Category Archives: Talent

More Proof We’re Overworked … and in Deep Talent Trouble

As per this recent article in Industry Week on “building a lean, mean profitable machine”, productivity in manufacturing has jumped by a record 94% during the past two decades while headcount has significantly shrunk. That’s a productivity increase that’s 60% higher than any other U.S. business sector. Since technological innovations have occurred across the board, one cannot attribute all of this productivity increase to new technologies. A good portion of it is due to blood, sweat, and tears — and people working harder and longer than ever before. And while it looks good on the books, it’s not sustainable over the long term.

There’s a reason that 9 out of 10 employees are looking for a new job. They feel like they’ve been worked to death and that there couldn’t be a job that is possibly worse than their current job. Considering that production is becoming more and more specialized and reliant on precision machinery and technology, this is not a good thing as the industry as a whole is facing a dire shortage of skilled production workers, scientists and engineers. Add this to the predicted shortage of up to 100,000 logistics workers by mid-decade, and you see a deep talent shortage looming across the supply chain.

How does your organization plan to manage it … before it’s too late?

The Universal Key to Supply Chain Success

These days, there’s a lot of requirements for supply chain success. Even a supply chain that is carefully architected, supported by the best technology, and managed using the most modern (collaborative) process is not guaranteed to succeed. But whether the supply chain is in the public sector or the private sector, there is one fundamental requirement of success that does not change: talent.

I was reminded of this when reading a recent post over on the HBR blogs about “the intelligence challenge” where the authors, who were all Marine Corps Intelligence Officers in Iraq who now advise clients through the Mayflower Strategy Group, noted that the way ahead, for those who want success in the public sector and the military, is to emulate the lessons learned from the recent slim-downs in the private sector where the winning organizations were those that spent money on obtaining best-in-class collaboration tools and top talent to deploy them.

The reality is that there is no one (network) architecture, technology, or process that will guarantee success in today’s global supply chain that is wrought with risk from end to end. That means an organization’s best chance of success is having top talent in place who can quickly react to unpredictable occurrences and prevent minor hiccups from becoming major disruptions. A good supply chain runs on good people, so make sure you have some. And be sure to give them the best tools and training available, as they can never be over prepared.

Share This on Linked In

Want a More Productive Supply Chain Worker? Take a Page from Tina Turner!

The difference between a productive supply chain worker and an unproductive one is staggering in today’s knowledge economy. As per this recent article in the McKinsey Quarterly on “boosting the productivity of knowledge workers”, raising the productivity of these workers, who constitute a large and growing share of the workforce in developed economies, represents a major opportunity for companies, as well as for countries with low birthrates that hope to maintain GDP growth. However, those companies that fail to keep up with their competitors will soon be swept aside in the battle for supremacy in the knowledge economy.

But knowledge work involves more diverse and amorphous tasks than do production or clerical positions and is thus hard to automate or streamline. Plus, the real returns are often the result of creativity and ingenuity that spark a new innovation — how do you boost that with a system or process? Typically, you don’t. So how do you increase the productivity of your knowledge workers? Simple, you increase the amount of time they have to spend on creativity, ingenuity, and innovation. And you do that by identifying their time-drains and taking them away.

According to McKinsey Research, knowledge workers spend half their time on interactions. Half their time! If they’re not getting what they need from these interactions, that’s up to half of their time wasted. So what can you do? You identify the productivity barriers — which can be physical, technical, social, cultural, contextual, and/or temporal — and you remove them.

If distance is a problem, you get people together when needed. If the technology isn’t sufficient for the types of global collaboration required by your team, you upgrade it. If the organizational modus operandi isn’t appropriate to the locale, you change it. If your people are having trouble understanding their counterparts across the globe, you give them some cultural training. If marketing can’t understand engineering and vice versa, you upgrade their technical skills. And if there truly isn’t enough time, you admit that fact and adjust the project scope and timelines to be more reasonable.

In other words, Tina Turner was right. If you want to succeed, you have to break through the barrier.

Share This on Linked In

E-I-E-I … E

Dalip Raheja of The Mpower Group recently ran a piece here on Sourcing Innovation on how Old MacDonald Was Right — It Is About E-I-E-I-O when it comes to successful supply chains. And when it comes to performance, he’s right — it’s all about Adoption, Execution, Implementation, Optimization, and Utilization.

But when it comes to attracting, retaining, and growing talent, you have to really focus on creating the optimal work environment. According to a recent piece in Industry week, when “hiring and retaining talent”, it’s all about the three E’s: Experience, Exposure, and Education because employees need

  • challenging assignments that allow them to develop new skills,
  • opportunities to expand their network inside and outside of the organization to continue learning, and
  • classes and mentoring to improve and gain new skills.

And the author is right. If your employees aren’t engaged, exposed, and enlightened, they won’t be energized by your organization. That means your stars will leave, and once high performers see their peers leaving, they won’t be very interested in joining.

However, it’s not the perfect recipe for an attractive environment as it misses two other key features of attractive work environments: Innovation and Inovlvement. Superstars want to innovate and build new products and solutions that make your customers’ lives better and they want to be involved in all aspects of the process from contemplation through design, development, and delivery. And they want to be informed when something happens good or bad (and asked for feedback). The don’t like a closed-door need-to-know environment and won’t stand for it. The want their E – I – E – I – E.

Share This on Linked In

Is India About to go through Classic Economic Growing Pains?

Reading Scott Anthony’s “Innovation Notes from India” over on the HBR blogs, I can’t help but noticing that India is about to face the growing pains that North America went through during the information technology revolution of the last few decades. Consider Scott’s points one-by-one:

India is a land of contrasts

Every revolution, from the telephone through television to the PC made North America a land of contrasts between the haves and the have nots. The culture of entire communities, cities, and counties, literally changed overnight. Take silicon valley for example. It was a new gold rush economy.

There are more people than jobs in India

That’s usually the case, and usually what propels a country to try anything to create jobs. And when unemployment hits a high, that’s what drives real innovation energy.

The innovation energy in India is tremendous

This is a key requirement for an innovation boom that is always accompanied by growing pains when a country tries to adapt to rapid change.

Indian companies might have it too easy

First-to-market companies always have it too easy during a new technology boom. As a result, they don’t innovate enough and that’s why the first-to-market companies are rarely the winners over the long term (and why what counts is being best-to-market).

There will be more SKS‘s in the coming years

Giving that developing economies are charging ahead, you can be quite sure there will be multiple micro-finance options in the years ahead as the rich try to take advantage of the boom and seize the opportunity, leading to more growing pains as the micro-financiers reach capacity when the companies they are financing require even more money to sustain their growth.

Share This on Linked In