Category Archives: Vendor Review

Kinaxis – A New Paradigm for Real-Time End-to-End Supply Chain Management! Part III

In Part I, we re-introduced you to Kinaxis, one of the most interesting companies in the entire Supply Management space. Billing themselves as a platform for Rapid Response designed to assist supply chain professionals in managing their change-ready supply chains, Kinaxis is actually a very extensive, but deftly integrated, end-to-end cross-functional supply chain what-if platform designed to help supply chain professionals determine how to respond to various unexpected situations. As discussed in Part II, by integrating all of your cross-functional Supply Chain Management applications into one centralized control center application, it has the unique ability to not only optimize production, distribution, and supply network models but to also allow a user to create what-if scenarios in real-time that will allow the user to, among other things,

  • model current, projected, and variations to, demand,
  • plan how production would have to ramp up, down, or shift to meet demand,
  • determine what the impacts would be to other customers if a preferred customer’s order was filled sooner,
  • understand the impacts to inventory and production if a certain raw material or part were unavailable for a short, or long, period of time,
  • comprehend the impacts to new product development and introduction of there is a delay in production, raw material acquisition, distribution, or if marketing wants to introduce a last minute change, and
  • manage the change process associated with demand, inventory, development, or production changes.

The Kinaxis platform does this, and more, because they believe that the key to not only surviving, but thriving, in today’s dynamic, constantly changing, and constantly interrupted global market is to know sooner, act faster. When it takes two days to understand what the impacts of a supply disruption of a material already in short supply will be, that’s too long (as the chances are that your competitor will have locked up the remaining supply before your organization even realizes it needs it). And when it takes a week to understand what the impact of a requested feature change by marketing will be to new product development, that’s too long (as the decision will always be ‘no’ because delaying production will be too risky – and if that results in a key-feature being left out, like e-mail on the Playbook, the resulting lack of marketshare could be devastating). And if you can’t tell your marquis customer whether or not you can expedite their order the day they call, that’s too long (as the end result is that they won’t be a marquis customer for long). That’s why the Kinaxis platform was built to allow these business critical questions to be answered within two-hours or less, on average (in the hands of a knowledgeable user). Many simple questions (such as what if I add this order, change this ship date, or expedite this order) can be answered in just a few minutes — and the full details as to why can be understood in under an hour.

And now the Kinaxis platform does this on a global scale. When SI first reviewed Kinaxis, it was primarily deployed in the English speaking world and single currency. Now, with offices in North America, Asia Pacific, and Europe they are deployed globally in multiple languages and support multiple currencies. In addition, they have added mobile (tablet) support so users can access the application on-the-go, in-the-plant, and on-site when a disruption is detected and has to be dealt with. Furthermore, all of the data is accessed in real time in both the mobile app and the main application. This is another powerful enhancement as what-if scenarios can be re-run as soon as data is updated in the ERP, Inventory Management, or Operations Planning system. No more waiting for the regularly scheduled sync.

Other key enhancements include namespaces, which allow different environments to be set up for different processes, geographic locations, or what-if scenario sets; integrated project management that ties together the project management capabilities of both the Kinaxis platform and the integrated applications (that are already supported by Kinaxis which supports all of the major ERPs); attribute-based planning; variant Bill-of-Materials support which allows multiple options to be considered simultaneously; “fair-share” constraints and additional constraint modeling capability; and process orchestration (that makes sure processes that are supposed to happen in sync happen in sync and those that are supposed to happen in sequence happen in sequence) that allows processes and activities to be defined and compiled in a logical, project-like, manner (that is intuitive to anyone used to using traditional project management tools).

What Kinaxis has built is a framework for modern enterprise-class end-to-end Supply Chain Management through a consolidated control center. It doesn’t replace your ERP, e-Sourcing, e-Procurement, Logistics and Transportation Management, Warehouse and Inventory Management, Trade Management, SRM and Visibility solutions — it allows you to take your operations to the next level by orchestrating their capabilities in an entirely new way (and, in fact, the Kinaxis system won’t reach it’s true potential unless your organization has most, if not all, of these systems in place). If all you have is a suite of best-in-class Supply Management applications, even if each application is 2.0, or even approaching 3.0, your Supply (Chain) Management organization as a whole is still 1.0 as it hasn’t mastered true process orchestration and functional collaboration. This is what Kinaxis gives you, if you are ready and prepared to embark upon the journey.

