Category Archives: Procurement Innovation

Lessons Learned from Best-in-Class, Part IV

The following are some more of the lessons learned shared by some of the participants at this year’s Hackett Best Practices conference in no particular order.

15. Fish where the fish are
If a fisherman wants to catch a fish, it’s more likely that he will catch a fish in a lake filled with them then in a lake that is devoid of aquatic life. Similarly, it’s easier to find savings in a category rife with overpayments, maverick spending and/or contracted rates (well) above market average. Thus, if the Procurement organization wants to get some quick wins to establish credibility, it should focus on those categories that represent the largest opportunities.

16. Focus on efficiency of the company
Procurement efficiency is important, but corporate efficiency must come first. Procurment must put the good of the company first, especially if it wants to graduate from the kiddie table.

17. Governance and Sponsorship must start from the top
Since Procurement success will usually require change, and organizations generally resist change, support will be required to achieve success. However, success will be a lot more likely if support comes from the top as it may be difficult to overcome resistance without executive support.

18. Have a Talent Management Strategy
Procurement transformation and success will require top talent, and top talent, which is in critically short supply in Procurement, will require a talent management strategy to identify talent, recruit talent, retain talent, advance talent, and capture their knowledge when they move up. A critical part of this strategy will be to transition or use critical resources from other parts of the business either through cross-functional teams or re-assignments.

19. IT is Procurement’s new best friend
Not only will Procurement transformation generally require new processes and systems, which will require the support of IT (as reengineering takes time and expertise), but IT is often in a situation similar to Procurement — being asked to reduce cost while delivering more value. Together, Procurement and IT can work together to reduce costs, increase value, and gain more recognition and respect for both business units as they transform the organization to a world class organization.

20. Leverage outsourcers and outsourcing relationships
Sometimes the best way to get ahead is to outsource part of the Procurement function to allow the organization to do more with less or maximize the capabilities it has. Sometimes this will involve outsourcing the tactical parts of the Procurement function, such as transaction processing; sometimes it will be outsourcing generic categories such as office supplies, tellecommunications, or commodity hardware buys to a GPO where the organization “fits”; and sometimes it will be working with consultant organizations to get better results on strategic categories where the organization doesn’t have the (market) expertise to get savings (without sacrificing quality or reliability of supply) on its own.


Our next post will continue our overview of the lessons learned that were shared by some of the participants at this year’s Hackett Best Practices conference.

Lessons Learned from Best-in-Class, Part III

The following are some more of the lessons learned shared by some of the participants at this year’s Hackett Best Practices conference in no particular order.

09. Data is King
Cost savings reports are good, but savings reports backed up by hard data are better. Forecasted savings are good, but detailed projections backed up by proven models and years of hard data are better. Targetted spend categories are good, but spend categories known to have considerable overspending backed up by a data-rich spend analysis are better. Any which way one chooses to look at it, data is king.

10. Demonstrate an interest in your client’s business
Just like the most successful service companies in the consumer space put the interests of the customer first, the most successful Procurement organizations put the needs of the client’s business first. But they go beyond that and develop, and demonstrate, an interest in the business of the client and try to understand what the internal client organization — be it Engineering, Marketing, or Legal — will need before even the client organization understands what it needs.

11. Do not minimize country specific needs
It might be tempting to globalize successful sourcing and procurement practices as is, but each country will have specific needs with respect to its culture, language, and accounting systems. As a result, it may not be possible to globally deploy certain systems or processes with respect to transaction management and global trade documentation management if the systems do not have customizations for those regions.

12. Empower the Global Teams
If the organization uses global teams for Procurement or Sourcing, be sure to empower them to do the jobs they need to do. Don’t outsource invoice processing without the authority to resolve discrepancies. Don’t outsource categories without the authority to contract on the award decision. Otherwise, the teams will not feel like they are a critical part of the organization and, once the team members get the skills and experience they need, they will depart for greener pastures.

13. Establish common methods of approach
Even though there may be category or country specific needs, generally speaking, the 80/20 rule is in play and 80% of processes, methodologies, and technologies can be standardized across the entire Global Procurement organization, which should be center-led.

14. Everyone wants the benefits, but no one wants the risk
The category owners will want the benefits of lower cost and higher quality that can come from a new supplier, but will want not the risk of the unknown. The users will want the advertised benefits of a new IT system, but will not want the risk that it will cost more and take longer to be deployed than advertised, or the risk that it might not even meet the big audacious goal that was advertised.


Our next post will continue our overview of the lessons learned that were shared by some of the participants at this year’s Hackett Best Practices conference.

Lessons Learned from Best-in-Class, Part II

The following are some more of the lessons learned shared by some of the participants at this year’s Hackett Best Practices conference in no particular order.

