Category Archives: Best Practices

The Most Important Word In Supplier Relationship Management Is Not What You Think It Is


Today’s guest post is from Joe Payne, Vice President of Professional Services at Source One Management Services, LLC. Joe co-wrote the book on Managing Indirect Spend:
Enhancing Profitability through Strategic Sourcing.

It may be an old story, but it is still an important story in any discussion of Supplier Relationship Management (SRM). According to Business Insider, with about six weeks to go before the launch of the iPhone in 2007, an angry Steve Jobs pulled his senior team into an impromptu meeting on a Monday morning. His plastic-screen’d iPhone prototype was scratched, and he demanded a glass screen be fitted to the iPhone. Specifically, he is quoted as saying “I want a glass screen. And I want it perfect in six weeks“.

If you read the Walter Isaacson biography on Jobs, you can imagine a few other words were in those two sentences. But that is not critical to this story.

Here is the important part. Once Apple and Corning perfected the art of cutting glass so intricately on a massive scale, they had two weeks to get the new glass faces on the phones. Their assembler, Foxconn, woke its employees when the first glass shipments arrived in the middle of the night, and arranged for production to run non-stop.
Not every supplier is going to wake its staff in the middle of the night to cater to your needs, but when you maintain a close relationship with them, and firmly establish the ways in which each party is critical to the other’s success, then the proverbial (and in Apple’s case, actual) doors open. This is the critical takeaway from any talk on Supplier Relationship Management: those in-depth relationships with your suppliers can lead to competitive advantages ranging from moving up in that supplier’s priority list to getting first dibs on their innovative practices and products.

The importance of Supplier Relationship Management is not lost on sourcing professionals and the industry at large, but the most important aspect of SRM seems to have been lost; or if not lost, then effectively drowned out by savvy marketers. A Googling of “Supplier Relationship Management” produces more than eight million results, but the first page is dominated by companies selling SRM software. When I googled, seven of the first page’s organic results, and all of the ad space, are dedicated to software solutions. While “Management” is an important aspect of “Supplier Relationship Management”, and having a clear view of your organization’s entire supplier pool is critical to effectively working with them, the value of SRM comes from the “Relationship” portion. Worded another way, no supplier has ever given a customer exclusive access to a new product because that customer put them in a database!

I should probably stop here to note that SRM software is a great way to manage all of your suppliers, and relatively easy to implement across all of them. Relationship-building, by comparison, is an impractical across-the-board practice returning minimal results for maximized efforts for all suppliers outside those producing critical, hard-to-obtain, or otherwise-important materials for your organization.

That said, “Relationship” is the critical term of SRM when dealing with critical suppliers. Period. Supplier relationship software allows you to track purchases, organize data, and better understanding of your organization’s demand for a supplier’s goods — all of which are tactical, short-term measures. Building relationships, on the other hand, is crucial for your organization’s critical suppliers, as it allows you to talk frankly with them and develop the long-term strategies necessary for mutual success. And it provides critical benefits.

So what are those critical benefits? For starters,

Preferential Access to the Supplier — Much like Apple was able to rouse Foxconn’s employees in the dead of night for glass screens, a thoroughly developed relationship with a supplier can gain your organization preferential access to them. The benefits of a healthy relationship can be leveraged to obtain priority access to product capacity, better pricing, and, depending on the supplier and product or service needed, access to the supplier’s best people.

Supply Chain Stability — With a relationship developed between your organization and a supplier, it is possible to talk frankly about their risks. Weather and disaster vulnerability, political events, logistics concerns — anything that could potentially impact the supply of their products to your organization. Additionally, these discussions allow you to get a better understanding of the supplier’s supply chain and the potential hiccups within it. Most importantly, these discussions provide the foundation for your organization and a critical supplier to jointly develop solutions to potential problems, ensuring that a mutually beneficial solution is reached in the creation of a better understanding between the two organizations.

Input Into Innovation — Another area where Apple capitalizes on its strong supplier relationships is in the joint innovation of new technologies, strategies, or processes. The company routinely puts out the cash to fuel a supplier’s development of an improved or revolutionary product or process in exchange for exclusivity. Recent examples include the company’s lockdown of capacitive touch screens following the iPhone’s launch and their joint development of the highly precise lasers used to perforate the aluminum MacBook frames to allow for hidden status lights. Even if your organization lacks the capital to fund supplier improvements, enhanced relationships can still get your organization input into a supplier’s next product, leading to design changes that can lead to more efficient production, or a lower cost, on your side.

Knowing that a partnership can lead to a reduced total cost of goods through shared responsibility, assistance in the product development process through shared expertise, and long-term stability through the forming of a bond with a customer are key incentives that can persuade reluctant suppliers to come onboard and sweeten the relationship on an ongoing basis.

If your supplier is critical, a deep and mutually beneficial relationship with them is critical too.

Thanks, Joe!

