Category Archives: Corporate

Advanced Sourcing Strategies Webinar

Procuri’s Supply Strategy #3 Webinar:

Advanced Sourcing Strategies: Expanding Sourcing Success

February 15, 2007: 11:30 am to 12:30 pm EST

 

Strategic sourcing provides the greatest and most direct lever for controlling costs and managing performance across the supply chain. With globalization and outsourcing on the rise and supply markets tightening, strategic sourcing has become a must-have competency for enterprises of all sizes and industries.

Many enterprises have tested Web-based negotiation technologies, such as reverse auction and e-RFx tools, reporting double-digit cost savings, halving sourcing cycles, and improving overall productivity and process standardization.

However, many early approaches and solutions were too feature-narrow and price-focused to drive sustained results. As a result, supply management groups are looking to build upon their success by adopting advanced sourcing approaches and broader e-sourcing suites.

What you’ll learn

  • How to move beyond the early stages of strategic sourcing to drive sustained results
  • Advanced sourcing strategies to assess true total cost and optimal award scenarios
  • How to assess and select the right e-sourcing platform for your organization
  • How to drive rapid deployment, quick results, and broad adoption with your sourcing program
  • Leverage supply market intelligence and services to improve and sustain momentum

 

Emptoris Update

Unfortunately, Emptoris (acquired by IBM, sunset in 2017) was not among the companies I was able to meet with during my whirlwind tour of Boston, but that didn’t stop me from trying to find out why they were all so busy. Apparently, those days were filled with meetings and company events to kick off the new year.

The official report I was able to solicit went something along the lines of the following.

The week culminated with a company wide meeting and post-holiday party where Emptoris essentially gave their employees a company update and a cause to celebrate. The major bullet points were:

  • Last year was Emptoris’ best year ever, with each quarter booking more sales and revenue than the quarter before.
  • Emptoris had more deals than Ariba.
  • Emptoris has succeeding in swiping at least one marquee Ariba customer.
  • Emptoris webinars are in hot demand … with their upcoming webinar already clocking in at over three thousand registrants.
  • Their consulting group and India operations are increasing rapidly to support demand.
  • Key verticals for Emptoris are financial services, CPG, and pharmaceutical.
  • A number of significant product enhancements are planned for the week ahead.

However, I’m sure the unofficial transcript of what transpired really was more in line with the following.

Early in the week:

Pinky: Gee, Brain, what are we going to do this year?
Brain: The same thing we do every year, try to take over the (sourcing) world!
Pinky: Narf! Zort! How are we going to do that Brain?
Brain: As you know, people in today’s dollar-driven economy are obsessed with anything that they think will fatten their own paychecks. My plan is to promise everyone who buys our system shares in our new sourcing savings investment plan which is funded by 10% of all of our sales. The sourcing savings investment fund will use our new real-time optimization technology to quickly buy and sell volatile shares at the lead end of the spikes, before everyone else decides to cash out, and aggregate value through the sheer volume of trades. This plan should net us billions before everyone else figures out that accelerated buying and selling short can make you billions and everyone else starts doing it and our algorithm fails miserably and we lose it all – but it won’t matter, because by then everyone will be using our software and we’ll rule the sourcing world!!!
Pinky: And how are we going to convince the employees this is a good plan?
Brain: You mean my loyal subjects that already address me as “Your Highness”? That’s easy, we just tell them all that they get a cut of the investment plan at the end of every quarter based on sales volume.
Pinky: That sounds fantastic Brain! Poit!
Brain: Yes, and failing that, I just filled my brand new playbook with backup plans that are sure to work if this one doesn’t work as spectacularly as I planned!

Next Level Purchasing’s Annual Purchasing Survey

Next Level Purchasing’s (now the NLPA, part of Certitrek) Annual Purchasing Survey is now available. Sourcing and Procurement professionals who complete the survey will receive Strategic Sourcing Questions & Answers, a document that answers questions about the most common issues related to implementing a strategic sourcing initiative, from how to build a cross-functional sourcing team to what some of the pitfalls of strategic sourcing are, as well as a $5 (US) discount voucher towards enrollment in the online mini-course “Negotiation No-No’s'”.

Do you need a Chief Strategy Management Officer?

Perusing the CFO Research Services site, I came across the “Corporate Performance Management: How Committed Leaders Drive Results” Report, consisting of conclusions papers from the CFO executive conference held earlier this year in New York, New York.

The second mini-paper in the report was Aligning the finance function to strategy execution based on a presentation by Robert Kaplan, co-developer of the balanced scorecard and a Professor at Harvard Business School. In this presentation, Robert Kaplan discussed various approaches for aligning the finance function more strategically with the goals of business units and corporate leaders, including:

  • the use of balanced scorecards as a shared framework to run the business, guide the operating agenda, and evaluate progress against strategy;
  • the use of activity-based budgeting to link the strategic planning capability of Balanced Scorecards with the operational budgeting mechanism of a time-driven ABC (activity-based costing) model; and
  • Establishing a new Office of Strategy Management to help execute strategy more effectively.

