Category Archives: rants

All Your Peers Are Chasing a Lost Cause — Are You? Part I

While I believe that the average company is still chasing the cost reduction myth (as highlighted in eyefortransport’s recent “Global Chief Supply Chain Officer Strategy – European Focus” report, for example), I am having a very hard time understanding why. As SI has pointed out a number of times over the past couple of years (including in it’s recent piece on the Top Ten Things To Do in 2013 To Control Costs), for any organization that has been pursuing any form of supply management over the past five years or so, cost reduction is a fantasy that’s not going to happen within your tenure. Inflation is back with a vengeance — it will be decades, if ever, before we see a return to the 1% inflation rate we enjoyed in the noughts. Global food reserves are at fifty, and in some cases, one hundred, year lows — and the past couple of years have seen riots in the first world over the cost of basic staples (like wheat and rice). And with rapidly increasing global demand, certain raw materials are scarcer than they’ve ever been. In other words, cost reduction is a pipe dream.

Moreover, recent research by Supply Chain Insights LLC (recently released in “Supply Chain Metrics that Matter: Driving Reliability in Margins”) has demonstrated that, for the average company, cost reduction never happened anyway. That’s right! You might have saved millions in those auctions when you had the power, or taken millions out of your distribution chain with optimization, but cost increases across the board ate up those savings in other areas. The researchers found that through analysis of publicly available balance sheet and income statement data [from 2000 through 2011], we find that 75% of companies in process industries lost ground on margins and only 5% of companies improved their positions on the number of days of inventory! In other words, despite all their supply management efforts, relatively speaking, their costs went up.

This isn’t to say that you shouldn’t be focussing on supply management or cost control, with rising, and increasingly volatile, raw material and commodity prices, supply unpredictability, demand unpredictability, and the rate of supply chain disruptions increasing super linearly, cost containment is a must. But thinking you’re going to reduce costs in this economic climate is foolish. The best you will do is control them — and that will be the difference, for many companies, between staying in business and filing for bankruptcy. Literally.

What you need to be focussing on is not cost, but cost drivers and how you are going to maintain visibility into those drivers to help you figure out where costs can be best contained, when your organization will likely have the greatest (or least) advantage in a negotiation, and how much cost certainty is worth. For example, is it worth locking in a one year contract when prices are volatile and possibly higher than the projected prices due to a recent disaster that reduced supply? They could go up if demand increases, but if another source of supply appears in six months, or the backlog of orders is cleared, they could return to pre-disruption levels (which will still be higher than last year).

So how do you do this? We’ll discuss it in part two.

2013: Another Year of the Same Old, Same Old? Part III

In Parts I and II we lamented the relative lack of new innovation in the space for the last few years, as most of the big announcements, and innovations, have centered around technologies that were in (initial) development of the first half of the noughts, and usability and applicability (to specific verticals) in particular before noting that we don’t see much new in the way of trends coming this year and that we’re not alone.

In the last two posts, we covered the global trends identified by ChainLink Research in their recently published Big Trends for Business 2013 as well as the business trends companies expect to the capitalize on this year as a result. In the first case, it almost looks like the Mayans were right, the world came to a stop, and then immediately reversed direction as it looks like we’re in for 2012 all over again and in the latter case, the trends are the same trends they should have been capitalizing on last year!

And if this isn’t bad enough, the big issues identified by ChainLink are the same issues we’ve been facing for years. The big issues identified were:

  • Working Capital Management
    There’s a squeeze up and down the chain — customers want to take longer to pay, suppliers want to be paid sooner. Plus, it’s getting harder to support the unprofitable product lines and the customers that cost more than they’re worth — but what, and who, are they?
  • Cost/Pricing
    Costs need to be kept down, more has to be done with less, and customers are continually demanding lower prices while inflation is coming back with a vengeance.
  • Channel Development
    More outlets are needed to sell more product to generate the revenue required for profitability.
  • Skilled Workforce
    Finding, and retaining, a skilled workforce is a critical issue to companies.
  • ChequeBook Under Lock and Key
    Because of the uncertainty, the chequebooks is under lock and key and the company is still hoarding cash instead of spending it.
  • Risk Management
    Seeing disruptions are on the rise, now more than ever, many companies are concerned about what could happen to them.

