — they’ll only recommend the partners they have sycophant partnerships with, get referral and implementation fees from, and who will ensure that they remain your overpriced consultancy of choice.)

2. You Don’t Understand What You Already Have

Once you understand what the correct processes are, why, and where the automation points are, you need to revisit the systems you have to see where they can solve the problems. Chances are you have a number of suites, supply chain platforms, and ERPs with easy to implement plug-in modules that solve a lot of the problems you have without buying any new systems. And even if new systems might do it better, chances are the improvement won’t be worth the extra money, downtime, and change management — which will all cost you dearly. The reality is that if you can get an 80% solution today, with tools your people are already using, that’s much better than a potential 95% years in the future.

3. You Don’t Understand What Your Capabilities Actually Are

By this we don’t mean your process capabilities or technological capabilities, we mean your actual functional capabilities. Your domain knowledge, your ability to execute on that domain knowledge, and your natural efficiency. It’s pointless improving processes to apply more advanced techniques or employing modern technology to speed up processes when you’re not capable of managing those advanced processes or technology. If you employ processes and systems you’re not ready for, they won’t deliver any results while costing you millions of dollars in the system selection and implementation processes.

4. You Don’t Understand How Long It Will Take to Upgrade Your Capabilities

Even if you figure out you need to upgrade your skills and those of your team’s, even if you posses a fair degree of human intelligence, you don’t know how long it will take. It’s not just buying a knowledge dump from a consultancy or giving your team a 5-day crash course, because knowledge that is not applied is not retained. There’s a reason College and University courses give assignments and projects as well as exams — the more you apply, the more you retain. If the imparted knowledge is not applied, it will not be retained. Until your team can start applying, repetitively, the new knowledge in improved processes, they won’t retain it and they won’t advance. The best training will be a day or two a month over months, not a week. And that’s for stage 1. It will take years to get your team from average to mastery. We’ve known for decades that major transformation projects take 5 to 10 years, and that the average journey to best in class for the committed is 8 years. Technology doesn’t change that. The longer you choose to ignore this fact, the longer you will fail.

To be continued in Part 2.

Supply Management in the Decade Ahead: Same Old, Same Old — Only the Pendulum Swings Part I

Almost 20 years ago, back in 2007, I wrote a 2-part series on Supply Management in the Decade Ahead: The Eight Major forces (Part 1 and Part 2) where I discussed the various external forces that will impact a company’s supply chain in the years ahead, as verified by CAPS, AT Kearney, and their clients.

And just like you don’t need to read another state of procurement report for five years! because, except for the tech-du-jour, nothing has really changed in the past five, ten, and even twenty years; you don’t really need to do an extensive study or survey to realize that the core supply chain issues are more or less the same, it’s just where the pendulum happens to be in it’s swing on each major issue.

Today we discuss the first four.

Global Competition Contraction

Twenty years ago, we were dealing with the rise of China hitting full swing as a result of the outsourcing craze that started to pickup in the eighties (as a result of pushes by McKinsey and counterparts), as well as other secondary markets becoming more accessible — and a host of global options for just about everything you could buy.

While this hasn’t changed, since the world’s dependence on China is still at an all time high (from about 5% of Global GDP in 2005 to almost 20% in 2025), and there are more and more companies popping up every year to satisfy your needs, their relative availability to you has changed. With canals and straits being shut down on a regular basis, sanctions coming fast and furious, tariffs costing out supply, and so on, the competition you can access in some countries (especially the United States and Europe) is shrinking by the day. The pendulum is swinging back from Globalization to Deglobalization/Contraction, and, as usual, you have to keep track of where the pendulum is and what direction it is (still) swinging in.

Merger, Acquisition, & Supply Market Consolidation

To meet the onslaught of new competition, companies headquartered in developed economies are still attempting to increase in size, scale and market power to ensure they survive stagflation and recessions. Others, in financial (di)stress, need to do whatever they can to survive. This will thus force many companies to continue the merger and consolidation trend that has been ongoing in fits and spurts for the past few decades.

Similarly, in the supply chain software space, paralleling the procurement software space, due to the impacts of the Age of AI Hype, we will see a lot of M&A as the bigger companies, with their legacy SaaS, acquire smaller “AI” players to add the “AI” propaganda to their own marketing, and the smaller legacy companies, struggling to sell their SaaS, put themselves up for (fire)sale to “AI” and I2O (Intake to Orchestrate) providers who need real capabilities and larger companies trying to complete their suites.

Increased Government Regulation

Governments continue to do what they do best — create red tape for the private sector, sometimes with the best of intent, sometimes to fatten their pockets, and sometimes just to keep busy. Sometimes the regulations help competition, sometimes they protect consumers, and other times they just add cost and process for absolutely nothing. Either way, they won’t stop.

This continues to lengthen your supplier / partner research and contract negotiation cycles, which must discuss relevant government regulations, privacy legislation, DEI (must [not] have), AI, and who’s on the hook when (import/export) tariffs get introduced out-of-the-orange. In addition, government actions to support or restrict economic development, such as tax incentives and trade restrictions, will continue to have a large impact on supply strategies.

