Category Archives: Procurement Innovation

B2BConnex – Connecting Companies the World Over Part II

In our last post, which re-introduced you to B2BConnex, a solution for e-Document Management that was designed to automate the end-to-end purchasing process and targeted at small and mid-sized manufacturing organizations still mired in the world of ERP.

We noted that, since our first posts on e-Document Management and automating the end-to-end purchasing process back in the 2010 time-frame, they have been hard at work and have increased the number of supported document types, added scorecard corrective action reporting (SCAR), the ability to have multiple configurations of the software for different geographies/countries/divisions/departments/plants, an improved shopping cart solution, more integration options out of the box, more usability features, and considerably more customization capability. We then dived into some of the new usability features, UI streamlining, reporting capability and some of the new configuration capabilities.

Today we are going to discuss the improved shopping cart, integration options, configuration options, and a few of the workflows more in depth.

Their catalog-based shopping cart works like you would expect, with the ability to search an individual catalog or all catalogs and be presented with a list of matching products complete with images, (partial) descriptions, price (with volume break) fields, default order quantity and add-to-cart button(s). One unique feature is that the application not only supports multiple languages, but allows each product to be associated with custom descriptions in any language the buyer or supplier chooses. This allows a buying organization to present the same catalog and interface to its users around the world, who can then select the language they want to see results in if the default language isn’t their native language. In addition, currency is also configurable and can be changed by the user as well. When the user goes to check out, the system automatically generates a purchase order template where the user can override the default billing, billing contact, shipping, shipping contact, and (requested) shipping method. Once the user confirms the order, the order, broken down by supplier, will be sent back to the client’s sales order system to generate an order there. Then, through the ERP’s fulfilment functions, the order can be used to generate one or more Purchase Orders which can be sent to the supplier through the B2BConnex Direct platform or Supplier Portal.

Once the supplier receives the PO, they can immediately accept it as is and return a Sales Order Acknowledgement, or, if they can’t deliver (all) of the requested items (at once), they can request modifications to delivery dates and order quantities and even request substitutions. In addition, if the supplier can deliver some products now and some products later, the supplier can split the line items and define the quantity that can be delivered now and the quantity that can be delivered later, each with associated delivery dates, and send the PO back with a modification request.

While the catalog-based shopping cart looks plain and simple with its “old-school” PO style, it’s actually quite sophisticated as it plugs into the B2BConnex Direct platform, which can deliver the purchase orders using a variety of methods, including, but not limited to, delivery through the B2B Supplier Portal, EDI to the supplier’s ERP, and XML or EDI (X12) to the supplier’s order management software. And all of this is configurable by the client in the sophisticated administration panel that allows the customer to define the document types supported, the delivery methods required (down to the plant level if need be), and any required mappings to translate from one format to another (which is important if the customer uses their own units of measure, abbreviations, or terminology and not what is expected in the EDI standard, for example).

In addition, there is a lot of security built in. Not only is there no capability by the supplier or buyer to change fields they have not been given access to (unlike there was in a big system that shall not be named that, for years, didn’t pull in the contract price data from the database but just assumed whatever was in the XML was correct), but there is a lot of security to prevent cross-site scripting, SQL injection, and other common and uncommon hack attacks.

Another neat feature is credit limits, which can be configured for each supplier per order and on aggregate and allow the buyer to be alerted when an order will surpass a credit limit and possibly be rejected by the supplier until Accounts Payable brings the buyer’s account up to date.

Their B2BConnex Direct platform, which functions as their native data mapping middleware, allows them to not only translate document types from one format and standard to another very easily, but also provides an API that they can use to integrate into just about any ERP, finance, procurement, or back-office system of relevance with respect to one of the many e-Document types that are natively supported which include, but are not limited to, RFQs, purchase orders, sales order acknowledgements, ship notices, delivery schedules, goods receipts, invoices, payment reports, payment receipts, RMAs (return merchandise authorizations), and inventory forecasts.

The B2BConnex platform, like the B2BConnex Customer (Buyer) and Supplier Portals, are very configurable — each document type that is sent from and/or delivered to each location can have its own delivery format. For example, if you have one plant offshore that still isn’t on the enterprise ERP, and can’t accept EDI, you can have EDI documents delivered to all plants except that one, which can be required to use the portal.