05. Be approachable
Remember that the ultimate goal is 100% of spend under management, and this will only ever be achieved if the Procurement organization is trusted to at least advise on all spend categories. But for an Procurement organization to even dream about getting to this point, it first has to be trusted with spend categories by each business unit — and no business unit is going to ask for Procurement’s advice if Procurement isn’t approachable.

Procurement has to be willing to help with any category and any challenge at any time and be excited to do so.

06. Be realistic about how things get done
The vast majority of processes, procedures, and relationships in an organization will be inefficient and Procurement will have to live with them for a while as established processes don’t change overnight. Procurement might know that a more efficient process will complete in half the time and get results that are at least as good, if not superior, but the business unit may not have that experience or willingness to trust a new process, especially if it is the first time it is bringing Procurement in for advice. Procurement needs to respect the existing processes and work with them until the business units are ready to change.

The same goes for relationships. Even though a relationship may not be optimially managed, or a supplier not the best possible choice for the business, if it’s a long standing supplier with which the business unit personnel have a deep relationship, Procurement will have to tread carefully and slowly introduce new management styles and new suppliers to the business, starting with less critical categories in the beginning.

07. Constantly evangelize the message and direction
This was one of the most common themes across all of the presentations I attended. Procurement needs to “comunicate 7 different ways” to the point where it “overcommunicates” and constantly spreads the message about its capabilities and successes. Remembering that it’s seat at the table is, in most companies, still a seat at the kiddie table, Procurement still has to build credibility and respect, and, most importantly, continue to get noticed.

08. Continual service expansion and innovation is critical
No matter how great of a success story Procurement is able to achieve on a category, in a business unit, or for the organization as a whole, it’s never enough. Everyone always wants more, and Procurement always reaches a point where that “more” will not come from cost reduction and avoidance alone. Procurement will have to find additional ways to offer value in the form of reduced risk, reduced complexity, and process and product innovation to the rest of the business.


Our next post will continue our overview of the lessons learned that were shared by some of the participants at this year’s Hackett Best Practices conference.

Lessons Learned from Best-in-Class, Part I

The following are some of the lessons learned shared by some of the participants at this year’s Hackett Best Practices conference in no particular order.

01. A highly leveraged IT model brings a lot of capability and scalability
Well designed and implemented software can scale with the business with the addition of more relatively cheap servers and storage devices. In fact, with todays high-density, low-power, blade servers, even the largest fortune 500 can often run off of a single rack (as a single server can pack 64 cores and 256 GB of memory which is a lot of processing power if the organization is not running bloatware like Microsoft Exchange). This brings a lot of processing power to the business with minimal increases in cost. Plus, the entire business can take advantage of the sourcing and procurement platforms that are available.

02. All shared service needs are not the same
This is why many purchasing groups or business process outsourcers for procurement fail. Different companies are at different levels of procurement maturity and different businesses have different needs even in the same category. It’s often difficult to go beyond office supplies and telecom contracts and get any agreement among participants.

But it is often worse than this. In a large multinational, different business units will often have substantially different needs in the same category due to local market needs, operational requirements, and existing (manufacturing) processes.

03. Always have a clear vision
In most companies where Procurement has a seat at the table, it is still sitting at the kiddie table or viewed as the young college graduate who still has a lot to learn and who needs to let the big boys run the business. Without a clear vision, there is no chance for Procurement to be taken seriously.

Furthermore, without a clear vision, it will be hard for Procurement to sell its services to the various units of the business and Engineering, Marketing, and Legal in particular where new product design, advertising, and legal services are “sacred cows” that Procurement “cannot possibly manage”.

04. Be able to measure success and failure
It takes more than a clear vision to get attention and respect. It also takes results that are objectively measured and clearly communicated. But more than that, it also takes a willingness to admit failure. Not every project will be a stunning success. For example, in a buyer’s market, it was often the case that a category expert consultant would run an auction 9 times for 9 different companies and save substantially each time but fail to see savings the 10th time because the client was a leader in managing the category or had inefficiently located manufacturing facilities and transportation costs were unusually high.

A similar situation will exist in an average organization. A crack sourcing team might hit a home run on the first nine categories they go after but fail to find savings on the tenth, even though an initial analysis indicated a high probability of savings, because of unique manufacturing needs, relative lack of supply, or unusually high transportation costs. And for the organization to truly get respect, it must be able to admit when the results weren’t as expected and do a public post-mortem to understand why and learn for next time.


Our next post will continue our overview of the lessons learned that were shared by some of the participants at this year’s Hackett Best Practices conference.

Straight to the Bottom Line: Part III.ii – Best Practice ABCs

In Part I.i we reviewed the introduction to Bob & Doug’s (& Michael & Shelley’s) classic Straight to the Bottom Line: An Executive’s Roadmap to World Class Supply Management in anticipation of Bob and Bob’s new text on Next Level Supply Management Excellence: Your Straight to the Bottom Line Roadmap which is coming out next month on June 28. Then, in Part I.ii, we reviewed the seven-step process that an organization could follow to get from where it is to where it needs to be. This was followed with a review of some case studies and insights from best in class in Part II. Our last post, Part III.i, covered four of the best practice ABCs that will help an organization get to best-in-class more efficiently while increasing the effectiveness of your Supply Management organization. Today’s post reviews the remaining six ABCs.

