Monthly Archives: May 2011

Straight to the Bottom Line: Part I.ii – A Roadmap to Successful Supply Management

In part I.i, we reviewed the introduction to Bob & Doug’s (& Michael & Shelley’s) classic Straight to the Bottom Line: An Executive’s Roadmap to World Class Supply Management in anticipation of Bob and Bob’s new text on Next Level Supply Management Excellence: Your Straight to the Bottom Line Roadmap which is coming out next month on June 28. We’re doing this because, even if you have read it, it doesn’t hurt to read it again and brush up on the foundations before starting your Next Level Supply Management journey.

The authors outline a seven-step process to get from where the organization is to where it needs to be that starts with goals and ends with transformation. And it goes something like this:

1. The Right Goals

The right goals are SMART: specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-sensitive and they must focus on real cost savings and value generation, not the cost per purchase order processed or the cost per FTE (which are tactical and send the wrong message — especially in the latter case as Hackett data demonstrates that world-class Procurement organizations tend to have the highest costs per FTE).

Targets should be mid-term, and not immediate, as true value comes from transformation, not one-time savings from a reverse auction because the supply-demand dynamics temporarily shifted in your favor. The authors recommend three-to-five year cost reduction targets that are mutually owned by Procurement, Manufacturing, Engineering, R&D, IT, and/or Finance as true transformation requires significant, up-front, investment in capital, brainpower, and personal commitment. However, considering that some organizations have seen 50:1 ROIs, the up-front preparation and investment will be worth it. In addition, the organization should start with three-to-five initiatives at first, and then add more only when the first set are under control. And it should avoid following in the footsteps of Jack Welch or Ignacio Lopez de Arriortua whose hard-nosed approach to cost reduction ultimately backfired in the end.

2. Process Integration

Competition is no longer company-to-company but supply chain -to- supply chain. As a result, a loosely coordinated group of companies focussed on the optimization of their individual objectives can not possibly compete with a supply chain operating as a team. A successful supply chain integrates each element of supply, design, production and distribution end-to-end. All of the stakeholders, both internal and external to the company, need to be involved in design and delivery. This is why its so important to have partnerships with strategic suppliers focussed on mutual benefit, and not arms-length hostile arrangements that result from a focus on hardball negotiations and perpetual price reductions on the supply side.

Within the company, the C-Suite, Sales & Marketting, R&D, Operations Management, Product Support, Finance, and Supply Management organizations must all be aligned and represented on the cross-functional team that manages each category. Each will have different primary goals, but the goals will be aligned with the written strategic sourcing plan, which will be aligned with the corporate strategy and objectives. And the right suppliers must be involved. As per a Wharton study quoted by the authors, one recent study of the U.S. food industry estimated that poor coordination among supply chain partners was wasting 30 Billion annually. If that’s not a good enough reason to integrate, I don’t know what is.

3. The Right Leader

The CPO must be able to lead well and work with the team. A lone wolf will not be able to handle the challenges of today’s purchasing organizations, which constantly change. The leader must be able to attract top talent and should possess a reasonable subset of the following skills:

  • cross-functional experience
  • credibility with Finance, IT, and Operations
  • experience interacting with the C-Suite
  • strategic thinking
  • ability to make tough decisions
  • results orientation
  • integrity

The last thing you want is a CPO who tells everyone that they have to spend four years as an entry-level tactical buyer before they can move up the ranks, unless, of course, you want your entire team to quit.

4. The Right (Corporate) Structure

Purchasing should lead from the center. Most best in class Procurement organizations, including most of the winners of Purchasing Magazine’s Medal of Professional Excellence, have been centralized or center-led organizations. (From 1984 to 2004, only two were decentralized.) A 2004 study from CAPS found that 83% of Procurement organizations were centralized or center led (hybrid). In a decentralized organization, it’s much harder to leverage volume, best practices, or market and supplier insight which will exist in pockets through the organization. Although the best structure will be dependent upon the organizational structure and the support from the top, at the very least the Procurement organization should be center-led and influence the decentralized units wherever it can make an impact.

5. Innovation & Technology

Best-in-Class Procurement organizations are willing to innovate and employ best-in-class technology to improve their sourcing and procurement initiatives. While the level of innovation that can be achieved at the current time will be dependent upon where an organization is on its journey, just about any organization can take advantage of new technology to improve its automation of tactical processes (through P2P), increase its insight into organizational spend (through Spend Analysis), and streamline it’s negotiation and award processes (through e-Negotiation and Decision Optimization) and start saving today. Leaders will also embrace Product LifeCycle Management (PLM) solutions.

