Category Archives: Talent

The Top 10 Myths of Workforce Development

Industry week recently ran a great piece on “the top 10 myths of workforce development” that is worth repeating since there is a big difference between effective workforce development that will increase the productivity of your staff and ineffective workforce development that will decrease the motivation of your staff.

  1. If you build it, they will come.
    Tell that to the manager who spent a million dollars on a “smart” toilet paper dispenser that insured no one could take more than the allotted number of tabs per trip to the toilet.
  2. When times are tough, cut training first.
    When times are tough, you should double the training budget as you have to get lean and mean. If you really need to cut, fire the moron in management who is the first to suggest you cut training.
  3. Just build e-learning courses. It’s cheaper.
    You need customized content development by an expert, which is costly, and then customized IT development, which is costly, and then controlled testing to make sure your students took the course and grasped the material, which is costly. If you add it all up, you’ll find that custom e-learning course development is not cheap at all.
  4. All training must be done in an instructor-based classroom setting in order to be valuable and convey important knowledge.
    Uhm, no. Some training can be pre-defined cookie-cutter web-training. Some can be on-line multi-media delivery. Some can be classroom.
  5. Once learners go through training, the manager never needs to find out how they are applying what they learned … that’s why they went through training.
    The first thing the manager needs to do is find out what they aren’t applying that they learned and how he can redesign processes and remove roadblocks to help his employees apply that knowledge.
  6. It is always better to look for your own local vendor.
    You need the experts, regardless of where they are located.
  7. Sending people on a training course will solve all performance problems and development needs.
    Sending people on a course will help them identify all the performance problems that are likely your fault. Until you eliminate those, there will continue to be performance problems.
  8. It will be obvious to a skilled trainer what each class participant needs so there is no need to discuss it in advance.
    As a former Professor and Professional Trainer, I love this one. I’m supposed to know the difference between a student who is staring blankly because he doesn’t know the prerequisite material from one who has trouble with the language of the course from one with an attention deficit disorder from one who finds the material too remedial if he won’t talk and you never discussed the goals and individual learning needs with me? HA!
  9. I’ve done presentations. Professional trainers make out that it is far more difficult than it really is.
    There’s blowing your own horn and actually conveying knowledge to another person. I would contest that many “presenters” don’t know the difference.
  10. We don’t need a university — we have a learning management system.
    If you hear this, be sure to follow it with a “and we don’t need you either” because if that kind of thinking is allowed to fester in your organization, you can forget about ever achieving any innovation whatsoever.

The Worst Cut You Can Make

Times are tough. Your sales are dropping. Your costs aren’t. And your balance sheet is bleeding red. You have to cut. I get it. But you DON’T have to cut resources – especially A level and B level talent! As yet another recent article (in Material Handling & Management) points out, cutting talented staff is a desperate measure that diminishes value in the long run.

Not only does it have a severely negative impact on productivity (the drop in morale decreases productivity across the board, which is a double whammy as you no longer have enough resources to get the job done right), but it greatly increases the risk of a major supply chain failure which could bankrupt you. Consider the recent highly publicized peanut recall. According to media reports, Stewart Parnell, president of the bankrupt Peanut Corporation of America, told employees that quality measures were too expensive and time consuming. If you have a sufficient number of high quality resources, you can do quality control in-house cost effectively — but only if you have a sufficient number of high quality resources, which you won’t have if you go around indiscriminately cutting your workforce without regards to the total cost to the business.

Furthermore, I’ve never encountered a situation where there wasn’t a better option. Not that long ago I was talking with a colleague at a consultancy who spent weeks working out a 500,000 productivity improvement that would be realized over the next 12 months and cost the company less than 50,000 to implement. Instead, the company chose to reduce costs by cutting a 45,000 resource (which prevented them from undertaking the initiative). All I can say is where’s the logic in that? Especially since the company *guaranteed* the savings and was offering a contract where they wouldn’t get paid until the savings were achieved. (Save 4K a month at the expense of 40K a month? That’s just dumb.) And I hear this story day after day and week after week from consultancies that identify 500,000 to 5,000,000 (or more) but the customer won’t pull the trigger because it will cost them a few thousand of expenses up front. (And I mean a few thousand, most of the bigger consultancies these days, and even some of the SaaS solution providers, are willing to offer results-based pricing where you don’t pay consulting fees until the contract is completed or until you realize the savings necessary to cover the consulting fee.)

So don’t cut head-count. Use them to tackle 3X, 5X, 7X, and even 10X ROI opportunities that will help you get back to the black before you bleed to death.

Top 10 Reasons That Good Employees Quit

A recent article on Material Handling Management on-line which noted that, according to the U.S. Department of Labor and Statistics, turnover can cost an organization 33% of an employee’s total compensation was kind enough to summarize the “top 10 reasons good employees quit”. It’s an important read because they’re all preventable, and keeping good employees not only lowers costs, but it maintains morale … and a happy employee is a productive employee.

