Category Archives: Finance

Could Incentives Improve Your Working Capital by 5%?

Share This on Linked In

A recent article in the Financial Times noted that “big companies in the US and Europe have up to 1 Trillion in cash tied up in working capital”, a number that represents roughly 6% of their revenue. Freeing up 83% of that would go a long way to reducing the financial pressure on many of these companies … and Ernst & Young, who recently surveyed 2,000 companies with respect to working capital improvements in 2008, believe that these companies can take a structured approach to improving working capital and improve their liquidity by 83% (by reducing the amount of cash tied up in working capital from 6% of their revenue to 1%).

The primary piece of advice given is that companies change their bonus schemes to reward improvements in cash performance. I think it makes sense. Sales pros perform best when their commission structure allows them to make progressively more with each sale. Procurement pros perform best when their compensation increases with real cost savings. So why shouldn’t supply chain and finance pros perform best when they are rewarded based on

optimal cash performance (which greatly decreases the cost of capital)?

Become a Financial Superstar with The Receivables Exchange

Share This on Linked In

The Receivables Exchange, which bill themselves as the world’s first electronic marketplace for trading accounts receivable, simply put, allows businesses to sell their receivables to a global network of institutional investors through an auction (with an eBay-like “buy it now” option) and access working capital in as little as one (1) day. The model, which has been covered by a large number of leading publications (including BusinessWeek, Forbes, and Inc.) is very successful with 99% of all auctions completing and more than 90% closing through the buy-out option, sometimes in as little as thirty seconds!

So why should you care as a Procurement Professional?

In these troubled times, it’s your job to do everything you can to save the business money … and helping finance, who are probably just going to the local bank and accepting the (higher) rates offered on operating credit lines, save money on working capital counts. If you need 2,000,0000 of working capital for the next 30 days while waiting for payments to come in and you take a loan at 2.5% when you could sell your receivables (as an asset-based sale) at 1.5%, that’s 20,000 in financing payments you don’t need to be making. If you have to do it every month, that’s 240,000 of instant savings. And we all know that the financing terms can be much more onerous than just 2.5% for many small and mid-sized companies today, meaning that this can be a million dollar plus savings opportunity for many mid-sized businesses.

Not only can you point out this solution to your finance team, which is probably spending 2.7% of working capital unnecessarily on an annual basis, but you can use your procurement and customer expertise to let them know which receivables would be the most attractive to third party financiers and which receivables would command the best rates. This would go a long way to helping traditional finance managers, that probably see you as the “L” in “P&L” (as astutely noted by Mr. Guth on the VMO blog), understand the cost-savings potential of your department when your expertise is applied throughout the organization.

Furthermore, it’s also your job to keep tabs on the financial health of your suppliers and help your strategic suppliers out so that they are there to help you in the future. If you know that they are in need of more working capital, and you’re not in a position to pay them early (at a fair discount), you can point them to The Receivables Exchange and even help them with the on-boarding and due-diligence process.

So how does The Receivables Exchange work?

Unlike traditional factoring, which generally costs more and places much more onerous restrictions on your financing, The Receivables Exchange is completely anonymous, your customers are not notified that your receivables have been sold (unless you want them to be notified — which means there is no impact to a customer’s AP department) with a 100% transparent fee structure, that is free from restrictive covenants. You bundle one or more invoices for auction, define the minimum advance you require and the maximum transaction fee you’ll pay (for a 30 day advance), your optimal “buy it now” financing requirements, the auction start time (usually “now”), and the auction length (3+ days). Then 30+ buying organizations, which represent 15 Billion in A/R buying power, bid on your receivables and, if the requirements are reasonable, a few days later (1-10 depending on how long the auction takes to close and transfer time requirements), you have cash in your bank account. Then, when your customer pays your invoice(s), the advance, along with the lending fee, is paid to the buyer, a small transaction fee (that is typically between 30 and 60 basis points and determined by your z-score) is retained by The Receivables Exchange, and the remaining funds go into your bank account.

And it’s a sellers market right now. The exchange currently has buying power that is four times it’s current throughput with a number of Receivables Buyers still waiting in the wings to take advantage of the great supply chain financing opportunities that are being passed up by banks and other traditional lenders. The only downside is that the platform is currently limited to US-Headquartered sellers. You can list international receivables on the exchange, including receivables due to international units, but you currently have to be operating, and headquartered, in the US to take advantage of the exchange. When you consider that you can significantly decrease DSO at a very low cost of capital, compress CCC, and increase ROE in a matter of minutes once you are registered (as the auction environment has been optimized for the sale of receivables and the process of uploading your invoice and due diligence documents, bundling for auction, and defining your minimum and optimal terms has been streamlined to only take a few minutes, on average) and download their Adobe Air client, it presents a great opportunity for any company that needs to improve their working capital situation.

For additional information, you can contact Paul Hoeper (phoeper@receivablesxchange.com) directly.

