Category Archives: Cost Reduction

It’s Conference Season, and that means It’s Travel Season!

And this means it’s time to get your T&E under control.

Since what gets measured gets managed, this also means that the first thing your Supply Management organization should be doing is measuring the spend. Then, when it has measured the spend, it should be evaluating the spend. If the spend is too high relative to industry norms, then it needs to get the spend under management as soon as possible. However, one thing it should not be doing is questioning the validity of the spend.

What do I mean by this? Simply put, neither Finance nor Supply Management should be attempting to judge the ROI of business travel by function, as suggested in this post over on CPO Rising, and they definitely should not be trying to measure it with a quantitative metric.

Why?

Simply put, outside of their respective domains, these organizations have no clue how valuable or invaluable a sales meeting, training session, or conference was, and sometimes even the VP who approved the spend doesn’t know, because the value from the travel typically cannot be measured in the short term. And there definitely isn’t any way to predict the value beforehand! In the CPO Rising post, the author gives the example of Sales and says you should ask if the sales team closed a deal as a result of an expensive trip or if IT has improved its processes by attending specific conferences. These are both WRONG questions.

In the Sales example, in traditional enterprise sales with traditional executives (who have been in their roles for 20+ years), not every trip is going to close a deal, or even have a directly measurable impact. Sometimes multiple trips are required by personnel to build a relationship, which must be built before a deal can even be negotiated as relationships in many South American and Asian cultures must precede a business deal. With this metric, the salespeople would never take a trip, never meet new potential clients or business partners, and never close any deals!

And the author of this CPO Rising post, who has obviously never been an IT guy*, needs to understand that sometimes where conferences are concerned, process improvement is not the point. Sometimes the whole point is to give key members of the development team who have been working their asses off for months straight on a key project a reward and a break (for burning the midnight oil on a regular basis and doing whatever it takes to make an unreasonable deadline set by Maury the Management Moron). The whole point is to keep the key team members happy, boost morale, and expose these team members to new ideas that will help them identify the technologies and processes they should be researching on their return. Because, where IT is concerned, it’s not how many warm bodies you have in front of computers, it’s how skilled those bodies are. In a discipline where your top coder can be as much as 20 times as productive as your average coder (because you have too many poor performers and not enough superstars), quantitatively measured in bug-free lines of code, and where top talent is rare, the organization has to keep its top talent, and low-cost tokens of appreciation, like conferences (that will also open the developers’ minds and embark them on a journey towards even more productivity in the future) is a great way to do it. If you’re going to cut the travel budget just because there’s no immediate return, then you might as well lay off the top 20% of performers in your organization, get a shotgun, blow a hole in the server, and see how you fare. Because that’s effectively what you’re doing if you don’t have another way to keep morale high in IT.

So what should an organization be measuring, evaluating, and managing in terms of T&E spend?

Come back tomorrow for Part II to find out.
* Unlike the doctor who has a PhD in CS and who has been a senior algorithm developer, enterprise software architect, research scientist, and CTO …

Why Bidding Flexibility Is Important to e-Auction Success

Regardless of what you want to call it — expressive bidding, lotting, market baskets, informed sourcing, etc. — the ability to let a supplier bid the way they can give you the best price is very important to e-Auction success. If all you can support is simple auctions on an item by item basis, and quotes on an item by item basis, you are not going to get the best deal.

This is rather easily illustrated. For example, let’s say your business is clone computer assembly for mid-sized businesses who don’t want the Dell or HP premium. Let’s also say that you buy six different components for these computer assemblies: cases, power supplies, motherboards (with on-board everything to keep it simple), memory, hard drives, and cable packs.

