Category Archives: Procurement Innovation

Why Are We Going to Spend Thirty Posts Exposing Past Procurement “Trends”?

Is it because the doctor is just plain tired of 2nd rate analysts and consultants selling last century’s solutions instead of accepting that we are in the 14th year of the 21st century?

Is it because without a solid understanding of where Procurement comes from, where it is, and where it needs to be, you’ll never get to where you need to go?

Or is it because without this understanding, you’ll never select the right technology and continue to be among those organizations that select those procurement tools that collectively cost organizations in North America 1.5 Billion per year and waste more than 32 Million man-hours because the Procurement system fails to increase their productivity (and, in some cases, because the system is not aligned with organizational processes and needs, actually decreases productivity and hinders savings identification and realization)?

It’s a combination of all three.

Modern Supply Management tools are supposed to save the organization money, not cost it money, but as The Topline Strategy group discovered (as summarized in this article over on S&DC Exec (“only one quarter of procurement professionals believe their procurement system makes them much more productive”) and MarketWatch (“survey finds inefficient procurement systems cost north american businesses 15 billion annually”), only 28% (or one-quarter) of sourcing an procurement professionals believe that their procurement systems make them productive.

This is an abysmal statistic in an industry that spent over 1.4 Billion on Enterprise Software in 2013, software that is supposed to increase efficiency and, in the case of Supply Management, identify savings and add value to the process.

Why is the situation so bad?

The article gives a few hints, including:

  • convoluted user interfaces,
  • lack of critical features,
  • poor integration or implementation (with enterprise systems & IT infrastructure), and
  • lack of regular, often necessary, updates

But, in many cases, the real reason is lack of fit and key functionality.

UI, proper implementation, good integration, and regular updates are important, but the system has to fit the workflow and support organizational processes. Sometimes the organization’s processes will need to be updated, but there is a difference between updating to a more appropriate process, and changing to a completely different process unsuitable to the organization’s business just to force fit a square system into a round architectural hole.

And there’s no way you can select the right fit if you don’t know what the right process should be for your organization. And you can’t know the right process until you know what that process has to support, why, and how the process will need to evolve over time.

And that is fundamentally why we have to spend thirty posts diving into past procurement “trends” so you understand what the real requirements are and what is just hot air coming out of the mouth of another slick talking speaker (or vanishing ink from their specially made pens). It will take time, especially since we will have to take a few breaks to maintain our sanity, but we have to do it.

Don’t you agree, LOLCat?

Can U Wake Me When Its Over.

Yes, LOLCat, we’ll wake you when itz over. We don’t want to drive you to drink too! (Futurists have already driven this LOLCat to drink!)

So, Why Are “Futurists” Still Stuck in the Past?

And driving poor LOLCat to drink?

There are a few reasons.

  1. They Have No Knowledge as they come from different backgrounds which offer them no education or experience in Supply Management.
    Just because you can get high, have psychedelic visions, white them down, and spin a good yarn doesn’t mean you can be a futurist. A poet, sure, but not a futurist …
  2. They Have No Vision beyond what the rear view mirror (or the hydrocarbon gas from the bituminous limestone) offers them.
    When Meatloaf said “it was long ago and far away and it was so much better than it is today“, he was referring to newly discovered young love, not business processes identified 30 years ago …
  3. They See Too Many Organizations Stuck in the Past and a few organizations (in the Hackett top 8%) ahead of the pack and they think they can peddle these best practices as future vision.
    This is not 1914 (which was 12 years before the first transatlantic telephone call) where good ideas take years to spread (and the first person to bring a new idea or technology from a different continent can make millions on someone else’s work) and a career can be built on one single improvement — this is 2014 where it only takes a few seconds for a story to be spread around the world. But I guess if you can’t look beyond the rear-view mirror …

So, why are so many organizations still stuck in the past (and fuelling the flame that powers these fantasy futurists)? There’s a few reasons, and they include:

  • Lack of Education
    Many Supply Managers were simply thrust into the role, with no training or background for the role. And despite the fact that they have some competence or experience in other areas, they are so ill-equipped and ill-prepared for the role that they might as well have been dropped in The Lost World*.
  • Lack of Resources
    Most Supply Managers are overworked (and underpaid, but who isn’t these days) and resource-constrained, with no time for training and no budget even if they had the time (or would sacrifice their few remaining free hours to get better and more efficient so that maybe someday they can take a whole weekend off).
  • Lack of Clarity
    With no formal education, no training, and no resources to make sense of the barrage of BS being thrown at them by futurists and analysts alike, how can they differentiate between current and past processes and technologies and what they need to embark on a path that will ready them for what comes next?

And the third reason is the most crucial. Until they get some clarity, Supply Managers are going to continue to be taken in by modern con-men (who include 2nd rate analysts, consultants, and salesmen of outdated technology) selling them silicon snake oil when they just need modern sourcing and procurement tools that fit their workflow and daily needs.

So, to this end, now that we’ve explained why thirty (30) of the thirty-three (33) future-trends are, at best, last decade’s future trends, we’re going to explain why futurists (and the organizations they preach too) are still stuck in the past, what’s relevant, and what it means to you and your organization.

And we’re going to do it one trend at a time. Starting tomorrow, with “future” trend #33 on governmental regulations, we’re going to illuminate the old news and ongoing blues trends one by one until we’ve laid them all bare. It will take a while, but if you stick with it, it will be worth the effort.

What do you think, LOLCat?

"Futurists" Drive Me Bananas!"

Me too, LOLCat. Me too.

