Category Archives: Technology

Simply Your Procurement Life and Eliminate the 5 E-procurement Mistakes You Don’t Realize You’re Making

Today’s guest post is from Iyana Lester, a Project Analyst at Source One Management Services who specializes in contract management and negotiation, project evaluation and monitoring, and market assessments.

Along with the boom of internet-based business came the challenges of maintaining an effective supply chain in the digital space. E-procurement offers a seamless solution to streamline processes and improve compliance all while reducing cost. While e-procurement has been around for several years, there still remains several factors that impede businesses from utilizing it fully and attaining maximum savings largely based on their expectations.

A recent Procurement Insights article points out that merely assuring yourself you’re doing everything in your power to maintain supplier relationships isn’t enough. “Even if you are well-versed in procurement and can speak every language in existence, nurturing complex supplier relationships in a global spectrum requires frequent communication that often slips without a system to manage the contact.” So what does this mean for organizations considering the shift?

Inform yourself of what’s out there before committing to one e-Procurement solution. More importantly, become educated on the user short-fallings that lead people to assume that their solutions aren’t optimal. This will allow the largest-scale view of your options without any user-impairment bias. By ensuring your expectations are reasonable, you’re conveniently building yourself a ladder out of a situation coined by Sourcing Innovation as Procurement Damnation. Whether you prefer it as a remix to AC/DC’s Rock ‘n’ Roll Damnation or a procurement state of agitation, you can’t anticipate unrealistic savings and results from an e-Sourcing platform. These solutions are helpful in approaching the challenges of global sourcing, but they are only 100% effective with a strategy that supports them.

Below is a list of several of the most common shortcomings faced in e-procurement. As you develop your e-Sourcing options, keep these organizational glitches in mind:

1. Poorly Implemented Systems

This issue stems from a lack of initial planning. The systems must be integrated with existing corporate systems so that they will be interacting all the way to the end user’s interface experience. They should also be implemented quickly to accomadate any rapidly-developed new technological advancement. Failure to consider any of these focuses can result in systems that aid in one area of the procurement process but cause harmful disruption in others.

2. Partial Implementation

When implementing any large scale change, the change must be adopted and interconnected organization-wide to achieve optimal outcomes. To successfully implement e-procurement, your organization needs to carry out a detailed evaluation of its procurement processes and consider the needs for each division. Roles will continue to depend on effective collaboration between many different organizational players. This will assist in preparing proper agendas and budgets.

3. Uninformed to the Latest Technological Advancements

Monitoring advancements in e-procurement technology will serve as a guide for key risk concerns that should be in your organization’s radar. Observing technological advancements will lessen the chance of your systems becoming outdated.

4. Failure to Develop Performance Metrics

Many organizations have the mentality that once a system is in place, all advantages and will be manually achieved. Considering a comprehensive set of metrics provides a better framework for benchmarking and allows for the procurement process to be more effectively managed. Some metrics areas to consider may include effectiveness, efficiency, quality, and cycle time.

5. Unsuccessfully Identifying the Issues at Hand

A system cannot effectively solve a problem unless the true problem is identified. Organizations often identify sources and causes of the problem and look for fixes that will only temporarily improve the issue. To capture the full potential of your e-Sourcing, never close your eyes to developments and minimize your exposure to Procurement Damnation by following the above steps. The most effective procurement management systems are constantly adapting their capabilities while remaining user-friendly and consistent. Procurement departments should be mindful and eager to pursue new functionalities wherever possible without compromising supplier data quality.

Thanks, Iyana.

Technological Damnation 81: Social Media

While there may be a dirty dozen of risk categories that we need to address in order to adequately address the Procurement Damnation we have willingly placed ourselves in as we try to collectively forge a new frontier, the largest category of risk that we need to address is that of Technology. Almost one fifth of all damnations that plague us fall into the technology category. Mobility, e-Currency, and Social Media are just the tip of the technology iceberg.