If you are forcing a supplier into separate bids by item, and the level of detail they can quote is price per unit, shipping per unit, and extended warranty per unit, you’re probably going to end up with quotes looking like this:

Supplier 1 Supplier 2 Supplier 3
Component Unit Freight EW Unit Freight EW Unit Freight EW
Case 20 5 1 22 4 1 18 6 0
Power Supply 40 3 6 36 4 3 38 4 2
Motherboard 199 5 24 195 5 19 189 5 30
Paired Memory Pack 49 2 4 47 3 6 51 3 4
Hard Drive 78 4 12 74 3 8 81 4 7
Cable Pack 22 4 0 24 3 1 19 5 0
Total 49 2 4 305 12 30 37 11 0
Grand Total 450

Not bad for a clone server, but if you bid out the basket and allow the supplier to bid on just the components they want and do so as a bundle, you might find that you get this result:

Case Power
Supply		 Mother-board Memory Hard
Drive		 Cables Freight Warranty
S-1 B-1   19   38   20   8   5
S-1 B-2   45   71   5   8
S-2 B-1   20   33   6   2
S-2 B-2   195   14   5   10
S-3 B-1   45   72   5   9
S-3 B-2   185   14   7   30
Grand Total 414

An 8% savings by allowing a supplier to bundle bids according to their operational efficiencies!

Get it now?

If I Succeeded in Destroying Dashboards, How Else Would I Improve Spend Analysis.

The smart alecks are correct — technically destroying dashboards is not adding anything to spend analysis so I didn’t actually provide a way to improve spend analysis technology, just the results you get from using it.

So if I succeeded and dashboards bit the dust, what would I do? (Besides banning integration points for report writers for all OLAP-based spend analysis products?*) Good question. Especially since there’s about a half dozen logical next steps.

Three things that would be useful if you had a true spend analysis product like Opera’s BIQ would be to:

  • Integrate Easy Should-Cost Modelling CapabilityThis way you can define a cost breakdown for a product or service you are looking to source and have the tool automatically generate an expected cost based upon current data, as well as a price-range, with confidence, based upon low, average, and high prices paid for the raw materials, energy, labour, etc. (provided that the should-cost model permitted base-cost definitions for any cost components you weren’t buying that were bought entirely by your supplier)
  • Optimized Awards Based on Historical Data and Business RulesYou don’t have to send out an RFX to get base market pricing if you are already buying a product, it’s in your transaction store. Nor do you have to run a complex event to determine the lowest cost providers for a market basket. Moreover, if you are buying commodity products and services with list prices, and all your suppliers do is give you a discount of X% for a guaranteed award, you don’t really need optimization to determine the lowest cost as it’s just a simple formula against current pricing. And if your only business rule is 2 or 3 way split, it’s just the 2 or 3 lowest cost suppliers with the appropriate risk mitigation. In this situation, it would be easy for spend analysis tools to build in some simple optimization capability to tell you your lowest cost buy, and if it’s close to your should-cost model, you can just cut a contract without going through a time-consuming sourcing event.
  • True Federation across Related Data SetsMost spend analysis tools are only capable of working on one cube built on one data classification at a time. This means that even though a user can pick the drill dimension order, only one set of data can be viewed at one time. But sometimes you want to drill into greater detail (such as who requisitioned all those widgets from the wonky supplier), and that’s not in the transaction file — so you need another cube with more detail on the invoice (history). Then you drill in on the augmented AP (cube) data until you get to the invoices associated with the supplier, switch over to the new cube and drill down to the line items of interest and retrieve the requisitioners. Another situation is where you are getting a lot of warranty returns, and you want to figure out what batches the returned items are in so you can determine whether or not the batches were bad and it will be cheaper to do a mass replacement (by just putting out a recall) than dealing with one breakdown at a time. In this case, you need to drill into the warranty cube and then branch over into the invoice cube to get the batch numbers associated with the appropriate goods receipts that are associated with the invoice.

These are just a few things that can be done, and all would simplify the life of an analyst. More to come at a later time but first, what would you do?

* If you don’t know why, you don’t know your spend analysis product limitations!

Doing Procurement Right Regardless of Organizational Size

A few days ago, in our post on how You’ve Negotiated but you still might not be realizing savings on marketing print, we pointed out two great guests posts by Santosh Reddy of GEP on how just throwing a problem over the wall to an expert doesn’t necessarily save you money — it just guarantees that someone else, namely the Print Management Company (PMC), makes money on your behalf.

Today, we’re going to point out another guest post by a GEP consultant, Sanyam Khurana. In his recent post on Spend Matters on “Procurement Lessons for Small Businesses and Large Multinational Corporations”, he notes that some strategies work well regardless of organizational size. Thus, if you are a small business that wants to get bigger, you should take take these lessons to heart and work on these strategies.