Add the really sad thing is the underlying reasons we are facing these problems haven’t changed for years either:

  • They still haven’t learned what working capital management is
    Most companies think extending DPO is good working capital management! In fact, a few think that 200 days is just fine! I’m anxious to see what company has this conversation first!
  • They still haven’t figured out that you can’t squeeze blood from a stone or that savings are a thing of the past
  • And that the only path left to success is to focus on value.

  • They’re still afraid of trusting someone to the extent required to truly hand over a sales channel they can’t manage in house.
    If you can’t handle Twitter, you shouldn’t even try.
  • They always cut the training budget first.
    It’s not someone else’s job to train your workforce, it’s yours! And stop putting the blame on the Universities – it’s not a University’s job to train your workforce, it’s a University’s job to introduce someone to higher learning, deeper thought, and intellectual pursuits — not the practical skills you need.
  • They still haven’t figured out uncertainty NEVER goes away.
    There’s always risk, but there’s always opportunity — and, moreover, the opportunity is typically created by someone with the guts to actually do something!
  • They still haven’t even given someone the responsibility of managing risk!
    If it’s not anyone’s responsibility, who’s going to do it? The shoemaker’s elves?

In short, most companies are standing still with the same problem set because they haven’t learned what they need to learn.

2013: Another Year of the Same Old, Same Old? Part II

In part I, we lamented the relative lack of new innovation in the space for the last few years, as most of the big announcements, and innovations, have centered around technologies that were in (initial) development of the first half of the noughts, and usability and applicability (to specific verticals) in particular. (Not to say there hasn’t been any innovation, but there’s a reason vendor coverage has been down the last couple of years. In addition to the fact that there’s been less to cover as the major best-of-breed players get gobbled up the IT gorillas who haven’t caught onto the value of social media and blogs in this space, there just hasn’t been as much to cover.)

Then we noted that we don’t see much new in the way of trends coming this year, and that SI isn’t alone! Reviewing ChainLink Research’s recently published Big Trends for Business 2013, it almost looks like the Mayans were right, the world came to a stop, and then immediately reversed direction as it looks like we’re in for 2012 all over again! The major global trends — slowing in the globalization of trade, china off-shoring, US Insourcing, Small Office Home Office (SOHO), and Local vs. Global don’t sound any different than what we’ve been seeing, hearing, and speaking for the last year (or two to be honest).

What’s even worse is that the business trends companies expect to the capitalize on this year are the same trends they should have been capitalizing on last year!

  • Manufacturing Goes East / Service Goes West
    If you still (have to) manufacture east, then you can at least focus on keeping your (value added) services (support) close to home. And to be honest, how much more does it really cost to have that call center in a small-town in Idaho or Alabama or even Springfield, Illinois or Wichita Falls, Texas where the costs of living are low and there are lots of people who can afford to take entry level positions for not much more than minimum wage? Yes, you can still get three resources for the price of one in some of the more remote locations in India, but when you factor in the long-distance costs, the travel costs for regular on-site visits and training, the ongoing training costs due to the much higher turnover (as poaching is very common and often an employee will go to lunch and not come back because the call center across the street offered him 15% more), and the lower throughput (as it’s always easier for someone from the same culture to understand an upset or confused caller who may use slang or unfamiliar words and resolve the issue sooner), services outsourcing is not as cheap as you think and might actually increase costs compared to a well run on-shore operation.
  • Devicification
    Finding ways to embed more intelligence in your older products to sell important upgrades, and charge more for what you sell. After all, with innovation down across the spectrum in many industries (relatively speaking), you have to milk what you have somehow.
  • Analytics
    More insight into operations and sales to maximize use of resources and potential sales.
  • Investment in Energy Independence / Green Technology
    Energy costs are going to continue to rise, and eventually will cost more than every piece of technology they power – unless we collectively do something about it. That something is moving to low-cost, renewable sources (and low-cost storage technologies that minimize our dependence on coal, oil, and gas and a third-party grid).

In addition, Retail needs to continue to pursue social media channels as sales channels; Life Science needs to continue to focus on better monitoring solutions; Food and Beverage need to focus on ingredient traceability from initial harvest to final consumption; and Packaging needs to focus on safety and security. Nothing new here either. And to top it all off, the big issues identified by ChainLink are the same issues we’ve been facing for years. But we’ll discuss those in Part III.

