Category Archives: Market Intelligence

DirectWorks: SaaSifying Co-exprise

Co-exprise was founded back in 2004 with a goal of building a new-type of direct sourcing solution not yet available in the North American marketplace. The goal was to integrate the new sourcing tools of the day — namely RFx, auctions, project management, collaboration, product information management [PIM], dashboards — with bill of materials, supplier engagement and management, and workflow management — capabilities not found in standard sourcing tools but desperately needed by manufacturers to handle their direct sourcing needs. In fact, it was so revolutionary that the doctor described it in 2007 as the first solution on the [North American] market to make a serious, honest, effort to address the complex direct sourcing problems that other systems cannot handle because these types of problems are unique and require a distinct solution.

The Co-exprise platform was relatively unique in its day in that it was built on a number of basic building blocks, including workflow management, business process rules, collaboration technologies, a centralized repository, project management, cBOMs (collaborative Bills of Material), cost models, and analytics, that were inherent to, and invasive across, the platform. This meant that all of the technologies were integrated into one collaborative workflow where all of the common data required by a direct sourcing professional was always accessible and analyzable. But, fast forward a few years, the platform had one failing — and that was that it wasn’t designed to be multi-tenant SaaS from the ground up.

Why? Back in the early 2000s, fast internet wasn’t pervasive, third party data center and application management was expensive and, most important, manufacturers wanted to keep their proprietary data in-house and valued deep security over remote manageability. But now that cost is paramount (and SaaS is always cheaper than in-house for non-IT enterprises), the cloud is accepted, and multi-tenant SaaS managed by professionals is often more secure than the corporate intranet, the playing field has changed and modern manufacturers want a SaaS platform.

So, shortly after a regime change, Co-express decided that it needed to go true multi-tenant SaaS, and that it would re-build from the ground up … as DirectWorks. Doing this would allow them to take advantage of new web development capabilities, such as better UI and distributed processing, that might not be doable if they just tried to do a straight port. So was this the right thing to do?

Yes and No. The new platform has a very easy to use and clean UI. Is extremely simple for the mid-size manufacturers that still use a traditional BoM sourcing approach that it was designed for. It allows manufacturers to organize items into products and products into programs so that sourcing and management can be done at the appropriate level. It still has good RFQ capabilities and a supplier repository. And a graphical dashboard with reporting capability.

But it still doesn’t have many of the features in the original Co-exprise product. There are no auctions. They may not be common, but sometimes it’s the fastest way to source commodity raw materials and items at market prices. Co-exprise had a fair amount of configurability and a workflow manager with some capabilities to customize the application to the buying organization, and the new SaaS product doesn’t really have either yet. The BoM structure and sourcing process is very inflexible, and there are no hints of true SRM.

However, while the indirect sourcing platform space is quite large, the direct sourcing space is quite small. The only players are DirectWorks, Pool4Tool, and SupplyOn — the last of which is mainly oriented around electronic interfaces and document exchange (but which also includes proposal, auction, and contract management capability). And while Pool4Tool, which used to lag in usability and integration among its modules, has now caught up and surpassed DirectWorks, Directworks has managed to port over half of the capabilities they built over ten years in two years, so it’s conceivable in two more they could be back to their glory days and a major fighting force on the market. Time will tell. And SI will be watching.

For a much deeper dive into the new DirectWorks, watch out for the upcoming Pro series by the doctor, the prophet, and the maverick over on Spend Matters Pro!

Procurement Sustentation 73: Individual Consumers

As we said in our damnation post, of course individual consumers are a consumer damnation. They are the consumer damnation. From your point of view, corporations (which will soon rule the world) are bad, governments are worse, but individual consumers take the cake, especially considering most of them bring their views to corporate and government purchases. And you are left trying to deal with the inanity and the insanity. When dealing with consumers, damnations are plenty.

Why are they so damn damning?

  • Consumers are fickle.
  • Consumers are demanding.
  • Consumers are impatient.
  • And some are outright vindictive!

So what do you do?

1. Insist on Third Party Marketing Research jointly overseen by Procurement.

Do you really need feature X or function Y? Does it really have to be blue? Does the schedule really have to be moved ahead 3 months at the cost of quality and reliability? Make sure all demands come out of a well designed survey that truly captures, objectively, consumers’ true desires. And make sure you understand what they are willing to pay, when, and why. Don’t let marketing force their assumptions on you at the expense of quality, reliability, and safety.

2. Make sure you clarify the value delivered, and the trade-offs associated with altering that value.

Make sure marketing understands what they can promote, Sales what they can sell, and all departments understand what the value is — and how that value will be altered if specifications are changed. Make sure Sales and Marketing understands how costs change, quality changes, and value delivered change if anything changes so that changes are not promised, and then mandated on high too late into the NPD process to allow the organization to keep costs low and value high.

3. Make sure all products are worth the weight.

If you can demonstrate that the value delivered will be more than your competitors, whether with new features, better (streamlined) functionality, or a lower cost for a higher quality products, then most consumers will be willing to wait.