Flexibility

If you’ve been paying attention, you know that Sourcing Innovation has been emphasizing the importance of the 3T’s to successful Supply Management — Talent, Technology, and Transition Management. Transition Management requires a lot of things, but above all else, flexibility as your organization needs to adapt to, and be in, a state of constant change, in order to navigate the ebbs and flows of today’s global economy.

Cost Optimization

Whether you’re buying 100 units or 100,000 units, you still have to make sure you’re paying the right price for the right product. Over paying by 10% is still overpaying by 10%, and with smaller budgets, and margins to work with, 10% is still a lot.

Supplier Rationalization

Whether you’re a 1 Million, 100 Million, or a 1 Billion dollar company, you still depend on your suppliers for your success. In Sanyam Khurana’s post, he gives the example of a bakery that requires raw material, namely flour, to produce its goods. If the suppliers don’t deliver, the bakery can’t bake its bread. Having the right suppliers that you can depend on through thick and thin is important regardless of organizational size.

Data Management

Not only does each of the above strategies require good data to be effective, but so do other organizational strategies. For example, you can’t optimize cost unless you know how much you are paying, how much you could be paying and the value you are getting. You can’t rationalize on the right suppliers unless you are keeping good performance metrics. And while you can always be flexible, there’s no point in being flexible unless you know the direction that you should be be flexibly moving in! Plus, in today’s economy, social media is often critical to marketing, sales, and advertising — and in order to focus on the right channels, you need data!

Data, data everywhere
And all the tables burst
Data, data everywhere
It can not get much worse!

 

15 Ways to Shave Costs From Your Supply Chain Part II

As per yesterday’s post, earlier this year, Inbound Logistics ran an article on 163 Ways to Supercharge Your Supply Chain that had good advice to improve your global logistics, customs, documentation, expedited shipping, warehousing, optimization, equipment, trucking, 3PLs, maritime, security, risk management, and general supply chain operations. Besides all of the obvious ways to improve your supply chain and cut your costs, and the more advanced ways that are covered regularly on SI, there are a few often overlooked nuggets of cost savings that should be singled out because they cost many companies money and go undetected. Today we will cover the remaining eight (8).

3PLs
Determine What Each 3PL Does Best
Most 3PLs excel in a niche such as global logistics, transportation, or warehousing because most of them started off focusing on one function and added others as they grew. Understand their strengths, and weaknesses, before selecting a 3PL.

Inventory Accuracy
Establish external and internal product traceability.
It’s not just inbound and outbound shipments, but internal transfers between different warehouse locations, etc. that need to be tracked. Knowing you have 10 units of a product is only useful if you know where the units are.

Lean Logistics
Manage your empty container flow.
Moving empty containers is equivalent to burning money. It’s a complete waste.

Seasonal Peaks
Know Your Overflow Potential Before You Need It!
Don’t be scrambling for overflow space and trailers, etc. when you need it — have a plan in advance.

Maritime
Bypass Distribution Centers
If you can consolidate a large shipment that can go directly to a store, or a local DC that serves multiple stores, do so — temporary storage costs money and so does unnecessary unloading and reloading of inventory.

Port Selection
Know Your Port’s Infrastructure Limits
Especially if the port is near capacity. If the port isn’t investing in infrastructure to expand capacity, or can no longer expand its infrastructure, then it should be expected that the port will hit capacity and that could be a problem for your organization in the future if you plan to do more global trade.

Security
Protect Against Malicious Behaviour By Former Employee … Credentials
It’s not just the former employee that can cause you problems, it’s their credentials! Just because an employee left on good terms does not mean that their login and access credentials won’t cause problems. A current employee trying to arrange an inside job will happily use the ill-gotten password of that esteemed former employee for their illegal gain.

Risk Management
When Selecting Geographically Distributed Vendors, Consider the Ports!
Multiple suppliers who ship through the same primary port can all be taken offline as a result of a typhoon that destroys the port.

For another 148 ways to optimize your supply chain, see the Inbound Logistics article on 163 Ways to Supercharge Your Supply Chain.