Category Archives: Finance

Working Capital Optimization – The Basics

Working Capital Management is a managerial accounting strategy focusing on maintaining efficient levels of both components of working capital, current assets and current liabilities, in respect to each other. Working capital management ensures a company has sufficient cash flow in order to meet its short-term debt obligations and operating expenses. (Source: Investopedia)

Working Capital Optimization is optimizing the balance between assets and liabilities, and, since assets can’t generally be acquired or disposed of on a regular, or quick basis, generally focusses on optimizing the ratio of cash-on-hand (and liquid assets that can be converted into cash-on-hand within 90 days) to liabilities. In practice, most organizations attempt to accomplish this by optimizing receivable collection, inventory cycles, and supplier payment terms. In other words, they try to collect receivables faster, reduce inventory cycles, and extend payment terms.

These are all valid ways to optimize working capital, but if they are not undertaken correctly, supply chain costs will rise. If you force your customer to pay before they can afford to and the customer has to borrow to do so, that’s going to increase their cost to service their customer, and if their customer can’t pay, they are going to come after you for price reductions at contract renewal time, and that’s not good for anyone. If you try to reduce inventory turn-over too aggressively, you will end up doing a lot of expediting or LTL shipments, which will reduce overall acquisition costs in the long run. And if you extend payment terms beyond which your suppliers can afford, at the very least you risk increasing your costs substantially as they will have to borrow at high financing rates and pass that cost onto you and you may even risk their financial solvency.

So how do you optimize each of these areas?

  • Receivables Collection
    Go after slow customers, but focus on those with the most ability to pay first. For public companies, use publicly available financials to figure out who is cash rich. For private companies, use credit rating data, such as that provided by services like D&B.
  • Inventory Cycles
    Optimize inventory (carrying) costs versus logistics costs versus potential loss from stock-outs and determine the optimal inventory cycle for each commodity.
  • Payment Terms Extension
    As per Tuesday’s post, figure out which suppliers can afford payment extensions such that they would suffer no negative impact or where the overall supply chain cost that would be borne by the end consumer is lessened and extend the terms.

PrimeRevenue – Priming Your Financial Supply Chain for Success

PrimeRevenue is a provider of Supply Chain Finance solutions that provides supply chain finance solutions to over 12,000 customers in 40 countries and that processes Billions of dollars of transactions each year. Like other providers of supply chain finance solutions, they provide a platform that helps suppliers access financing for their receivables when they need it. With over 40 leading financial institutions on their platform, it is a platform that every buyer and supplier should consider for their finance needs. But that’s not why we’re covering PrimeRevenue today. We’re covering PrimeRevenue because they go beyond just providing a funding platform to meet your cash needs – they also provide an analysis platform to help you figure out how best to meet your cash needs.

In particular, they provide a solution by the name of SciMap that provides a consolidated and classified analysis of your spend, enriched by insights from PrimeRevenue’s global database, based on detailed and updated market intelligence. This allows you to make better buying decisions as well as negotiate optimized payment terms, putting the power to improve your working capital in your hands.

In particular, this platform provides you information on:

  • average payment time for the commodities you buy,
  • average financing terms for suppliers with similar credit ratings, and
  • average financing terms for companies with a similar credit rating to you.

Based on this you can figure out

  • whether you are paying faster or slower than the market average,
  • what financing your supplier is able to get, and
  • what financing you are able to get

and then you can figure out whether you should be looking to

  • extend or reduce payment terms, depending on whether
  • the supplier can get better financing or
  • you can get better financing.

Then, if it is the case that the supplier can afford to be paid later and paying earlier threatens to increase the overall supply chain cost, then you have a valid reason to negotiate with (or, if necessary, mandate to) the supplier for a later payment, helping it to obtain the lower financing you know it can obtain if necessary.

When it comes to supply chain finance and working capital analysis, the PrimeRevenue SCiMap solution is unique in the supply chain finance space and a solution you should really be looking at if you want to get your supply chain working capital optimized.

You Should Never Pay Your Supplier Late … Unless

paying late is actually the right thing to do.

SI has said since day one that you should never pay a supplier late, and it still believes this, but the reality is that sometimes late is not late. So when is late not late? Simply put, when paying the supplier late hurts the supplier less than it hurts you.

The whole point of paying suppliers on time is to not only keep them financially sound, but to reduce the cost of your end-to-end supply chain. If your supplier depends on your business and needs that cash to buy raw materials, pay its workers, and fund its overhead costs, and it has to wait for that cash, then it has to borrow money to buy those raw materials, pay its workers, and fund its overhead costs. And if it’s cash strapped, chances are it’s not going to get a good rate. Furthermore, if it’s small, or doesn’t have an A credit rating, it’s not only going to get a bad rate, it’s at risk of getting a very bad rate. Some suppliers often have to borrow at 20% to 40% to stay in business while they wait for your payment, which sometimes doesn’t come until 120 days after the product has been provided to you. If such product takes 60 days to make and ship to you, that’s 180 days the supplier is waiting for payment and the cost has been effectively increased 10% to 20%. And who do you think is paying for that? You are!

However, sometimes we have the opposite situation – a buyer who is strapped for cash waiting to get the next product to its customers and a large supplier, who does business for a lot of large companies, that is in a relatively cash rich situation. In this situation, the buyer might be forced to borrow cash at a relatively high rate of interest, which could easily be 12% to 18%, while the supplier could go another 60 days without payment with no adverse effect. Paying the supplier on-time in this situation is ultimately as damaging to the supply chain as a whole as paying a cash-strapped supplier late. Anything that increases the cost ultimately increases the price to the end consumer. And anything that increases the price risks decreasing the customer base, and the overall revenue that keeps the supply chain going.