In addition, customers can manage their own profiles and user base, deciding who has access to what parts of the system and add and remove accounts as necessary. The last thing you want is to have to wait for a vendor to add or remove an account every time someone joins or leaves your organization. While a number of modern systems have this feature, there are still systems out there that work on named-user licenses (and as a solution buyer, you have to watch out for that).

In a nutshell, even though the B2BConnex solution employs an old-school look, it is actually a very modern SaaS application under the covers and definitely worth looking into if you are a small-or-mid-sized organization that is still in the ERP world and need a better solution.

B2BConnex – Connecting Companies the World Over Part I

Since we first introduced you to B2BConnex, a solution for e-Document Management that was designed to automate the end-to-end purchasing process, they’ve been working hard to extend their platform and serve the global operations of their customer base. Even though, as we noted in our first post, their solution was targeted at small and mid-size manufacturing organizations that are still mired in the ERP and need better solutions for their purchasing function, B2BConnex has recently acquired some larger mid-sized companies with global operations and a global supply base. As a result, B2BConnex has been steadily expanding their solution capability and footprint to meet the needs of these larger clients.

As per our post on e-Document Management for Small & Mid-Size Manufacturers, they started out as an e-Document Management solution, implemented as a simple web-based portal solution that integrated with the back-end ERP and/or MRP system, that allowed purchasing and logistics personnel to efficiently manage RFQs, Purchase Orders, Kanban Orders, Shipment Notices, Payment Inquiries, and Invoices and sales to efficiently handle inbound RFQs, sales orders, and inbound shipment inquiries. On top of this, as per our post on automate the end-to-end purchasing process, they built m-way matching and reporting capabilities (and can tell you whether or not the invoice matches the purchase order and / or the goods receipt), scorecard capability, and customer branding capability as well as streamlined Excel integration and a shopping cart that runs on a customer catalog.

Since then they have been hard at work adding more and/or improved document types (including requisitions, specifications, surveys, etc.), scorecard corrective action reporting (SCAR), the ability to have multiple configurations of the software for different geographies/countries/divisions/departments/plants, an improved shopping cart solution, more integration options out-of-the-box, more usability features (such as the ability for a supplier to flip a PO, or line items, into an invoice or ASN and a buyer to flip an invoice, or line items, into a goods receipt), and more customization capability (which allows the entire look-and-feel to be custom skinned, including layout options, by the customer). In today’s post we will talk about the streamlining that B2BConnex has implemented since we last covered their application, the enhanced reporting, and the configuration capability. In tomorrow’s post, we will discuss their improved catalog and shopping cart capability, their B2B Direct solution, and the associated services that B2BConnex offers.

All of the relevant fields of the documents can be edited in-line in the application. For example, once a purchase order has been created, the supplier can request changes online to pricing, quantities, delivery date or other data which are updated in your ERP system once approved . All changes are tracked and a full audit trail is maintained, as well as any or all comments attached to the purchase order. The same holds for the shipment notice, which can be created by a supplier with access to the supplier portal. The shipment notice can be created from a single purchase order or from open line items from multiple orders. Similarly, Corrective Action Requests can be created manually and can reference invoices, shipment notices, or goods receipts and be associated with the requisite line items.

The UI has been streamlined so that when a user logs in, they can quickly view a list of all documents that have been assigned to them and how many of those documents require (immediate) attention. This allows the user — be it a buyer, logistics manager, or supplier — to focus their attention on those items that require immediate attention and prioritize their workday.

In addition, document creation has been streamlined so that a user only has to enter minimal meta-data information, as each document can have as many attachments as is required to create the specification, RFQ, or scorecard. In addition, all documents can be created from Excel sheets, and templates can be exported from the application.

Custom reports can be built on any data in the system, and the reporting capability allows the user to quickly retrieve only those documents that have been recently reviewed, changed, accepted, negotiated, approved, satisfied, etc. and restricted to a supplier, buyer, etc. based on the audit-trails and meta-data maintained by the system. Built-in reports, all of which are configurable, include performance summary, response time, negation detail, time to approval, received unapproved, delivery, price data, first pass yield, open document line, and transit days report — all designed to measure the performance of purchasing.

The configuration capability is quite extensive. The administrator can configure look and feel, fields displayed for view or update, status codes, currencies, languages, scheduling, expediting, user accounts, account policies, logging, file I/O, EDI, portal options, individual geography/department configurations, ERP integration (including users, data field mappings, etc.), partners, partner profiles, items, and catalogues, and other data items of relevance. The solution can be customized to fit the process of the buying organization and the workflow of the applications the personnel are used to.

