Monthly Archives: November 2009

Overcoming Cultural Differences in International Trade with Japan

Today’s post, which is partially based on materials from Dick Locke’s seminars on International Purchasing, is edited by Dick Locke, Sourcing Innovation contributor and President of Global Procurement Group and Global Supply Training.

This post is going to examine some of the cultural differences that you may encounter (as an American or Canadian Sourcing / Procurement Professional) if you are doing business with Japan. We start by discussing each of the eight key cultural considerations outlined in our introductory post and then highlight a few other points that you should be aware of.

As per our initial post, this discussion is high-level and general in nature and, as Dick Locke points out in his classic text on Global Supply Management, while it is too easy to stereotype a country, individuals in each country will vary from the stereotype. You need to take time to get to know the people you will be dealing with because their behavior may be nothing like the usual behavior of the country in which they reside and there is always a chance that you might run into people who are trained to act like you … while in your presence.

The first thing you need to know is that culturally, the Japanese are very different from anyone else. They were historically isolated, crowded by geography, and their language is pretty much its own language group, despite the fact that they have three alphabets (kanji, hiragana, and katakana). Furthermore, the beginning of Tokogawa rule in 1603 marked the beginning of 250 years of almost complete isolation, until 1853 when Commodore Matthew Perry arrived.

  • Power Distance
    In a word, moderate. There is a defined hierarchy, and no decision can be made with approval from the top, but those approvals generally aren’t made until a consensus decision has been reached at the lower levels of the organization and pushed up to the top for approval. You see, in Japan, your Japanese counterparts represent their company, which is part of their group, which represents Japan, which is represented by their companies … and it is all part of a very complicated social structure that, to be frank, the Japanese do not expect anyone who isn’t from Japan (from birth) to understand. However, their hierarchical structure insists on exaggerated respect for the senior negotiator, and they expect you to give your senior negotiator the same level of deference.
  • Uncertainty Avoidance
    In a nutshell, very high. The Japanese don’t like uncertainty.
  • Individualism
    Despite the apparently strong need for the younger generation in the big cities like Tokyo and Osaka to display their individuality through dress, electronic gadgets, and a very distinct (night) life (style), individualism in Japan is low compared to most countries in the world. The Japanese social structure is to encourage you to be (mutually) dependent on those around you from birth, and that carries over into the younger generation who, despite their apparent pursuit of individuality, always belong to a group of like-minded individuals as well as their family.
  • Polychronic vs. Monochronic Time
    From a business perspective, both apply. The Japanese are punctual to a tee, and you can set your watch by their trains, and even though they will always keep to a meeting schedule, they will hardly ever commit to a “we need a decision by …” request. They have a strong belief that you should always take whatever time is needed to get it right, and that solidarity in agreement is a must. Negotiations will be finished when they are finished, not before.
  • Personal / Impersonal
    Generally speaking, the Japanese are a very shy and private people who are uneasy around foreigners. They are often thought to be a very serious people as well because smiles can be few and far between, but you have to remember that, to the Japanese, Happiness hides behind a straight face. However, in business, the rules change, and they can be very aggressive. Also, possibly due to their generally lower tolerance for alcohol, and the fact that alcohol serves as a release valve for pressure in their society, they can be very loud and boisterous in business-related social functions, at least amongst other Japanese or those who have been accepted into uchi where the workplace group is concerned. (This will not happen quickly, or easily, if it even happens at all. You will need to appropriate their culture, language and social hierarchy as well as they believe any non-Japanese person can to even have a chance.)
  • Buyer / Seller Rank
    In Japan, the buyer always outranks the seller. That being said, they will only do business with you if you respect their strict rules on social and business conduct. (If you do not, they will politely end the negotiations, and you will never hear from them again.) Also, the Japanese do have a propensity for entering into business relationships that require mutual obligations. It’s not like guanxi in China, where you will get a generous “gift” in exchange for a future favor, but you will be expected to fully hold up your end of the bargain if you ever want to do business with them, or any company in their group, again.
  • Importance of Harmony
    Harmony is a fundamental foundation of their web society which is based on a great interdependence among all members of a group and an abundance of moral and social obligations, both vertically and horizontally. The only other country where harmony is as important is China. In Japan, meetings are not about decisions, information gathering, or even understanding … they are about creating harmony between two groups.
  • Importance of Face
    The importance of face is also extremely high and a part of their social fabric. It is so vital that everyone’s face must be protected at all costs that they have developed a very ambiguous language based largely on impersonal verbs that allow for multiple interpretations of a sentence and make it very difficult to understand who is being referred to. Their natural speech patterns enhance politeness while increasing vagueness … and allow anyone to be absolved of possible blame, which allows everyone to save face. Thus, you must never assign blame (especially to them) or hurt their feelings if you want the negotiations to go well.

