Category Archives: Technology

An Enterprise Software Buying Guide, Part I: Overview

Buying enterprise software isn’t easy. In fact, it’s just as complicated as global sourcing, if not more so (and that’s why IT professionals make great global sourcing professionals, as noted in this recent article from Global Services). You’re buying something that’s immaterial and, these days, ephemeral, but just as costly once all the “hidden” costs are taken into account.

What’s worse, a mistake can cost you many times the initial purchase price. Accidentally spot buy 10,000 parts incompatible with your current assembly? You sell them at a 10% loss, take a one time hit, learn your lesson, and move on. Move too quickly on that new, on-premise, e-Sourcing platform to take advantage of that limited time “special discount” and lock in a five year term on a platform that is thoroughly incompatible with your ERP? There’s an additional seven to eight figures, up front, of custom integration work plus significant third party maintenance each year to keep the middleware running each time you patch your ERP or your new e-Sourcing platform and “break” the custom middleware.

Thus, when it comes to enterprise software, you need to be prepared. In this 8-part series, I’ll attempt to walk you through each step of the enterprise software buying process, point out what you need to watch out for, and pass on some of the secrets of successful software purchasing.

First of all, let’s outline the basic process.

  1. Form a Cross-Functional Team.
  2. Document Your Needs.
  3. Identify Potential Solutions.
  4. Build Your Cost Models.
  5. Define Your Objective.
  6. Negotiate Professionally.
  7. Comb the Contract.
  8. Manage Performance.

Sounds simple enough, doesn’t it? Too bad each step is a virtual minefield laden with explosives that can blow up your costs, your project, and your organization’s trust in you. That’s why we’re going to examine each phase in detail.

When you get right down to it, enterprise software is a serious commitment. Even if you are able to divorce yourself from a system (or a vendor) after signing a contract, you can bet that it won’t be before you incur a significant penalty. (Even if the vendor is a “quit anytime you want” SaaS vendor. There’s always a cost, even if it isn’t always paid direct to the vendor.) Plus, you’ll have to move all of your data to a new system, which will likely require custom development work to integrate it with other systems and cause your losses to mount in this double whammy scenario. Of course, you’ll take a productivity loss while your employees are left without a system (and if it’s a supply management system, the disappearance of a key piece of analytics technology could result in uninformed buyers making less-than-optimal, and costly, sourcing decisions). That’s why you have to do everything you can to make sure you select the right system up front.

In our next post, we’ll discuss cross functional team formation.

Supply Chain Management Gets SaaS

A recent headline in Industry Week stated that “On-Demand Supply Chain Management Solutions (are) to Increase as Economic Pressures Accelerate”, so I clicked on the link hoping for a new study that would indicate the further rise of cost-effective SaaS solutions in the SCM space. What I got was an article by Mr. John Sicard of Kinaxis, a vendor who offers Rapid Response Management On-Demand. But even though it wasn’t what I expected, I ploughed on, knowing that it was likely to contain some good tidbits as Randy Littleson, blogmaster of The 21st Century Supply Chain and a VP of Kinaxis, has been publishing some great pieces lately, and I expected that the article would build on them.

With many companies now outsourcing most, if not all, of their manufacturing operations to regions outside their target markets, which dramatically increases supply chain complexity and volatility, the need for supply chain management solutions is greater than ever. Add this to the fact that the precarious global market place is demanding more from corporate performance than ever before while stressing staff and budgets, and we have the ideal situation for SaaS offerings. By consolidating multiple traditional desktop SCM solutions into a single low-cost on-demand offering, companies can rapidly gain tangible benefits without stressing IT or the bank account because SaaS removes many traditional barriers to software adoption by minimizing ownership costs and implementation risks.

SaaS solutions generally deploy faster, cost less, and reduce risk when compared to traditional on-premise enterprise solutions and can be a much easier sell to finance departments willing to pay a small monthly fee for an immediate ROI rather than pay out a large sum for a system whose timeframe for return is uncertain at best — especially when you consider that software licenses, unlike physical equipment assets, tend to have 0 resale value. They can also be more flexible (especially since, if the vendor fails to perform, you can extract your data, terminate your contract, and move to a new provider next month), provide superior security (as they have IT security experts on staff while you don’t), and scale better, and faster, as they were built for the cloud.