However, social media might be the most damning of all. Besides the obvious facts that we collectively as a society waste enough time on a single video to double the size of Wikipedia (Source), that social media is literally making us stupid (Source), and that every marketer and their dog is doing their best to convince you that your company has to be on every social network in existence (including the dozen that are literally here today and gone tomorrow as Facebook and Twitter have pretty much won the social media war in the English speaking world for the time being), there is the simple fact that social media takes more than it gives.

Social Media is called social media for a reason. It was designed for people to be social with each other, not for businesses to sell wares to consumers, certainly not for businesses to sell goods to each other, and definitely not for businesses to conduct important, strategic, operations. But yet you are constantly bombarded with requests from marketing for information about your supply chain efficiency, corporate social responsibility, sustainability, or other operations and practices that can be used to boost corporate image, brand reputation, or product differentiation on these outlets. You’re working hard to define and implement proper category management techniques on dozens of strategic and high-value categories but all marketing cares about is which supplier will get the organization the most free press, whether the “in vogue” corporate social responsibility practice of the day is getting enough attention, or if the new product being sourced will have enough bell-and-whistle features to allow for one dozen unique messages for each social media channel of interest. Is it insane or is it inane? Or is it both?

And then, to make matters worse, rather than use your supplier portal, your suppliers want to message you on the social network they are signed into 24/7, your partners are checking the never updated Facebook company page instead of the official contact directory, and eliminated vendors keep messaging your organization’s Facebook and Twitter accounts asking marketing why they are no longer being considered, rather than read the detailed explanation in the vendor management portal you provided them.

Where Procurement is concerned, social media is a menace that puts poor old Dennis to shame. And now even the “don’t be evil” Google, as per yesterday’s post on who wins and loses in the Twitter/Google deal, is going to index the biggest trove of inanity that exists on the internet. When will the chaos cease?

Who Wins, Who Loses in the Twitter/Google Deal?

A recent post over on VentureBeat on who wins, who loses in the Twitter/Google deal attempted to analyze the Twitter/Google deal to make sense of it. In the deal, Google is allowed to index all tweets and Twitter gets revenue in addition to more traffic from Google. According to the author, Google is getting really valuable time-sensitive content to put ads against which will help it super-serve its users and, as such, acquires a real-time pulse of the world because Twitter remains the only place you can connect with smart, influential people on things you care about.

At this point SI has to say WTF? While there are some smart, influential people on Twitter, there are a number of fallacies to this statement. First of all, not every smart, influential person is on Twitter. Not even close. And many of the smartest, most influential people on Twitter barely tweet, and if they do, due to the 140 character limit, they aren’t saying much. Secondly, what kind of idiot do you have to be to believe that Twitter remains the only place you can connect with smart, influential people? Not only are Facebook and LinkedIn still mega-big (unlike Google Plus), but there is one location that trumps them all when it comes to connecting with smart, influential people. The Real World. (And not the MTV show. I mean offline where you’ve been able to, in the right forums, find smart, influential people for tens of thousands of years.)

As a result, since SI assumes that any conclusions made by the author are all hogwash as the assumptions from the get-go are wrong, SI is going to tell you who really wins, who really loses — and why.

Biggest Winner: Sentiment Analysis Companies

Social media marketers have corporate marketers convinced social media marketing and, more importantly, social media reputation is the most important thing and that these corporate marketers have to track that daily. And how are these corporate marketers supposed to do this? By way of sentiment analysis which can, of course, only be done by web-scouring sentiment analysis software offered by a handful of companies. And once they can get real-time data through Google, their analysis will, of course, be more current and relative than ever (and, as such, their prices will justifiably go up). Or at least that’s what they’ll claim.

Next Biggest Winner: Twitter

Twitter has struggled to monetize it’s network since the beginning. A regular, big, check from Google is a really good thing. First of all, it’s money in the bank. Secondly, in Twitter’s view, it’s verification to investors that it is the social network of choice because Google has deemed it worthy of payment for its data. And it’s likely that its investors will believe this spin, praise Twitter’s executive team, and continue to support its growth.

Biggest Loser: US!

When we do a search, Google will now be inundating us with useless Tweets in our search result. Twitter decreases our IQ and makes a twit out of all of us (proof). Twitter may even be downfall of the western world. (There’s a reason why SI hails the fail whale.) At the end of the day, we all lose.

