Sometimes Old-School Works Just Fine: An EC Sourcing RFP Case Study

It’s still a buyer’s market. Many suppliers are desperate for business, supply (capability) still exceeds demand in many markets, and even though prices are starting to rise in some markets with expectation of recovery, they haven’t risen much yet. According to many strategic sourcing professionals, it’s the perfect market for an (e-)Auction because suppliers will compete for your business. And while that may true, it does not guarantee that you’ll get the best result.

An e-Auction carries a number of risks. The result can be higher prices than a traditional negotiation. For example, if the auction was limited to a small number of suppliers, who are in contact, they may collude to keep prices high — or they may all adopt a strategy of delayed bids and minimum bid decrements which could result in higher prices. The result could be unsustainably low prices. A supplier, desperate to win business, might hope to make up losses in future volume, bid a razor thin margin, and then risk bankruptcy when its costs rise. At this point, the only choice for the organization would be to accept higher prices (through surcharges) or risk an interruption while a search for a new supplier was conducted. And the result could be strained supply base relations. A poorly conducted event can instill animosity in winners and losers alike, which would result in poor service from the winners and lack of response in future bid requests from the losers.

As a result, sometimes the best approach is an old-fashioned multi-round RFX with feedback between each bid, as it was for a certain mid-size apparel retailer, who we’ll call Apparel-For-You, who was new to e-Sourcing and just wanted a way to streamline their ocean freight bidding efforts (for their 25M ocean freight category) and communicate with suppliers in a consultive way. Specifically, Apparel-For-You, not realizing the significant savings opportunity before them, had the following goals in their search for an e-Sourcing solution:

  1. Understand Supplier Willingness to Bid on a Per Lane BasisHistorically, Apparel-For-You had been surprised a number of times not only with respect to bids that came in, but with respect to lanes carriers were willing to bid on individually
  2. Reduce Analysis and Reporting TimeApparel-For-You’s supply base, which provided them with over 2,200 individual SKUs, was spread across 30 ports of origin, 4 major ports of destination, 9 carriers, and 4 container types — which equals 4,320 bids to be collected and analyzed before the 120 lanes can be divided among the carriers. While certainly not impossible to do by hand, that’s still 10 (9 carrier plus 1 integrated) fairly large spreadsheets to manipulate and analyze in a time consuming and error-prone manner.
  3. Communicate with Suppliers in a Consultative and Regular FashionWithout a dedicated sourcing tool, it’s difficult for all team members to know when a carrier was last contacted and what was discussed. The ball could be dropped, and this could lead to a damaged relationship. Given the importance of relationships in Apparel-For-You’s supply chain, as apparel has a short product life-cycle, this is something Apparel-For-You wanted to avoid.

Given these requirements, and Apparel-For-You’s lack of e-Sourcing sophistication, EC Sourcing recommended that Apparel-For-You use a multi-round RFX, starting with an RFI to find out which carrier was interested in which lanes, with analysis and feedback between each round. The carriers were all informed up-front of the new process, and Apparel-For-You consistently followed-through after each round.

Using the built-in templates, Apparel-For-You was able to easily create an RFI that allowed it to create the right pricing matrix for each supplier as well as clarify important T&C’s with each. The process of collecting bids from carriers, who were used to Excel, was simplified by way of Excel integration. This integration also simplified the amalgamation of the bids into a single matrix for analysis purposes, as the integration was automated and free from human error.

Using built-in reports and advanced analysis models provided by EC Sourcing, Apparel-For-You was able to quickly analyze the bids after each round and provide the supplier with feedback on their relative ranking, which included how much they’d have to lower their bids to improve their rank and take the #1 spot. Using this information, the carriers were able to adjust their bids accordingly and focus on the lanes they could perform the best on with respect to the buyer’s needs.

In the end, Apparel-For-You not only accomplished their goals of

  1. Understanding Supplier Willingness to Bid on a Per Lane Basisas this information was known before the first bid was collected
  2. Reducing Analysis and Reporting Timeas the project time-frame was reduced by 35%
  3. Communicating with Suppliers in a Consultative and Regular Fashionas they were able to inform the carriers of their rank and potential awards promptly after each bid, and track when the last discussion took place

but Apparel-For-You also reduced their costs by 19%.

This just goes to show that, sometimes, old school works just fine. The full case study is available in PDF form.

Share This on Linked In

Webinar Wackiness VIII: Webinars This Week from the #1 Supply Chain Resource Site

The Sourcing Innovation Resource Site, always immediately accessible from the link under the “Free Resources” section of the sidebar, continues to add new content on a weekly, and often daily, basis — and it will continue to do so.

The following is a not-so-short selection of over 15 webinars THIS WEEK that might interest you:

Date & Time Webcast
2010-May-25

 

14:00 GMT-04:00/AST/EDT

Capitalizing on the Direct Import Opportunity

Sponsor: Management Dynamics

2010-May-25

 

14:00 GMT-04:00/AST/EDT

Mastering S&OP: What’s Required to Win the Battle?