Come back tomorrow for a review of additional capabilities added by B2BConnex since our last posts as well as a discussion of the services they offer.

Supply Management Has a Long Way To Go To Get to The Top!

The ISM and BravoSolution (who want to align Sourcing with the rest of the organization) recently released the 2013 ISM Survey of Procurement Executives on “Procurement & Sourcing: Moving from Tactical to Strategic” which summarized the responses from 545 Supply Management executives at the Director level and above to a detailed survey created by BravoSolution and administered by ISM last July and August.

These executives were given a list of 24 topics identified to be of recent concern to procurement and sourcing executives and asked to identify their top organizational priorities in 2013. The top priority of improving cost reduction and savings should not be a surprise to anyone since most companies have been laser-focussed on cost-reduction and savings since the major financial crisis in 2007-2008, to the detriment of just about every other important goal. However, what should be surprising is that cost reduction and savings is not only the top priority in 60% of companies but still twice as important as the second most common business priority of revenue growth and profit improvements despite the fact that most organizations expect their cost reduction efforts to yield less than 10%!

The time of near-zero inflation is at an end and with hyper-inflation a strong possibility in many commodity markets and a few countries, and, despite the opinion of some experts, we could be looking at a return of stagflation in some global economies. And even if we don’t see stagflation, the rapid rise in costs across a number of raw material and commodity categories should be enough to convince the average Supply Management professional that savings will not be possible in many categories and the best one can hope for is cost avoidance — unless other opportunities for savings are identified. Opportunities that revolve around process improvement, raw material substitution, value-add, and non-value add service removal. This means that more effort should be spent on supplier collaboration and innovation, supplier performance and sustainability management, and raw materials, but the first two of these options were only listed as priorities by 19% and 23% of the respondents, respectively, and the third option didn’t even make the list of the 9 topics that were selected by more than 10% of respondents.

It was nice to see that 30% of respondents recognized that a key capability of properly performed Procurement is the delivery of revenue growth and profit improvement, but this doesn’t happen without the proper focus on efforts that can lead to revenue growth and profit improvement, which include efforts like the Procurement Perfect Order (which will make your organization a more attractive supplier), improvement of working capital (which will allow Finance to reduce interest and penalty payments, take advantage of early payment discounts, and possibly even earn money on short term investments), improving customer loyalty (as it costs less to keep a customer than to acquire a new one), improving the strategic nature of trading partner relationships (as this can lead to joint efforts to take cost out of products and services and increase sales), and more spend under management (which permits better spend and opportunity analysis). However, from this set up of options, only two — getting more spend under management and improving working capital — were selected as priorities by more than 10% of respondents. Without appropriate priorities, profit and revenue goals are just pipe dreams.

There’s a fair amount of analysis in the 23 page report, but the bottom line is that Supply Management has a long way to go to become the strategic powerhouse it should be. It’s just like Angus, Malcolm, and Bon said back in 1975 — It’s a Long Way To the Top (If You Wanna Rock ‘n’ Roll). A long, long way …

If You Really Want to Make Stakeholders Hate You, Just …

Spend Matters UK recently published a 5-part series on how to make stakeholders hate you, which presented five actions you can take that, despite your intentions, will help you achieve your goal of helping stakeholders to hate you.

In order, they were:

  1. Drive them Mad with Technology
  2. Revel in Being the Gatekeeper
  3. Talk Your Own Language
  4. Insist Every Spend Category is the Same
  5. Focus Purely on Savings

From a Procurement point of view, pushing for new technology, focussing on savings, and speaking the language of good Procurement is typically a good thing (as technology helps you do your job better, savings pleases the C-suite, and the language of Procurement isn’t appreciated enough). But from a Legal point of view, technology is irrelevant; from a Marketing point of view, it’s about sales, not savings; and from an Engineering point of view, the language of Procurement is irrelevant — the product has to work, work well, and be something to be proud of (damn it). So, even if it’s delivered with the best of intentions, a push for new technology, a focus on savings, or explanations delivered in your language can turn stakeholders off.