So, if you do have the opposite situation, despite the supplier’s grumbling, you should pay late. But ONLY if you have this situation, which, generally speaking, occurs less than 10% of the time. So how do you know if you have this situation?

Come back tomorrow to find out.

Is Your Financial Performance Lagging?

Even if it is not, you might want to consider BravoSolution’s and Basware‘s upcoming webinar on Five Untapped Methods to Improve Financial Performance. Hosted by Mickey North Rizza, former Gartner and AMR Research Analyst with over two decades of supply chain experience, you know that this webinar taking place next Wednesday, August 21 @ 11:00 am PDT / 2:00 pm EDT is going to be filled with useful information.

All you have to do is look at the statistics. Research has demonstrated that leading companies that improve their Purchase to Pay processes find operational savings that can exceed 40% and that those who also implement end-to-end Source-to-Settle processes (with smartly linked Sourcing and Procurement) see an average 14.6% increase in operating margin and a 12.8% ROIC (Return on Capital Invested). Given the increasingly low returns in cash-based investments, pursuing this opportunity should be a top priority.

It Took 40 Years, but BPOs (Bank Payment Obligations) are now Truly SWIFT!

SWIFT, formerly known as the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications, and a global provider of secure financial messaging services, turned 40 on May 3 of this year, and that’s noteworthy on it’s own as this tells us that we’ve only been thinking about electronic financial transactions on a global scale for 40 years, but that’s not the most important piece of news to come out of SWIFT, which processes 90% of traditional global trade transactions, this year.

The most significant piece of news to come out of SWIFT this year, and this decade, is the fact two weeks later on May 17, two months ago, the electronic Bank Payment Obligation (BPO) for an open account transaction became an official financial instrument under the International Chamber of Commerce’s (ICC) Uniform Rules for Bank payment Obligation (URBPO). The URBPO, which is an element in the electronic matching of open account trade data, and which utilizes the ISO 20022 messaging standards, provides an irrevocable payment guarantee in an automated environment and enables banks to offer flexible risk mitigation and financing services across the supply chain to their corporate customers.

As defined by the U.S. Department of Commerce’s International Trade Administration in their Trade Finance Guide, an open account transaction, which is the preferred transaction type by most North American and European multi-nationals, is a sale where the goods are shipped and delivered before payment is due. This option, which is often the most advantageous to the importing buyer, is often the most disadvantageous to the exporting supplier, as they will have difficulty getting financing from their bank to finance the production and shipment of the goods until they are paid by the buyer without proof that they will be paid. That’s why many suppliers will insist on a Letter of Creditworthiness from the buyer’s bank, which will often need to be provided direct to the supplier’s bank. This paperwork takes time, especially since it has to flow through banks, slows down trade, and aggravates buyers who need to move fast to keep up with constantly changing customer demand. That’s why they insist on open accounts, even though the supplier’s bank may not accept them because the buyer, or the buyer’s bank, isn’t known (well enough) to the supplier’s bank, which is fair.

This is a situation that, theoretically, could be easily corrected with an electronic replacement for a letter of credit, that could move at the speed of light down a fiber cable, as the buyer’s bank, which can see the buyer’s ability to pay, can immediately send the supplier’s bank an electronic Bank Payment Obligation that the bank will pay when the goods are shipped and adequate proof has been provided. The supplier’s bank could then advance the supplier as it has a trustworthy bank obligation, and not just a copy of a purchase order (PO), from the buyer’s bank that it can rely on. And now that we have the ICC URBPO, this is finally a reality. And if you’re a multi-national, it’s a reality that’s at your fingertips!

All that is required to create a BPO is a purchase order and an acceptance by the supplier. All that is required to complete the BPO is a commercial invoice and acceptance by the buyer. No other documents are required.

The process is as follows, provided the buyer has an open account with a bank on the SWIFT network that is, or soon will be, URBPO enabled:

  • the buyer sends their PO to their bank and requests a BPO be sent to the supplier’s bank
  • the buyer’s bank delivers the BPO through the TSU (Trade Services Utility) operated by SWIFT to the supplier’s bank
  • the supplier’s bank delivers the PO to the supplier
  • the supplier accepts the PO and sends confirmation to their bank
  • the supplier’s bank delivers the confirmation to the buyer’s bank

and, voila, a valid BPO, which is irrevocable once all conditions are met, has been created. Once the terms of the PO have been completed in full,

  • the supplier informs their bank and provides the commercial invoice
  • the supplier’s bank informs the buyer’s bank that the terms have been completed
  • the buyer’s bank asks for confirmation from the buyer
  • the buyer confirms completion

and the supplier is paid! It’s that easy.

Since only banks have access to the TSU, it’s likely that you’ll probably still have to use e-paper to communicate with your bank if you’re a small or mid-size operation, but if you’re a large multi-national, you can work with an approved vendor (of which there are at least 6 and more in the process of being certified) to integrate your finance system into the bank’s SWIFT system and if you have an open account with the right permissions, automatically create BPOs within your transaction limit (and seamlessly submit requests for approval and conveyance with the click of a mouse), just as easy as you can do ACH payments and wires today with advanced business banking solutions from the major banks.

Of course, it goes without saying that you have to be a client of either the 6 banks that are currently live, the 10 banks that have implemented the capability and that are in the process of implementing their big clients, or the 50 banks that are adding the capability, but if you’re not, and you’re a major player in international trade, maybe you should be! e-Invoicing was e-Procurement 1.0. e-Payment was e-Procurement 2.0. But e-BPO/TSU is e-Procurement 3.0, and if you want to get to the next level, you have to get there.