Sponsor: John Galt Solutions

2010-May-25

 

11:00 GMT-04:00/AST/EDT

What You Need to Know to Claim Your Technology is “Green

Sponsor: Gartner

2010-May-25

 

13:00 GMT-04:00/AST/EDT

Burning Coal, Burning Cash

Sponsor: Clean Energy

2010-May-26

 

12:00 GMT-04:00/AST/EDT

Value-Focused Supply Management

Sponsor: PMAC

2010-May-26

 

15:00 GMT-04:00/AST/EDT

Supplier Compliance – In The New World Of Risk & Responsibility, Cope is Not A Strategy

Sponsor: Rollstream

2010-May-26

 

14:00 GMT-04:00/AST/EDT

Supplier Trade Management Audit Helps U.S. Businesses Identify and Quantify Unnecessary Supply Chain Costs

Sponsor: Global Data Mining

2010-May-26

 

13:00 GMT-04:00/AST/EDT

Strategic Meetings Management – Approaches for Success

Sponsor: Maxvantage

2010-May-26

 

9:00 GMT-04:00/AST/EDT

Enterprise Architecture & Strategic Cost Management

Sponsor: Gartner

2010-May-26

 

10:00 GMT-04:00/AST/EDT

SaaS, Cloud Computing: Game Changer or More of the Same?

Sponsor: Gartner

2010-May-26

 

13:00 GMT+10:00/AEST

Technology Trends You Can’t Afford to Ignore

Sponsor: Gartner

2010-May-26

 

8:00 GMT-04:00/AST/EDT

How to Succeed with Master Data Management

Sponsor: Gartner

2010-May-26

 

10:00 GMT/WET

Infrastructure Utility: a necessary step from traditional outsourcing and cloud computing

Sponsor: Gartner

2010-May-27

 

11:00 GMT-07:00/MST/PDT

Build a Foundation for Growth while Minimizing Business Risk

Sponsor: JDA

2010-May-27

 

10:00 GMT-04:00/AST/EDT

Cloud Computing: Real Stories from the Front Lines

Sponsor: Gartner

2010-May-27

 

9:00 GMT-04:00/AST/EDT

Supply Chain Excellence: Rebuilding Global Supply Chain Infrastructure for Sustainable Growth

Sponsor: Gartner

2010-May-27

 

14:00 GMT-05:00/CDT/EST

Taking the Cost Out of the Supply Chain with eCommerce

Sponsor: ePartners

They are all readily searchable from the comprehensive Site-Search page. So don’t forget to review the resource site on a weekly basis. You just might find what you didn’t even know you were looking for!

And continue to keep a sharp eye out for new additions!

b-Pack: Packing It In for A Brave New World, Part III

Two weeks ago, in Part I, we told you how b-pack, hot on the heels of Ivalua, had decided to cross the Atlantic and join in the conquest to bring the bohemian revolution to the world of Procurement and P2P with their extensive solution suite that actually closes the P2P loop. Then, last week in Part II, we expounded on a few additional capabilities, which are relatively unique in the marketplace, that extended the basic value offering beyond what a standard P2P application delivers. Today, we’re going to dive into a few more value-adds, some of which are also relatively unique in the marketplace. But first, a recap of the story to date.

In Part I we described the base b-pack platform that takes you from the start of a traditional sourcing cycle (RFx), through a contract, to a requisition (which may be from a catalog), against a budget, to receipt of the goods (which can include asset tracking information), and the invoice, to payment, reporting, and supplier management. We dove into the basic P2P cycle and covered the requisition, approval, receipt, invoice, matching, payment, and reporting cycle in detail as well as the solution delivery options that are available to you.

Then, in Part II we detailed some of the integrated applications that build out the core capabilities to also provide the organization with expense and travel management, asset management, dispute resolution, and procurement business intelligence reporting.

Today, we’re going to address inventory management and its integration with asset management, budget management, fleet management, and internationalization. Then, in the fourth and final post of this initial series, we’ll tackle some of the advanced invoice management and viewing capabilities, document management, administration, and the supplier portal.

Inventory management, which is tightly integrated with asset management, allows you to track not only how much product you have at each (warehouse) location, but where the product is stored. The tool can handle multiple locations, which can each belong to a different (management) company, multiple rooms at each location, and assign multiple departments, managers, and clerks to each room. In addition to tracking the products (and counts) in each room, it can also track all of the inventory moves associated with each product into, within, and out of the warehouse. Like any good inventory management system, it allows for the creation of manual and automatic replenishment orders, which generate purchase orders against existing contracts and which are pushed through the appropriate approval channels if desired. The replenishment workflow is detailed and allows for multiple states, including fill, approval, standby, warehouse, in order, received, and shelved (put away) states. Finally, in addition to the basic inventory, asset, budget, and catalogue information, the user can also define custom fields, notes, and documents to track against each item.

