• Part 1: Sourcing Excellence IS Optimization!
• Part 2: Predictability in Tough Times
• Part 3: AI Doesn’t Drive Savings, Innovation, or Performance.
• Part 4: Why Do You Need Frameworks and Systems for Sourcing Excellence

And Sourcing Excellence requires (Strategic Sourcing) Decision Optimization.

As the Sourcing Optimization Grand Master Paul Martyn has clearly stated in his post on how Procurement is at an Inflection Point:

• AI won’t fix Procurement.
• Dashboards won’t fix Procurement.
• Better Data won’t even fix Procurement.

ONLY structured, modelled decision making that gets executed in the practice of true Sourcing Excellence will.

And that structured decision making will be based on true multi-objective sourcing optimization that takes costs, risks, and goals into account to help you, the intelligent human, make the right decision that a dumb machine will never see.

And if you want to find out how that’s done, reach out to the Sourcing Optimization Grand Master himself who has saved Billions in his career WITHOUT increasing risk, liability, or complexity and find out how your organization could be the next to save millions (upon millions) while making less risky and more valuable decisions.

Sourcing Mediocrity, or worse, Bad Buying, leads to chaos.

Your costs are up.

Your delivery predictability is gone.

Your energy supply is intermittent and brown outs are becoming normal while those costs go up too.

Your taps are running dry.

Your workforce benefit costs are going up as healthcare costs skyrocket.

Your AI costs are going up as compute and consulting skyrockets and more consultant time is needed to deal with the results of bad, bad, hallucinations, that have gone beyond wrong orders, 3-way mismatches, and fraudulent payments to bad customer advice and legal claims that have put you in legal jeopardy.

This isn’t inflation. This is bad buying.

With good buying and sourcing excellence:

Your costs are stable — because you didn’t select risky suppliers, squeeze their margins to dangerously low levels, or make ridiculous asks that only add cost and not value.

Your deliveries are predictable as you’ve selected carriers that can support multiple routes and have re-routing plans in place if a route gets shut down due to a port strike, border closing, or “Geopolitical conflict” (i.e. war).

Your energy supply is regular as you were sure to build where the grid could support your energy needs, select providers (where you had a choice) that could guarantee the supply, and installed backup generators for key functions (and batteries for minimal lights and on-site computing requirements).

Your water pressure is through the roof as you ensured there was adequate supply and put contracts in place to guarantee it.

You manage your benefit negotiations carefully, put long term contracts in place, and work with the provider to prevent fraud (which makes you a customer of choice).

You don’t buy Gen-AI just because every brain-fried consultant and their favourite cognitively atrophied analyst is telling you to. You buy classic AI that works hallucination and error free at a fraction of the compute and cost.

In other words, you apply sourcing excellence end-to-end.

And you make good use of (strategic sourcing) decision optimization.

And you realize savings twice the savings of your peers.

But don’t take my word for it. Take the word of Paul Martyn, one of the original Sourcing Optimization Grand Masters who has sourced over 20 Billion dollars, and seen consistent results doing so over the past two decades.

And saved oodles of cash. To find out how much, check out this post on how you’re seeing your sourcing decisions repriced from bad buying. Then do the math on how much you could be saving (and, of course, reach out to Paul if you’d like someone to help you put a plan in place to save that money).

P.S. If you haven’t figured it out yet, if you were using Busch-Lamoureux Exact Purchasing you’d not only know that you should already be using optimization, but where, why, and would have already reached out to Paul to help you define the program.