Category Archives: Procurement Innovation

b-pack: Taking Root in Their Brave New World, Part II

In Part I, we discussed how b-pack, who packed it in for a brave new world (Part I, Part II, Part III, and Part IV) back in 2010, crossed the Atlantic in their quest to spread some of their French Procurement bohemian revolution to the rest of the world, bringing with them a suite of Procurement solutions that take you from the start of a traditional sourcing cycle (RFx), through a contract, to a requisition (which may be from a catalog), against a budget, to receipt (which can include asset tracking information), and an invoice, to payment, reporting, and supplier management. Three years ago their Procurement suite, which also included document management, expense and travel management, asset management, inventory management (which is integrated with asset management), fleet management, dispute resolution, a supplier portal and procurement business intelligence reporting in a solution that was extensively internationalized, was one of the most in-depth solutions available, and it has been developed considerably since then.

In the past three years b-pack has added (or significantly improved) (collaborative) contract authoring and advanced contract management (coming out in the next release this quarter), advanced requisitioning and services procurement, OCR (Optical Character Recognition) integration, project management and project support across requisitions and budgets, an enhanced collaboration portal, a GPO (Group Purchasing Organization) module, and enhancements across the board to all core and supporting modules while at the same time extending their out-of-the-box integrations with ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) and AP (Accounts Payable) systems, increasing usability, and taking (RAD) rapid application development to a whole new level with respect to the degree to which the platform can be customized for a new client.

Today we are going to discuss the enhancements to requisitions, budgets, and project-management.

As discussed in yesterday’s post, one of the things b-pack has learned while servicing over 100+ global clients in 20+ industries in the public and private sector is that every company has their own unique Procurement process, which starts with the requisition. For example, some companies start with a requisition, which must be approved before a PO can be generated, some companies start with a PO, and some companies, where most of the spend is for small amounts, start with the invoice. In addition, and this is true in the public and health-care sectors, some processes start with check requisitions for employee (travel) expenses and study participant payments. Each of these requisitions requires a different (approval) process. In addition, while some requisitions are for one time product or services buys, some are for repeating, regularly scheduled buys, and some are for products or services that are to be delivered over multiple phases of a project, and multiple POs, invoices, and receipts need to be managed against the same requisition over the course of the project.

In response to this need, b-pack has extended their platform to support a slew of requisition types and processes, and each customer can select just the types, and processes, that they require. In addition, each step can be customized as needed and the approval process, which is rules-driven, can be as simple or complex as required. This is what allows them to meet the needs of Sony Music UK, for example. In the music industry, requisitions are for projects which can include CD recording and CD promotion. A CD recording will require studio costs, producer advances and fees, artist advances, flat fees and payments, post-production costs, etc. A CD Promotion will include promotions for multiple singles, which will have associated production costs, advertising costs, and special event costs (for artists appearances). And while the CD recording requisition might be a single-phase project, the promotion will generally be multi-phase, with each phase centred around the release of a single. The b-pack platform not only supports the requisitions required for these types of projects, but also supports templates for each project (or recurring order) that is required. So, all a talent, or project, manager, needs to do to set up a project is select the type of requisition, select the template, input the expected costs (against the pre-populated expense groups and project codes), and send it off for approval.

It’s budget creation and tracking capability is also quite advanced. It allows you to set up a budget that is as detailed as necessary and track it monthly or against project phases. The budget can be compared against the appropriate project(s), requisitions, invoices, and receipts and the user can see how they are doing at any particular time. This real-time visibility into the budget allows them to track the success of the project.

After requisitions, the next biggest enhancement to the platform is probably in respect to its project definition and management. In the b-pack platform, projects can be as simple or complex as required. They can be single phase or multi-phase; associated with a budget; linked to zero or more documents and contracts; associated with the relevant requisitions, invoices, and receipts; associated with one or more users including the project manager; and updated automatically when any associated requisition, invoice, receipt, etc. is updated.

And, as with previous versions of the b-pack platform, all of the data fields are driven off of master-data and the suppliers, approvers, account codes, project codes, etc. can all be selected from drop-down lists after a few characters have been entered. In addition, all of the master data tables (that are not pulled from associated ERP, AP, etc. systems) can be updated using Excel spreadsheets – making it easy to administer.

b-pack has put a lot of thought into usability and worked hard to make sure the platform meets the needs of its international users. Tomorrow, we’ll dive deeper into its new, relatively unique, RAD architecture.

b-pack: Taking Root in Their Brave New World, Part I

When we first introduced you to b-pack in 2010, they were packing it in for a brave new world (Part I, Part II, Part III, and Part IV), hoping to spread some French Procurement bohemian revolution to the rest of the world.

