Category Archives: Procurement Innovation

Ariba + Orbian = ?

The Ariba (acquired by SAP) – Orbian partnership is something I expected everyone and his dog would be picking up on and writing about, but with the exception of Mickey North Rizza’s (AMR, acquired by Gartner) and Jason Busch‘s (SpendMatters) analyses*, I haven’t really found anything of note, which is surprising given the potential significance of the partnership (if Ariba pulls it off right).

Ken Roche, CEO of Orbian, notes that By providing low-cost receivables financing and certainty of payment timing and amount to suppliers, buyers are able to achieve cost savings or better trade terms. Additionally, suppliers generate incremental free cash flow, improving their [days sales outstanding (DSO)] metrics and capital efficiency, by gaining access to the entire value of the receivable, at a low cost.

According to the press release, The ASN (Ariba Supplier Network) serves buyers and sellers in 115 countries and has combined transactions exceeding $95B annually. The ASN lets the buyers trading the $95B approve the invoices and notify Orbian. The suppliers view and Orbian provides payment within 48 hours of the decision to the supplier. This slashes the model to 2 days from the previous 30.

Mickey notes that:

  • Ariba is for many others a best-of-breed suite that is wrapped around their ERP system, such as Oracle or SAP. And while the two systems, Ariba and ERP, may work together, this presents an even greater opportunity for ERP-centric companies to tie into the ASN and take advantage of the Ariba partnership for greater working capital.
  • The partnership [also] moves Ariba ahead of its competition by offering three
    opportunities to improve working capital for the buyer and suppliers: earlier payment with electronic invoice presentment and payment (EIPP) and cards, dynamic discounting, and a third-party supply chain financing opportunity.
  • The Orbian strengths are in its diversified pool of investors that provide
    liquidity outside of the traditional bank credit line. With a low cost, plenty of capacity from investors, and a tiered structure, the opportunity is vast for immediate cash flow improvements. This is a huge differentiator for CFOs, treasurers, and CPOs who need additional resources that won’t adversely affect their balance sheet debt.

And Jason Busch notes that:

  • The real advantage for the original parties is that involvement with Orbian does not detract from the commercial paper pricing for suppliers. In other words, it’s a legitimate form of off-balance sheet financing which does not limit the ability to borrow in other ways.
  • I’d speculate that the global supply chain finance market opportunity will top a trillion dollars annually in the next decade (in deal volume).

But Supply Chain Finance goes well beyond just EIPP, early discounting, and third party financing. It also includes, among other aspects, virtual consignment financing, true optimization of working capital, increased analytics capability, and real-time visibility into program activity and the status of each customer. And this partnership could allow customers to take each of these aspects of supply chain finance to the next level as well.

For example, the platform could be used to facilitate greater virtual consignment financing, where the buyer buys the raw materials with added leverage and sells them to the supplier at cost, since buyers could also take advantage of this third party financing and still get the supplier a better rate. If the supplier needs to borrow anyway, when you consider the buyer could negotiate a better rate on both financing and on the raw material cost, this will still save money.

The platform can also be used to better optimize working capital – which goes beyond just early payment discounting. A supplier can calculate how much money it needs in any given week and optimize which payments to take early, which payments to take on schedule, and, which payments to accept late – offering yet another form of financing, but this time to a buyer.

And the platform can be used to give each supplier greater real-time visibility into the financial activity and status of each customer, giving them visibility into the financial side of their supply chain they may not have had before. It also gives the buyer better visibility into not only the financial status of their suppliers, but how much a buyer is willing to accept on an order to get paid quickly. This not only helps buyers manage risk, but could help sourcing teams negotiate better deals if they could turn around payments faster.

In other words, this is a partnership that could significantly advance the supply chain finance side of e-Procurement if done right … but only time will tell.

* All posts prior to 2012 were removed in the Spend Matters site refresh in June, 2023.

Expert Purchasing Management, A Review, Part II

To emphasize my point that I believe Next Level Purchasing’s new course “Expert Purchasing Management” is worth your time and dollars, with kind permission, I am going to dive into a few topics covered in the course that I believe illustrate the expert advice contained within the course.

The course begins by noting that there are four critical areas to the success of a purchasing department.

  • Organizational Perceptions of Purchasing
    if you’re not perceived as effective, your internal customers will try to bypass you instead of working with you
  • Purchasing Performance Measurements
    since management often only cares about metrics
  • Purchasing Staff Skill Levels
    since purchasing today requires top notch skill sets
  • Purchasing Staff Morale
    as a happy employee is a productive employee

It provides methodologies to gather intelligence on organizational perceptions and paint a clear picture, to determine how purchasing is measured and how well it is performing, to determine current staff skill levels and gaps between what the skill levels should be, and to improve morale.