The Japanese find face-to-face negotiations with foreigners difficult. They generally negotiate in teams where each member has a different speciality and reason for being there. They are primarily there to gather information to bring back to head office and to build harmony between two potential business partners. You need to observe protocol, be patient, and avoid bluntness in this process, or they may suddenly, albeit very politely, break off negotiations. Also, many of the decisions and agreements, especially on points, will occur during social interaction between meetings. When invited, you will need to take part in these interactions if you want to build harmony and move the process forward.

Finally, as I strongly recommended in my first post, if you plan to start doing business with any new international country, including Japan, you should do a thorough job on your homework. You can start with:

  • Dick Locke’s course on the Basics of Smart International Procurement (which is offered through Next Level Purchasing and counts towards the SPSM2 certification or ISM Continuing Education Hours), or
  • a customized seminar from Dick Locke’s Global Procurement Group. Dick Locke and his associates each have decades of experience doing business with over two dozen countries, including the fifteen biggest importers and exporters to and from the United States, and Japan. A single day with an expert like Dick Locke could save you months of headaches.

Again, a big thank you to Dick Locke for serving as editor for this special series of posts and providing some up-to-date materials and information for the purpose of this series.

Share This on Linked In

Webinar Wackiness: Webinars This Week from the #1 Supply Chain Resource Site

The Sourcing Innovation Resource Site, always immediately accessible from the link under the “Free Resources” section of the sidebar, continues to add new content on a weekly, and often daily, basis — and it will continue to do so.

The following is a not-so-short selection of over 30 webinars THIS WEEK that might interest you:

Date & Time Webcast
2009-Nov-16
14:00 GMT-05:00/CDT/EST
Overcoming Selection, Prioritization, and Decision Making Challenges
Sponsor: Decision Lens
2009-Nov-17
14:00 GMT/WET
Unlock your Travel & Entertainment Expense Management Savings by Automating and Streamlining Processes in your Shared Services
Sponsor: Shared Services Outsourcing Network
2009-Nov-17
16:00 GMT-05:00/CDT/EST
Retail Cross-Channel Consortium Findings
Sponsor: Sterling Commerce
2009-Nov-17
11:00 GMT-05:00/CDT/EST
Contingent Labor: Agility and Savings
Sponsor: Ariba
2009-Nov-17
14:00 GMT-05:00/CDT/EST
Future of Manufacturing Study, Insights and Warnings: A Roundtable of Industry Experts Weigh In
Sponsor: Industry Week
2009-Nov-17
11:00 GMT-08:00/AKDT/PST
Getting the Most from Your Sourcing and Procurement Technologies
Sponsor: SIG
2009-Nov-17
12:00 GMT-05:00/CDT/EST
Exploring the Financial Services Institutions Market in Brazil
Sponsor: IDC
2009-Nov-17
10:00 GMT-07:00/MST/PDT
7 Tips for A Successful eProcurement Implementation
Sponsor: Ketera
2009-Nov-17
11:00 GMT-04:00/AST/EDT
Mining Emotion from Data
Sponsor: Endeca
2009-Nov-17
16:00 GMT/WET
Governing Your Outsourcing Portfolio: Are You Achieving Maximum Value
Sponsor: EquaTerra
2009-Nov-17
14:00 GMT-05:00/CDT/EST
CarbonFree Business Program Webinar
Sponsor: Responsible Purchasing Network
2009-Nov-17
8:00 GMT-08:00/AKDT/PST
Improve Your Warehouse, Shipping & Inventory Operations
Sponsor: Solarsoft
2009-Nov-18
10:00 GMT-05:00/CDT/EST
Technology Trends You Can’t Afford to Ignore
Sponsor: Gartner
2009-Nov-18
8:00 GMT-05:00/CDT/EST
Hardball Negotiation Tactics
Sponsor: Gartner
2009-Nov-18
9:00 GMT-05:00/CDT/EST
Social Software, Think Big, Start Small, Move Fast
Sponsor: Gartner
2009-Nov-18
11:00 GMT-05:00/CDT/EST
Preparing for Challenges in Global Telecommunications Markets in 2010
Sponsor: IHS Global Insight
2009-Nov-18
15:00 GMT-05:00/CDT/EST
CPSIA Compliance: Certificate Network Exchange
Sponsor: Rollstream
2009-Nov-18
10:00 GMT-08:00/AKDT/PST
Environmental Regulation Update
Sponsor: Design Chain Assocaites
2009-Nov-18
13:00 GMT-05:00/CDT/EST
What do CVS, Nationwide, and Lufthansa have in common?
Sponsor: Terradata
2009-Nov-19
14:00 GMT-04:00/AST/EDT
Leadership In Tough Times: Best Practices For Today’s Challenges
Sponsor: Chief Executive
2009-Nov-19
14:00 GMT-05:00/CDT/EST
GDM Introduces New Web-Based Customs Auditing System
Sponsor: GDM
2009-Nov-19
11:00 GMT-05:00/CDT/EST
Develop and Manufacture Anywhere To Reach Global Markets and Optimize Product Supply Networks
Sponsor: AMR
2009-Nov-19
11:00 GMT-08:00/AKDT/PST
Generate Working Capital
Sponsor: Receivables Exchange
2009-Nov-19
11:00 GMT-05:00/CDT/EST
Best Practices to Implement Sustainability and Energy Reduction Within the Four Walls of your Plant
Sponsor: Infor
2009-Nov-19
11:00 GMT-05:00/CDT/EST
Procure to Pay Benchmarking and Best Practices
Sponsor: Ariba
2009-Nov-19
13:00 GMT-05:00/CDT/EST
IDC Energy Insights’ Outlook – Distributed and Renewable Energy
Sponsor: IDC
2009-Nov-19
14:00 GMT-05:00/CDT/EST
Work Your Working Capital: Cash Management Survival Tactics for Your Company’s Financial Resiliency
Sponsor: Bottom Line
2009-Nov-19
13:00 GMT-05:00/CDT/EST
Increase Efficiencies and Reduce Costs with Business Integration
Sponsor: Hubspan
2009-Nov-19
11:00 GMT-05:00/CDT/EST
SRM Success or Failure. Do You Have the Right Supplier Collaboration Strategy?
Sponsor: Hubwoo
2009-Nov-19
14:00 GMT-05:00/CDT/EST
Open the Window to Your Company Spending
Sponsor: Expense Watch
2009-Nov-19
14:00 GMT-05:00/CDT/EST
Office Electronics and Computers Purchasing Guide Updates
Sponsor: Responsible Purchasing Network
2009-Nov-19
8:30 GMT-05:00/CDT/EST
Build Better Customer Relationships
Sponsor: Solarsoft

They are all readily searchable from the comprehensive Site-Search page. So don’t forget to review the resource site on a weekly basis. You just might find what you didn’t even know you were looking for!

And continue to keep a sharp eye out for new additions!

David Clevenger on “Line-Item Outsourcing”

Today’s post is from David Clevenger, Vice President of Corporate United.

Having spent most of my professional life in the supply chain field, I have become a fairly outspoken proponent of outsourcing. My commitment to these ideas are based not in the cost saving potential of these arrangements, but rather in what I have always perceived as the value of having someone else invest in competencies not relevant to one’s direct business.

A recent post by the doctor (Why Are You Paying PR Firms to Develop Your Marketing Plans?) led me to leave a comment on his site regarding what I felt were misguided views on strategic outsourcing. In turn, the good doctor has asked me to expound upon my own thoughts in a guest post; an act that has led me to question my own sensibilities.