* I’m referring to the original here, so if you’re thinking Michael Crichton, then the problem is even bigger than you realize.

Procurement Needs to Expand its Horizons

On Friday, Pierre Mitchell published a great piece over on Spend Matters on how “Procurement Needs to Stop Benchmarking Itself Against Procurement”. According to the post, most procurement organizations know to benchmark themselves against others outside of their own industry, but they often don’t look to completely different functions, processes, technologies, techniques and even cultures to help them find and deliver new sources of value, of which there are many.

Some of the best ideas presented in the post are to:

  • use knowledge management to gather/store intelligence, catalog transformation projects for storyboarding, and model skill supply for resource planning like management consultants
  • get a grip on supply chain network design
  • master competitive intelligence and content/intelligence tools
  • predict model building using all data available to you
  • transition from quality control to supplier enablement and
  • manage the Procurement brand .

Taking these one by one, Procurement can definitely improve by:

  • documenting what it learns from every project and using that to define improved processes and transition management,
  • looking at the entire supply chain before defining the category and the bid,
  • making use of all of the market data available to it to determine how well it is doing and how well it could be doing,
  • building predictive trend models to understand likely order volumes for seasonal / limited life span products,
  • find new potential sources of innovation, and
  • improve the Procurement brand and the reach of Procurement.

We’ll discuss a few of these in upcoming posts, but for now check out Pierre’s post and remember, as we’ll also discuss in an upcoming paper series later this fall, improvement comes from reaching beyond Procurement’s current limited boundary.

Procurement — Why We Matter Even More!

Last week, we re-ran a post by David Furth, former VP of Marketing at Hiperos and current President of Leap the Pond, on Procurement – Why We Really Matter. In this post, David explained that Procurement is on the verge of its next major transformation where it will continuously assess risk and introduce integrated processes and controls across the company to mitigate the risk by working closely with other functional areas, business lines, and geographies. In addition, Procurement will implement management control programs that actively monitor both performance and compliance to help ensure suppliers are meeting all their obligations.

David was, and is, right. Now that everything is outsourced, resourced, and optimized to razor-thin JIT models, risk management — and continuous monitoring — is key. But that is just the beginning.

It’s not just risk monitoring, but compliance monitoring and performance monitoring. (Safety) regulations (like RoHS, WEEE, and REACH) are coming into effect fast and furious around the globe, as are bans on toxic substances, materials and products that can be used to create dangerous weapons, and conflict minerals and diamonds. As a result, compliance monitoring is becoming more and more important.

But so is performance monitoring. You can’t ignore the importance of quality, reliability, and safety as it is your reputation — and bank account — on the line. If the products you deliver continually break under warranty, even if you have a policy that you can return for replacement, you’re still losing the profit, the customer’s trust, and the costs associated with processing the return. If the products hurt someone — you’re getting sued, not your supplier. And if the products don’t perform up to spec, even if they don’t break, the customer ain’t coming back.

And even though savings aren’t everything, because it all comes down to ROI — value delivered by your organization. However, if your organization is to remain competitive, it still has to keep costs in check and at least keep costs in line with your competition. Often the only way to do this is to identify when you need to help your suppliers decrease their costs and increase their productivity, and this requires constant performance monitoring.

And who else in the organization can properly monitor risk, compliance, and supplier performance? Not manufacturing. Not logistics. And definitely not finance. That’s why Procurement Matters — Now More Than Ever.

Once You Get the Three T’s, What’s the Next Step To Asia Pacific Dominance?

In our last post on Why There Are No World Class Procurement Organizations in Asia Pacific, we noted that the primary reason that no business head or CPO in Asia-Pacific reported their Procurement capabilities as great is the classic Triple-T problem — a lack of talent, technology, and transition management. When we reviewed the seven things that Bain indicated procurement teams lack, we noted that all were fundamentally an instantiation of a talent, technology, or transition management problem.

However, getting the three T’s in place is just the first step. The next step is to apply them properly. Where do you start? One place to start is with the six enablers outlined in the article. While the doctor thinks it is debatable that these enablers will help a company establish 4th generation Procurement, like the article suggests, it will definitely up an organization’s game and put them on par with their counterparts in the western world.

So what are these enablers?

1. Better Organization

This requires the organization to acquire a clear procurement mandate, a streamlined organization that appropriately delineates global vs. regional vs. local responsibilities, and clear roles and decision rights across Procurement. In addition, the organization needs to elevate critical decisions to senior management (to ensure they not only have senior management buy-in but support), implement a feedback loop from internal customers to end consumers, and establish effective reporting channels.

2. Better Processes

This requires better category management, vendor management, and information management. Sustainable savings come from holistic category management, not point commodity sourcing. Suppliers only improve when properly managed. And information quality is key to Sourcing, Procurement, and all related aspects of Supply Management.

3. Better Tools & Systems

Leaders have integrated and transparent data for both direct and indirect spending. Good decisions require good data. Good data can only be obtained from good tools.

4. Better P&L Effectiveness

Leading companies have pull-based demand management with enforced compliance and formalized budgeting for all categories. They employ sourcing platforms that allow a company to see the direct effect of a sourcing decision on the bottom line.

5. Better Talent Management

Just because you have talent today, this does not mean you have talent tomorrow. If you don’t continue to educate and advance your talent, they will leave you for a competitor who will. Plus, as your organization grows, you will need to add more talent. Without a proper talent management strategy, your talent equation can only be solved for a single point in time — if you are a lucky one.

It’s a hard climb, but a feasible one. And if you review the SI archives, you will find many posts about how to improve in each of these areas. Happy Hunting!