Unlike other e-Procurement systems of the day, b-pack understood that e-Procurement was more than just requisitions, catalogs, and invoices. Good e-Procurement solutions take you from procurement through purchase through receipt, payment and supplier management to begin the cycle anew. To this end, b-pack brought with them a suite of solutions that take you from the start of a traditional sourcing cycle (RFx), through a contract, to a requisition (which may be from a catalog), against a budget, to receipt (which can include asset tracking information), and an invoice, to payment, reporting, and supplier management. In addition to these core e-Procurement modules, they also brought document management, expense and travel management, asset management, inventory management (which is integrated with asset management), fleet management, dispute resolution, a supplier portal and procurement business intelligence reporting in a solution that was extensively internationalized.

So what have they been up to since then? Quite a bit. In addition to (collaborative) contract authoring and advanced contract management (coming out in the next release next quarter), advanced requisitioning and services procurement, OCR (Optical Character Recognition) integration, project management and project support across requisitions and budgets, an enhanced collaboration portal, a GPO (Group Purchasing Organization) module, and enhancements across the board to all core and supporting modules, b-pack has been working hard to extend their out-of-the-box integrations with ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) and AP (Accounts Payable) systems, increase usability, and take (RAD) rapid application development to a whole new level with respect to the degree to which the platform can be customized for a new client.

One of the things b-Pack has learned serving 100+ clients globally across 20+ industries in the public and private sectors over the past 13 years is that every single company is different when it comes to the Procurement processes that they use. Furthermore, not only are the procurement (inventory, and receiving) processes (just to name a few) different, so are the types of requisitions, budgets, and projects that they use. And if you try to meet their needs with a one-size fits all platform that doesn’t mimic organizational processes exactly, what ends up happening is that the employees, used to doing things a certain way, do everything they can to bypass the platform, no matter how easy it is to use or how consumer-oriented it is. And what ends up happening is that, instead of Supply Management getting their spend under management (SUM), maverick spend actually increases after the e-Procurement platform is implemented. In response to this realization, b-pack has been very heavily focussed on not only increasing the customization capability of their platform over the last few years, but in doing it in such a way that the platform can be custom configured through user-driven administration options. This achieves three very important goals in the enterprise software world. One — there is only one instance of the b-pack platform – which makes it very easy to maintain and update as every customer runs the same core code base. Two — every customer (administrator) can configure the platform themselves as their needs change. Three — a custom instance can be configured for even the most complex Fortune 500 in a matter of days by a b-pack product manager who sits down with the customer and walks through all of their Procurement processes with them.

In the posts that follow we will discuss some of the unique customization capabilities in the new b-pack solution in detail.

3 Easy Steps to Take Up To 7% Off Of Your Organization’s Bottom Line Costs!

  1. Mandate Organization-Wide Cooperation with Supply Management on all Spend.
  2. Implement an e-Procurement/P2P solution and Mandate that 100% of Your Spend Goes Through the Platform.
  3. Give Supply Management the Talent it Needs to Apply the Appropriate (Advanced) Sourcing Techniques to all Categories.

It’s that simple. Why?

  1. 70% of revenue is spent on non-labour costs
    as per Proxima’s recent “Corporate Virtualization Report”
  2. 100% of spend through a single system gets all 70% of the revenue being spent on non-labour costs under management
  3. (Advanced) Sourcing saves an average of 10% to 12% across-the-board on all spend being addressed (as per back-to-back studies from Aberdeen) and 10% of 70% is 7%!

That says an average 1 Billion organization could add up to 70 Million to its bottom line at the end of a year with a proper focus on Supply Management. Supply Management truly is the organization enabler!

Your Best Secret Weapon Against Bankruptcy? e-Invoicing and Supply Chain Finance

Right now, you’re probably scratching your head and saying you’re biggest secret weapon is better marketing and advertising to get more people to buy your product and keep the cash coming in. However, the real problem, especially for any company in the supply chain that is not customer facing, is the inbound cash-flow. Every month employees have to be paid, overhead costs have to be paid (or the lights go off and the doors get locked), and (starving) suppliers have to be paid. This can only happen if the company is paid, or has access to cash until it gets paid.