6. Show Them the Money

Leading Procurement organizations know that the first question on every C-level Executive’s mind is Show Me the Money and are prepared to show a real savings report that answers the following questions:

  • Are the savings real?
  • Are they net of inflation?
  • How were they calculated?
  • What’s the baseline?
  • Who (in finance) verified the calculation?
  • Where are the savings on my bottom line?

In addition, they’ll have calculations ready that demonstrate their impact on the P&L, which will capture:

  • initiatives
  • volume fluctuations
  • marketplace factors

in order to demonstrate total profit-and-loss-impact.

Even though a good Procurement organization

  • improves working capital
  • improves “monetization” of underutilized corporate assets
  • reduces risk and pricing volatility
  • increases organizational compliance with contracts
  • improves the overall effectiveness and efficiency of the supply chain in meeting key operational needs

until Procurement has established itself as a critical enabler of corporate success, all Procurement will hear from the C-Suite is Show Me the Money.

7. Transformation

This is the end-state, the foundations of a world-class supply management organization that applies leadership, best practices, innovation, and technology to generate year-over-year savings and value for the organization. However, this transformation will only be achieved if:

  • a shared need that everyone understands and believes in is defined
  • an exciting vision of change is presented
  • clear communication is made on a regular basis
  • obstacles are eliminated (by the CEO if need be)
  • executive actions are consistent with the vision
  • changes are reinforced
  • leadership has skin-in-the-game and stays the course

It can be a long journey to a best-in-class supply management organization, but it will be well worth the effort. For more information, and examples, on how to set goals, integrate processes, pick the right leader, define the right corporate structure, innovate and apply technology, show them the money, and achieve total Procurement organization transformation, review Bob & Doug’s (& Michael & Shelley’s) classic Straight to the Bottom Line while you wait for Robert A. Rudzki and Robert J. Trent’s follow-up on Next Level Supply Management Excellence.

Compliance and Security are Top IT Concerns

A recent article over on Supply & Demand Chain Executive that summarized a survey by the Information Systems Audit and Control Association (ISACA) that found that the top three concerns of IT professionals were:

  1. regulatory compliance
  2. enterprise-based IT management and governance
  3. information security management

It’s kind of surprising that information security management is third and not first on the list given the headlines that come from breaches in security, such as the recent Sony PlayStation Network breach. Regulatory compliance is important, as it can result in fines for failures, but breaches are more costly, once the damage to the brand and the lawsuits are factored in.

I was a little surprised to see enterprise based IT management so high on the list. It’s an important topic, but given recent disasters, I would have expected diaster recovery and business continuity, #4, to take its spot, as IT management is a never ending issue and rarely overlooked by CIOs and CTOs, even though they might no always find the time to get it where they want it.

Straight to the Bottom Line: Part I.i – A Roadmap to Successful Supply Management

In preparation for next month’s June 28 release of Robert A. Rudzki and Robert J. Trent’s Next Level Supply Management Excellence: Your Straight to the Bottom Line Roadmap, we’re going to do a formal review of Bob & Doug’s (& Michael & Shelley’s) classic Straight to the Bottom Line: An Executive’s Roadmap to World Class Supply Management. Even if you have read it, now would be a good time to read it again to make sure you’re well versed in all of the foundations before starting your Next Level Supply Management journey.

The classic text starts with an overview of the opportunity available to those organizations willing to embark on a Supply Management journey. Packed with success stories, including that of a 40B Manufacturer who saved 1B over three years with a modest investment of 20M, of Xerox and how it slashed produt development time by a year and manufacturing costs by 50% by including suppliers strategically in design, and of Lucent and how it achieved 20% year-to-year price savings when it needed them most, the underlying theme is that supply chain management can play a significant role in profitability.

In addition to describing the great opportunity that Supply Management offers an organization, the first chapter also does a great job in defining the new role for Purchasing in a modern supply management focussed organization and the benefits that can be achieved. Some of the key changes and benefits are:

Changes Benefits
  • Ongoing Priority
  • Transformation Mandate
  • Central Point of Contact for Suppliers
  • Strategic Corporate Objectives
  • Cross-Functional
  • Reduced Cost Structures
  • Higher Return on Assets
  • Better Risk Management
  • Reduced Cycle Times
  • One Voice

Before diving into the basic roadmap, the authors state that an organization must first understand where it is before it can define the roadmap to where it is going. And the organization should start by asking some important questions, which the authors define as follows:

  1. Are supply chain goals integrated into the strategic plan of the business?
  2. Does the chief executive know who the chief purchasing professional is?
  3. What is the relationship of the chief purchasing professional to the chief executive?
  4. Does the procurement team have top- and bottom-line objectives?
  5. What percentage of external spend is supervised by purchasing and covered by a written strategic sourcing plan?
  6. What percentage of spend is leveraged through internal spend pools?
  7. Does the organization have the right leadership in the Procurement function.
  8. What is the working relationship between Procurement professionals and those in other disciplines?
  9. What are the opportunities available to Purchasing professionals for training and improvement?
  10. What is the chief executive’s personal commitment to achieving improved corporate performance through a best-in-class Procurement organization?

