Category Archives: Sourcing Innovation

Did “The Gambler” Teach Us Everything We Need To Know About supply Management Operational Success?


You Got to know when to hold ’em, know when to fold ’em,
Know when to walk away and know when to run.

Thirty three years ago, Kenny Rogers unleashed upon the world this country classic, written by Don Schlitz, which was the inspiration for a movie that came out two years later. And it seems, thirty three years later, that this is the message that SAP is unleashing upon the supply management world as the foundation of their advice for “achieving operational excellence in any economic climate”.

In the aforementioned article, the author provides four (4) tactics that are employed by best-in-class performers to elevate procurement proficiencies. Simply put, the author is recommending that you hold ’em, fold ’em, walk away, and run.

  • Hold ’em: Hold On To Your Suppliers through a Supplier Connectivity Strategy
    Integrate suppliers into key points in the supply management process. This will reduce mutual overheads and costs through better insights into your process.
  • Fold ’em: Fold Your Employees Into Your Organizational Procurement Process through a Compelling End-User Purchasing Experience
    Utilize the fact that your employees are web-savvy online shoppers with expertise in navigating online purchasing sites in such a way that allows them to slice and dice their options and get the best deal. Provide them with the right enterprise supply management portals and they will get the best value available to them.
  • Walk Away: from Non-Existent Savings and Unprofitable Efforts by Prioritizing Spend Categories with Significant Cost Reduction Opportunities
    Start with categories that will deliver a high return with minimal effort (usually by way of standardization) and then progress to categories that will deliver reasonable savings with reasonable effort, staying far away from those categories that yield only minimum returns for maximum effort. Remember the 80/20 rule – 80% of savings will typically come from 20% of categories. Focus there.
  • Run: Away from Unnecessary Processes by Moving towards a “Zero-Touch” Procurement Process
    Leading organizations use procurement solutions to do the “heavy lifting” on approvals, order delivery, and invoice management that streamline approvals and automate approvals for low-value, low-risk purchases where manual review would often cost more than could be saved through a detailed analysis.

And it’s all great advice. Now if only they had remember that you:

Never Count Your Money While You’re At The Table

    • :

because Failure is Imminent without Constant Innovation

    Simply put, what is leading-edge today, is average tomorrow, and yesterday’s technology the next day. You can never rest on your laurels — you have to keep improving your processes. The minute you stop to count your money, you stop innovating, you stop identifying new cost reduction or value generation opportunities, you stop saving or generating value, and you begin the slow decline from leader to laggard. Today’s corporate world has evolved to a high-stakes winner-take-all poker game and there’s no time to pause and count your savings until the supply management game is won.

It would be a great starting recipe for supply management organizational success.

A.T. Kearney’s Four Dimensions of Strategic Value

In a recent article over in IndustryWeek on why it is “time to tell your CPO to collaborate with suppliers”, A.T. Kearney outlined their four dimensions of strategic value that they claim will allow an organization to unlock the next level of value. The four dimensions of value they outlined are:

  • growth
    through improving the value proposition for existing customers or generating sales to new customers
  • risk management
    to deal with a world of increasingly unpredictable and devastating risks
  • value-chain optimization
    by tweaking the value chain to benefit all players by allowing them to focus on their strengths
  • structural capabilities
    that improve agility, responsiveness, scalability and even corporate social responsibility

And, according to the article, they depend on collaborative relationships with the supply base. However, in order to succeed in these relationships, the parties must reach mutual value. So how do the parties reach win-win situations? They start by using a value-screening process that takes the following steps:

  1. Develop a Relationship Baseline
    does the existing relationship provide a competitive position, strategic direction, and/or joint commercial flow in an aligned culture?
  2. Identify Initial Value Hypotheses
    is there a potential opportunities that brings a level of value to both parties?
  3. Align with Internal Partners
    which opportunities bring the most value to the organizations?

Then, according to A.T. Kearney, the next step is to turn supplier collaboration into a core competency. This is not an easy process, but it is a manageable one. It revolves around:

  • the formation of value creation teams,
  • the establishment of foundational processes, and
  • management of the transformation.

These core actions become part of a two-to-three year transformational roadmap which, when completed, will address all key suppliers and, hopefully, provide value well above and beyond typical cost reduction strategies. And if they are done right, they should enable the four dimensions of value outlined above.

Are they worth it? Any organization that grows, controls risk, and improve its structural capabilities and value chain should be able to create and sustain value even in weak economic environments, so they are worth it. Are they enough to get you to the next level? On their own, probably not as they don’t require innovation (as renovation is often enough for companies who are not leaders), but they are good value dimensions.

Knowledge Based Sourcing V – The Verdict

This week examined Knowledge Based Sourcing, Booz Allen’s entrant into the Next Level Arena. Described as a competency consisting of a set of powerful techniques used to identify high impact value drivers that result in increased understanding and knowledge of ‘ideal’ cost structures that can be used to develop better relationships with suppliers, focused on reality based improvement plans, and gain an ongoing business advantage, KBS turns out to be a sourcing paradigm largely based on advanced cost modelling and associated analytical techniques.

Since advanced cost modelling is a solid foundation for both strategic sourcing decision optimization and spend analysis, KBS is a good foundation for any sourcing effort, but does it go far enough to truly be a next level supply management paradigm? Let’s look at some of the key tenets of the other entrants into the Arena.

  • High Definition Sourcing (HDS)
    Category Excellence. Adoption. Stakeholder Partnership. Decision Monitoring. BI Focus.
  • Value Focussed Supply (VFS)
    Working Capital Optimization. Revenue Enhancement. Corporate Reputation Protection. Increased Supplier/Customer/Stakeholder Loyalty. Strategic Advantage. Intellectual Capital. Sustainable Value Chain.
  • Next Level Supply Management (NLSM)
    Leadership. Transformation. Corporate Finance Focus. Talent Management. Collaboration. Energy Management. Idealized Design. (Lean) Supplier Development. Complexity Reduction. Working Capital Management. Early Involvement.
  • Next Practices (NP)
    Talent Management. Adoption. Execution. Implementation. Optimization. Utilization. Customer Value Focus. Risk Focus. Mind Share. Information. Alignment.
  • Supply Management Transformation (SMT)
    Innovation.
  • Supply Chain Leverage (SCL)
    Value Creation Framework. Market share. Diversification. Productivity. Tax Effectiveness. Demand Management. Lean.

Hmmm. While most of these start with a foundation of modelling and cost management, that’s as far as the similarity goes. In most of these models, modelling to understand current costs is simply the first step on the path to category excellence, revenue enhancement, working capital optimization, or customer value improvement. It is not an end in and of itself. Furthermore, most of these next generation methodologies start with TVM (Total Value Management), realizing that TCO doesn’t go far enough for most categories — and KBS seems quite content with TCO.

Verdict? While KBS might last a few rounds against SMT, against HDS, VFS, NLSM, NP, and SCL, it wouldn’t last three rounds before getting KO’d. I guess it’s time for Booz Allen to update their model!