Category Archives: Technology

Has Twitter Already Turned Too Many into Twits?

Last Saturday, I pointed out a recent article on how “students [are] failing because of Twitter, texting” (Canoe.ca), covered in a CNet video which asks “does Twitter make you stoopid”?. The article pointed out that, at the world renowned University of Waterloo, thirty percent of students who are admitted are not able to pass at a minimum level, a failure rate that has increased five percentage points in the past few years. The cause, according to experts in the field, is “cellphone texting and social networking”, which are collectively degrading writing skills. And as we all know, Twitter combines both into one happy little medium that will zap your IQ much faster than your backyard bug-zapper solves the mosquito problem.

Shortly after I penned that piece, I found this piece on CNet that noted the “blogging decline among teens, young adults”. Now, while it’s true that most blogs will eventually be abandoned (with the abandonment rates in line with the 3-3-3 rule), relatively speaking, the average number of blogs that survive over time, and, thus, the average number of relative bloggers, should still be increasing slowly as the online population increases. However, a recent survey by the Pew Research Center found that while 28% of teens (12-17) and young adults (18-29) were bloggers in 2006, by 2009, the number of teens and young adults blogging dropped in half (to 14%).

The Pew Research Center attributed the decline in blogging to changes in social network use, arguing that people use social networking sites less as they get older. While this may be true, it’s certainly not true for teens and young adults, which are using social networking more by the day, and it misses the fundamental cause entirely. Simply put, they’re not blogging because Twitter has made them stoopid and given them ADD (Attention Deficit Disorder).

If you can’t spell well, compose an expose, or think beyond 140 characters, you can’t write a blog post worth a damn. And all this leads me to the very important question posed in the title — Has Twitter Already Turned Too Many Of Us into Twits?

Share This on Linked In

iValua: Tackling End-to-End Sourcing And Procurement, Part II

In my last post, I described how iValua, a ten year old French software and solutions company, has one of the broadest supply management suites on the market today. From RFX to payment, the majority of the key steps in the sourcing and procurement cycle are covered in one of iValua’s many solution modules. And while it is true that most of the modules aren’t very deep, it’s also true that many small and mid-sized companies, and even some of the larger Global 3000’s that don’t have that many complicated buys, don’t need deep functionality where sourcing and procurement is concerned. Over thirty of France’s largest companies use the solution, including Air France Industries, La Poste, and Arcelor Mittal, the largest steel company in the world.

In this post, I’m going to describe some of the capabilities of the product in more detail. But first, some global capabilities. The platform, which is built on .Net, is delivered via SaaS through your browser. As a result, it is accessible anywhere. Many of the screens are built using a widget-based architecture and, like dashboards, the layouts are customizable by each user. The user can sort by, show, and hide any column of any table. Quick search and advanced search is available for every screen (and table), a navigation history is maintained for quick back-tracking, and the user can customize a favorites link for quick access to specific screens and reports. Finally, all data can be exported to Excel and all supported objects (bids, contracts, purchase orders, invoices, payments, reports, etc.) can be imported from Excel as well.

But the best platform-wide capability is the ability for the platform to be integrated to any ERP, Database, or external data source (due to the existence of appropriate abstraction layers in the platform). Before iValua decided to become a provider of a SaaS supply management platform, they were a custom software development shop. As a result, they had deep development skills and broad experience with a number of platforms. Thus, when they decided to focus on supply management, they were able to do custom integrations for each client. Now that they have over 100 customers, they have integrated with almost every major ERP and Relational Database in France, most of the major ERPs and Relational Databases in Europe, and some of the major ERPs and Relational Databases in North America. If they haven’t integrated with your environment yet, it probably won’t take them long to do so. Plus, using their partnerships with Bureau Van Dijk, D&B/Altares, Vigeo, and EcoVadis, they can enrich your supplier related data when they pull your data in.

Sourcing

Sourcing starts with the definition of a project. Once basic information is defined (type, process, owner, dates, and scope), the owner can define a team, create a message center, define currencies, outline a schedule, and keep track of relevant documents. Then the user can invite suppliers, create RFXs with selection and evaluation criteria, track responses, save analysis, create awards, and create an implementation plan. RFXs and Auctions support multiple lots and multiple rounds and the buyer can determine whether or not suppliers can see bids, whether or not the bids are displayed anonymously, and when they can see the bids.

Procurement

In addition to requisitions, budgets, purchase orders, expense reports, invoices, goods receipts and recurring receivables, the procurement application supports catalog-based buying. The system can be integrated with any EDI, XML, or punch-out catalog, which can be augmented with user-defined items (which could include custom items or services defined in contracts). The expense reporting module supports p-cards, advance requests, standard expense, and travel expense reports. In addition, a supplier evaluation form can be attached to every purchase order (in addition to every award and contract) and reports can be run at the purchase order level, award and contract level, and global supplier level.

Reporting

They have a very extensive reporting tool that allows you to look at data over the time periods of your choice (daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly, or yearly), in the organizations of your choice, in the spend category families of your choice, for the suppliers of your choice, along the dimensions, or axes, of your choice in a wide variety of tabular and graphical formats. Basically, the application builds a master spend cube and allows you to view any sub-cube, or sub-cube summary of your choice. While it might not allow you to do arbitrary spend/data analysis, it will more than satisfy your average procurement professional and manager. (And you could always augment the suite with off-line analysis for your senior analysts if you needed.)

