Category Archives: Vendor Review

b-pack: Taking Root in Their Brave New World, Part II

In Part I, we discussed how b-pack, who packed it in for a brave new world (Part I, Part II, Part III, and Part IV) back in 2010, crossed the Atlantic in their quest to spread some of their French Procurement bohemian revolution to the rest of the world, bringing with them a suite of Procurement solutions that take you from the start of a traditional sourcing cycle (RFx), through a contract, to a requisition (which may be from a catalog), against a budget, to receipt (which can include asset tracking information), and an invoice, to payment, reporting, and supplier management. Three years ago their Procurement suite, which also included document management, expense and travel management, asset management, inventory management (which is integrated with asset management), fleet management, dispute resolution, a supplier portal and procurement business intelligence reporting in a solution that was extensively internationalized, was one of the most in-depth solutions available, and it has been developed considerably since then.

In the past three years b-pack has added (or significantly improved) (collaborative) contract authoring and advanced contract management (coming out in the next release this quarter), advanced requisitioning and services procurement, OCR (Optical Character Recognition) integration, project management and project support across requisitions and budgets, an enhanced collaboration portal, a GPO (Group Purchasing Organization) module, and enhancements across the board to all core and supporting modules while at the same time extending their out-of-the-box integrations with ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) and AP (Accounts Payable) systems, increasing usability, and taking (RAD) rapid application development to a whole new level with respect to the degree to which the platform can be customized for a new client.

Today we are going to discuss the enhancements to requisitions, budgets, and project-management.

As discussed in yesterday’s post, one of the things b-pack has learned while servicing over 100+ global clients in 20+ industries in the public and private sector is that every company has their own unique Procurement process, which starts with the requisition. For example, some companies start with a requisition, which must be approved before a PO can be generated, some companies start with a PO, and some companies, where most of the spend is for small amounts, start with the invoice. In addition, and this is true in the public and health-care sectors, some processes start with check requisitions for employee (travel) expenses and study participant payments. Each of these requisitions requires a different (approval) process. In addition, while some requisitions are for one time product or services buys, some are for repeating, regularly scheduled buys, and some are for products or services that are to be delivered over multiple phases of a project, and multiple POs, invoices, and receipts need to be managed against the same requisition over the course of the project.

In response to this need, b-pack has extended their platform to support a slew of requisition types and processes, and each customer can select just the types, and processes, that they require. In addition, each step can be customized as needed and the approval process, which is rules-driven, can be as simple or complex as required. This is what allows them to meet the needs of Sony Music UK, for example. In the music industry, requisitions are for projects which can include CD recording and CD promotion. A CD recording will require studio costs, producer advances and fees, artist advances, flat fees and payments, post-production costs, etc. A CD Promotion will include promotions for multiple singles, which will have associated production costs, advertising costs, and special event costs (for artists appearances). And while the CD recording requisition might be a single-phase project, the promotion will generally be multi-phase, with each phase centred around the release of a single. The b-pack platform not only supports the requisitions required for these types of projects, but also supports templates for each project (or recurring order) that is required. So, all a talent, or project, manager, needs to do to set up a project is select the type of requisition, select the template, input the expected costs (against the pre-populated expense groups and project codes), and send it off for approval.

It’s budget creation and tracking capability is also quite advanced. It allows you to set up a budget that is as detailed as necessary and track it monthly or against project phases. The budget can be compared against the appropriate project(s), requisitions, invoices, and receipts and the user can see how they are doing at any particular time. This real-time visibility into the budget allows them to track the success of the project.

After requisitions, the next biggest enhancement to the platform is probably in respect to its project definition and management. In the b-pack platform, projects can be as simple or complex as required. They can be single phase or multi-phase; associated with a budget; linked to zero or more documents and contracts; associated with the relevant requisitions, invoices, and receipts; associated with one or more users including the project manager; and updated automatically when any associated requisition, invoice, receipt, etc. is updated.

