Solving the 2011 Supply Chain Budgeting Dilemma

A recent post over on Supply Chain Matters by Bob Ferrari discussed the 2011 supply chain budgeting dilemma. According to Bob:

Input commodity prices are again on the rise. A recent Wall Street Journal article (paid subscription may be required) notes that in food products, metals, energy and other commodities, prices are again on the rise. As an example, because of the severe crop failure in Russia, wheat prices have risen 34%. In one year, corn is up 44%, milk 6.5% and cheese 29%. Copper is up 30% and other metals such as steel, aluminum and other metals are on the rise.

The implication is that in many industries, firms are determining whether increasing costs will be passed along in higher prices, or will be absorbed or buffered by reduction of costs in other areas … supply chain cross-functional teams will again have to ascertain what assumptions, plans and programs will need to either be accelerated or deferred in 2011.

In our view, these challenges come at a very unfortunate time. Now, more than ever, teams need to be prepared with the supply chain planning and execution capabilities required for the post-recessionary recovery. Most companies who survived the global recession have done so by severe cost cutting and reduction of headcount. While balance sheets remain cash rich and profitability remains at high levels, supply chains are probably the highest state of lean than they have ever been in the last decade.

It’s a bad situation, but it doesn’t have to be. There’s an easy fix. Stop hoarding cash, buy some new systems to increase your team’s productivity, add a few top guns, and go to work on controlling costs along the board. I know it’s never that easy in practice, but it should be.

Share This on Linked In

P.S.  (Shameless plug.) If you need help selecting those new systems, both Bob and I can help.

It Isn’t Always Strategic! Part I

There’s been a lot of debate about The Life and Death of Strategic Sourcing ever since Dalip Raheja claimed that Strategic Sourcing is Dead back in August (with numerous posts indexed at this link), and while most of it has been good, there’s been one major point missing in all of the debate to date:

Sourcing is NOT always Strategic!

That’s right! Sourcing is NOT always Strategic!

First of all, most of what you buy is not critical to operations.Consider all of the following which is bought by most businesses on the planet:

  • office supplies
  • office computing equipment
  • janitorial services
  • HR support
  • print material for marketing
  • electronic discovery for legal services
  • outsourced manufacturing for commodity products

Not Strategic!

  • office supplies

    who gives an albino rat’s behind who made your stapler and copier paper and where they came from

  • office computing equipment

    for 99% of companies out there, as long as it runs Microsoft Office and an internet browser, who made the machine is irrelevant

  • janitorial services

    it’s not too hard to wash a window, sweep a floor, or empty a trash basket

  • HR support

    there are at least six top-tier HR-support agencies out there whose services are essentially indistinguishable

  • print material for marketing

    any print shop that can print 8.5″ x 11″ brochures in 16M colours does the trick

  • electronic discovery for legal services

    there are a number of software packages out there that do exactly the same search on exactly the same file formats and thousands of monkeys who can use them

  • outsourced manufacturing for commodity products

    if you’re manufacturing office supplies, clone PCs, or children’s toys, there are hundreds of factories that can get the job done

Let’s look at the definitions of the word strategic:

  • Merriam-Webster: (a) a careful plan or method : a clever stratagem or (b) the art of devising or employing plans or stratagems toward a goal
  • Wikipedia: a word of military origin, refers to a plan of action designed to achieve a particular goal. In military usage strategy is distinct from tactics, which are concerned with the conduct of an engagement, while strategy is concerned with how different engagements are linked
  • Business Dictionary: Art and science of planning and marshalling resources for their most efficient and effective use

These say that strategy is

  • carefully thought out,
  • goal focussed,
  • efficient, and
  • distinct from its implementation, which is tactical.

Thus, if you simply jump to strategic sourcing techniques, you are not being strategic. If you’re not planning how to efficiently use all of the affected resources, you’re not being strategic. If you’re not thinking about why a certain plan of action is being considered, you’re not being strategic, and, most importantly, if what you are doing does not relate to a major business goal or objective, it’s not strategic.

Share This on Linked In

Don’t Forget the Time Zone!

You’d think that this would be obvious in the year 2010, but it’s ridiculous the number of companies that advertise on-line events, for which they are obviously seeking a global audience, and don’t include the time zone. Not only does most of the world NOT run on your timezone, but most of them don’t have a clue what time zone you’re in. And don’t give me that B.S. that “your customers know where we are”, because, if you have multiple offices, I guarantee that at least some don’t. And if you are doing it at a partner or customer office that is not in your head-office time zone, how are they supposed to even have a clue?

And learn what daylight standard time means. It’s amazing how many events I see for 11:00 EDT in December (not possible!) or EST in July in New York (again, not possible!). And don’t take the timezone shortcut and just use ET, CT, or PT. Remember, not all provinces and states (like Saskatchewan and Arizona) use daylight savings time, and the usual assumption is that if an abbreviation is used, you mean xDT in summer and xST in winter.

And if there is any possibility of confusion (and with timezones there usually is), spell the timezone out. BST can mean British Summer Time, Burma Standard Time, or Bangladesh Standard Time.

Don’t be a Dummy! Use the fully qualified timezone.

Share This on Linked In

Cultural Intelligence VIII: Korea

This series is edited by Dick Locke, SI’s resident expert on International Trade, author of Global Supply Management — A Guide to International Procurement (which was the definitive guide for almost a decade), and President of the Global Procurement Group and Global Supply Training which regularly gives seminars on International Trade and working with International Cultures.