However, insisting every category is the same or revelling in your role as the gatekeeper is definitely confrontational and will help achieve your goal of getting stakeholders to hate you, with time and effort of course. But if you really want your stakeholders to hate you, and hate you with an unrelenting passion, the best way to accomplish this, beyond a shadow of a doubt, is to:

     0.  Take all the Credit

Assuming that you can convince the stakeholders (or the C-Suite who will force them) to work with you, the best way to truly become the target of their ire is, once the project is a success, take all the credit. While it’s true that the root of the project success — be it cost savings, quality improvements, JIT delivery, value-add, etc. — will be the result of the technology, process, and supply management experience you bring to the table (which takes the good job they were doing and makes it great), you can’t take all the credit. Remember, (as far as the stakeholders are concerned), they worked just as hard as you; they brought the category expertise to the table; they have the experience with their preferred suppliers to, supposedly, determine which tactics and methodologies are likely to yield the most fruit, and they have a need to look good to the C-suite too. (Especially if their department is seen as a cost-center and not a value-creator.)

So if you stand up when the project is done, compare the greatly improved results that were achieved when the department worked with you for the first time (compared to the dismal results the department achieved on its own last year), and do your absolute best to take all the credit, the stakeholders will hate you so much that they will strive to open the gates of hell and unleash its fury upon you. It’s the only thing you have to do to gain their eternal animosity. No ifs, ands, or buts about it. No top five list needed.

Why Big Brains Will Beat Big Data in Procurement


Today’s guest post is from Ryann Kahn, Marketing and Communications Manager at Source One Management Services.

Two weeks ago, the Sourcing Innovation blog published an article about how the three cognitive traps stifle global innovation. I couldn’t help but think about how the same points could be made in procurement: data (though usually we don’t have Big Data) can help overcome some common issues, but ultimately Big Brains are more important and effective at the same job.

Take a procurement sourcing project for example.

The commonly used traditional three-bid process is data driven. It implies that if you collect enough (i.e. three pieces of) data, then you are making a good decision. Now, by collecting three bids, you know you are not getting the worst price and service out there and you are encouraging some competition. But without category expertise or a strategic process in place, can you really consider the data alone enough to justify that you have made a wise and innovative decision? Data != strategic sourcing.

But the data itself can often lead to the confirmation bias that the doctor referenced previously. Was your RFP template (or software solution) structured in a way that drove you to the conclusion that you already had envisioned? For example, if you want to remain with your local incumbent supplier, does your scorecard penalize suppliers for not having a location near you? Did you only request pricing on a specific product, which you knew your preferred supplier had the best (or only) price available? Confirmation bias in the sourcing world is real and common. Many companies effectively eliminate competition with better solutions because of the way they structure their questions.

By contrast, a true strategic sourcing process uses data in a Big Brain process.

The first step is a spend analysis of data from contracts, supplier invoices, P-Cards, supplier reports, POs, and more. (That’s a lot of data.) Then we look at market intelligence, historical trending, new products or process enhancements and benchmark data. (Now that’s Big Data!) All of this information is pulled, assessed, and analyzed. But the data alone does not give a full picture of a company’s spend. It takes the “curious, open mind” to uncover the whole story. Data may suggest inadequacies, but only through more in-depth research and thorough interviews with stakeholders and end users will one be able to identify problems and usage requirements.

The next step of the strategic sourcing process is the sourcing strategy. Again, it begins with data collection to cast a wide net of suppliers and determine their capabilities. But the bulk of the work in this stage belongs to the Big Brain: creating the supplier strategy, envisioning an RFx strategy, and planning for an execution strategy.

Even if procurement evolves to join the Big Data bandwagon, data will never be able to replace a human category expert. A category expert comes armed with nuanced knowledge of market trends, characteristics, players, and history, and uses analytical skills to apply that to plain data. Or, as the HBR article says, “When we look at markets different from our own we often have little information”. An expert who has been intimately involved with sourcing a category for years will be able to achieve better results than a novice armed with data, or the most powerful e-sourcing tool, any day.

In the final phases of the strategic sourcing process, implementation and compliance, it is entirely the work of a Big Brain. Experts must ensure that a company is actually achieving the results that were identified in the earlier phases in terms of savings and level of service. These experts may use tools to help collect the data to support the process, but the tools themselves don’t do an adequate job of capturing the data that is important to the unique organizational situation.

Data can, and does, help make good sourcing decisions, but ultimately it’s the Big Brains that lead the way. A Big Brain will always be needed to strategically apply the data (big or small), and be the “curious, open-minded researcher” to make a good decision.

Thanks, Ryann.