Nothing SaaS converts didn’t already know, but it’s good to reiterate it regularly as new SaaS solutions come online every day and just because there wasn’t one that met all of your needs yesterday doesn’t mean that there isn’t one today. Keeping an open mind might allow you to find a great new solution at a cost that is but a fraction of the ROI it will return.

Technology and My Hobby

Over on New Florence, New Renaissance, Vinnie Mirchandani has reach his goal of fifty guest author submissions to his Technology and My Hobby series. For those of you looking for something different, but yet interesting, to read … you might want to check this out. To help you find the guest posts related to your hobby, I’ve indexed them by category.

Category Author Company
Archaeology (Armchair) Michael Lamoureux (of Sourcing Innovation)
Baseball (Little League) Mike O’Brien (of Appirio)
Basketball Coaching Dan Dal Degan (of Salesforce)
BBQ Floyd Teter (of Jet Propulsion Labs)
Beagles Peanuts
Blood Donation Tom Foydel (of SightLines)
Brewmastering (Home) Dennis Howlett (of ZDNet)
Bridge David Dobrin (of B2B Analysts)
Cars (Tinkering) Brian Sommer (of TechVentive)
Cartoons (Tech Toons) Alvaro “Blag” Tejada Galindo (of SAP)
Cats Rusty Weston (of Third Set Media)
Chess Rita Mirchandani
Cycling Paul Wiest (of Siemens Enterprise Communications)
Fishing Mike Prosceno (of SAP)
Flying Ameed Taylor (of Applation)
Gardening Erik Keller (of Wapiti LLC)
Gastronomy William Mougayar (of Eqentia)
Golf Jim Rafferty (of Market Shapers)
Green Living Timothy Chou (an Author)
Home Design Josh Snowhorn (of Terremark)
Home Improvement (Global) Helmuth Guembel (of Strategy Partners)
Home Movies Tom Wailgum (of CIO Magazine)
Model Planes Anil Wats (of DP World)
Musical Discoveries Mike Laven (of Traiana)
Jazz (Big Band) Joe Thornton (of Lawson Software)
Organ Playing Gerlinde Gniewosz
Reading Francine McKenna (an Author)
Restoring Antiquarian Books Jason Busch (of Spend Matters)
Rifles (Target) Tom Ryan (of Gartner)
Rock (Guitar) Devan Sabaratnam (of Business on Software fame)
RVs Tom Chimera (of Overpayment Recovery Services)
Running Eric Dirst (of DeVry)
Sailing Curtis Beebe (of PwC)
Side-Tripping Kimberly McDonald Baker (of Project Partners)
Photography Michael Krigsman (of Asuret)
Skiing Sig Rinde (of Thigamy fame)
Snorkeling Louis Columbus (of Cincom)
Soccer Coaching Christian Schuh (of Siemens Enterprise Communications)
Squash Nick Dembla (of Capsilon)
Super Momming Joy Wald (of ADT)
Technology Impact Bob Warfield (of SmoothSpan)
Technology Luddism Josh Greenbaum (an Industry Analyst)
Tennis Karen Beaman (of Jeitosa)
Theatre Marilyn Pratt (of SAP Labs)
Travel (International) Harish Malani
Vinyl DJs Ray Wang (of Forrester)
Wine John Dean (of ex-Steelcase fame)
Working Out Larry Dignan (of ZDNet)
Writing (Adventure) Rein Krevald (an Author)
Youth Science Mentoring Charlie Bess (of EDs)

Will We See The Two-Per-Category Theory Where Supply Chain Technology is Concerned?

A recent TPMA (Trade Promotion Marketers Association) Outlook contained an article by Bob Houk (of the TPMtoday blog) that expounded on the two-per-channel theory that refers to the idea that retail channels are consolidating to the point that there will eventually be only two significant players in each channel. The article also discussed the two-per-category corollary that states that as retail channels consolidate, and as shelf-space decreases and increases in cost, the suppliers to the few remaining retailers will also consolidate.