And, as with previous versions of the b-pack platform, all of the data fields are driven off of master-data and the suppliers, approvers, account codes, project codes, etc. can all be selected from drop-down lists after a few characters have been entered. In addition, all of the master data tables (that are not pulled from associated ERP, AP, etc. systems) can be updated using Excel spreadsheets – making it easy to administer.

b-pack has put a lot of thought into usability and worked hard to make sure the platform meets the needs of its international users. Tomorrow, we’ll dive deeper into its new, relatively unique, RAD architecture.

b-pack: Taking Root in Their Brave New World, Part I

When we first introduced you to b-pack in 2010, they were packing it in for a brave new world (Part I, Part II, Part III, and Part IV), hoping to spread some French Procurement bohemian revolution to the rest of the world.

Unlike other e-Procurement systems of the day, b-pack understood that e-Procurement was more than just requisitions, catalogs, and invoices. Good e-Procurement solutions take you from procurement through purchase through receipt, payment and supplier management to begin the cycle anew. To this end, b-pack brought with them a suite of solutions that take you from the start of a traditional sourcing cycle (RFx), through a contract, to a requisition (which may be from a catalog), against a budget, to receipt (which can include asset tracking information), and an invoice, to payment, reporting, and supplier management. In addition to these core e-Procurement modules, they also brought document management, expense and travel management, asset management, inventory management (which is integrated with asset management), fleet management, dispute resolution, a supplier portal and procurement business intelligence reporting in a solution that was extensively internationalized.

So what have they been up to since then? Quite a bit. In addition to (collaborative) contract authoring and advanced contract management (coming out in the next release next quarter), advanced requisitioning and services procurement, OCR (Optical Character Recognition) integration, project management and project support across requisitions and budgets, an enhanced collaboration portal, a GPO (Group Purchasing Organization) module, and enhancements across the board to all core and supporting modules, b-pack has been working hard to extend their out-of-the-box integrations with ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) and AP (Accounts Payable) systems, increase usability, and take (RAD) rapid application development to a whole new level with respect to the degree to which the platform can be customized for a new client.

One of the things b-Pack has learned serving 100+ clients globally across 20+ industries in the public and private sectors over the past 13 years is that every single company is different when it comes to the Procurement processes that they use. Furthermore, not only are the procurement (inventory, and receiving) processes (just to name a few) different, so are the types of requisitions, budgets, and projects that they use. And if you try to meet their needs with a one-size fits all platform that doesn’t mimic organizational processes exactly, what ends up happening is that the employees, used to doing things a certain way, do everything they can to bypass the platform, no matter how easy it is to use or how consumer-oriented it is. And what ends up happening is that, instead of Supply Management getting their spend under management (SUM), maverick spend actually increases after the e-Procurement platform is implemented. In response to this realization, b-pack has been very heavily focussed on not only increasing the customization capability of their platform over the last few years, but in doing it in such a way that the platform can be custom configured through user-driven administration options. This achieves three very important goals in the enterprise software world. One — there is only one instance of the b-pack platform – which makes it very easy to maintain and update as every customer runs the same core code base. Two — every customer (administrator) can configure the platform themselves as their needs change. Three — a custom instance can be configured for even the most complex Fortune 500 in a matter of days by a b-pack product manager who sits down with the customer and walks through all of their Procurement processes with them.

In the posts that follow we will discuss some of the unique customization capabilities in the new b-pack solution in detail.

PrimeRevenue: Priming Your Financial Supply Chain for Success, Part II

In Part I, we discussed how PrimeRevenue, a provider of Supply Chain Finance solutions that provides supply chain finance solutions to over 12,000 customers, including a large number of Fortune 500 and Global 3000 companies, in 40 countries and that processes Billions of dollars of transactions each year, provides a supply chain financing solution that goes beyond just providing a platform to sell receivables and includes an analytics component that helps a buying organization figure out how to best meet its working capital needs.

In particular, as part of their platform, they provide a module by the name of SCiMap that provides a consolidated and classified analysis of your spend, enriched by insights from PrimeRevenue’s global database, based on detailed and updated market intelligence that allows you to make better buying decisions as well as negotiate optimized payment terms, putting the power to improve your working capital in your hands. It does this by analyzing all of your spend data, presenting you with potential opportunities for payment term extension, and providing you with a what-if analysis platform that allows you to tailor a plan to meet your needs in a manner that is consistent with your level of risk.