Budget management is very powerful and allows the user to define budgets at the invoicing company, department, or user level and assign them to a manager and a chief. Each budget can be assigned a budget code, a group code, and a cost centre for accounting purposes and the administrator can define individual purchase authorizations, monthly purchase authorizations, and / or annual purchase authorizations. Approvals can be against global budget amounts, monthly budget amounts, individual purchase amounts, or always and automatic rejection rules can be defined for requests that are obviously unreasonable against the budget. Finally, budgets can be rolled up for reporting purposes.

Fleet management, their newest module, was built at the request of a customer who wanted a way to track their fleet vehicles in a manner that was tightly integrated with asset management and invoice management (to insure that vehicles were properly tracked, serviced, and that payments were at contracted rates). It lets you quickly retrieve vehicle records, fuel utilization statistics, and maintenance contracts and allows you do define alerts based on (fixed) budget utilization, kilometres, taxes, department utilization, preventative maintenance rules, and suspect expenses (with respect to predefined rules). It comes with a number of built-in reports, including total vehicles by type (gas, diesel, hybrid, electric), owned vs. leased summary, manufacturers and lessors, and make and is integrated into their global reporting engine that allows you to create your own reports. For each vehicle, it tracks the original order information, unique asset ID, VIN, type, category (sedan, SUV, truck, etc.), manufacturer, manufacturing location, make, description, grey card info, kilometrages, financing information, insurance information, fuel consumption, service history, maintenance schedule, trip history, and costs per kilometer as well as the division, department, and manager it is assigned to — and every field is searchable to allow you to quickly find the record(s) of interest. The detail of information that is tracked allows for a very deep analysis which will not only tell you which vehicles are the most expensive to operate, but why (fuel, insurance, service, etc.). This will allow you to make much better fleet decisions in the future.

With respect to internationalization, not only is the product multi-lingual and multi-currency, but the tool includes an integrated translation feature that allows text to be translated, automatically, between English, French, and a few other European languages. The buyer can define which currencies are supported, which countries they are supported for, the display properties, associated tax rates (at the country and state level), the conversion rates, and the (auto) update rules (when and from what data source).

In summary, b-pack provides a comprehensive P2P e-Procurement solution that also includes some very useful capabilities above and beyond the basic procurement cycle requirements that can provide significant additional value to many buying organizations, including the inventory management, budget management, and fleet management capabilities described in this post.

Share This on Linked In

You Can Get More By Getting Mad … If You Don’t Let It Cloud Your Judgment

A recent research summary over on Strategy + Business, which summarized a recent study at UC Berkeley, noted that you can get more by getting mad, as it lets the other party know that the deal could fall through. If the other party wants the deal, this could cause the other party to rethink the terms of the offer and come back with a better deal for you that pays more attention to your demands. However, it can also backfire because if the other party doesn’t want the deal that bad, or if the other party thinks you’re only being angry as a ploy to get a better deal (when you aren’t really angry), it could cause the other party to walk away.

In other words, it’s a tool in your toolkit, but not the centre-point of a strategy that should rely on fact-based total cost negotiations. Who cares if you save an extra 5% on unit price if the logistics costs will cripple you in the end as global freight prices rise again?

Share This on Linked In

Use Johnson’s Business Model Tips to Get Your New System Approved

A few months ago on the HBR Blogs, Mark W. Johnson published a short piece on “A New Framework for Business Models” where he reviewed Drucker‘s definition for a business model which is nothing else than a representation of how an organization makes (or intends to make) money and noted that, in addition to specifying how a company (intends) to make money, it should also specify why a customer would want to buy from you.

Why a customer would want to buy from you is answered by your customer value proposition which identifies something that your customer needs and proposes an offering that meets that need. Specifying how you’ll make money is a bit harder. To answer this, you need to analyze your:

  • Revenue Modelquantity times price
  • Cost Structuredirect costs, indirect costs, and overhead
  • Margin Modelwhat is the actual profit
  • Resource Velocityhow much throughput can you achieve

When I read this, I couldn’t help but notice how appropriate the definition is to business cases in general and how you also have to clearly answer these four questions if you expect to get funding for that new supply chain system you need. For example, if you want a new e-Sourcing system, you need to define:

  • Payback (Revenue) Modelexpected number of sourcing events times expected savings per event (on average)
  • Cost Structuresoftware, hardware, support, etc.
  • Margin Modelwhat are the real savings when the costs are taken into account
  • Resource Velocityhow many more events will you be able to handle with the new system

Otherwise, you won’t have a solid business case that clearly outlines the ROI and why you should be allowed to buy it in the first place. Furthermore, if you can’t define the resource velocity, you can’t specify how it increased your customer value proposition, which, in the case of an e-Sourcing system, is increased event throughput to help other organizational units drive savings straight to the bottom line (as e-Sourcing can also reduce HR, Marketing, and Legal costs, for example).

Share This on Linked In