There are right answers and wrong answers to each of these questions. Before an organization can truly begin it’s journey, it must have the right answers to most, if not all, of these questions. Otherwise it won’t have what it takes to move up the Procurement maturity curve. And an organization does want to be best-in-class because best-in-class organizations see the following transformations:

Before After
Little/No Strategic Sourcing 100% of Sourcing Covered by Written Sourcing Plans
Spreadsheet Analysis Optimization Analysis
Defect Rates > 40K PPM Six Sigma Quality
On Time Delivery (OTD) of 65% to 90%    Optimized OTD
Prices Rise 3% to 5% Annually Costs Drop 5% to 7% Annually

And these benefits just scratch the surface. For more benefits, more success stories, more insights, and the right answers to the above questions, check out Bob & Doug’s (& Michael & Shelley’s) classic Straight to the Bottom Line while you wait for Robert A. Rudzki and Robert J. Trent’s follow-up on Next Level Supply Management Excellence.

The Time For Lean Is Now

But that does not mean you should rush an implementation. While lean can save time and money while increasing efficiency, a poorly thought out lean strategy will do nothing but disrupt operations, which will only waste time, increase cost, and decrease efficiency. And when you rush the implementation of any transformational program, chances are that you will make one or more mistakes that will lead you down the wrong road.

So, not only should you take the time to plan it out and get it right, you should learn the lessons from those who have went, and messed up before. The Supply Chain Digest recently ran a short piece documenting some common mistakes when implementing lean principles that is worth a read.

Don’t Implement Lean with a Weak Strategy or Insufficient Resources
If the strategy is weak, the workforce will see that it is half-assed and quickly lose faith. If the resources aren’t there, the overworked workforce will quickly lose interest in the initiative and fail to support it. As the article points out training, target setting, and communication tools all need to be carefully planned for proper implementation of Lean.

Don’t Take Lean Concepts Beyond the Lean Maturity Level of the Organization
Just because the lean designer has advanced theoretical knowledge and years of practical experience, that doesn’t mean the rest of the organization does or that they’re ready to be an advanced organization. The key to success is to take it one step at a time, one change at a time, and work your way up to a more advanced level.

Don’t Try a Cookier Cutter Solution
True Lean optimizes your business, not someone else’s. It’s impossible to take a cookie cutter plan and apply it out of the box. It will need to be appropriately tailored to your business by an expert, who will map out stages that the organization will have to pass through to obtain true lean success. As the article points out, each Lean solution must match with the company size, industry, ethnic cultures, product price structure, location, environment and a number of other related variables.

Follow these nuggets of advice, and you can start your journey down the road to lean success.

You Know Your Procurement Rules Are Onerous When

Even your public sector organizations are saying the rules are inflexible, complex, and onerous! Seems that the NHS, who need to find 50% more savings and make up to twenty billion pounds of efficiency savings by 2015, are heeding my advice that they need to stop buying like a government agency and have made a submission to the European Commision’s consultation stating that EU public procurement law should be amended to allow for greater negotiation with bidders during the selection and award process.

According to a recent article over on SupplyManagement.com, the NHS Confederation has called for a significant increase of the threshold at which organisations are obliged to follow EU rules. The current level applies to many relatively small contracts, putting them through the same onerous tendering processes as ones worth many millions which, as I pointed out in my post on how the NHS can find 50% more savings, is moronic. When the bid is too low, you get organizations bidding that have mastered the art of the “change order”. They agree to do “X” where “X” sounds like it is what you want, but really isn’t, and then to get what you really want, because of the tight contract, you’ll have to pay a ridiculous amount in change order fees, and the result is that the net cost will be more than the highest bid, and significantly more than the lowest bid from a competent, honest, vendor.

Hopefully when the EU revises the regulations this summer, they’ll listen to the NHS request. Otherwise, there’s no way the NHS is going to find the savings it needs to continually reinvest in patient care, wait times are going to continue to go up, and quality of service is going to continue to go down.