  1. The Job Was Not As Expected
    The job changes from the original description to something else. The employee, who believes that his new employer played a bait-and-switch game, wonders what else the company lied about and seeks greener pastures.
  2. Work Life Imbalance
    Forcing your staff to pick up the slack when a project’s behind, when a team-mate departs, or when you just finished a right-sizing might look like a great cost-savings opportunity, until your employees get tired of 60, 70, and 80 plus hour weeks and decide to stick it back to you.
  3. New Hire Mismatch
    Square pegs don’t fit in round holes. ‘Nuff said.
  4. Management Freezes Raises and Promotions
    Generally speaking, money isn’t the top reason someone takes a job or the top reason someone leaves one, but if an employee can earn 15%, 20%, or 25% across the street …
  5. Feeling Undervalued
    No one wants to feel less useful than a door-stop. A little praise for a job well done goes a long way.
  6. Lack of Decision-Making Power
    No one wants to be micro-managed, and there’s no need to micromanage a good employee who was hired because she can do the job better than you in the first place.
  7. Not Enough Coaching/Feedback
    Good employees want a career path … and want help getting to the next level.
  8. Management Lacks People Skills
    Not only do people not want to feel like doorstops, they don’t want to work for them either. Make sure that your managers are properly trained and developed, or they might just cost you your best employees.
  9. Too Few Growth Opportunities
    If there’s no career path within, your employees will look for one without (you).
  10. Lost of Faith and Confidence in Leaders
    Make sure you always do the right thing.

A FieldGlass Update

Those of you who followed the travels of the Sourcing Maniacs on their 2008 Vendor Tour may recall that one of their stops was FieldGlass (in Chicago), a provider of an on-demand contingent workforce management solution.

A well-designed contingent workforce management solution will streamline the contingent labor requisition process, simplify the identification of qualified resources, automate the distribution of requests, standardize resource rates, automate the collection of quotes, track contracts, and insure that staffing companies and contractors always bill at the approved rate, and only for approved hours on approved projects. The solution will reduce recruitment costs, processing costs, and payment costs as well as prevent overcharges and overpayments, which can often total 20% or more at companies with a large contingent workforce and no solution to manage the process.

FieldGlass has taken the SaaS approach to application development, and instead of one big release every year or two, they’ve moved to a quarterly release cycle where they package smaller, but useful updates every quarter. Their latest release adds or improves on four areas functionality:

  • fine-grained service control
    More granular cost allocation, rate card flexibility and tracking down to GL accounts.
  • time-sheet review process
    The ability to have suppliers and local program managers review time-sheets as part of the approval process so that errors are caught, and corrected, earlier (or, in the worst case, supply managers cannot claim lack of knowledge of deceptive billing as they have to sign off).
  • improved ad-hoc approval support
    Sometimes there’s an emergency where you need someone right away and can’t follow the usual process.
  • decision wizard
    That can be used to guide you through the the process.

It was the last capability that caught my attention. With so many options to choose from in a large company: current approved staffing vendor, new recruiter, direct hire … statement of work, position advertisement, RFX … hourly rate, salary, fixed price contract … it can be hard for someone outside of HR and new to their position to make the right decision. The ability to create company specific decision trees for staffing and hiring allows a manager to walk through a series of Y/N or multiple-choice questions and quickly figure out the route they should be taking, the partner (if any) they should be using, the type of position they should be filling, and how they should be classifying it. This, in turn, allows a manager to focus on finding the right resource, instead of wasting time fiddling with processes, which is what workforce management should be all about.

Did We Need Yet Another Study To Tell Us That Slave-Driving Isn’t Productive?

A recent study from the University of Melbourne, covered by Computer World, found that workers are more productive if allowed to use the internet for leisure. Duh! Anyone with two working brain cells in IT should be able to tell you that.

Specifically, it found that People who do surf the Internet for fun at work – within a reasonable limit of less than 20% of their total time in the office – are more productive by about 9% than those who don’t. The explanation given is that people need to zone out for a bit to get back their concentration. Duh! Anyone who’s taught can tell you that. Every 17 to 20 minutes, you lose 1/3 of your audience if you don’t shake things up a bit, change the topic, wake them up, etc.

And even more insightful, the press release notes that it is important such browsing is done in moderation, as internet addiction can have the reverse effect. Duh! If you spend 8 hours a day following the twits that comprise the twittersphere, then you’re obviously not going to get anything done.

At least the computerworld article had the good sense to state the obvious points that should have been made.

  • It gets personal things off your mind.
    It’s hard to work distracted. If you can pop-on the internet, and get an annoyance like paying a bill, pre-ordering take-out, or getting out a message you can’t forget to deliver over with, you free yourself of distractions and this enables you to concentrate (providing you turn off those twitter feeds).
  • It converts unnecessary real-time interactions into asynchronous ones
    Nothing destroys deep concentration more than a five minute “pop-in” by a colleague who just feels the need to “talk”. If it’s unimportant, they can write you an e-mail, and you can read it later when you’re not in the middle of something important.
  • It makes work enjoyable.
    No one is productive in workplace hell where bosses spend all their time reciting garbage along the lines of “personal time steals from the company” and doing everything they can to squash happiness. Happy workers are productive workers. Productive workers create value. And that’s what sells in today’s economy.

So keep your workplace fun and free of too many unnecessary restrictions. As long as employee behavior is responsible, you’ll get your money’s worth.