Share This on Linked In

iValua: Tackling End-to-End Sourcing And Procurement, Part I

By now, you’ve probably heard the foreshocks of the latest vendor to enter the supply management space in North America, iValua. iValua is a ten-year old French software solutions company that has slowly built up a broad e-Sourcing and e-Procurement solution that covers most of the bases that I outlined in my post where I reminded you that it’s sourcing and procurement, in which I also reminded you that you don’t have your supply management bases covered unless you have a solution, or set of integrated solutions, that cover the basics.

In that classic post, I indicated that the basic cycle was the following:

  • Spend Analysis
    Analyze spend related data and find the best sourcing opportunities,
  • RFX
    solicit an RFI, RFP, and/or RFQ and/or
  • e-Auction
    initiate an e-Auction then
  • Decision Optimization
    make the best award using available data and
  • Contract Management
    start the contract management lifecycle.
  • Requisition
    A requisition is created when a good or service is required and
  • Approval
    if it is against the existing contract, it is approved
  • Purchase Order
    and a purchase order is created off of the contract.
  • Goods Receipt
    When the supplier delivers, a goods receipt is created and
  • Invoice
    the invoice is recorded and
  • Reconciliation
    the invoice is reconciled against the goods receipt and purchase order.
  • Payment
    Payment is made after reconcilation
  • Tax Reclamation
    and if VAT is reclaimable, filings are made
  • Spend Analysis
    and after time has passed, the payments are analyzed to insure spend is on target.

With respect to this cycle, iValua has modules that cover the basics for just about every phase except for decision optimization and tax reclamation. In addition, the suite also has modules that address:

  • Sourcing Process Management
    which allows sourcing processes to be customized and managed as sourcing projects
  • Procurement Process Management
    which allow you to define your own requisition, approval, and purchase order creation and delivery processes
  • Supplier Performance Management
    which allows you to create surveys and track performance metrics
  • Budget and Expense Management
    which allows you to create budgets by organizational unit and sub-unit and capture expense reports
  • Customization
    which is an extensive administration module that allows branding, coloring, wording, dashboards, roles, permissions, security, and default processes to be configured

All-in-all, it is one of the broadest supply management suites in the market. In my next post, I’ll provide more details on some of the various modules.

Share This on Linked In

There’s No Such Thing as Good Spreadsheets

If you’re still using spreadsheets to run any aspect of your sourcing, procurement, or supply management operations, then you’re working at the edge of a steep cliff over a deep ocean waiting for the earthquake to come. I bring this up yet again because I recently stumbled upon an article over on the Harvard Business Review blogs on “why good spreadsheets make bad strategies”, which, by the way, they do.

 

It was a great blog post. We live in a world obsessed with science, preoccupied with predictability and control, and enraptured with quantitative analysis. Economic forecasters crank out precision predictions of economic growth with their massive econometric models. CEOs give to-the-penny guidance to capital markets on next quarter’s predicted earnings. We live by adages like: “Show me the numbers” and truisms such as “If you can’t measure it, it doesn’t count.”

 

What has this obsession gotten us? The economists have gotten it consistently wrong. And, moreover, the same economists who totally missed the recession turned back to the same quantitative, scientific models to predict how the economy would recover [after 2008], only to be mainly wrong again. CEOs keep on giving quarterly guidance based on their sophisticated financial planning systems and keep on being wrong — and then get slammed not for bad performance but for their failure to predict performance exactly as they promised mere months earlier. (Hence my distaste for Wall Street and my recent praise for private equity.)

Now, while CEOs and their CFOs would love to be able to extrapolate last month’s sales quantity and predict next quarter’s sales, but sometimes they find out that those sales weren’t as solid a base for growth as they might have thought — especially if some of the customer relationships underpinning them weren’t as strong as they might have imagined.

The fundamental shortcoming is that all of these scientific methods depended entirely on quantities to produce the answers they were meant to generate. They were all blissfully ignorant of qualities.

What people keep forgetting is that, in business, numbers are meaningless out of context. 1M in revenue this year means nothing if you don’t maintain whatever quality earned you that revenue this year. If you got the business because you had a better product, and you’re in an industry where products improve quarterly, and you don’t continue to invest in improvements, you can’t project 1M next year. Loyalty only accounts for so much in many categories, like technology and electronics.

So, as a forecasting tool, spreadsheets are even more useless than you tend to think they are. And they’re even worse as a business tracking tool if you’re engaged in global trade, because they don’t automatically update when the regulations and tax rates change. And paying the right amount can get you fined, and even jailed if it was determined that you did not make any efforts to insure proper payments and filings (if you’re an officer of the company).

Share This on Linked In

How The Mighty Have Fallen

The past decade has been rough on many companies, but technology companies appear to have bore the brunt of it. Check out Fortune’s biggest losers over the past decade over on CNNMoney.com. Eight are technology companies, and all make Ariba’s Market Cap Loss of 46 B [as chronicled in James Kwak’s The Myth of Ariba and discussed in my post on Will Private Equity Players Offer You Better Value Than Public Equity Players] look like pocket change!  (Ariba Peak: 47 B, Recent: 1 B, approx.)

Company Loss Peak Market Cap Recent Market Cap
Cisco Systems  425 B  557 B 132 B
General Electric  423 B  601 B 178 B
Intel  400 B  509 B 109 B
Microsoft  390 B  642 B 252 B
Nortel  283 B  283 B     0 B (bankrupt)
Lucent Technologies  274 B  285 B   11 B
America Online  219 B  222 B     3 B
WorldCom  186 B  186 B     0 B (bankrupt)

Lesson learned? Besides the fact that market valuation should never exceed a reasonable multiple of revenue (10X might be okay in extreme situations for true up-and-comers, but 100X is ridiculous), I’d have to say that this also teaches us that Software and Hardware is not worth more than the value you are able to extract from it.