Industry Week’s Mega Checklist for Improving Cash Flow in Your Supply Chain

Share This on Linked In

Industry Week recently an article on “how to optimize your supply chain to improve cash flow” that was pretty much a 21-point mega cash-flow optimization checklist for manufacturers that need to improve their cash-flow, which starts with EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) optimization. The suggestions offered were:

  • Business Process OptimizationReduce direct variable process costs with better information flows that are designed to decrease order management costs.
  • Direct Effort OptimizationDecrease direct variable costs by increasing the value-added-to-nonvalue-added ratio through network and production optimization.
  • Efficient Utilization of ToolsLessen direct variable costs by ensuring the right number of tools are available, adequately utilized, cared for, and properly stored.
  • ERP & PLMDiminish divisional ERP/PDM/PLM software fixed costs by rationalized all of the various ERP, PDM, and PLM instances in use.
  • Indirect SG&A Optimization Constrict variable headcount costs through processes and procedures as well as organizational and software solutions.
  • Logistics OptimizationShrink direct variable costs with better packing and storing that reduces waste and overhead.
  • Machine OptimizationCompress direct and indirect variable costs by optimizing machine utilization and maintenance schedules.
  • Network OptimizationEbb fixed costs by reducing the number of redundant facilities.
  • Obsolescence Cost MitigationWane direct variable costs through better forecasts and inventory management.
  • Lean your Plant LayoutSubside fixed costs by reducing the space needed for the same output.
  • Product Management OptimizationAbate indirect variable costs by improving product-use instructions.
  • Production OptimizationContract direct variable costs through cycle time reduction.
  • Quality Control Assessment of ProductionCurb indirect variable costs by minimizing failure rates.
  • Research and Development OptimizationCurtail indirect variable costs by reducing the need for engineering support staff.
  • Risk ManagementLighten indirect variable legal costs by assessing potential business risks.
  • Safety Audits, Training, & Insurance Spend Management Lower indirect variable costs by auditing the production area and minimizing safety issues.
  • Spend ManagementRestrain direct variable costs by evaluating existing assets to realize consumption cost savings.
  • Supplier AuditCheck indirect variable costs by ensuring material and information flows with the supplier are optimized to minimize failure and rejection rates.
  • Supply Chain ManagementSlash direct variable costs by developing optimal just in time structures with demand planning.
  • Supply Chain Management OptimizationMinimize direct and indirect variable costs by focussing on financial, material, and information flows in planning/scheduling, logistics, and procurement.
  • Transportation ManagementNarrow direct variable costs by optimizing shipment lot sizes, consolidating shipments, and improving freight terms.

Is Trouble Ahead for the Purchasing Profession?

Share This on Linked In

A recent report by Loudhouse, sponsored by BravoSolution and covered in Industry Week in their article on “Purchasing Officers: Confident Now, But is Trouble Ahead?”, found that 69% of the CPOs surveyed had not examined the impact of the last six months on their supply management strategy, which leaves them exposed to potential long-term problems.

This is problematic, especially since the research study found that many purchasing professionals are currently following short-term strategies that could lead to long term problems. As the article states, CPOs can deliver cost savings today by hard negotiation, however tomorrow’s efficiencies must be realized through evolving business strategies and addressing the top three procurement challenges of ‘cost saving,’ ‘speed,’ and ‘visibility’. But this hard negotiation can backfire. After all, as per a recent CPO Agenda study, which quantified the doom and gloom in the market today, half of the respondents have already experienced the bankruptcy of at least on key supplier since the year started, and over three quarters of CPO respondents are (very) concerned about the prospect of other key suppliers going out of business before the year is over.

So if you want to avoid trouble ahead, be sure to insure that you leave your suppliers some margin, that you pay on time, and that you monitor your suppliers health.

The Total Cost of Ownership Equation in a Green Economy

Share This on Linked In

A recent article on building an actionable framework for “Green Purchasing” did a great job of outlining the the true total cost of ownership calculation for any purchase when sustainability is taken into account. Simply put:
TCO = Purchase Cost + Overhead + Environmental Costs + Social Consequences where

  • Overhead Costs and operating costs include:
    • labor requirements
    • utility costs
    • maintenance costs
    • rent
    • depreciation
    • production/utilization costs
  • Environmental Costs include:
    • regulatory reporting costs
    • remediation
    • pollution control costs
    • waste management costs
    • unused inventory disposal costs
    • labeling
    • environmental insurance
    • accident cleanup costs
    • future compliance costs
  • Social Consequence Costs include:
    • customer relationship costs
    • regulator relationship costs
    • lender relationship costs
    • worker health and safety costs
    • corporate image and brand costs
    • litigation costs

In other words, the best price is not the best price if:

  • the product costs more to use, maintain, and own
  • the product costs more to insure, dispose of, and clean-up after
  • the product could damage your reputation with customers, lenders, and regulators.