Mostly Harmless, Part XVI

Previous Post

In the last post, the process of tax reclamation was defined and some of the complexity around tax reclamation was discussed. This post will address some of the challenges associated with tax reclamation, some best practices, and the benefits that could be expected from an appropriate e-Procurement solution with good tax reclamation support.

Common Challenges

• Tax Rate Verification

  Is the rate being charged by the supplier the right one? This is tricker than it seems. In HTS, almost identical classifications can have greatly differing rates (which has led to lawsuits by retailers on the basis of gender discrimination, since they believe that gloves for a man should be taxed at the same rate as gloves for a woman). Some countries update tax rates on an irregular basis. (HST [Harmonized Sales Tax, a blending of the GST and PST in some provinces] increased in three provinces in Canada on July 1.) And sometimes a supplier is using an old database or makes a human error.

• Reclaimable Tax Identification

  Can the organization recover the tax? Is it out-of-state? GST or equivalent? A VAT to which it is exempt?

• Tax Credit Identification

  Is the expenses an eligible Research & Development expense that can be credited against taxes payable (such as the SRED in Canada)?

Best Practices

• Automatic Tax Rate Verification

  It’s amazing how many AP clerks will accept the tax calculation as valid, without even a cursory glance, once they have verified the items have been delivered and the rate appears to be in an acceptable range.

• Automatic Exemption Flagging

  To simplify recovery efforts, any taxes that the organization knows it is eligible to recover should be automatically flagged by the (rules-based) system. In addition, the system should also flag any tax payments that the organization might be able to recover and that should be manually reviewed.

• Automatic Flagging of Suspect Taxes for Manual Review

  Any taxes that are not in the system should be flagged. Any calculations that are not consistent with internal calculations should be flagged. And the invoice / taxes SHOULD NOT be paid until manually reviewed.

Potential Benefits

• Prevention of Overpayments

  Automatic verification of taxes (to insure they are valid) and rates (to insure they are current) can prevent significant overpayments.

• (Over)Payment Recovery

  A good tax tracking system can simplify overpayment recovery when such payments are made (which will sometimes be unavoidable, especially if a 3PL or broker handles imports and screws up a filing), and can simplify recovery of taxes the organization is eligible to recover on a quarterly or annual basis.

• Future Credits and Savings

  The ability to flag payments that might be (partially) eligible for tax credits can greatly simplify the process of claiming tax credits in an acceptable manner. This can reduce corporate taxes and lead to considerable organizational savings over the long term.

Once the taxes are reclaimed, the actionable part of the procurement cycle is complete and it’s time to analyze performance, which is the subject of the next post.

Next Post: Analysis, Part I

Share This on Linked In

Mostly Harmless, Part XV

Previous Post

Tax reclamation is the process of applying for and securing tax refunds and rebates due to the organization. In many circumstances, a buying organization may be eligible to reclaim some or all of the taxes that it pays to a supplier. For example, in the US a buying organization can often reclaim out-of-state sales taxes (if the organization has no presence in that state), in Canada an organization can reclaim GST (Goods and Services Tax) paid, and in the UK, sometimes an organization can reclaim VAT (Value-Added Tax). In addition, a company can almost always reclaim tax overpayments if a filing is made in a timely manner, especially if the organization has an APA (Advance Pricing Agreement) in place.

Taxation is a tricky subject in just about any country. For example, in the US, while intangible assets are not subject to property taxes in most states, they are in some. The same holds true of electronic downloads (software, books, etc.). There’s the LKE, which allows capital gains tax to be deferred when the sale of an asset is being used to generate cash to buy new, or similar, assets to replace the asset which is being deprecated. Then there’s the tangled web called the Harmonized Tariff Scheduled (HTS) which determines import taxes, where classification mistakes are easily made and where a simple misclassification (ladies sleepwear vs. ladies lingerie) can result in a large difference in assessed taxes. (My favorite is imported printers. Leave the cartridge out, the tax rate can be 0. Put the cartridge in, that’s a “value” tax of about 5.5%.) And of course, there’s the issue of foreign taxes, which the organization can get credit for, and in essence reclaim, if properly recorded and reported.