A little over halfway through the course in lesson five it points out that a purchasing manager must act independently. A purchasing manager must be a leader and not a doer and not fall into the trap of doing the buyers work for them – as this will ensure the manager never has time to focus on department strategy, improvements, and cost savings and reduction innovation. It provides some good tips to help purchasing managers from falling into the trap of doing a buyers work for them, which include:

  • adding “works independently and solves problems with a minimum of management assistance” on performance evaluations
  • holding weekly meetings to encourage buyers to share challenges and solutions with their colleagues
  • encouraging buyers to think through situations and develop several potential solutions on their own – they should only come to you for advice on choosing the best solution

Finally, near the end (in lesson seven) it notes that, when it comes to eSourcing systems, sometimes less in more and when evaluating such systems you should only use a basic capabilities checklist and not detailed specifications (even though the sponsors of the Sourcing RFP Template might disagree). Specifically, detailed specifications have the following disadvantages:

  • specifications can be slanted to a particular provider
  • strict specifications may penalize more cost-effective software which actually does 90% of what you want and 99% of what you really need
  • strict specifications could result in a provider adding functionality that could then become a foundation for a patent dispute, which could be a problem for you if you are using the only instance with that customization

Finally, the course provides you with a starting capabilities checklist that you can use when evaluating eSourcing solutions.

I hope this has given you some more insight into the importance of continued education and appropriate courses for your professional development and why I believe the “Expert Purchasing Management” course and the “Senior Professional in Supply Management” certification is most likely worth your time and investment as a procurement professional.

Expert Purchasing Management, A Review, Part I

Recently, I reviewed the on-line course “Expert Purchasing Management”, the latest offering from “Next Level Purchasing” (now the Certitrek NLPA). The course, designed for new and existing purchasing managers struggling to balance the many demands of their leadership role and get the most out of their department, is designed to teach a purchasing manager evolving best practices, new technologies, and the policies and procedures they’ll need to take their purchasing department to a new level of success.

According to NLP‘s website, those who take the course will learn

  • How to report purchasing performance metrics to senior management
  • Four things about the purchasing environment that you need to assess right away
  • How to develop a purchasing customer service survey
  • Tips for improving purchasing staff productivity
  • The secrets for involving internal customers and establishing a successful Purchasing Advisory Board
  • The most important things to consider when naming your purchasing department
  • Five common purchasing department structures and their advantages and disadvantages
  • How to prioritize commodities that the purchasing department will source
  • Four indicators that you should look for to identify non-traditional areas for potential savings
  • Three different ways to assign buyer responsibilities
  • The types of various purchasing profit center models and the dangers of choosing the wrong one
  • How to staff your purchasing department with the right people
  • How to create a Purchasing Dashboard
  • How to set the perfect purchasing department goals
  • How to develop purchasing policies and procedures
  • How to establish a standard sourcing process
  • Strategies for using templates to improve productivity and reduce problems
  • Best practices for making recommendations to senior management
  • Three ways to reduce the tactical purchasing activity under your management
  • Five steps to take to ensure that you don’t do buyers’ work
  • How to improve compliance with purchasing initiatives
  • The essentials of launching a purchasing department Web site
  • How to assess the available purchasing technology by watching video demonstrations of leading software from Ariba and Zycus
  • Ten keys to eSourcing success

But of course, like the four courses I previously reviewed here on Sourcing Innovation (links below), it not only lived up to its promises, but also:

  • Covered the basic performance measurements and how to differentiate good metrics from bad
  • Discussed the five common organizational structures for purchasing departments as well as the associated advantages and disadvantages
  • Included a three-stage plan for long term purchasing development
  • Discussed eight types of policies and four types of procedures you should consider defining and implementing if you haven’t already
  • Discussed best practices for creating RFX, Contract, and Analysis templates
  • Highlighted the point that while ERP systems are very strong in terms of their database functionality and integration of data across the enterprise, they tend to be very inept when it comes to supporting world-class purchasing practices.
  • Provided some basic patterns for successful spend analysis.
  • Compared the traditional RFX process with the eSourcing RFX process step-by-step to ensure the advantages and efficiencies of best practice eRFX use are crisp and clear
  • Highlighted that when it comes to eSourcing applications, sometimes less is more and that its best to figure out the basic capabilities you need and simply compare such systems to a capabilities checklist because companies often reap great results when using less expensive eSourcing systems.
  • Discussed and differentiated the different types of pricing models being used by eSourcing providers as well as the advantages and disadvantages of each model.

Thus, I’d have to say that this course is definitely worth it. However, unlike the previous courses, which have been under continuous improvement for a couple of years now (since NLP collects all feedback and questions and makes it a point to update each course at least once a year), I did find two minor issues. Not that anything was wrong, just that I disagree.

The first issue is that Next Level Purchasing defines eSourcing as as the use of the Internet to automate several tasks associated with an RFP process. As regular readers know, I define eSourcing as the full eSourcing cycle from spend analysis through contract creation and management, following the spend analysis, supplier qualification, RFX, auction and/or negotiation, decision optimization, award and contract creation and subsequent management process that is currently outlined in “Strategic e-Sourcing Best Practices” over on the e-Sourcing Wiki [WayBackMachine]. As far as I’m concerned, Charles definition is that of the executable eSourcing Cycle which starts with the pre-RFX supplier qualification and ends with the post-RFX auction phase. That being said, everything the course covers about RFPs and related activities is correct.