Kinaxis – A New Paradigm for Real-Time End-to-End Supply Chain Management! Part II

Yesterday, in Part I, we re-introduced you to Kinaxis, one of the most interesting companies in the entire Supply Management space. Billing themselves as a platform for Rapid Response designed to assist supply chain professionals in managing their change-ready supply chains, it is actually a very extensive, but deftly integrated end-to-end cross-functional supply chain what-if platform designed to help supply chain professionals determine how to respond to various unexpected situations.

How do they do it? The built a platform that functions as a Global Control Tower for your supply management operation by integrating all of your cross-functional Supply Chain Management (SCM) applications into one centralized control center application that allows you to access all of your data through one centralized application and

  • model current, projected, and variations to, demand,
  • plan how production would have to ramp up, down, or shift to meet demand,
  • determine what the impacts would be to other customers if a preferred customer’s order was filled sooner,
  • understand the impacts to inventory and production if a certain raw material or part were unavailable for a short, or long, period of time,
  • comprehend the impacts to new product development and introduction of there is a delay in production, raw material acquisition, distribution, or if marketing wants to introduce a last minute change, and
  • manage the change process associated with demand, inventory, development, or production changes

among other capabilities. By integrating all of your key SCM applications, including your ERP, transportation and warehouse management, SRM (Supplier Relationship Management), demand planning, and S&OP systems, it can construct elaborate supply chain models that link inputs, outputs, and resources that can answer these questions.

For example, by integrating your ERP/Inventory System with your order management system, it can not only generate an optimization model that can be used to create a distribution plan that minimizes the number of late shipments or missed orders, but automatically generate what-if scenarios that demonstrate what will happen if a certain customer order is given priority. It might be the case that accelerating an order for one customer will cause orders for 10 customers to be late due to volume requirements or production times.

In addition, because it can model dependencies and production cycles, it can also immediately calculate what would happen if a raw material shipment to your supplier’s production facility is six weeks late. It can immediately calculate how many customer orders would be missed or late, the impact on revenue, and the associated loss based upon inventory carrying costs, overhead costs, and workforce costs, among others. Thus, if your organization has a good visibility solution in place, the minute that a disruption is detected it can begin to calculate the impact, and within an hour understand the extent of the associated loss. Plus, it can start modelling the extent that the loss can be countered with each mitigation option the organization can identify using the what-if modelling capability to generate variant scenarios and analyze the associated costs and profits. Thus, if the organization can identify three different sources of replacement supply with different lead times and costs, it can use the Kinaxis platform to determine which option is best in a matter of hours and get on it.

And the best part of all is that the application is as easy to use as a multi-tab spreadsheet. They built a spreadsheet like interface that is familiar to Supply Management professionals with extensive drill-down capability, a visual supply chain network model, and visual reporting capabilities. The interface, which can display multiple linked spreadsheets automatically, and highlight where you are in the master sheet when you are drilling into a sub-sheet, automatically highlights warning situations, including late shipments, overruns, and projected losses. And if you’re not sure what to do, the built-in help not only explains every column, shading, and warning, but how to easily create new what-if scenarios (as a copy of the current scenario) where you can calculate the impacts of adding orders, removing inventory, changing shipments, etc.

The modeling and real-time optimization of the inventory, demand planning, and order management functionality is unique in the supply management space, but its not for the feint of heart.

Although the application is available on-demand, it’s not like an e-Sourcing or e-Procurement solution where you can start using it as soon as they create an instance for you. In order for your organization to experience the full potential of the platform, which has the potential to save a multi-billion dollar Global 3000 hundreds of millions of dollars, a few things have to happen:

  • all of your Supply and Operations Management applications have to be integrated,
  • the models have to be tailored to your business rules, processes, and constraints, and
  • the cross-functional team members critical to each function that is to be modelled and each task that is to be performed have to be trained on what the platform needs and how to use it.

This doesn’t happen overnight, and for the Global 3000, doesn’t happen for six figures either. While many of today’s on-demand Supply Management applications in e-Sourcing, e-Procurement, SRM, etc. can be obtained and implemented by a Global 3000 in the six-figure range, this isn’t the case for this type of a solution. Kinaxis has put ERP to shame where complexity is concerned. When you consider how much the application can do, ERPs, which are considered by most system integrators to be the most daunting integration projects in the private sector, look like simple App Store app installs in comparison. And, unlike ERP providers and integrators, they have a much better track record (with double digit revenue growth seven years running). They built their platform, and business, slowly — taking the time to understand the requirements and get it right. In other words, this isn’t a solution for an organization wanting a quick fix. It’s a solution for an organization that wants the ability to plan, and respond, in the long term. So where the mid-market is concerned, Kinaxis is for those organizations that are willing to make the effort and commitment it takes to become a market leader.