In sitting down and really thinking through whether outsourcing strategic relationships is a viable path for any business, I have been forced to consider whether or not recommendations I have made to clients for more than a decade have been as sound as I once thought them to be. In considering these interactions, I am reminded of what drives so many organizations in the direction of outsourced solutions: cost savings.

I have long felt, and continue to feel, that outsourced arrangements initiated with the primary objective of cost savings are destined to fail. Instead, it is important to investigate the more relevant cases for identifying a third party to replace in-house resources.

  • Competency: In short, the presumption here is that a specialist in a given field will have greater focus on a given area than a member of an organization for whom the function is not a core competency. This is not to say that the employees of companies assigned to roles in IT and HR are not competent in their field, rather that their organizations are not as focused on those functions as IBM and Hewitt, respectively.
  • Investment: Because human resources is not the core competency of, say, a manufacturing organization, it makes incrementally less sense for that company to invest in the best people and tools for that function. Instead, the manufacturer is wise to invest their resources in advanced production techniques or distribution models.
  • Relevance: An important question to ask when considering an outsourced arrangement is whether or not your customers care. Think of it from a consumer’s perspective; when you are shopping at The Gap does it matter to you that their data centers are managed by IBM or CSC? Identifying what’s relevant to your customers is a good litmus test for deciding whether or not something belongs inside your walls.

Once a company has reached the conclusion that a given function lends itself to outsourcing, and that an appropriate business case can be established, the difficulty begins.

The challenge outlined in the original post is a common one, i.e., what should this provider do?

The example cited in the original post delineated the responsibilities of a public relations firm, specifically between developing a communication and managing communications. In that post it was argued that an outsourced provider was less qualified to do the former and better suited to the latter.

While I may have taken exception to the specific tack taken in that example, there are two excellent questions raised as a result of the discussion:

1. When is an indirect function strategic?

Another common error associated with outsourcing is painting all activities related to a specific function with a broad brush. Let’s use legal services as an example. Activities like immigration law are relatively commoditized and non-strategic, and other specialties like contract, labor, and product liability law have been mastered by niche firms; general counsel is a different animal altogether. This is a role that most [large] companies will absolutely want to have in-house because an intimate level of familiarity with the business is key to their ability to serve effectively in their role. This role may include the identification of outsourced partners to represent the company, but is probably too strategic to outsource.

2. When are elements of a function not appropriate for outsourcing?

The mere fact that an outsourced provider can accommodate a “soup-to-nuts” solution, doesn’t mean that you have to take them up on it. While, as I mentioned, I support outsourcing in many forms, the question of competency must be raised in dissecting the ability of the outsourcers themselves.

The answer to these two questions result in a solution that I call “line-item outsourcing”. This is the practice of selectively outsourcing the pieces of a function that are non-strategic, while maintaining control over those things not done effectively by the outsourced provider. While this practice can be applied across functions, let’s use facilities management as an example. Facility managers are responsible for an enormous amount of activity ranging from financial issues around leasing and capital management, to the oversight of hundreds of vendors performing functions as disparate pest control and elevator maintenance. For nearly every company in the world, performing these tasks does not represent a core competency, and further represents a major administrative burden. As a result, organizations like CB Richard Ellis, Jones Lang LaSalle, Cushman & Wakefield and others have thrived.

These organizations are without peer when it comes to property management, development and operations. As a result, many companies are content in allowing them to take over these and all related functions; but what about buying? Under this outsourced management umbrella there are contracts for janitorial services, HVAC maintenance, security monitoring, food services, landscaping, lot sweeping, snow removal and literally dozens of other functions. Being highly competent at managing properties does not make these providers equally capable of sourcing great contracts for these services.

By taking a “line-item” approach to outsourcing, companies can optimize these relationships by (i) outsourcing only the parts of the functions that can be done more efficiently and effectively by another provider and (ii) maintaining responsibility for the elements of those functions at which the outsourced provider does not excel.

Ultimately, the responsibility to make outsourced relationships blossom falls back on the customer. As a general rule, it’s not in your best interests to employ a call center in India if you have no intentions of getting on a plane once in a while to ensure that it’s being appropriately managed. Furthermore, don’t outsource complete functions when the strategic components of that function should be kept in house. Finally, do not presume to think outsourced providers are any more universally capable than your own organization…no matter the bill of goods they are attempting to sell.