Canada has similar complexity. Out-of-province purchases may not be subject to a provincial sales tax if the company does no business in that province. There’s the GST (Goods and Services Tax) which must be charged by the seller on all non-exempt purchases, but which a buying organization is able to reclaim in full on an annual, or quarterly basis (as the tax is designed so that the ultimate bearer of the tax is to be an individual). And then there are special tax credits, such as the SRED (Scientific Research & Experimental Development) tax credit that can be accrued on up to 75% of all eligible R&D expenses and used to offset (federal) taxes owed by the corporation.

And then there’s the EU, where every country, despite a common currency, still has it’s own complicated tax structure. There’s so much to keep track of that a number of businesses are built around the provision of taxation databases and regular updates to their customers, as some of these businesses are able to charge thousands a year just for database access. The EC (European Commission) Taxation and Customs Union site alone has 14 different databases indexed (and these are just the EU tax systems), including:

• AEOAuthorized Economic Operators
• EBTIBinding Tariff Information
• QUOTATariff quotas and ceilings.
• SEEDSystem for the Exchange of Excise Data
• SUSPENSIONSAutonomous Tariff Suspensions
• TARICIntegrated Community Tariff
• Taxes in EuropeThe EC’s on-line information tool covering the main taxes in force in the EU member states.
• VIESVAT Information Exchange System

As a result, tax reclamation is an involved and difficult process that requires really good e-Procurement support to get right. However, considering that it can save a large organization millions of dollars a year (or more), it’s worth it.

Next Post: Tax Reclamation, Part II

Share This on Linked In

Mostly Harmless, Part XIV

Previous Post 

Reconciliation challenges and best practices.

A payment is the transfer of wealth from one party to another. The payment is usually cash or cash equivalent, such as cheque, money order, or electronic funds transfer. The payment must be recorded, tracked, reported and assigned to an invoice. Despite all of the focus on e-Payment (P2P, EIPP, etc.), it’s actually the simplest part of the e-Procurement process. The AP clerk simply sends a cheque or instructs a payment to be made, and then records the debit. All of the complexity comes before (which should now be apparent after reading this far in this series) and after (which will become clear). Nevertheless, there are still some challenges to be addressed, some best practices to streamline processes, and some benefits to getting it right.

Common Challenges

• Paying on Time

  For even a moderately sized company with hundreds of payments to process every week, it can be hard to keep track of which payments are due and which payments are approved. While the organization might choose to make some payments late, others may need to be made on time to avoid penalties.

• Automating Payments

  If a contract specifies a regular, recurring payment, if a payment can be automatically approved, or if the organization has chosen to pay off a debt in an instalment plan, the payments should be automated.

Best Practices

• Rules-Based Automation

  The system should allow one time, limited-time recurring, and regular (repeating) payments to be automatically queued according to whatever rules the organization has in place.

• e-Payment / Accounting System Integration

  e-Payments generally need to be made through bank systems, or through accounting systems that are integrated with, and authorized to use, bank systems. As a result, the system should be capable of being integrated with these systems. This integration can be as easy as exporting a (differential/update) XML file at an hourly interval (with information to be propagated to the accounting system) and importing a (differential/update) XML file at an hourly interval (with information to be propagated [back] to the e-Procurement system).

Potential Benefits

• Cost Reduction

  Without good system support, payment processing is a very time consuming, and somewhat error prone, task. A good system that automates payment processing saves time (and processing costs), prevents late payments (that generate penalties), and reduces the chance of human error (that can lead to more penalties or costly recovery initiatives).

• Increased Savings

  Automating payments not only reduces costs, which contributes to savings, but allows payments to be scheduled in a manner that allows for early payment discounts, which increases the savings available to the organization.

Once the payments are made, it is time to try and recover the tax payments that can be refunded to the organization, which is the subject of the next post.

Next Post: Tax Reclamation, Part I

Share This on Linked In