HICX Solutions, a provider of a leading Supplier Management platform, was founded in London in 2004 to create a platform to effectively tackle supplier master data management and supplier risk management. Recognizing that the Supplier Information Management (SIM) platforms of the day were not enough to effectively manage suppliers — especially since the data was needed in ERP/MRP, sourcing, procurement, logistics, and related systems — they embarked upon a mission to create a solution that fixes that.

The problem with SIM solutions, besides the fact that they aren’t true SPM (Supplier Performance Management) or SRM (Supplier Relationship Management) solutions; don’t address risk; and don’t address supplier development, is that SIM is not master data management. It’s supplier data management, but it’s data management within the platform. An organization needs supplier data management throughout the enterprise, not just a single platform. And that is effectively master data management (MDM).

And that is HICX’s core strength. It’s cradle-to-grave supplier management and contract management is built upon this core industry leading MDM capability that can not only accept data from and push data to dozens of ERP and best-of-breed systems throughout the enterprise, but can automatically match and merge the majority of such data, even upon an initial engagement. (HICX has already mapped common fields in dozens of ERP and best-of-breed systems and if your systems have already been mapped, you can skip the mapping step that typically precedes a data merge process.) The MDM system will automatically identify duplicates and conflicts and human data stewards will only need to correct records on an exception basis (when there is a conflict as the system can be programmed to ignore exact duplicates on import).

On top of this MDM capability, HICX has implemented a suite of solutions for:

• Supplier On-boarding for discovery, enrolment, and enablement on the system
• Supplier Data Management for supplier data centralization and management
• Supplier Performance Management for KPI, issue, and initiative tracking
• Supplier Risk & Compliance Management for risk factor, regulatory, and insurance tracking
• Supplier Corrective Action Management for issue identification, resolution plans, and implementation tracking

The supplier on-boarding, which is built on the industry leading MDM, is a particular platform strength. In the HICX, the on-boarding process can start as early as the identification of a new supplier which is onboarded using a process that adapts to the type of supplier (be it under consideration as a long-term [strategic] supplier, a sub-contractor, a one-off vendor, logistics company, government organization, etc.) and that is simplified with the provision of a D&B (or equivalent) number that allows for all public information to be automatically imported. One advantage of the solution is that, even before a supplier is onboarded, potential matches or duplicates in the system are automatically identified to prevent a user from inviting a supplier that is already doing business with another organizational unit. And if additional data is needed, data can be imported quickly from any platform using their script-based import capability.

For more information on HICX Solutions, check out the 2-part series on Spend Matters Pro (Part I and Part II [coming soon]) [membership required] by the doctor and the prophet. This in-depth analysis is definitely worth your time if you are on the market for a SxM solution and trying to not only identify the leaders (of which HICX is one), but determine which of the leading solutions is right for you.

In our last post, we noted that State of Flux released their 2015 Global SRM Research Report: The Business of Supplier Relationships at the State of Flux Chicago and London Events. This report, which is their 7^th annual research report that analyzes detailed survey data from over 500 global companies, provides deep input into the state of supplier relationship management and the benefits that it can bring.

The importance of good SRM cannot be underestimated. For example, more than 40% of survey respondents have achieved a positive, quantifiable post-contract benefit from their SRM activities, with 31% reporting a benefit of 4% or more. Moreover, 60% report cost reductions, 52% report cost avoidance, and 39% report preferential pricing. These are substantial across-the-board benefits.

So how do you achieve these benefits? According to State of Flux, it starts by mastering the six pillars of SRM value mastery. These are:

Business Drivers

As discussed in the next pillar, an SRM program needs to be adopted to be successful. This adoption will not happen if there is no clear reason for the program to be adopted, and given that many Procurement professionals are against the wall to deliver results, the most attractive programs are those with business drivers.

There should be business drivers that will deliver solid, measurable, value to the organization. This can include spend reduction and cost control, but can also include an increased rate of innovation, faster product design and delivery, and a more collaborative, problem solving, working relationship.

As per previous posts in this series, SRM can deliverable measurable savings. And even though the soft benefits can be hard to measure, over one third of the State of Flux survey respondents indicate tangible benefits from supplier innovation, service level improvements, and risk management / risk reduction.

Stakeholder Engagement and Support

SRM requires collaboration between all stakeholders and suppliers in order to work. SRM needs to benefit the organization as a whole, not just one department. That’s why all stakeholders need to be engaged up front and support the program up front. Many SRM initiatives fail because they start in one department and overlook other key stakeholders who need to be involved because their absence causes an inconsistent front to be presented to suppliers down the road.

