Category Archives: Supplier Information Management

Key Questions When Selecting a Multi-Criteria Supplier Sustainability Monitoring Solution

In our last post on why Supply Risk Management Can Not Be Siloed, we noted that the average organization was not properly managing risk, and this was not only costing the organization time and money, but putting it at significant risk. We noted that there were a number of reasons for this — which included a lack of time, resources, and even immediacy — but the biggest reason was because there is a lack of cohesion in the fragmented risk management approach employed by many organizations. But we also noted that there was something the organization could do, namely, take a holistic approach to sustainable risk management.

In a holistic approach to sustainable risk management, risk management is centralized through a Centre of Excellence (CoE) that holistically manages risk for the entire organization. This CoE will put together policies and procedures that not only ensure that

  • every supplier is covered
  • on all relevant dimensions
  • but not on irrelevant dimensions
  • without any duplication of effort

but also ensures that

    • there are no false positives in the risk assessment and
    • there are no false negatives

Part of these procedures will include regular monitoring for risk and the regular re-examination of risk and sustainability of organizational suppliers and potential suppliers. And best practice will dictate that part of this monitoring and review will be automated by a multi-criteria supplier sustainability monitoring solution and supported by a provider that specializes in this type of platform as the monitoring will need to be maintained and adjusted as new data sources become available, old data sources go offline, and the depth of data changes over time.

But how do you select a good provider, and, most importantly, how do you select a good platform to meet your multi-criteria sustainability needs? The first thing you do is understand what makes a good platform and what the platform needs to do to take away your risk and sustainability management and your risk and sustainability monitoring pain.

To help you achieve this goal, the doctor recommends that you download Sourcing Innovation’s latest white paper on 5 Essential Criteria for Selecting a Supplier Sustainability & Risk Monitoring Solution, sponsored by Ecovadis, that will help you understand what a good sustainability and risk monitoring solution needs to do, not just what features or functions need to be in the brochure.

SpendHQ: Revving Up Visibility Into Your Supply Base

When we last dug into SpendHQ back in 2014 (Part I, Part II, Part III, and Part IV), we noted how this solution has grown from a simple spend reporting tool into a fully featured spend visibility tool that tracks all of your spend over time — by category, department, and user; a category management tool that lets you dive into category spend and filter down to the items of interest, see managed vs unmanaged spend, and track compliance; and, as of the next release later this quarter, track contract meta data and do basic contract lifecycle management.

We also noted that while it was not the most powerful (ad-hoc) spend analysis solution on the market, it was a really great solution for a mid-market company without a (useable) spend analysis or visibility solution that needed to get one up and running quickly, accurately, and usefully (as the solution has more power and capabilities than the average company needs to get great results). Within 4-6 weeks, a company with no spend analysis capability can be up and running 100% and be making useful, informed decisions.

Since then, they have been hard at work improving the contract module; adding a new compliance module in the visibility engine that allows the user to instantly see, for the selected categories, the addressable spend, the managed spend, the compliance rate, and the impact rate; and a brand new vendor detail module that sits on top of their brand new supplier database that contains information on about 20 Million entities that was formed from the fusing of their database of over 7.5 M entities that they built up over 12 years of operation and InsideView’s database of over 15 Million entities. The database has basic vendor information (address, ownership, status, industry, revenue, etc.), insights (on products, services, strengths, etc.), family tree (which contains ownership, subsidiary and sibling information), and financial data. A user can also see all associated contracts in the contract module and click into the details of each one as required.

One of the gems of the platform is the new and improved Category Management module with greatly enhanced savings management capability. On a category basis, this module summarizes spend, managed spend, core list compliance, and pricing accuracy — where each unit purchased is compared against the contract price. This allows an organization to identify maverick spend and overspend during the contract (on every refresh) and address issues as they arise. Within a category, they can drill into each item and see total spend and drill into spend by location and/or buyer, allowing them to zero in on maverick spend and spend that is priced off-contract. The pricing accuracy can drill down from a category to an item if need be and track inaccuracies, undercharges, overcharges, and overall error rate (as well as overall loss).