The second issue is that the course does not devote a section to explaining the differences between traditional installed behind-the-firewall enterprise applications and on-demand applications, and the various models for on-demand delivery as well as the advantages and disadvantages of each. Although this is partially covered in the section on pricing models, there’s a lot to be said on each side of the fence and I feel that a good understanding of the issues can make the difference between selecting an eSourcing suite that’s good for the organization and an eSourcing suite that’s great for the organization. Of course, this wasn’t designed to be a technology course, so my point might not be valid. But you should know by now I am picky.

Of course, knowing the perfectionist that Charles Dominick is (the President of Next Level Purchasing), I’m sure these qualms will be addressed in spades in the very near future.

So if you’re looking for a professional certification, I still believe that the “Senior Professional in Supply Management” is likely the certification for you, and that if you have the SPSM and are looking to maintain it, then this course is worth your time and dollars. But if you still don’t believe me, be sure to read part II where I dive into three topics of interest.

It’s … It’s … It’s … Coupa-sonic!

The press-release hits the wire later today, but ISM started yesterday, and thus your chance to see the new version of Coupa‘s Enterprise Procurement Platform is here! It’s not only Purchasing Simplified, it’s the next evolution of on-demand procurement for the small and mid-sized enterprise.

The enterprise version of Coupa not only supports the procurement cycle from end-user requisition through delivery confirmation, but also supports approval hierarchies, attachments and automatic PDF creation, punch-out support, asset tagging, multi-way matching, and even RFQs! (I know, I know … everybody and their dog supports RFQs these days, but how many people include this basic e-Sourcing functionality inside an e-Procurement system at no-extra cost? And how many are designed with the straightforward needs of a SME in mind? And how many are easy to use?)

Based on Coupa’s underlying open-source Coupa Express platform, the industry’s first freely downloadable eProcurement solution, a company can be up and running on Coupa almost immediately. According to Lynell Rogeri of Cantaxx, Coupa Enterprise was delivering results within 24 hours of installation and the simple, ‘clean’, screens allowed them to be much more productive than they could have been with traditional procurement software. Furthermore, Coupa offers the breadth of functionality that gives them exactly the business process support they need.

As per the press release:

Small and mid-size companies that want a simple and affordable solution to automate their purchasing, invoicing, and eRFQ processes can now choose Coupa eProcurement Enterprise. Delivered as On-Demand or On-Premise software, Coupa eProcurement Enterprise includes full product support and offers a total cost of ownership that is 10 to 20 percent of what companies pay for traditional eProcurement solutions.

So, if you’re in Vegas, be sure to check out their ISM booth! If you weren’t able to make it, attend their webinar and check out the new Coupa website!

And if you missed any, here are the previous posts on Coupa’s product:
More Than Coupacetic
Riding the Rails with Coupa
Coupa Charges Ahead
Coupa Cabana Cafe: Open For Business
Procurement Independence at the Coupa Cabana Cafe

As well as the Coupa production chant in
Davie and the Coupa Factory

After all, It’s Coupa Time!

Critical Purchasing Officer

In a recent CAPS Research publication “Supply Leadership Changes” they point out that few decisions that affect the success of supply in an organization will have more impact than the decisions regarding who will be the CPO and to whom he or she will report.

The report had some interesting findings:

  • There were a total of 73 CPO changes and 75 reporting line changes in the 30 companies studied over a 10 year period.
  • There was a total of 29-first CPO appointments in the 30 companies studied over the 10 year period.
  • The centralization of supply at a firm was typically triggered by a simultaneous corporate strategic change and move towards centralization of many functions, and trigged the establishment of the fist CPO in 22 of 29 instances.
  • In 5 of 29 cases, the first CPO was established when the executive team recognized that centralization of supply would gain the corporation a variety of benefits.
  • Initial CPOs and replacement CPOS are typically found within the company more than they are not (62% and 73% of the time).
  • When a CPO was recruited outside the company, the CPO came from a supply position.
  • An internally recruited CPO with a supply background had an average tenure of 4.3 years while an internally recruited CPO without a supply background had an average tenure of 3.5 years, but first-time CPOs with a combination of supply and non-supply experience had an average tenure of 5.5 years.
  • CPOs leave their position for a variety of reasons, the most common being promotion to another position. Other common reason are major corporate strategic and structural change and a major corporate strategy strange.

These findings, and other, have some interesting implications:

  • Leadership in the top supply function is in a state of constant flux and getting a running start at the position is important.
  • The trend toward the appointment of non-supply managers to the CPO position is continuing and a significant burden of education and support falls upon the shoulders of the senior supply managers with supply experience.
  • Individuals aspiring for the CPO position need to move to a corporate supply position.
  • The CPO and the person to whom he or she reports forms a powerful team within the organization.
  • A new CPO must create a plan of action.

This might imply that:

  • A supply manager should constantly be improving herself. Continuing education and awareness is critical. ( Blogs contribute to awareness. )
  • A supply manager should be ready for increasing responsibility.
  • Corporate supply is where it’s at.
  • If you want to be a powerful CEO, get a great CPO.
  • A good plan is important.