Today’s guest post is from John Shaw (Senior Director, Adoption Services) of BravoSolution, a leading provider of spend analysis, (e-)sourcing, supplier performance management (SPM) and healthcare sourcing solutions and a sponsor of Sourcing Innovation (SI). It is the fourth of an eight (8) part series, which, when complete, will form a white-paper that BravoSolution will be releasing to the general populace next Wednesday.

Yesterday’s post (Part III) discussed the concept of adoption from 30,000 feet and how this typical view is both useful and useless from an adoption perspective. While it is usually directionally accurate and good for identifying low-hanging fruit, it typically does not indicate if supplier value is increasing, transparency is improving, or efficiency intensifying. For that, more visibility is needed.

Today’s post will provide an example to illustrate this claim.

Company A: Measuring Supplier Value

So let’s go deeper into the challenges of each of our example companies. Company A is a global manufacturer who has been using their e-Sourcing tool for some time. At the 30,000-foot view the project appears to be progressing nicely. However, a key question that is important to Company A remains unanswered: “Are users using the system in a way that helps them to maximize supplier value?”

In order to answer this question, we must first understand what system behaviours drive supplier value. If we start simply, we can conclude that an event should have some basic characteristics:

• Supplier Participation:
  
  Maximizing qualified suppliers generally increases award quality.
• Event Structure:
  
  Well structured events facilitate a better understanding of supplier capabilities.
• Spend Value:
  
  Managing greater volumes of spend increases potential event value.

Next, we create simple measures at the User and Category level. This becomes our 10,000-foot view. We are drilling deeper into the current situation and finding our next layer of adoption improvement opportunities.

Using this level of data we can now begin to look deeper into understanding how system activity is correlating to our business objectives.

By creating a few simple metrics for each of our basic event characteristics we can see the symptoms of poor adoption emerge.

These patterns become a roadmap of improvement activities for the Adoption Team to explore. Notice on the chart below that Adoption Team activities typically start with an interview and continually ask more questions!

Part V will discuss the importance of understanding the category impact and its implications for the transition to high definition adoption measurement.

Today’s guest post is from John Shaw (Senior Director, Adoption Services) of BravoSolution, a leading provider of spend analysis, (e-)sourcing, supplier performance management (SPM) and healthcare sourcing solutions and a sponsor of Sourcing Innovation (SI). It is the third of an eight (8) part series, which, when complete, will form a white-paper that BravoSolution will be releasing to the general populace next Wednesday.

Yesterday’s post (Part II) introduced us to High Definition Adoption Measurement (HDAM) and framed the solution in the context of e-Sourcing, which presents a common complex adoption challenge.

Today’s post addresses the typical view from 30,000 feet and how it leaves something to be desired.

Adoption from 30,000 Feet:

The report below highlights what appears to be a very successful Go-Live followed by a year of continual growth of system usage. This is the 30,000-foot view and it should answer some very fundamental questions like:

• “Have we trained everyone?“
• “How many of our Souring Events are going through the system?“
• “Is usage increasing according to plan?“

These 30,000-foot views are useful. The report could apply to any of our three (3) companies and might be presented at an executive level as evidence of a successful first year of rollout. In this example, it seems our companies are generally moving in the right direction. If we saw problems at this level, we could easily identify the low hanging adoption fruit to pursue.

But if we reflect back upon the business case of each of our example companies, this view does not really tell us much on how any of them are progressing in increasing supplier value, maintaining transparency or increasing efficiency.

Take the following “unknown issues” common in e-Sourcing organizations. Each issue is counter-productive to the organization’s goals, but is not evident on the report:

These examples are the tip of the iceberg. They illustrate how users can appear at a 30,000-foot level to be using a system correctly but also how that 30,000-foot view can be deceptive. When this occurs to your organization, the results are simple. Your organization isn’t realizing the full ROI that you set out to achieve and the Adoption Team doesn’t have visibility into the problems they need to fix.

Part IV will provide an example case study that describes some of the adoption challenges at a global manufacturer.

Today’s guest post is from John Shaw (Senior Director, Adoption Services) of BravoSolution, a leading provider of spend analysis, (e-)sourcing, supplier performance management (SPM) and healthcare sourcing solutions and a sponsor of Sourcing Innovation (SI). It is the second of an eight (8) part series, which, when complete, will form a white-paper that BravoSolution will be releasing to the general populace next Wednesday.

Yesterday’s post (Part I), which noted that rolling out a technology solution isn’t anything like building the “Field of Dreams“, pointed out that just giving the team the tools they need isn’t enough. The leadership team also needs to acquire a set of tools designed to help their team succeed. In short, they need an “adoption toolkit” to make sure the tools are adopted as standard operating procedure.