These are all fantastic recommendations, after all, scorecarding is something I recommend you use in your sourcing organization as it is one of the few mechanisms for addressing operations as a whole, activity-based budgeting makes more sense to me than silo-based budgeting since most activities today cut across traditional organizational boundaries, and the key to the development of a first-class supply chain is a good strategy.

My question is whether or not you really need an Office of Strategy Management and a Chief Strategy Management Officer. I whole-heartedly agree on the paramount importance of good business strategy and the need to elevate strategy at the senior executive level, definately agree that you should have a strategy team, and see the importance of good execution and communication of strategy throughout the organization, but am curious as to why this function cannot be appropriately handled by the CEO, CFO, COO, CPO, and CCO. (Chief Executive Officer, Chief Finance Officer, Chief Operations Officer, Chief Procurement Officer, and Chief Communications Officer.)

According to the mini-paper, Kaplan advocates the adoption of a new two-to-six person Office of Strategy Management to be led by a Chief Strategy Management Officer (CSMO). This CSMO would ideally report to the CEO or COO but could also report to the CFO, especially at companies where the planning chief already reports to the CFO. The CSMO’s job would be to formulate and communicate strategy and to oversee its execution. He would help breach silos by coordinating strategy across functions. He would make sure that all business and support groups were aligned with the enterprise strategy and that strategy remained a high management and board priority.

I don’t know about you, but this sounds like a CPO role description to me. After all, with procurement about to become the center of tomorrow’s organization (as per my e-Sourcing Forum [WayBackMachine] Purchasing Innovation series, including my post on “Sourcing the New Organization”), it is going to be the CPO’s job to breach silos, align business groups, and lead strategic initiatives on a daily basis. Thus, I believe that strategy should be led by the CPO, with appropriate input and support from the rest of the CXO team, especially the CCO who will need to help communicate the corporate strategies to the rest of the organization.

But the role of executive leadership is critical to sustain the focus in people’s busy lives, Robert Kaplan is not just any bloke, I was not fortunate enought to attend the talk and had to settle for the summary, and this topic certainly deserves some very deep thought. Strategy is critical. Maybe you need a separate unit and a new CXO, maybe the CPO can handle it appropriately backed by the rest of the executive team, and maybe you need a strategy coordinator that reports to the COO or CPO. It’s a tough question. Anyone have any additional thoughts or comments on the matter? Any fellow bloggers want to chime in?

Are you getting what you’re worth?

Tim Minahan of Supply Excellence [WayBackMachine] offered us a great post on “How to Assess Your Net Worth” back in June IF you were a purchaser in the US, leaving Canadian purchasers out in the cold. Fear not, as reported in this month’s Frasers/PMAC NewsLetter, the 2006 Purchasing b2b/PMAC Salary survey was recently released and here’s what the numbers say.

On average, supply chain practitioners are receiving a salary of $66,357, up 4.2% from last year; male purchasers are still earning 17% more than their female counterparts, $70,089 vs $60,119; and Alberta is the best place to be with an average salary of $75,418. Furthermore, the most lucrative industry is retail and wholesale trade, where purchasers pulled in an average of $81,092, followed closely by natural resources at $80,709.

Here are the average salaries, by job title, for the last three years.

Title 2006 2005 2004
VP Dir Net $90,700 $84,250 $78,158
VP Dir Purch $87,118 $80,068 $75,182
VP Supply Mgmt $104,000 $99,000 $84,000
Chf. Dir Supply Mgmnt $96,750 $91,000 $84,500
Dir Mtrls Mgmnt $85,000 $79,000 $76,000
Mtrls Mgr $88,778 $91,967 $85,328
Purch Mgr $71,465 $66,728 $62,108
Purch Agent $52,218 $48,428 $45,415
Sr Buyer $58,779 $56,583 $54,951
Other Buyer $48,617 $46,800 $44,718
Other $66,162 $66,600 $65,215

The full report is available. How do we stack up to the US, the average buyer makes more $66 vs. $62 (adjusted to Canadian based on the average of the ISM and Purchasing Magazine surveys), the average Director makes less $91 vs. $120, and the average VP makes significantly less $94 vs. $160. This is bad news for Canada, already number two in the world in the talent crunch with 76 million baby boomers in the US eligible for retirement in the next five years, since you know the US compensation for supply chain leaders is only going to increase, making it even more unattractive for those leaders to stay in Canada when south of the border starts paying not 33% to 70% more, but 50% to 100% more.

The only thing on a Canadian company’s side right now is that it’s more profitable for a purchaser to start his or her career and gain valuable experience in Canada. So my message to corporate leaders is this: make an effort to slowly increase your pay scales to match US rates for senior professionals and keep our talent here – and over the next decade we can show the US how efficient operations are done Canadian style.