Kinaxis – A New Paradigm for Real-Time End-to-End Supply Chain Management! Part I

Kinaxis, which was first reviewed on SI by the Sourcing Maniacs in their classic 2008 Vendor Tour, is one of the most interesting companies in the entire Supply Management space. Billing themselves as a RapidResponse solution, which was initially designed to be a demand management platform (available on-demand) to assist supply chain professionals in managing their change-ready supply chains, it is actually a very extensive, but deftly integrated, platform that also does:

    • Demand Order Analysis,
    • S&OP (Sales and Operation Planning),
    • Supply & Capacity (Constraint) Planning,
    • Master Production Benchmarking & Scheduling,
    • Inventory Management,
    • New Product Introduction,
    • Order Analysis & Planning,
    • Supply Management,
    • Profitability Management,
    • Supplier Collaboration,
    • Integrated Project Management,
    • Process Orchestration,
    • Change Management,

and

  • Cross-Functional Supply Chain Management.

And it’s used by customers to do all of this, and more. It’s the next level of Supply Management. Once you’ve implemented e-Procurement and put your Spend Under Management, e-Sourcing and Strategic Sourcing Decision Optimization and established processes that keep your costs down and value up, e-Transportation and Trade Management to optimize your distribution and global trade (import/export processes), e-Visibility to manage your risk, and e-Supply Chain Network Optimization to manage your network design, it’s what you do next.

Why? Because each of these solutions only get you so far on their own. e-Procurement eliminates the time-consuming, value-less tactical buying functions that waste time and money, but doesn’t deliver much beyond manpower savings and doesn’t generate value on its own. That’s where e-Sourcing comes in. e-Sourcing takes the spend the organization has under management, analyzes it, and runs strategic sourcing events (such as auctions and optimization driven negotiations) to execute buys and delivery schedules that save the organization time and money, but doesn’t actually manage the distribution or global trade aspects, which can cost time and money if the right documents aren’t executed in the right way at the right time to streamline imports and exports. e-Transportation and Trade Management optimizes the logistics and distribution and ensures everything runs efficiently and smoothly in a non-loss generating manner, but doesn’t optimize the entire transportation and inventory/warehouse management network. When the organization has the opportunity to change its production locations, 3PLs (Third Party Logistics carriers), and/or warehouse and distribution locations, an e-Supply Chain Network Optimization solution will, given current demand and contracts, optimize the entire production, storage, and distribution network to the extent permissible, but will not be able to do anything about change, order analysis and demand generation, optimization of new product development and introduction processes, sales and operations planning around new and upcoming products, production benchmarking and scheduling, cross-functional supply-chain process orchestration, or change management when an unexpected event (such as a material shortage, natural disaster, or supplier bankruptcy) forces a rapid, real-time change to the plan.

This is where Kinaxis comes in. Starting from the premise that what product, risk, and change managers need are answers to common questions like the following in real-time:

  • what is the impact of a supplier shutdown due to a fire in the plant?
  • how can I launch a new product a quarter early?
  • what if a user mistakenly changes an inventory parameter?
  • what would happen to our ability to fulfill demand to our other customers if we accelerate fulfilment of an emergency order for a preferred customer?
  • how can we effectively reengineer our planning processes?

Kinaxis has built a solution that supports very complex, but easily generated, what-if scenarios that will allow a user to ask these questions and get an answer in a few hours, as compared to the days, or weeks, it would have taken them in the past. How? Come back for Part II!

FieldGlass: Adapting to Every Contingency, Part III

In Parts I and II we discussed all of the improvements FieldGlass has made to its contingent workforce management platform since SI first covered FieldGlass back in 2010, including its improved rate guidance, rate structure, job posting process and it’s new ask-an-expert recommendation engine and powerful timesheet module. Today we’re going to dive into FieldGlass’ new Statement of Work (SoW) module.

You’re probably wondering why SoW gets its own post, because, after all, isn’t a Statement of Work just a formal document that captures and defines the work activities, deliverables, and timeline of a project that can be attached as a PDF? Well, technically, yes, but from a usefulness point of view, no. The problem with SoWs is that they are not a static contract attachment but a living, breathing document, and process, that needs to change and adapt as circumstances change. Every time new information is discovered, resource availability changes, external events introduce delays, unexpected regulatory changes require new approvals or different materials, or requirements change for business reasons, the SoW needs to change. Moreover, in order to effectively manage a project governed by a SoW, hours and resource usage has to be tracked against the SoW, which has to be updated as needed for the tracking to be relevant.