Outsourcing can be a positively game-changing approach for any business, but not unless it’s taken up with the care and vision that decisions of this magnitude warrant.

Thanks, David.

Share This on Linked In

Time to Start Preparing for the Next Recession

Wow! This recession isn’t over yet and CNN Money is already telling us to prepare for the next recession! Considering that boom-and-bust cycles have been happening faster and faster, it’s good advice, but it’s still a bit of a downer. I agree with Moore (in the contained video interview) that a new economic order is likely needed, but it’s not going to happen any time soon, so we have to optimize against what we have.

So how do you prepare for the next recession? The article offers three primary pieces of advice:

  • Make friends now with people you’ll need later.
    For example, if the government gives you a chance to sit on task forces, send executives, not functionaries. It doesn’t look good when the CEO only shows up to lobby officials on a potential tax or regulatory change that would benefit his or her company.
  • Listen to unconventional wisdom.
    No one wanted to listen to Jeremy Grantham when he said that real estate and asset prices had become insane. He’s still working when many fund managers aren’t.
  • Don’t go soft on evaluations.
    The best companies, like P&G, are as rigorous in evaluations in good times and bad. That’s why they never find themselves with a roster of C players when the downturn hits.

It’s all great advice, and I’d heed it because you’ll do even better than your peers during the recovery if you do.

Share This on Linked In

How to Insure Your Employees (Re)Connect with the Business

A recent article in Industry Week presented “ten tips from Watson Wyatt that were designed to help you help your employees reconnect with the business” in these troubled times. They weren’t bad, and are definitely worth a review (if you add a little flair). In the doctor‘s words, they are:

  1. Ditch the Dotted Lines
    The organizational structure should be crystal clear. Every employee should understand their role and how they contribute to organizational success.
  2. Cut the Crap
    Be honest about the situation. You might think otherwise, but an average employee can smell B.S. a mile away.
  3. Lead-line the Golden Parachutes
    Make sure executive compensation is in alignment and dependent upon the executives driving value to the business. Remember, while few people will have a problem with a 2M bonus to a CEO who increases profits by 20M (as long as all the contributors are justly rewarded as well), you can bet no one will agree with a 2M bonus to a CEO that led the business to a 20M loss.
  4. Sink Signature-based Sales Commissions
    A salesperson shouldn’t get a 1M cheque for signing a 10M contract. They should get the 1M cheque for delivering 10M of profitable revenue to the business. This means that they should be selling software and services aligned with the business and making sure that the customer stays happy and actually pays the business the 10M. Considered structured plans that give, say, 25% each time a revenue target is realized (such as first payment, second payment, etc. or every quarter the customer remains).
  5. Pitch Performance Penalties
    Review performance management and make sure you’re focussing on measures that contribute to success. For example, number of calls per day and number of bugs fixed are NOT good measures. The first entices customer service reps to get the customer off the phone as soon as possible, which leads to repeat calls when the problem doesn’t get resolved, and the second entices programmers to put easily fixable bugs in their code.
  6. Weed out the Weak
    Make sure you focus on the key talent that contributes to your organizational success and that the Wallys are the first to go when cuts are made.
  7. Trash the Touchy-Feely Awards
    You should only be rewarding exceptional performance, not the norm. Otherwise, what incentive does anyone have to truly excel? (Personally, I hate this “everyone should get a reward” crap that has infiltrated our society in recent years. It’s inspiring a culture of lazy lolly-gaggers. While it would be nice if everyone was capable, you should have to work for it!)
  8. Pitch the Proctologist
    The reports he finds with his flashlight are rubbish. Get a real data analysis system and base decisions on facts and analysis, not on gut-feel and emotion.
  9. Discard the Dunce-Hat
    If anyone needs it, they shouldn’t be working for you. Instead, make sure you understand where the critical roles and skills are and do what you can to support them.
  10. Abdicate the “Me-Too” Attitude
    A business needs leaders, not followers. Who cares what your golf-buddies are doing. You need to figure out where you business needs to go, how you’re going to get it there, and lead your employees out of the dark and into the light.

Share This on Linked In