Negotiations Management

Nothing captures the inherent complexity of negotiations management better than this quote straight from the bottom line:


Everyone in the organization has bought things for their personal lives. Whether it’s the CEO, his executive assistant, or the blue-collar guy on the loading dock, everyone buys things every week in their personal lives. And, in fact, most people are very proud of their buying skills. Why not? After all, ever since someone spent his or her first dollar as a young person, that person has done a lot of buying, and they probably believe they do a good job at it. That’s our biggest challenge — everyone sees themselves as a buyer
.

This is why it’s challenging, why a buyer needs a strategy, why a buyer has to define a MDO (Most Desired Outcome), a LAA (Least Acceptable Agreement), and a BATNA (Best Alternative To Negotiated Agreement) before starting a negotiation and be prepared to stick to her guns. And she needs to be aware of all of the basic factors that can affect a negotiation — summarized and discussed in the text.

Contract Management

Contract Management goes beyond using a contract management tool to create templates, capture contracts, and track expiration dates to supplier-centric strategies. An organization that does so will not only reduce (contract) creation time, reduce maverick buying, and properly prepare for sourcing efforts, but also optimize the total relationship with its key suppliers through a holistic review of the relationship.

Risk Management

Risk Management is the process of analyzing the possible exposure to loss and reducing loss potential. Proper risk management recognizes that some loss potentials may be avoided, others can be modified to limit their financial consequences, and not all risks must be accepted as they first present themselves. The risks that will be addressed are those with a loss potential that is unpalatable to the organization. The type of mitigation will be dependent on the risk in question, and may take the form of change in sourcing strategy, interest rate hedging, commodity hedging, credit insurance, and/or asset insurance, depending on the risk in question. For detailed examples of market, social, property, casualty, employee, and financial risks and mitigtions, which can be quite complex, see the text.

Consortium Buying / Group Purchasing Organizations

Consortium buying, the process of pooling your needs with those of other companies, is a great idea in theory but, in practice, it generally hasn’t worked. First of all, direct competitors are not good candidates for a consortium due to a natural reluctance to share basic information and best practices with each other. Secondly, most of the initial companies will be at different stages of procurement sophistication and it will be difficult to get all of the companies on the same page. Third, the quality of data available from each company regarding total spend will be vastly different. As a result, most consortia failed. There are some examples to the contrary, including Corporate United, but unless the participants are:

  • centralized or center-led
  • relatively sophisticated
  • from different industries
  • from diverse markets
  • apples-to-apples with quality spend data

the chances of a consortium working are not very good.

Asset Recovery

Used equipment dealers seemed to prefer (and be able to afford) new Cadillacs in their line of business. Why? Because, traditionally, when a plant facility had an idle piece of equipment somewhere in the plant, someone in the plant would declare the equipment as “surplus”, it would be subsequently written off for accounting purposes, then stored somewhere and forgotten until it got in someone’s way who would then seek out a scrap dealer who would get the equipment simply by offering an amount close to the scrap or write-off value. In reality, the asset would be worth considerably more, and if the scrap dealer could find another buyer, the scrap dealer would net a very high return.

However, an organization with an effective asset recovery program in place will match unused equipement with needs in other parts of the business and strategically dispose of unneeded assets in profitable used equipment sales.

Business Process Outsourcing (BPO)

Often defined as “the delegation of one or more IT-intensive business processes to an external provider that in turn owns, administers, and manages the selected process based on defined and measurable performance criteria”, the BPO market exceeded 100 Billion in 2004 and may exceed 1 Trillion today. The Procurement BPO market is (significantly) smaller, but if the organization is not up to snuff in certain categories, it might be the better option. The advantages of BPO include rapid cost reduction, the ability to focus scarce resources on strategic catgories, and the ability to upgrade systems and people across the enterprise. The main disadvantage is higher costs and reduced efficiency if done wrong. For an overview of the organizational state required for BPO success, see the text.

Finally, the authors also provide a detailed discussion of when to use a consultant (intelligently).

For more details on the effective use of outsourcing, negotiations management, contract management, risk management, consortium buying, and asset recovery, (re)read Bob & Doug’s (& Michael & Shelley’s) classic Straight to the Bottom Line. It’s packed with insights on every single page. And even though, at five posts, this is SI’s longest book review, it’s only scratched the surface at summarizing the deep and varied insights that can be found in this classic text. When Bob & Doug put pen to paper, not only do they match the insights of Canada’s own Bob and Doug, but the content is so rich that a proper review would be longer than the book itself. So give it a(nother) read. You won’t be disappointed.