Inbound cash-flow is a serious problem, especially as more and more companies extend DPO terms across the board. It’s so bad in the UK that the government established the Late Payments of Commercial Debts Regulations to protect small businesses struggling with cash flow due to late payment of invoices. Cash-flow problems, and chronically late payments in particular which are topping 120 days (or more) in some verticals (especially in the UK), and not lack of customers, are now causing more bankruptcies than business failures (as there is no lack of customers). As far back as 2008, 4,000 UK businesses, which represented at least 40% of bankruptcies in 2008 in the UK, failed as a direct consequence of late payment! And that percentage is increasing.

So how is e-Invoicing going to help? One of the many advantages of proper e-Invoicing is that a buyer gets an invoice almost as soon as you submit it (as transmission over the internet typically only takes a few seconds at most) and can send a receipt thereof to your system immediately. If it’s a customer you have a contract with, then you have options. If they are cash-rich, and amicable, you can offer them early payment discounts that will save you both (if the alternative for you is borrowing at 20%). If not, and the customer has a good credit rating, you can put the invoices out for factoring on a Supply Chain Financing hub and get them factored at a much better rate than your local bank (that might struggle with a simple international wire) will give you.

Done right, as long as you are selling enough to meet your operational costs, e-Invoicing and Supply Chain Financing could save your hide when your competitor goes out of business. They truly are the best secret weapons you might have against bankruptcy (especially given that over 80% of invoices are still paper in many countries).

The next evolutionary phase of e-invoicing

Today’s guest post, which originally aired on Purchasing Insight, is courtesy of Pete Loughlin, Managing Editor at Purchasing Insight and a global expert on purchase-to-pay who could once be found on Twitter at @peteloughlin.

When it comes to electronic trading, the Latin Americans, most notably Brazil, Mexico, Argentina and Chile, put the so-called developed countries to shame in terms of their ambition. While the Europeans continue to support business processes hardly changed since they were developed by the spice merchants of Venice during the Renaissance, South American governments are building business and tax collection infrastructures that many of us would never have dreamt possible.

It’s absolutely true. Many of the business conventions that are employed in the west today are based on the methods of trade developed by Italian bankers in the 16th century. The way we trade including systems of banking and credit were all fine-tuned to meet the needs of merchants trading in the far east. And while many aspect have been modernized some of the core principles remain the same. Old habits die hard and today, despite our delusion that we are part of a digital economy, about 80% of the B2B invoices in Europe are pieces of paper.

For over 20 years, the lawmakers in Europe have grappled with the growth of e-business and it’s is only recently that the European Union has developed something which comes close to a common understanding of what an electronic invoice is. You could sympathize. It’s not possible to simple throw away centuries of convention and legislation. Starting from scratch and reinventing trading rules from 1st principles to take into account modern technology is no easy task – impossible perhaps. But that’s what the Brazilians and the Mexicans have managed to achieve. The have reinvented the business of invoicing and tax collection.

Today in Brazil, the tax authorities know about every business transaction before it happens. They know about every delivery of goods and services and the tax due. Law enforcement agencies including customs officers and police have the power and the tools to check on goods in transit to make sure that all the documentation is in order and that tax is being collected properly. Whereas in Europe and North America, electronic invoicing is about efficiency, in Latin America it’s about maximizing tax revenue.

All a bit heavy handed some might think. A level of government interference in business that is going a step too far maybe. But to those – especially those in Europe – who think that there’s no need to further police tax collection, let me say one thing. Greece.

Whereas the taxman in Latin America is proactively monitoring trade in real-time, ensuring it is calculated correctly and ensuring it’s paid, the taxman in the UK is looking retrospectively at the accounts of the likes of Google and Starbucks, scratching his head and asking “Why don’t you pay tax?”

All respect to Latin America. This is the way we’d do it if we were starting with a blank sheet of paper. But let’s take a look into the future and to some of the fastest growing economies in the world. Because that’s exactly what they have got – a clean sheet. They have virtually no physical infrastructure and even less business infrastructure. No embedded rules or conventions to hold them back. Could they build something even more sophisticated and ambitious? They can and they will.

When it comes to looking for the next evolutionary phase in e-invoicing, don’t look to the United States or Europe. Don’t even look to Brazil or Mexico. Look to Africa.

Thanks for letting SI reprint this awesome post, Pete!