As highlighted in last year’s post on Overcoming Cultural Differences in International Trade with Korea, while the Republic of Korea has a lot of similarities with the Asian countries that surround it, it also has a lot of differences. Having built the third largest Asian economy in less than half a century, starting with low-cost high-quality export production and then a move into high-tech high-value-add in the 90s, Koreans tend to move at a rapid pace. Also, as (recent) history has taught them that compromise leads to defeat and second place spells disaster, they are extremely competitive. They are always looking for an advantage, quick profits, and a quick sale … which is generally more important to them than the development of solid, long-term, business relationships.

With respect to Locke’s seven key cultural differences (first outlined as six in his classic text on Global Supply Management), power distance is moderately high as they have a vertical society that observes strict protocol, time is very monochronic and punctuality is expected, and your rank as a buyer is moderate. However, while they are quite high on uncertainty avoidance, unlike many Asian countries, they are willing to experiment and take risks if the reward is there. They are strongly influenced by hahn, which describes the build-up of pent-up energies, unrequited yearnings, and general frustrations, so while harmony is important, so is competition. However, kibun (hurting someone’s pride), is a very sensitive issue, and face is more important to them than it is to the Japanese. They are quite individualistic for an Asian country, though not as individualistic as North Americans, and very personal.

With respect to verbal communication, they are the most direct of the Asian countries, except where “no” is concerned, which must always be delivered indirectly or as a “maybe”. You should keep your volume moderate and avoid being boisterous (with the only exception being you are at a club and drunk, but then you must apologize for it immediately the next day).

With respect to non-verbal communication, as with the Japanese, body language conveys respect and you should learn when, and how, to bow. You need to avoid large gestures, bold facial expressions, and maintain a harmony in your emotions. While you need to be close enough to exchange business cards or pour drinks, you must not get too close and you must avoid touching them. With the exception of the handshake, physical contact is inappropriate unless the individuals are peers of the same sex or family. However, unlike some other Asian countries, eye contact is important and indicates sincerity and attentiveness.

Meetings are structured, and its important to provide information, including information on all attendees, in advance. Be sure to avoid writing anyone’s name in red (including your own). While negotiations can take place at the table, deliberations will be made in a group before a decision is made. As with other cultures, meals are common, with the etiquette similar. The major difference being that you should finish everything on your plate, but even if you are still hungry, you must refuse the first offer of seconds. Most Korean businessmen tend to believe that they will get to know a business partner, colleague, or customer better over a few drinks (which should be held with the right hand) and invitations after business hours will be common. Lean what gunbae means.

Finally, modesty is very important. If you are complemented, you should indicate that you are not worthy of such praise.

Share This on Linked In

Webinar Wackiness XIII: Webinars This Week from the #1 Supply Chain Resource Site

The Sourcing Innovation Resource Site, always immediately accessible from the link under the “Free Resources” section of the sidebar, continues to add new content on a weekly, and often daily, basis — and it will continue to do so.

The following is a not-so-short selection of over 12 webinars THIS WEEK that might interest you:

Date & Time Webcast
2010-Oct-26

 

11:00 GMT-07:00/MST/PDT

Proving Real Value-Closing the Performance Perception Gap Between Finance and Procurement

Sponsor: ICG Commerce

2010-Oct-26

 

11:00 GMT-04:00/AST/EDT

Transportation Cost Management for the Pulp and Paper Industry

Sponsor: Enterprise Performance Solutions

2010-Oct-26

 

15:00 GMT/WET

Overview of Biznet’s PerforMIS v5.3 Solution

Sponsor: Biznet Solutions

2010-Oct-26

 

10:00 GMT-04:00/AST/EDT

Finance, Operations, Sales, and Customer Service – Sharing Critical Data with Interaction

Sponsor: Sherwood Systems

2010-Oct-26

 

11:00 GMT/WET

Building an efficient and affordable IT infrastructure

Sponsor: CIO Connect

2010-Oct-26

 

11:00 GMT-07:00/MST/PDT

Proving Real Value-Closing the Performance Perception Gap Between Finance and Procurement

Sponsor: Sourcing Interests Group

2010-Oct-27

 

10:00 GMT-04:00/AST/EDT

Distribution Strategies: Integrated Web thru Ecommerce

Sponsor: Integrated Systems Solutions

2010-Oct-27

 

14:00 GMT-04:00/AST/EDT

Picture Perfect Integration: Go-live on-time, under-budget, and maximize ROI

Sponsor: Emergys

2010-Oct-27

 

10:00 GMT-07:00/MST/PDT

Getting More Spend Under Management Faster with CombineNet ASAP 4.4

Sponsor: CombineNet

2010-Oct-27

 

14:00 GMT-04:00/AST/EDT

Preparing for Growth: How, Why and Where Manufacturers are Investing as Markets Re-Emerge

Sponsor: Infor

2010-Oct-28

 

14:15 GMT/WET

Operation Excellence and Sustainability Strategies for Manufacturing and Product Development

Sponsor: PepsiCo

2010-Oct-28

 

11:00 GMT-04:00/AST/EDT

Achieve Organizational Alignment on Contract Management Your Bottom Line Will Thank You

Sponsor: Ariba

2010-Oct-29

 

12:00 GMT-04:00/AST/EDT

Leveraging Africa & Middle East

Sponsor: Global Services Media

They are all readily searchable from the comprehensive Site-Search page.