In addition, the particular interface customization and support for MRO, T&E, shipping and small parcel spend categories, often overlooked “tail spend”, is far superior to an average product and lets a buyer not only figure out what is maverick or going to on-contract suppliers (but being billed at off-contract rates), but how the spend breaks down across base charges, fuel charges, surcharges, and so on. This allows you to drill into the cost drivers of categories and products, and attack the real cost drivers in a strategic engagement. The specific capabilities built for shipments in particular are quite good. The shipment analytics breaks costs down into accessorials, zones, and fuel surcharges so that an organization can see precisely how the spend is breaking down, where the bulk of the charges are, and where any overspend are.

SpendHQ was built for the sourcing organization that wants a best of breed spend analysis and visibility tool and support maintaining and interpreting it, with the option to engage the right expert at the right time in the right categories to maximize savings. Its more of a “savings as a service” offering than the majority of other spend analysis players, and the best results come from augmenting it with ISG’s sourcing expertise that can help identify the right category to source to maximize savings at any given time. It’s a vendor that should definitely be kept on your radar.

For a deeper dive into SpendHQ, keep an eye out for the upcoming in-depth Spend Matters Pro review [membership required] by the doctor and the prophet that will appear later this summer.

State of Flux: The Flux Capacitor is being designed for the Future … of SRM!

State of Flux is a provider of Supplier Relationship Management (SRM) software and services that was founded in London (England) in 2004 to focus on an overlooked area of supply management, supplier relationship management. When it was founded back in 2004, most companies were just starting to offer supplier information management (SIM) solutions, which were a pre-cursor to the KPI / scorecard-based supplier performance management (SPM) solutions that followed. Only a few companies had SRM in their mind’s eyes, and State of Flux was one. What started as a very simple system for supplier information, performance, and supplier (corrective) action planning and development has grown into a full fledged supplier relationship management solution that encapsulates supplier information management, performance management, risk management, governance and relationship management, CSR (corporate social responsibility), contract, and innovation management.

In addition to their SRM services, focussed around consulting and executive staffing/managed services, and software (which was branded Statess), they have also been producing the Global SRM research report (which was covered in State of Flux has the Treatment for your SRM Ailments Part I: The Need and Part IV: The Business of Supplier Relationships) for the last seven years which provides very deep insights into the state of supplier relationship management and what the top performers do. (Last year’s report was focussed on the customer of choice, and companies that are their suppliers’ customer of choice get [significantly] more value than their peers and this year’s report will be focussed on technology, and the value it can provide, and the annual survey will be out soon.)

As we have covered the platform fairly extensively in the past (in Statess Part I, Part II, and Part III and State of Flux Part I and Part II), this post will simply focus on major improvements since the last series.

In our last series, we discussed the developments in progress, namely:

  • Prospective Suppliers
  • Contract Management Enhancements
  • KPI Templates and Drillable Scorecards

Since then, State of Flux has completed these enhancements.

  • The prospective supplier module is based on questionnaires with dynamic workflows that ensure a supplier only provides the information that is required, and cannot participate in open challenges until all necessary information has been provided.
  • Contract data and meta-data definition is now highly granular, and the version comparison feature allows a buyer to quickly identify any changes between versions.
  • The KPI templates have been completed and augmented with a wizard that makes it really easy to replicate KPIs across suppliers and organizational units, and make the minor tweaks and modifications (to the weightings, data fields, etc.) that are necessary to have the most accurate and meaningful supply possible.

In addition to this functionality, State of Flux has also added:

  • Single Sign On: that integrates with the organization’s native LDAP (or other single-sign on mechanism) to allow a user to sign-in with an existing account
  • Deep CreditSafe Integration: that integrates all of the credit safe financial and risk data across the application (including the risk and performance modules) with quick access to a supplier rating from the supplier screens
  • Automatic Risk (Severity) Calculation: that automatically computes the severity (and RAG — red, amber, green — status) of a risk as soon as the probability and potential impact of a risk are defined
  • Excel Export which enables every piece of data in the application to be exported to well-formatted Excel spreadsheets and workbooks (for import into other systems and analysis/reporting tools)

The system gets better each year, and when you combine it’s end to end completeness with the fact that there are only a handful of providers focussing on best-practice SRM, State of Flux is definitely a provider to consider. For a deeper dive on State of Flux and their platform, watch out for the upcoming Spend Matters Pro piece (membership required) co-authored by the doctor and the prophet that will take a deep dive into the platform, it’s strengths, and its opportunities for improvement.