2013: Another Year of the Same Old, Same Old? Part I

Regular readers will note that I’ve been lamenting the relative lack of new innovation in the space for the last few years. Most of the big announcements, and innovations, have centered around technologies that were in (initial) development in the first half of the noughts, and usability and applicability (to specific verticals) in particular. And most of the hype has centered around Big Data, which isn’t new, Cloud, which is just your provider giving you hands-off ASP, and “spend optimization” which is typically defined as real-time visibility into spend and budgets. All good, but where’s the ground-breaking new technology?

In fact, in the last few months, the only ground-breaking new R&D has centered on allowing players outside of Supply Management, namely Marketing, to manage the value chain. (Ugh. Supply Management is supposed to manage the value chain!) There’s a few companies that have come to my attention as of late that are working on some innovative new offerings that could reshape markets Supply Management should own. (And when they release their products/services, SI will cover them.)

But I guess I shouldn’t be surprised. From a business perspective, I don’t see much new in the way of trends coming this year. And I’m not alone. ChainLink Research recently published their Big Trends for Business 2013, and it looks like we’re in for 2012 all over again.
Maybe the Mayans were right, the world came to a halt, and now we’re moving backwards. Seriously. Consider these global trends:

  • Slowing in the Globalization of Trade
    This started 2 years ago, and will continue throughout the decade. There are a few reasons for this, including the emergence of what were once “low-cost countries”; the continued rise in the cost of oil and, as a result, transportation; and the move towards protectionist policies in a few major first world players, and the U.S. in particular with its “Buy American” movement.
  • China Off-Shoring
    As emerging economies become emerged economies, they pick up our (bad) habits and find even poorer countries to outsource to.
  • US Insourcing
    As a direct result of the slowing of the globalization of trade, Buy American policies, economic stimulus policies, consumer backlash against foreign products, and rising costs of outsourcing for mid-sized businesses.
  • Small Office Home Office
    For some, it’s the new American Dream to be your own boss, for others they have no choice as they can’t secure (the) full time work (they want), and for others still it is forced upon them by their employer that doesn’t want the overhead of a large office.
  • Local vs. Global
    The 60’s saw the hippies protesting the war and lack of equal rights, the 80’s (dubbed the “me” generation) saw the yuppies concerned with the lack of personal wealth and ways to achieve the American dream before retirement age, and now that we’ve seen the result is unrelenting greed, which has delivered nothing but one economic disaster after another, we’re coming full circle and focussing on the greater good again. However, we learned from the previous generation (or the modern media which has chronicled the hippie movement in various formats) that “peace and love” isn’t enough, that we’re not taking down the governments and the corporations, and that we have to work within the system to help our neighbour. And the answer we have come up with is “Buy Local”.

And as a result of these global trends, we will see a number of secondary trends focussed on by Supply Management and/or Manufacturing organizations this year. These will be discussed in Part II.

Have We Reached The Supply Chain Plateau Part IV?

In our last post, we discussed that the results of a recent survey by Greybeard Advisors that asked “has our profession advanced, or regressed?” led Robert Rudzki to conclude that overall, based on the companies that participated in the survey, we cannot show that our profession has advanced during the past four years; in fact, at some companies, there has been a return to more tactical approaches and objectives.

Why is this?

Some insight is provided by the survey responses to the “write-in” topic that asked for the single most important factor that worries me about ensuring our supply management organization will be successful is. The top themes from the responses provided were:

  • Lack of ongoing commitment from top-level management and buy-in from the rest of the company
  • Lack of proper planning and budgeting from our internal clients
  • Incompatible objectives of multiple business units
  • Lack of bandwidth / resources to do the job properly
  • Need less focus on tactical wins in favour of larger, greater returns (from doing the job strategically)
  • The challenge of how to invest in the future of the department while simultaneously being told to reduce budgets

In SI’s view, it still comes down to the manpower capability issue, which is a direct result of the lack of education and training that pervades our space. If everyone was suitably educated and trained:

  • top-level management would see the importance of the function and their commitment to its success and provide the appropriate support
  • other units would understand what is required of them in terms of financial and manpower resources
  • business unit objectives would be appropriately aligned to maximize success
  • sufficient resources, including sufficient training on such resources, would be provided
  • the focus would be on long-term gains vs short term wins and
  • training would be emphasized, and mandated, not cut!

In summary, SI will state again that people have to be educated and trained at all levels of the function, and until that happens, up-to-date technology or not, there is not going to be any progress.