However, executive level stakeholder support is critical for success. As per the state of flux survey, 46% of leading companies have the backing of their chief executive. This is more than double the number of non-leading companies that have senior executive backing for their SRM initiatives (which check in at 21%).

Governance and Process

SRM programs need to be well designed, well run, and well executed. This requires a good governance program and a good process that all parties can follow. A good governance program requires a number of factors, which include, but are not limited to:

• a designated, accountable executive
• regular performance review meetings
• period strategic review meetings
• an agreed upon issue escalation process
• performance scorecard(s)
• contract reviews
• risk reviews

Leaders in governance and process have all of this, and more.

People and Skills

SRM requires the right people with the right skills to be involved. They should not be led by the former office manager with no negotiation or account management experience who was thrust into a buying, and then a relationship management, role as a result of a couple of reorganizations.

Just like the skill set required by a sourcing professional (who must be a jack of all trades and master of one) is quite diverse, so is the skill set required by a(n) SRM professional. While a number of skills were identified as important by survey respondents (with over 50% of respondents identifying over 12 different skills), the following five were identified as the most important (by over 70% of respondents):

• communication
• strategic thinking
• trust building
• influence
• cross-functional collaboration

Information and Technology

Modern supply chains, and the buyers and suppliers who keep them moving, run on information and information technology. SRM is no exception. Even though supply chains are fundamentally driven by people, as highlighted in the last pillar, these people need good information and good technology to not only get their jobs done, but excel at their jobs.

However, as we have seen, SRM is more than just process and the best SRM platforms are those that augment (or include) existing technologies that manage key aspects of relationships that affect the entire organization. For example, contract management, sustainability management, risk management, and performance management are critical to SRM success, but, with the exception of contract management, only a small number of organizations have systems for these core capabilities in place. Specifically, as per the survey:

• Contract Management 62%
• Performance Management 42%
• Risk Management 31%
• Sustainability Management 12%

Relationship Development and Culture

SRM is not a set-it-and-forget-it process or platform, it is an ongoing endeavour that must be managed as relationships must be continually nurtured and developed. In addition, cultural alignment is very important. The State of Flux Survey found that over 90% of respondents said that good cultural alignment was key to good supplier relationships. This is rational and logical — if both you and your supplier want the same thing and work the same way, it will be a lot easier to work together than if both organizations have different goals and different business processes.

To master SRM, you must master these pillars, but we have just scratched the surface with regards to what is involved and what success looks like. We highly recommend that you download the new State of Flux 2015 Global Research Report on The Business of Supplier Relationships, which is jam packed with not only definitions, but findings that will help you address each pillar appropriately. You won’t be disappointed.

At the State of Flux Chicago and London Events, State of Flux released their 2015 Global SRM Research Report: The Business of Supplier Relationships. This report, which is their 7^th annual research report that analyzes detailed survey data from over 500 global companies, provides deep input into the state of supplier relationship management and the benefits that it can bring.

The importance of good SRM cannot be underestimated. As the report clearly states in its introduction, the nature of business is changing, with many companies becoming both flatter and more reliant on third parties to delivery everything from customer support through to research and development … in other words, businesses are putting more and more of their brands’ reputations into the hands of other companies. In such a scenario, a business can only be as good as its worst supplier.

On the other hand, becoming a key supplier’s customer of choice will bring access to a range of benefits, from price advantages to innovation — and that failing to do so will mean such benefits accruing to competitors instead. However, this is no longer as easy said as done as changing business dynamics are giving suppliers more power and choice about who they partner with, and how.

More than 40% of survey respondents have achieved a positive, quantifiable post-contract benefit from their SRM activities, with 31% reporting a benefit of 4% or more. Moreover, 60% report cost reductions, 52% report cost avoidance, and 39% report preferential pricing. These are substantial across-the-board benefits. While a strategic sourcing decision optimization event on a category might save 10% or 12%, that savings is limited to the handful of categories that the organization has time to strategically source. If the average organization has 60% of spend under management, only has time to strategically source ¹/_3^rd of that in a given year, then the organization only saves 10% on 20% of spend, for a grand savings of 2%. But a great SRM program can save 4%. Across the board. Year over year. This is substantial.

This is not unrealistic. As per our previous posts, research demonstrates that good SRM contributes to as much as 70% of a company’s gross profit. No other business function can make this claim. And, most importantly, State of Flux‘s seven years of research has demonstrated that the benefits, both ‘soft’ and ‘hard’, that have been secured by the companies leading the way in SRM have continued to increase. The gap between the leaders and the laggards is getting bigger and bigger.

Supplier relationships are big business, but improving them requires more than a will. It requires knowing the way. That will be the subject of our next post.