To this end, FieldGlass has built a very powerful, and flexible, SoW that supports the entire project lifecycle from a worker and resource perspective because you can’t just manage the resources, you also have to manage the resources they need to do their jobs. Take construction projects for example, in addition to the digger, he will need a Digger Truck. The workers putting up the frame will need a crane. And so on. And, more importantly, this equipment will have to be inspected on a regular basis, typically every six months, to comply with safety regulations. The ability to track the resources, and their last inspection date, is not only important, but critical to minimizing costs. For example, one customer, that was unable to effectively track and access this inspection data on a project basis, was inspecting a machine every time it was assigned to a new project on a new site. Because some machines are only needed for a few months, it was doing almost three times as many inspections as it needed to, and for one machine which cost 25K an inspection, spending 125K to 150K a year when it only needed to spend 50K. These costs added up and this savings on its own more than paid for the FieldGlass solution.

The SOW is full-featured and supports not only a project description and a list of approved workers but also rates, fees, schedules, milestones, deliverables, resources, roles, and management events. Each worker can be associated with the appropriate rate structure, payment schedule, location, onboarding, and offboarding process. Each resource can be associated with it’s own schedule (for usage, maintenance, inspection, onboarding, and offboarding), fee structure, and payments. Deliverables can be added and modified as required, and reports can be set up to report on the amount paid to date, budget amount, etc. It’s quite powerful and quite useful as the full lifecycle of the project, worker, and resource has been taken into account, made fully visible to the reporting engine, and integrated in such a way that the appropriate information can be used in timesheets, job postings, etc.

The new FieldGlass Statement of Work functionality has the potential to transform the way you manage outsourced projects.

FieldGlass: Adapting to Every Contingency, Part II

Yesterday, in Part I, we outlined all of the improvements FieldGlass has made to its contingent workforce management platform since SI first covered FieldGlass back in 2010, and discussed in detail its improved rate guidance, rate structure, and job posting process. Today, in Part II, we will cover e-mail approvals, FieldGlass’ new Ask-an-Expert recommendation engine and its powerful timesheet module. Then, tomorrow, in Part III we’ll cover its new Statement of Work (SoW) support.

E-mail Approvals
While this is an “old-news” capability for many supply management platforms, what is surprising is just how much e-mail approvals accelerate the worker selection and approval process. Customers who implement e-mail approvals reduce their cycle time, on average, by 66%! A manager who may not log into the system every day is in her email (every working hour of) every day.

“Ask an Expert” Recommendation Engine
This is a powerful tool for customers who want to take the time to customize the default workflow templates for their organization. By defining the appropriate questions and responses, a manager can be directed to the appropriate labour category for any position and the appropriate process. Is this a temporary position? Contingent? Outsourced to a service provider under contract? Or should it be a full time position that should go through a non-contingent process? And are there appropriate contingent labour providers who can staff the position, or will an RFP need to be issued? (For example, let’s say it’s a one-time integration of a new back-office Supply Management system and no currently approved provider has an expert on staff.) Depending on the need, the system will direct the user to the appropriate course of action, which could be as simple as creating a new instance of an archived job-posting for a 6-month temporary labour position to issuing an RFP to find a new provider for an 18 month systems integration project.

New Timesheet Module
Just like e-mail approvals, timesheet solutions are “old-news” too, except when they are expertly integrated into the contingent workforce solution in such a way that usage for both employees and managers is almost effortless. In the average situation, an employee will just have to enter the number of hours they worked each day during the week because the system will automatically retrieve the projects they are working on and the associated billing codes, and automatically classify overtime. For an average worker on one project, they will have to enter five numbers each week. The system automatically validates each timesheet against statements of work; daily, weekly, monthly and SOW hour limits; and employee work hour/day/month restrictions and generates warnings where manager review/approval is required. A manager can then one-click approve all timesheets without warnings, and, through check-box selection, approve all timesheets with warnings that are expected and acceptable (which will happen if a manager approves overtime on a given project to get it done). This greatly reduces the number of timesheets that require individual review and attention and makes managers much more efficient.

In other words, while a number of these improvements were evolutionary and to-be expected, what is unexpected is how well some of these improvements were integrated. The bulk of the FieldGlass platform is incredibly easy to use for the average manager and approver once initial configuration is done.

Tomorrow we’ll discuss the new Statement of Work functionality.