This reminded me of my recent post on why Marketing is Not Optional and how, as a result of too much inaction on the part of too many vendors and a lack of faith by too many buyers, this prolonged recession is likely to accomplish what years of M&A activity couldn’t, namely, condense the market to a small handful of key players for each technology and services offering. And I got to thinking, what happens if the space over consolidates and we see the two-per-category theory take effect in core e-Sourcing and e-Procurement offerings? What would happen then? We already have the situation where the suite solutions offered by the big providers are essentially the same solutions offered five years ago, with a few more “bells and whistles” in the UI that really don’t offer much in the way of value improvements. Would we have any innovation at all? And more importantly, even if we don’t see the two-per-category, but only see a small handful of providers … would they all centralize on a “value system” like SAP or Microsoft? What value would there be if all the savings they offered up had to be pumped into (ridiculously?) high license fees and maintenance fees with “empty-calories“? Good questions. Scary questions!

And questions we’ll have to ask unless the more innovative vendors wake up and small the espresso, double down, show you the value, and find a way to sell it to you with essentially no up-front cost — which is very realistic with a SaaS model where they can give you a free 30 day trial and not bill you until the end of month two, giving you enough time to get your first quick wins, demonstrate value, and justify the low monthly service fee that you’ll pay for the 3, 5, 7, and 10+X ROI that these solutions will deliver.

Entry Visibility: Your Trade Visibility Success Depends On It

A little over a month ago, I told you that You Need Trade Visibility, which helps you track your products from the time they leave a supplier’s warehouse until the time they reach your end customer, because it helps you to:

  • understand the factors that impact costs, cycle times, and service levels,
  • identify minor issues before they turn into major problems,
  • enforce compliance, and, most importantly,
  • prevent millions of dollars from being flushed down the drain.

And to highlight the last point, I pointed out how

  • A Global Data Mining study across 5 companies with 3 Billion to 31 Billion in revenue found over 150 Million in duty savings alone.
  • Most companies spend hundreds of thousands of dollars in manual filing costs a year for shipments that can be processed for pennies by global trade management solutions.
  • Most trade cycles are 65% longer than they need to be. Each day “in transit” costs roughly 0.5% of the total shipment value and costs an average company 5% of the value of an average shipment.

A key component of trade visibility is entry visibility. An entry visibility solution allows a company to manage the trade compliance process associated with the import of goods that starts when they leave a foreign supplier’s warehouse and ends when they reach their (initial) destination. It ensures that all the regulatory, compliance, and documentation requirements are met in an accurate and timely fashion at the lowest possible cost and prevents costly fines and delays.

Accuracy and timeliness are critical because:

  • An average international transaction could require as many as 35 documents across 25 parties complying with over 600 regulations and more than 500 free trade agreements.
  • Most companies are losing millions in overpayments due to misclassifications:
    • U.S. Customs estimates that between $1.5 and $2.3 Billion of the $20 Billion collectively paid by over 300,000 importers is likely an overpayment (due to a misclassification).
    • A recent Aberdeen Study on Global Trade Compliance Priorities found that the wrong duty was paid on 11% of international shipments.
  • Most companies are losing millions through Free Trade Agreement mismanagement.
    • A recent study quoted by Aberdeen found $17 Million in savings through better utilization of trade agreements across five companies.
    • Black and Decker was able to increase its NAFTA savings by 240%, from $3 Million to $7 Million over 4 years through better FTA management.
  • Inefficient administration of customs processes will cost you 7% of total trade value.
    • A United Nations study estimated that lost opportunities end up costing the global economy over $420 billion annually.

That’s why it’s important to implement an Entry Visibility solution, as it will reduce filing costs, enforce compliance, reduce data synchronization complexity across your supply base, generate the proper import packets, and provide the “Reasonable Care” required by the Mod Act. Furthermore, with a SaaS-based entry visibility solution, such as the solution offered by
Integration Point, you can be up and running in a matter of days, auditing every entry, and eliminating costly overpayments due to misclassification errors.

For more information on how Entry Visibility can save you time, money, and compliance headaches, check out Integration Point’s new white-paper on Closing the Loop with Entry Visibility.