What’s Your SRM Index Score?

Supplier Relationship Management is a key component of good strategic Procurement management. Good SRM can contribute to lower costs and higher organizational value through higher quality, great reliability, value-add, and innovation that an organization might not achieve otherwise. But how does an organization know how well it’s doing?

One way is to benchmark against its peers. While this will not necessarily tell an organization how good it is doing compared to how well it could be doing, it will tell an organization how well it is doing against its peers, which provide a baseline of how good it could be doing.

So, considering most organizations keep this data private, how do you figure it out? One way is the State of Flux SRM Index. Over the last seven years, State of Flux has collected and analyzed detailed SRM data on over 1200 global companies across the six different dimensions of business drivers, stakeholder engagement, governance & process, people & skills, information & technology, and relationship development & culture.

If your organization takes the SRM Survey (closes July 1, 2016), State of Flux can automatically assess your responses against its database and compute an index score for your organization and instantly let you know if your SRM is undeveloped, developed, established, or advanced. In addition, should your organization desire (and should multiple individuals in different departments complete the survey), State of Flux will also give you a free SWOT analysis on request.

HICX: HI-C to the X for SXM

HICX Solutions, a provider of a leading Supplier Management platform, was founded in London in 2004 to create a platform to effectively tackle supplier master data management and supplier risk management. Recognizing that the Supplier Information Management (SIM) platforms of the day were not enough to effectively manage suppliers — especially since the data was needed in ERP/MRP, sourcing, procurement, logistics, and related systems — they embarked upon a mission to create a solution that fixes that.

The problem with SIM solutions, besides the fact that they aren’t true SPM (Supplier Performance Management) or SRM (Supplier Relationship Management) solutions; don’t address risk; and don’t address supplier development, is that SIM is not master data management. It’s supplier data management, but it’s data management within the platform. An organization needs supplier data management throughout the enterprise, not just a single platform. And that is effectively master data management (MDM).

And that is HICX’s core strength. It’s cradle-to-grave supplier management and contract management is built upon this core industry leading MDM capability that can not only accept data from and push data to dozens of ERP and best-of-breed systems throughout the enterprise, but can automatically match and merge the majority of such data, even upon an initial engagement. (HICX has already mapped common fields in dozens of ERP and best-of-breed systems and if your systems have already been mapped, you can skip the mapping step that typically precedes a data merge process.) The MDM system will automatically identify duplicates and conflicts and human data stewards will only need to correct records on an exception basis (when there is a conflict as the system can be programmed to ignore exact duplicates on import).

On top of this MDM capability, HICX has implemented a suite of solutions for:

  • Supplier On-boarding for discovery, enrolment, and enablement on the system
  • Supplier Data Management for supplier data centralization and management
  • Supplier Performance Management for KPI, issue, and initiative tracking
  • Supplier Risk & Compliance Management for risk factor, regulatory, and insurance tracking
  • Supplier Corrective Action Management for issue identification, resolution plans, and implementation tracking

The supplier on-boarding, which is built on the industry leading MDM, is a particular platform strength. In the HICX, the on-boarding process can start as early as the identification of a new supplier which is onboarded using a process that adapts to the type of supplier (be it under consideration as a long-term [strategic] supplier, a sub-contractor, a one-off vendor, logistics company, government organization, etc.) and that is simplified with the provision of a D&B (or equivalent) number that allows for all public information to be automatically imported. One advantage of the solution is that, even before a supplier is onboarded, potential matches or duplicates in the system are automatically identified to prevent a user from inviting a supplier that is already doing business with another organizational unit. And if additional data is needed, data can be imported quickly from any platform using their script-based import capability.

For more information on HICX Solutions, check out the 2-part series on Spend Matters Pro (Part I and Part II [coming soon]) [membership required] by the doctor and the prophet. This in-depth analysis is definitely worth your time if you are on the market for a SxM solution and trying to not only identify the leaders (of which HICX is one), but determine which of the leading solutions is right for you.