Today’s post will introduce the concept of High Definition Adoption Measurement (HDAM), but first, it will frame the problem.

E-Sourcing: A commonly complex adoption challenge

For the purposes of this paper, we’ll discuss Adoption Measurement in the context of e-Sourcing simply because so many organizations use an e-sourcing tool to varying levels of success. It serves as an easy-to-identify-with example. Interestingly, the adoption challenges inherent in e-sourcing can be quite complex. We hope this paper will challenge you take an in-depth look at how you apply adoption measurement in your organization, both for e-sourcing and other solutions you use to support your business.

What is High Definition Adoption Measurement?

High Definition Adoption Measurement is a catchy way of saying that we are going to measure and understand how your organization is using a solution. It is a process of understanding your business case and tailoring a set of standard measurements to create visibility into how well the behaviours of your people are supporting your organization’s goals. It includes sharing these metrics with your team, setting collaborative targets and working towards those targets.
Adoption Measurement serves as the basis for prioritizing opportunities for continual improvement and defining solutions for capitalizing upon those opportunities. It essence, it is the Opportunity Assessment and Wave Planning processes of the Adoption Professional!

Setting the Stage: Understand the Business Case

The first step in measuring adoption is to understand why a particular tool is being implemented by an organization. While this may seem both obvious and easy for something like an e-Sourcing tool, I can assure you that one business case does not fit all organizations, no matter how well the benefits of e-Sourcing have been documented. For our discussion, we will highlight 3 organizations that have been modelled after common customer profiles in BravoSolution’s customer base.

Observe that each of these organizations is trying to solve a different problem with the same e-sourcing tool. Although they all may be able to benefit from using e-Sourcing to achieve additional supplier value, increase transparency to the sourcing process and increase team efficiency, they each have their own focus areas.

Part III will describe the typical view of adoption from 30,000 feet and the useful- and useless-ness of such a view.

Today’s guest post is from John Shaw (Senior Director, Adoption Services) of BravoSolution, a leading provider of spend analysis, (e-)sourcing, supplier performance management (SPM) and healthcare sourcing solutions and a sponsor of Sourcing Innovation (SI). It is the first of an eight (8) part series, which, when complete, will form a white-paper that BravoSolution will be releasing to the general populace next Wednesday. However, since SI is focussed on delivering educational, innovational, and inquisitive content on a regular basis, BravoSolution has been kind enough to give SI readers a first-look.

So you are a seasoned leader in the rapidly maturing field of strategic sourcing and your leadership team continually challenges you to maximize the value of your team to the organization. You are, of course, resource constrained. Before you lay an open field of opportunities, yet you hold in your hands a limited amount of time, money and people.

And so the work begins! You prioritize the opportunities, build a budget and set about bringing the right mix of people, process and tools forward. As a part of this planning, you invest in giving your people the right set of tools and processes for the job. In the field of Strategic Sourcing this usually means the implementation of solutions to support activities like spend analysis, sourcing execution and contract implementation.

Unfortunately, rolling a spend analysis or e-sourcing tool out across a global organization isn’t anything like building the “Field of Dreams“. Just because you’ve built and shared the solution doesn’t mean the team will use it AND use it correctly. Just as a Sourcing Professional needs the right tools in their toolkit, the leadership team needs a set of tools designed to help their people succeed with the solution and tools they have provided. They need an “adoption toolkit” to make sure the solutions and tools are adopted as standard operating procedure.

The Adoption Toolkit

The most successful adoption programs start at the very beginning of the solution implementation project and are institutionalized into the ongoing operations of a business. In practice, most solution implementations are heavily front-loaded. For a period leading up to the “Go-Live”, organizations invest heavily in solution configuration, communications, training, documentation and process consulting. When the solution goes live, the broader team celebrates, claps each other on the back and leaves the solution’s ultimate success to the solution owner and their super users. We’ll call these individuals left in charge of the solution the Adoption Team.

There are a number of critical tools that should be available to the Adoption Team, but the most important by far are the tools by which they will measure the ongoing adoption of the solution by the organization. Measuring adoption progress against a solution’s business case is the single most important element in understanding where to direct the time and energies of the Adoption Team. Without high quality adoption measurement, an Adoption Team is analogous to a ship at sea without a navigation system; the best and most experienced captains may find their way, but the majority will be left drifting without direction or focus.

Part II will define High Definition Adoption Management (HDAM) and describe it in the context of e-sourcing, a commonly complex adoption challenge.