4. Demonstrate a responsible supply chain.

You’re going to get sued, even if you did nothing wrong. So make good and damn sure you took every precaution to do everything right.

5. Implement a truly hassle-free return and replacement process.

You can minimize complaints and associated costs by making it easy for unhappy consumers, regardless of the reason, to get a replacement or a refund as fast as possible.

In other words, by making sure decisions are objective, and planning is done ahead, you can minimize the damnation that is going to come your way.

State of Flux: The Flux Capacitor is being designed for the Future … of SRM!

State of Flux is a provider of Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) software and services that was founded in London (England) in 2004 to focus on an overlooked area of supply management, supplier relationship management. When it was founded back in 2004, most companies were just starting to offer supplier information management (SIM) solutions, which were a pre-cursor to the KPI / scorecard-based supplier performance management (SPM) solutions that followed. Only a few companies had SRM in their mind’s eyes, and State of Flux was one. What started as a very simple system for supplier information, performance, and supplier (corrective) action planning and development has grown into a full fledged supplier relationship management solution that encapsulates supplier information management, performance management, risk management, governance and relationship management, CSR (corporate social responsibility), contract, and innovation management.

In addition to their SRM services, focussed around consulting and executive staffing/managed services, and software (which was branded Statess), they have also been producing the Global SRM research report (which was covered in State of Flux has the Treatment for your SRM Ailments Part I: The Need and Part IV: The Business of Supplier Relationships) for the last seven years which provides very deep insights into the state of supplier relationship management and what the top performers do. (Last year’s report was focussed on the customer of choice, and companies that are their suppliers’ customer of choice get [significantly] more value than their peers and this year’s report will be focussed on technology, and the value it can provide, and the annual survey will be out soon.)

As we have covered the platform fairly extensively in the past (in Statess Part I, Part II, and Part III and State of Flux Part I and Part II), this post will simply focus on major improvements since the last series.

In our last series, we discussed the developments in progress, namely:

  • Prospective Suppliers
  • Contract Management Enhancements
  • KPI Templates and Drillable Scorecards

Since then, State of Flux has completed these enhancements.

  • The prospective supplier module is based on questionnaires with dynamic workflows that ensure a supplier only provides the information that is required, and cannot participate in open challenges until all necessary information has been provided.
  • Contract data and meta-data definition is now highly granular, and the version comparison feature allows a buyer to quickly identify any changes between versions.
  • The KPI templates have been completed and augmented with a wizard that makes it really easy to replicate KPIs across suppliers and organizational units, and make the minor tweaks and modifications (to the weightings, data fields, etc.) that are necessary to have the most accurate and meaningful supply possible.

In addition to this functionality, State of Flux has also added:

  • Single Sign On: that integrates with the organization’s native LDAP (or other single-sign on mechanism) to allow a user to sign-in with an existing account
  • Deep CreditSafe Integration: that integrates all of the credit safe financial and risk data across the application (including the risk and performance modules) with quick access to a supplier rating from the supplier screens
  • Automatic Risk (Severity) Calculation: that automatically computes the severity (and RAG — red, amber, green — status) of a risk as soon as the probability and potential impact of a risk are defined
  • Excel Export which enables every piece of data in the application to be exported to well-formatted Excel spreadsheets and workbooks (for import into other systems and analysis/reporting tools)

The system gets better each year, and when you combine it’s end to end completeness with the fact that there are only a handful of providers focussing on best-practice SRM, State of Flux is definitely a provider to consider. For a deeper dive on State of Flux and their platform, watch out for the upcoming Spend Matters Pro piece (membership required) co-authored by the doctor and the prophet that will take a deep dive into the platform, it’s strengths, and its opportunities for improvement.

Analytics8 SpendView: An Affordable New Mid-Market Spend Analysis Solution

While the analytics marketplace, like the e-Sourcing marketplace, might be well established with most Procurement organizations able to name half a dozen likely providers off the top of their heads and most analyst firms able to name two dozen, the fact remains that less than half of Procurement organizations use real analytics and only the leaders go beyond basic spend reporting to index tracking, what-if savings estimates, or predictive trending.

There are numerous reasons for this lack of adoption, but a big reason was that early analytics solutions often came with a hefty six figure price tag. And that was just for the initial project. Then there were quarterly data warehouse refresh fees, report update fees, maintenance fees, and consulting fees to help interpret the patterns and identify the biggest opportunities. Many early adopters ending up paying seven figures annually, often for a limited return. Why? Because by the time the warehouse was refreshed, the reports run, the analytics done, and the spend opportunities identified, the business demand changed, the market dynamics changed, the prices changed, and the analysis was of limited relevance.

However, as newer solutions, like Spend Radar and BIQ came on the scene, spend analytics became much more affordable, and useable, as analysts could refresh data on monthly, weekly, and daily basis and obtain the solution in the five figure range. Plus, they had a fair amount of control over what data was loaded, what cubes were built, and what reports were available — with the ability to generate their own cubes and reports, sometimes on the fly with solutions like BIQ. Analytics stated to take off. And so did the e-Sourcing suite providers that gobbled them up. As a result, there are now few analytics solutions that are affordable by the mid-market and fewer still targetted there.