Technology Advances

(Proclaimed) technology breakthroughs continue to cause major changes in how products and services are provided, especially in the software and control systems spaces. Properly applied technology improvements (i.e. real AI vs. Gen-AI LLMs) will revolutionize design, planning, and production systems and continue to lower total cost of production and the consumer’s total cost of ownership. Aggressive early adopters who overpay for the hammer when they don’t have any nails (just screws) will drive up costs while driving down efficiency and organizational capability (as they lay off workers they actually need and freeze hiring) are increasing their costs significantly and reducing their consumer base. If they can’t rapidly correct, they’ll end up being part of the new M&A frenzy (if not the next bankruptcy), while those who can successfully adapt modern, proven, tech with a plan will win big.

For the rest of the decade, and possibly part of the next decade, the winners will continue to be those that adopt the right SaaS solutions (because, while we may be in the SaaSpocalypse, it’s only going to weed out those overcharging for commodity software and capability, and the companies that survive the next few years will be those that offer true value. The reality is that even agentic (and AI) is still SaaS, it’s just SaaS that requires less (to no) human intervention [beyond maintenance by the provider] for the tasks it is assigned.

Supply Chain 2026 or Supply Chain 2008? Part II

Still continuing our “the more things change, the more things stay the same” theme, back in 2008, the Supply Chain Digest published an article on Key Trends Impacting Supply Chain Management and Logistics for 2008 where it asked a number of leading academics and practitioners what they saw coming. (Their responses are summarized in this SI post.)

Nine (9) experts weighed in and provided 24 thoughts on what they saw coming in 2008. Those thoughts more-or-less fell into seven themes, and for the most part, those themes are the same themes today. Moreover, the specific concepts addressed are more-or-less the concepts being addressed today. Let’s continue to take them theme by theme.

Automation / Tech

Three (3) of the nine (9) experts centered on automation/tech as a core theme and stated that they believed:

  • Enhanced Visibility and Automation will take hold in logistics
  • The firms that recognize that a fresh approach focussed on value, cash flow, and light, non-intrusive, web-service-based, value-add software components that work with existing solutions and technologies will be the ones that make progress.
  • Successful supply chain technologies will become solution/results focussed, not just technology-focussed.
  • On-Demand / SaaS will continue to gain traction – particularly in TMS

Enhanced visibility is now needed across the entire supply chain. If you don’t identify a disruption at the source three levels down your supply chain (mine collapse, plant fire, etc. resulting in a material or part shortage), you won’t have time to recover by the time your tier 1 supplier misses the delivery date.

The best solutions are those that plug-and-play with the ones you already have — that connect out of the box. That’s why I2O (the “term-du-jour”) solutions are so hot — they help an organization plug and play disparate systems together.

The real leaders are those that use technology as an enabler, not a talent replacement, and definitely not as the ultimate solution. They focus on next generation tech that augments intelligence and makes their talent more efficient.

Despite all the hype that Agentic AI will take over, since the majority of it is based on hallucinatory Gen-AI and failures are becoming commonplace enough that organizations are losing faith in the hype, organizations will soon return to trustworty multi-tenant SaaS based on (A)RPA and deterministically controlled/gated agents, and efficient, affordably priced next-gen SaaS will soon come to the forefront again.

Logistics

Two (2) of the nine (9) experts centered heavily on logistics as a core theme and stated that they believed:

  • The need for Integrated Logistics will increase.
  • Carrier bankruptcies will increase in 2008.
  • The biggest challenge carriers will face is staying afloat as lower volumes and reduced margins crunch their cash-flow.
  • The biggest challenge for shippers will be maintaining service levels as carriers exit unprofitable markets and lanes.

The need for integrated logistics is still increasing as the constant interruptions across the global supply chains come fast and furious. We’re in a reality where you need to re-route shipments on the fly at not only every cross-dock and modal interchange point, but at every intermediate stop. Major road, bridge and border closures will force new routes; port, canal, and strait closures will force alternative shipping options or a switch to air cargo; sanctions will force entirely new carriers, routes, and supply chains; and so on. Once you head down the wrong route, it can take days to backtrack and select a new one, potentially causing perishable cargo to be wasted. Once your cargo is boarded on a ship that might be halted mid-route, it’s too late to have any hope of getting it on time. Once it gets into the hands of a now sanctioned carrier or hits a port in a sanctioned country, you’re never getting it back.

Carrier bankruptcies are a regular occurrence every time recessions cause a significant drop in spending and bookings drop, oil prices shoot up, insurance rates shoot up, or global pandemics prevent critical maintenance parts from being obtained and too much of the fleet goes offline. We’ve had multiple instances of mass carrier shutdowns and bankruptcies over the past 20 years (2008 recession, introduction of Map-21 in 2013 [RIP-21], COVID, and now the tariff crisis (with carrier shutdowns in 2025 almost equalling the closure rate of RIP-21: about 8,000 last year compared to about 10,000 during RIP-21).

Now that volumes are still down on many lanes and in many sectors due to the tariff crisis and rising oil costs are crushing their margins again, carriers are again desperately struggling to stay afloat.

Maintaining service levels is a considerable challenge with declining margins and the need to maintain secondary lanes that will never operate at capacity in order to secure major contracts.