The potential opportunities for working capital improvement are summarized on the unique SCiMap dashboard that summarizes:

  • Commodity Standard Opportunities
    for which commodities are you paying faster than market average?
  • Vendor Standard Opportunities
    which vendors are you paying faster than your competitors?
  • Parent Standard Opportunities
    which vendors are you paying faster than the average time in which their parent or sibling organizations are paid?
  • Country Standard Opportunities
    which vendors are you paying faster than the average DPO for the country?
  • Cost Neutral Opportunities
    which vendors could be paid later with no impact to their finances? (e.g. they
    are cash rich while you are cash poor or they are financing at 90 days and you are
    paying at 60 days)
  • Discount Opportunities
    which vendors could you convert from early payment discount terms (that they are
    unable to effectively take advantage of) to standard terms?
  • Inventory Turnover Opportunities
    which terms could be extended to match inventory days and associated carrying costs?
  • Buyer Standard Opportunities
    which vendors are you paying faster than your average payment terms?
    (note that if your average payment terms are worse than market averages, these may
    not be real opportunities)

From this dashboard, that will typically identify hundreds of millions of working capital that could potentially be freed up in a typical multi-billion dollar company within a matter of weeks, a senior Supply Management analyst can dive into each pot of opportunities, identify the commodities and vendor in question, access the credit-rating and average finance rate for each vendor, and determine if the opportunity is real or not. SCiMap can even do program design to help procurement determine what suppliers will be targeted first based on different criteria to maximize the opportunity.   From here, the buyer can identify the real opportunities for working capital improvement that will not endanger the vendors or increase the overall supply chain cost to the end consumer. The Supply Management analyst can then create a term extension model that will benefit the organization without hurting the supply chain.  Then in SCiMap procurement can report what actually happened in execution to see where the model was successful or had challenges.

This is important because, despite the best efforts of your accounts receivables department, receivables collection will only take an organization so far, which means the organization will have to hang on to cash longer to improve working capital at some point. Inventory optimization will help, but if the Supply Management organization is mature, inventory will have been optimized long ago and there will be no more opportunities to improve working capital. Furthermore, during periods of prolonged recession, you know that Treasury is going to demand term extension as a way to improve the cash position of the company, and you have to be prepared for this because you know better than everyone that you can’t just increase payment terms from 60 to 90 and not negatively impact your supply chain. Not only will some suppliers be unable to bear the term extension, others will take back the benefits that you negotiated in exchange for faster payment. Preferred customer status and order fulfillment during a supply shortage? Forget it! Faster-than-guaranteed response times on service? Dream on! Marketing perks? Ha ha! And let’s not forget the fact that if you are already paying some vendors slower than market average for the commodity, vendor, or country, you might be paying more than you have to and speeding up those payment terms might decrease your overall costs – not having to pay at all improves working capital much more than paying late.

The SCiMap solution, which is unique, is a must-have for any organization that wants to truly optimize it’s working capital in a way that won’t come back to bite it in the @ss at contract renewal time, especially when you consider the fact that PrimeRevenue has analyzed trillions of dollars in spend and will only present you with opportunities for consideration that are real for at least one group of companies in the global supply chain. While all the opportunities may not be real for your organization, you won’t waste time analyzing commodities or vendors that obviously cannot handle a term extension. This gives you the ammunition to push back on Treasury or the C-Suite when they get the hair-brained idea that just because their competitor was able to increase payment terms by 30 days and get away with it that your organization can too.

PrimeRevenue – Priming Your Financial Supply Chain for Success

PrimeRevenue is a provider of Supply Chain Finance solutions that provides supply chain finance solutions to over 12,000 customers in 40 countries and that processes Billions of dollars of transactions each year. Like other providers of supply chain finance solutions, they provide a platform that helps suppliers access financing for their receivables when they need it. With over 40 leading financial institutions on their platform, it is a platform that every buyer and supplier should consider for their finance needs. But that’s not why we’re covering PrimeRevenue today. We’re covering PrimeRevenue because they go beyond just providing a funding platform to meet your cash needs – they also provide an analysis platform to help you figure out how best to meet your cash needs.