This is where Analytics8 SpendView comes in, built on over a decade of big data analytics experience and over 15 years of spend analytics experience by the solution designers, SpendView is a new analytics offering designed to bring modern easy-to-use spend analysis capability to any organization with over 10M in annual spend at a price tag it can afford, but good enough to satisfy even large multi-nationals with unique needs. What kind of price tag? A price tag that starts in the low five figures for a perpetual license (with low annual maintenance fees). (This is a price tag that can allow an average mid-market organization to obtain at least a 10X ROI every year.)

The new Analytics8 SpendView suite is a set of 4 integrated modules that allows an analyst to family and normalize suppliers, identify preferred and manage suppliers, categorize spend, and create and drill into spend reports. The vendor normalization module allows the analyst reviews all supplier records and maps all duplicates to one master record. It’s got a very simple interface, search, filter, select, and associate with a single click. The supplier assignment allows the analyst can select all unmanaged or un-preferred vendors, choose whether or not to manage or prefer them, assign suppliers to parents, and quickly see what percentage of spend is with preferred and/or managed suppliers. The categorization module allows the analyst to categorize transactions to categories by defining rules. The interface, currently supplier or description driven (but which should also be department and / or GL-code driven), allows a user to drill into uncategorized transactions, filter for similarity, and define rules that map groups of transactions to categorized spend. The rule is added in numeric order, but can be re-ordered as needed. And the reporting module ontains a set of canned widget-based drill down reports that allow an analyst to drill down into spend data, by supplier, department, category, geography, or other attribute and extract a report on the data, and only the data, they want to see it — which could be invoice data, payment data, or purchase order data. It’s built on QlikView and has the full capabilities thereof.

It’s power and usefulness to the average organization is more-or-less on par with its more established primary competitors — which SI sees as Rosslyn Analytics, Sievo, Spend 360, and SpendHQ (especially since BIQ and Spend Radar, named above, were among the acquisitions of the previous generation of best-of-breed stand alone analytics providers) — and it is a quick entry into spend analytics for any enterprise already using QlikView for other analytics needs.

SI recommends you check out the deep dive on Analytics8 SpendView by the doctor and the prophet over on Spend Matters Pro [membership required] that goes deep into strengths and weaknesses, corporate SWOT analysis, and the market landscape. (Part I, Part II and Part III now available) You won’t be disappointed.

Where’s the Beef?

There are a lot of fast food chains, and a lot that tried to make it big enough to take on the grand-daddy of them all, McDonalds, which has sold hundreds of billions of burgers across 36 thousand plus locations since the opening of its first restaurant in 1940. One chain that hoped to take them at their level was Wendy’s, founded 29 years later in 1969 and which has since grown to over 6 thousand plus locations worldwide, with a rapid expansion that took place in the mid-eighties, about the same time they launched their classic “Where’s the Beef” campaign (which tried to demonstrate their value by focussing on the fact that they used a bigger beef patty in their main burger as compared to the two big competitors they were taking on, which they claimed used massive buns to disguise smaller patties).

This was not only one of the best campaigns of the decade, but of the twentieth century as this classic catchphrase has progressed into everyday use and is now universally used in the English language to question the substance of an idea, event, or product.

And, as such, this is a decision we should be making as Supply Management professionals every time we select a product, supplier, or partner. Because only a product, supplier, or partner with “beef” deserves our money, and only one with “prime beef” deserves top dollar.

So how do you find the beef?

The first thing you have to do is define what “the beef” is and when you are evaluating a product, supplier, or partner — strip away everything else. In automotive, high-tech, and defense, it’s typically quality and reliability. The bolt can’t break, the processor can’t overheat, and the interface has to be suitably shielded to prevent interference or hijacking. Cost is important, but not paramount, services are useful, but not critical if there are third parties, and warm fuzzy feelings don’t amount to much if a product breaks and someone dies as a result.

In services, it is all about the efficiency or the effectiveness, depending on the type of service being put to bid. If it’s for tactical data processing (such as invoice entry, verification and correction), it’s about efficiency. You want as many invoices converted into verified electronic format for automated m-way match as quickly as possible. If it’s for marketing media, you want services that generate campaigns that are as effective as possible — every eyeball and lead effectively reduces the cost and increases the value.

Then you create a scorecard that evaluates the product, supplier, or partner on the “beef”, and compare all such products, suppliers, or partners on the weight of the “beef” and only the “beef”. Any that don’t stack up are eliminated. Now you have the beef.

Then, and only then, do you do a full 360-degree scorecard to figure out which cut of “beef” is the best for your business. A lot of supply managers try to evaluate too much too soon, and spend too much time evaluating the bun and end up making an inferior supply chain decision as a result. So in your next evaluation, remember to ask “Where’s the Beef” to stay focussed.