After my recent post on how Walmart Changed the World … But Not Necessarily for the Better, I reminded my Twitterers* about what happens when you use Walmart Consultants. In a nutshell, when you pay a cut rate, you get a cut job … and the pleasure of the consultant blaming you for his or her incompetence.

However, this is still better than what you get when you use a sleazy consultant (who, in another life, was probably a lemon, err, used car salesperson). As per this great post over on the Enterprise Irregulars on “Screwing the Customer” (Tales from the Crazy Consultant File), we can still be surprised by the antics of some consultants. The post chronicled two stories.

In the first story, a small, profitable business that was a multi-million dollar money machine, bought on-premise ERP software from a reseller that poorly fit their needs. Since the reseller did not specialize in implementation, the firm wanted the vendor to find them another implementation services company. But since the vendor had no relationship with the buyer, the buyer was dependent on the reseller to find, and manage, the implementation of software that poorly fit their needs. The buyer has outsourced control, leverage, and judgment to an unworthy consulting firm. Translation — the customer is screwed.

In the second story, a small consulting organization has a multi-million dollar change management contract with a large state agency. Part-way through the project, the consulting company unilaterally shifted its focus to advising on tools and methodologies. The state agency threatened termination, and the consultancy responded with a large invoice and threats of legal action. Meanwhile, the agency hiring manager has limited options since any change would involve delays and additional expense. Translation — this customer is also screwed.

Unfortunately, the sleaze is not limited to these two examples. The Supply Management space also has its share of sleazy consultants, which are our equivalent of the the used car (lemon) salespersons, and many of them fall into the following two categories:

Slippery Spend Analyst

Yes, it’s true, that the doctor promotes a good spend analysis almost as often as he promotes a good optimization-based sourcing project, but there are two types of spend analysts in the world. Those that educate you, and those that just tell you where your spend is too high and offer to negotiate it down for you. In the short term, this works great — the consultant identifies a category, like telecom, where you are 15% over market average and the consultant negotiates your rates down to 5% below market average and you save 20%. But in the long term, as users are added to and removed from the plans, and usage changes, rates creep back up and in three years your organization is again paying 15%-plus over market average. And, again, you have to pay the consultancy to do the spend analysis to reduce your rates. Now, if they had trained you on their process and one or more tools, you’d have the option to do it yourself, or to just use them for the negotiation. But since they didn’t, you’re left in the dark.

Recovery Specialist

This is a wonderful racket. Almost every big organization overpays its suppliers due to duplicate payments on the same invoice (by accident, when it is resubmitted due to a late payment), duplicate payments against the same products (as the organization will resend the invoice with each shipment corresponding to the same PO), overpayments (because negotiated payments were misapplied), and failed deductions (because parts were bad and payment was not refunded). But not every organization catches all of these overpayments, which can add up to Millions for Global 3000s. There are consultancies out there that specialize in this recovery, and this is a good thing as long as they don’t take advantage of you.

The problem is that most of the consultancies that specialize in recovery use “black-box” methods to identify these overpayments, which are guarded more securely than Fort Knox. So even though they might find an organization a Million in savings, and take Two Hundred Thousand as a Fee, the organization isn’t that much better off than if it hadn’t hired the consultancy because. In as little as eighteen months, there will be another Million in overpayments hidden in the books because the consultancy didn’t tell the organization how the majority of overpayments originated or what best practices the organization could adopt to minimize the amount of overpayments it made. This could allow the organization to go longer between significant recovery audits, and the organization would likely pay less, and lose less, over time. A good recovery firm will do this, and a really good recovery firm will even advise you on the software options that exist to plug some of the holes in your payment processes and/or tolls that will automate part of the recovery process.

^* Yes, the doctor is on Twitter, riding the Fail Whale as he chases the Twitter Bird (because the doctor wants his marbles back)!

Last month, Forbes ran an article that needs to be in every Supply Manager’s toolkit. Given that the number one priority of most Supply Management organizations is to gain trust across the organization and get more spend under management (SUM), an average Supply Manager, as she gains trust, is going to get a lot of advice from the individuals on the cross-functional teams she is going to build. Some will be good, but some will be bad (and downright ugly). A good Supply Manager knows how to latch onto, implement, and encourage the good advice while carefully avoiding the bad advice.

Ignoring bad advice, especially if is from an individual who’s buy-in you need and who thinks it’s really, really good, can be tough, so I’m glad Forbes ran this article. Even though the article was written more for entrepreneurs about to embark on a startup, it is just as applicable to Supply Managers about to take on a new category. So what was the advice?

1. Look Forward – not back.
   Study trend lines that correspond to what you need to buy, not historical demand levels. Demand could be falling. The last thing you want to do is be stuck with a warehouse of obsolete inventory. So make sure you don’t just get last quarter’s numbers, ask for the last three years.
2. Ignore Your Friends – talk to customers.
   It’s not what engineering or marketing wants — it’s what the end consumer wants. If you don’t procure the products and services that the end consumer will buy, it doesn’t matter how good you do your job as the organization won’t last long without sales. So no matter how good they claim the advice is, be sure to say that sounds like an awesome idea, let’s run it by our customers to see if they are ready for it.
3. Consider the source.
   Everyone has their own bias and point of view. It’s important that you balance all the views in your sourcing decision to arrive at what’s best for the organization as a whole, not just what’s best for engineering, marketing, or even your own Supply Management organization. The best Supply Management organizations increase overall value. So when engineering gives you a great idea, be sure to say that’s great, now how do we sell it to marketing and vice versa. When everyone gets on the same page, the advice is likely to be better, or at least consistent.
4. Learn to Love the Word No.
   Some requests will be so bad that there will be no way to address them besides just saying no. For example, marketing will insist on a certain print shop which costs 50% more than the next highest bidder because of a great relationship. There’s just no way to deal with this situation delicately. Print is print. It’s not creative, and there is absolutely no rationale argument for such a premium. In this situation, you will just have to say no and move on.
5. Bet on yourself – always.
   At the end of the day, you have to make the decision, and, most importantly, as you are being held accountable, you have to make the right one. If you’ve done your homework, that’s something you will be able to do. You just have to have the confidence that you can do it, even if everyone else is pulling you in a different direction. Don’t expect other organizations to echo your views, they won’t. They have their own goals. Your job is to get everyone on the same page when you can, and make the tough call that is best for the organization when you can’t. C’est la vie de gestion des approvisionnements.

As the article says, simply put – advice is an input. Treat it as one of many.