In particular, they provide a solution by the name of SciMap that provides a consolidated and classified analysis of your spend, enriched by insights from PrimeRevenue’s global database, based on detailed and updated market intelligence. This allows you to make better buying decisions as well as negotiate optimized payment terms, putting the power to improve your working capital in your hands.

In particular, this platform provides you information on:

  • average payment time for the commodities you buy,
  • average financing terms for suppliers with similar credit ratings, and
  • average financing terms for companies with a similar credit rating to you.

Based on this you can figure out

  • whether you are paying faster or slower than the market average,
  • what financing your supplier is able to get, and
  • what financing you are able to get

and then you can figure out whether you should be looking to

  • extend or reduce payment terms, depending on whether
  • the supplier can get better financing or
  • you can get better financing.

Then, if it is the case that the supplier can afford to be paid later and paying earlier threatens to increase the overall supply chain cost, then you have a valid reason to negotiate with (or, if necessary, mandate to) the supplier for a later payment, helping it to obtain the lower financing you know it can obtain if necessary.

When it comes to supply chain finance and working capital analysis, the PrimeRevenue SCiMap solution is unique in the supply chain finance space and a solution you should really be looking at if you want to get your supply chain working capital optimized.

iValua: Proving Their Mettle with Source to Settle, Part IV

In Parts I through III, we noted that when we last covered iValua in 2010, they were one of the few providers tackling end-to-end sourcing and procurement in a single suite of integrated modules built on one common platform. We noted in Tackling End-to-End Sourcing and Procurement, Part I that this French company had capabilities that, at least to some degree, addressed each of the core phases of the basic sourcing-and-procurement cycle except decision optimization and tax reclamation. Since then, they have added advanced tax tracking capability, and a boatload of other features that include SIM/SPM, Risk Management, Project Management, Enhanced Analytics, and Extensive UI customization. Today, we will continue our coverage of the platform, which includes modules for Supplier Management, Sourcing, Contract Management, Catalog Management Procurement, Invoice Management, Expense Management, and Reporting that were covered in Parts I through III; and Administration that will be covered today as we wrap up the series.

Administration

Administration is very extensive in the iValua platform. Administrative users can manage users, tables, workflows, reporting indicators, units of measure, currency, alerts, menu options, content, templates (for RFX and Auctions), import, scheduled processes, notifications, (re)assignments, and information sources (as the platform can pull in RSS and XML feeds from various web sources for display on the dashboard).

The ability to define arbitrary data tables and import the data for analysis into the system is quite powerful. It makes the built-in analytics capability much more useful as the data can be augmented and enriched to also include data from the payment platform, third party supplier assessments, and optimization events conducted external to the iValua system. A classic limitation of many Sourcing and Procurement systems was the inability to import arbitrary data not accounted for in the existing schema. The iValua platform took a best practice from leading spend analysis platforms and made sure a user could import whatever data she needed anywhere in the supported source-to-settle process. The ETL screen is comparable to an advanced version of Microsoft Excel import (familiar to every Microsoft Office User) that allows the user to define the first line index and last import row, column and line separators, text qualifiers, encodings, and field template (that defines the fields and their names). The user can also define how long the data should be kept (and throw-away one-time analysis data or archive payment data indefinitely), who can see it, and what modules, plans, or anomalies the data should be associated with.

Design Mode

Design Mode is a new capability in the iValua platform that allows a user to dynamically redesign the layout of their menus, screens, and dashboard widgets. Each user can customize the look and feel of the application in a way that makes them most productive using simple drag-and-drop and checklist-based / mouse-click component and option selection. It is quite slick. It also allows iValua to customize a configuration for a new client extremely rapidly based upon the particular needs of the different users of the application.

In summary, the iValua is a very extensive Source-To-Settle platform and an extremely viable option for a mid-size or large organization that is looking to update their sourcing and procurement capabilities in an integrated end-to-end source to settle platform. It is especially suited to a multi-national that has to operate in a significant number of countries and languages as iValua, which already supports 15 different languages, is used daily by more than 150K users and 500K suppliers in over 70 countries.