Best Practice Technology Vendor Selection for True Multi-Nationals

2012

  1. RFX: You’re Asking for the Wrong Information
  2. RFX: You’re Not Asking for the Right Information
  3. RFX: You’re Missing the Most Important Point
  4. Open the Doors for a Truly Successful RFP
  5. Stuck with an ERP? You Do Have Options!

2015 Reprise

  1. RFX: You’re Asking for the Wrong Information
  2. RFX: You’re Not Asking for the Right Information
  3. RFX: You’re Missing the Most Important Point
  4. Open the Doors for a Truly Successful RFP
  5. Stuck with an ERP? You Do Have Options!

Best Practice Vendor Selection for True Multi-Nationals Reprise Part V: Stuck with an ERP? You do have options!

This is a reprise of a series that first ran in 2012. It’s as relevant, and important, today as it was then.

Despite claims to the contrary, you are not stuck being a sap or hearing prophecies from an ethylene-gas inhaling delphi. You do have options. Acquisitions might have some analysts in a tizzy, but you only need to remember one thing. Don’t Panic.

It’s been years since the acquisitions of Ariba & Emptoris.

They were not the only best-of-breed game in town then, and they certainly aren’t the only best-of-breed game in town now. In fact, for many companies, SI would argue that they are not even in the best-of-breed category as the length integration cycles required to integrate them into their acquirer’s platforms slowed down development and now there are only a few module or functions left that, in SI’s opinion, are still best-of-breed. However, there are lots of other options, and these options exist on both sides of the Atlantic.

Best of Breed vendors eat, sleep, and drink supply management

Unlike do-it-all or ERP vendors, best-of-breed supply management vendors are focused entirely on a critical supply management process and, as a result, they tend to be much better at it than do-it-all or ERP vendors, especially supplier enablement, which we all know fuels the e-procurement benefits engine.

Best of Breed on an ERP backbone can offer significant advantages

  • Best of Breed providers often know the strengths and weaknesses of ERP systems they are replacing better than the consulting implementation partners, who care more about if they can weasel their way into long-term strategy consulting than a successful implementation. (For example, there are a couple of vendors with over 100 customer SAP implementations, who know the system way better than a Big 5 consultant on his second implementation.)
  • Best of Breed providers have enabled hundred of thousand of suppliers, maybe more, over the years … in all regions of the world … your 347 suppliers aren’t going to make them flinch (and they will be faster and cost less, because once again, they, or their carefully selected integration partners, have been there, done that … a few hundred thousand times.)
  • Best of Breed provider’s customers are all former ERP e-procurement / consulting implementation customers … that’s right, most of whom have already failed using the ERP/consultant approach, spent the millions, got 7 punch-outs and 11 catalogs implemented … now they spend thousands and get … well, you already know … actual results and benefits.
  • Best of Breed providers have to be better than the ERP or broad portfolio providers, because they can’t fall back on their CRM sales or app server license revenue if they don’t deliver.
  • And because of all of this, Best of Breed providers have way more references than the ERP providers. Those big ERP guys based in Germany have two significant e-procurement references … one they’ve been using for 3 years, and another from a company I never heard of on this side of the Atlantic … I know of one Best of Breed provider who has 19 published case studies, and has only lost one customer in 14 years, and that was after this company was a customer for 9 years, and decided to outsource IT, and the outsourcer, IBM, brought in an ERP to replace all of the internal systems.
  • Best of Breed providers’ SaaS-type offerings and supplier networks eliminate the need for your IT department or external consultants to be involved, so they implement faster and less expensively
  • The most successful Best of Breed providers have service organizations or carefully selected service partners around the globe to assist with implementations and provide stability.
  • Best of Breed providers fill in the gaps where ERP fall short. ERP may try, but it is not all-in-one and they are usually a year or more behind the Best-of-Breeds functionality-wise.
  • Best of Breed works and they have the client stories to prove it. Follow SI’s advice and check their references.
  • Best of Breed will help your SUM (Spend Under Management) soar.

Consider your options carefully. A Best of Breed solution on your ERP backbone might be the best decision you can make.