Building and Ground Maintenance Outsourcing: A Maturing Cost Reduction Trend That Requires a Disciplined Approach


Today’s post is from Howard Gutman, a Manager in the Hackett Group’s Strategy and Operations Practice who consults to Fortune 1000 clients in operations improvement, sourcing and procurement, supply chain, and cost optimization. He was previously associated with MMG, KPMG, and PWC PRTM.

Many companies currently have their building and ground maintenance function (e.g. security, janitorial, and HVAC) managed by their own employees and/or a set of local suppliers for individual offices/ manufacturing sites. However, the success of companies such as AT&T and BMW, who have outsourced their building and ground maintenance function to integrated facilities management firms such as Jones Lang LaSalle and ABM, has caused many companies to question whether they should change their approach to the building and ground maintenance (BGM) function. Based on our recent client work, the outsourcing of BGM is an increasingly maturing trend across several industries but it requires a disciplined approach to develop an understanding of a company’s current demand and specifications in order to maximize the overall savings opportunity.

Before a company can consider outsourcing this function, a company should utilize a disciplined approach to understand demand for BGM by collecting the following information:

  1. Number of building sites;
  2. Basic information about each site (e.g., address information, total square footage, building population, number of bathrooms, outdoor square footage);
  3. Total spend for each major building and ground maintenance category by site (e.g. janitorial, HVAC, and environmental services).

Once this basic understanding of a company’s demand is established, a company must work with their operational leads to gather detailed specifications for each of their BGM services (e.g., frequency and requirement for HVAC maintenance at each site). After the development of the demand set and specifications, a company can pursue a strategy of outsourcing this function as the information mentioned above is essential for any RFP process involving integrated facilities management companies.

Two recent clients utilized the above approach to outsource their BGM function but each had initial concerns about outsourcing this function due to business culture and regulatory reasons.

Our first client, a Fortune 500 telecommunications company, liked the operational benefits of moving to a single integrated building provider, which includes centralized reporting and 24-7 support. However, they had concerns about regulatory issues such as maintaining continuous 911 service at rural locations. Through the RFP process, our client discovered that all of its major competitors had moved to an outsourced BGM solution, particularly at their rural locations.

Our second client, in the manufacturing space, had concerns about moving control of building management from their plant managers to an outside building and ground maintenance provider. Through the RFP process, it discovered that many of its competitors had moved to integrated facilities management companies who were deeply experienced in the manufacturing space.

The results of these two projects are projected to result in cost savings of 10% to 12.5% over the next two years along with increased maintenance standards and visibility into building issues through 24/7 online reporting. However, the main benefit for these organizations was that they could better focus on their core business functions, while delivering continuous savings through a disciplined approach for outsourcing BGM that has already been implemented by their peers.

Thanks, Howard for some insight into this often overlooked spend category!

3 Easy Steps to Take Up To 7% Off Of Your Organization’s Bottom Line Costs!

  1. Mandate Organization-Wide Cooperation with Supply Management on all Spend.
  2. Implement an e-Procurement/P2P solution and Mandate that 100% of Your Spend Goes Through the Platform.
  3. Give Supply Management the Talent it Needs to Apply the Appropriate (Advanced) Sourcing Techniques to all Categories.

It’s that simple. Why?

  1. 70% of revenue is spent on non-labour costs
    as per Proxima’s recent “Corporate Virtualization Report”
  2. 100% of spend through a single system gets all 70% of the revenue being spent on non-labour costs under management
  3. (Advanced) Sourcing saves an average of 10% to 12% across-the-board on all spend being addressed (as per back-to-back studies from Aberdeen) and 10% of 70% is 7%!

That says an average 1 Billion organization could add up to 70 Million to its bottom line at the end of a year with a proper focus on Supply Management. Supply Management truly is the organization enabler!

Supply Chain Insights 7 Steps to Failure

A recent Slideshare presentation by Supply Chain Insights (SCI) on 7 Reasons You May Fail in the Race for Supply Chain 2020 had some great insights into what many organizations are doing wrong but, more importantly, cemented the need for the 3Ts, as discussed in SI’s recent post on Supply Chain 2020 – What Will It Take to Get There, if you want you Supply Chain organization to make it to 2020.

According to SCI, these are the 7 reasons your supply chain may fail:

  • You treat your supply chain like a function
    rather than an end-to-end process.
  • You hired a boatload of consultants and spent buckets of money on “best practices”
    that were actually “emerging practices”.
  • Your technologies are more about you than your customers
    even though customer data is more readily available.
  • You are moving like a snail in a fast-paced world
    when you need to be executing in real-time.
  • You are simply not prepared to compete for supply chain talent
    which is the missing link in the supply chain.
  • Your technologies are quickly becoming legacy
    while new technologies are emerging every day.
  • Your supply chain is too reactive
    when it needs to sense and learn.

SCI is right on the money. If your supply chain:

  • lacks talent
  • runs on antiquated technology
  • hasn’t transitioned to new processes in decades
  • only reacts to disruptions, instead of trying to predict & mitigate them
  • doesn’t work with customers and never asks for their data
  • doesn’t focus on solutions instead of the “hot” methodology of the day and
  • doesn’t focus on strategic organizational planning because it’s spending all it’s time executing tactical processes

it’s not going to be around very long.

A supply chain needs to be:

  • driven by talent
  • enabled by technology
  • transitioning to improved processes all the time
  • focussed on risk management and mitigation
  • collaborating with customers and suppliers up and down the chain
  • solution-driven, not “emerging practice” focussed and
  • strategic, not tactical.

And that’s just the start. For more insights into what attributes your supply chain needs to adapt in order to survive the race for Supply Chain 2020, check out SCI’s 7 Reasons You May Fail in the Race for Supply Chain 2020 before your supply chain starts stumbling too (if it hasn’t already).

These Transformations Worked For Samsung. With a Few Tweaks, They Will Work for You Too!

Samsung is not only none of the most successful global electronic brands, but one of the most successful brands period. (And with the surging popularity of Android, and it’s new Galaxy tablet, it’s market share is increasing rapidly in that market – one of the hardest to compete it.) On top of this, it is a supply chain leader, ranked #8 on the Gartner 2013 Supply Chain Top 25. How did they do it? A recent piece over on Supply Chain 24/7 on 7 Best Practices that Transform Samsung Electronics’ Supply Chain by SupplyChainOpz that referenced research by the Harvard Business Review, Supply Chain Management: The International Journal, and the Journal of the Operational Research Society did a great job of identifying the key decisions, and transformations, that helped propel Samsung from a much smaller player in trading, food processing, textiles, insurance, securities and retail to a world leader in electronics and digital technology.

Since they will work for any Supply Chain with a few tweaks, SI is strongly suggesting that you (re-)read SupplyChainOpz 7 Best Practices that Transform Samsung Electronics’ Supply Chain before continuing on to SI’s 7 Transformations that will transform your CPG Supply Chain.

7 Transformations that will Transform Your CPG Supply Chain

  1. Listen to the Voice of the Customer
    Look at the top 10 of the Gartner Supply Chain Top 25. Apple, McDonald’s, Amazon.com, Unilever, Intel, P&G, Cisco, Coca-Cola, and Colgate-Palmolive. Every single one of these companies sells products the customer wants in every market they are in. To better understand the market, Samsung sends senior employees to MBA programs at local universities to help them understand the market and then establishes connections with appropriate leaders and partners in those markets to keep the insights coming in after the executives return to their HQ. While it’s not critical to attend a program in the target market, it is critical to be tapped in. Pay attention to market intelligence, go to trade shows and see what is attracting attention, follow the emerging trends, and consider what an average individual in your target market does in the course of a day and a week.
  2. Setup a Cross Functional Team Composed with the Right Talent
    As a Supply Management practitioner, this is a best practice that should be well ingrained by now as you should be setting one up for every strategic sourcing project. However, there should also be a cross-functional team that guides the over-arching supply chain strategy.
  3. Adopt a Measurable Supply Chain Improvement Methodology
    Samsung adopted Six Sigma and transitioned to DMAEV (Define, Measure, Analyze, Enable, and Verify). There’s also TPS and the Lean Methodology that fell out. The particular improvement methodology is not as critical as the commitment to implementing and executing on it day in and day out.
  4. Transition to Standardized Technology, Processes and Parts
    Samsung standardized parts and processes and produces the majority of its components in Korea to enable them to better monitor and manage product quality. But don’t stop at parts, and production processes, move to planning and management processes and the underlying technology processes. For every function, there should be one system and one version of the truth. Each department can use its own best-of-breed systems if, and only if, there is a central data store that functions as the master data repository that each system works off of and that is always taken as the one version of the truth.
  5. Utilize Advanced Sourcing, CRM, and Production Systems
    An Advanced Planning and Production System is a good start, but lets face it, true efficiencies materialize by getting the sourcing right. Be sure to source all strategic or high-value components using a strategic sourcing process that makes use of spend analysis and decision optimization and other advanced technologies. In addition, be sure to capture all of the sales data and user feedback that you can with good CRM systems. And be sure to make sure that you react to sales forecasts appropriately with your advanced planning and production systems.
  6. Implement Risk Monitoring and Measurement
    The best laid plans are easily and quickly ruined by a single supply chain disruption. Implement an advanced supply chain visibility and monitoring system that monitors your suppliers and their suppliers to detect minor supply hiccups before they become major supply chain disruptions and to make sure you are aware of any significant event (such as an earthquake, border closing, civil uprising, etc.) that could affect your supply chain as soon as it happens.
  7. Focus on Your Talent
    Samsung threw out the seniority-based performance evaluation system and implemented a performance-based system in its place that allows the best and the brightest to have their career fast-tracked. Make sure you have a system that allows talent to advance through your organization if you want to attract, and retain, the talent you need for your supply chain.