II: Attracting and Maintaining Great Talent
III: Finding, Training & Retaining
V: Driving Competitive Advantage Thru an Effective Talent Supply Chain
Well, I haven’t found a good follow up to the Flaming Laptops fiasco to write about yet, so while you’re waiting, you can always check out Finland‘s Flaming Sideburns, Spotify previews. Or, if you like your rock a little more psychedelic, you can check out the Flaming Lips. Finally, if you like your rock with a modern punk twist, you can check out the Flaming Bulldogs on Audio Lunchbox. Got your own flaming band to recommend? Leave a comment.
And for those of you just itching for a comedy fix, Humor Matters has a Christmas Humor Index in the spirit of the forthcoming season.
I’ve been bemoaning the talent issue for months – ever since I realized that it was a lot worse than just about everyone* would like us to think that it is. With the exception of a few brilliant posts on the Spend Management Talent Game (Part I*, Part II*, and Part III*) by The Prophet, and a few posts back in September on “Attracting Great Talent the Jack Welch Way” by Tim Minahan on Supply Excellence [WayBackMachine] and “Behaviors Correlated to Performance” by THE BLOGGING THUNDER FROM DOWN UNDER on Vendor Management (renamed Contract Capital Management, [WayBackMachine]) it seemed as though I stood alone in my belief in the criticality of The Talent War and my continual efforts to convey to you the extreme urgency of The Impending Crunch.
Fortunately, Aberdeen has raised the alarm and both Supply Excellence and the Purchasing Certification Blog [WayBackMachine] have taken up the cause.
Now you can be confident that I’m not just echoing the cries of the recruiting agencies (whose profits are highest when your needs are most desperate) and go out and attack the problem before it attacks you. I still recommend the Talent Acquisition Strategies I laid out previously and would also recommend that you use my other posts in The Talent Series as a starting point for your research in your efforts to define winning strategies.
* With the exception of the 3rd party recruiting agencies, of course – but they’ve been crying wolf for so long, it’s often easy to ignore their cries.
* All posts prior to 2012 were removed in the Spend Matters site refresh in June, 2023.
To hit home my point that I believe the online courseĀ “Savings Strategy Development” from Next Level Purchasing (now the NLPA, part of Certitrek) is worth the time and investment for a purchasing professional looking to advance her knowledge and career, with kind permission, I am going to dive into a few topics covered in the course that I believe hit home on the importance of a good savings strategy and a well designed course to help you develop one.
The course begins by noting that saving money is arguably the #1 reason for the purchasing profession. Businesses exist to make profit, and that happens when the bottom line is improved. There are two ways to do that. Increase revenue or decrease expenses. Effective purchasing decreases expenses, particularly in terms of cost of products sold or selling, general, and administrative expenses.
The first lesson then goes on to define seven types of savings, including the well understood hard-dollar, the moderately realized but hard-to-calculate payment term savings, and the less common alternate condition savings. It lays out clear calculations for each of these. For example, the proper way to calculate payment term savings, which results when more favorable payment terms are negotiated, as defined in the course, is:
{(New Discount – Old Discount) – [(Old Window – New Window) * (Money Cost/365)]} * Spend
where:
It then clearly defines the difference between quick hit, supplier relationship, and strategic sourcing savings opportunities and defines a methodology for determining what type of opportunity a category represents. It also defines the basic strategies that should be considered for each savings opportunity. For example, a quick hit opportunity generally implies the use of competitive bidding from pre-qualified suppliers who have already accepted a contract template.
Of course, the crux of the course is the ten phase approach to world class sourcing which should be applied as a starting template each and every time you start planning your sourcing – and savings – strategy for a strategic sourcing opportunity. And unlike some approaches that you will discover reading through materials you will find on the web, which tend to focus on the technology and not the core underlying process, it includes due emphasis on a current baseline analysis (phase 2), market survey (phase 4), and success measurement (phase 9). After all, without a baseline, you will not be able to measure your success, which is key to establishing your worth, and that of your department and profession, as a procurement professional, and without a decent understanding of the market, it will be hard to determine reasonable goals, objectives, and the magnitude of your success. (A price concession in a tight market where suppliers generally have more bargaining power is a bigger win than a price concession in an open market where supply exceeds demand and suppliers have little bargaining power.)
I hope this gives you some more insight into the importance of continued education and appropriate courses for your development and why I believeĀ “Savings Strategy Development” from Next Level Purchasing is most likely worth your time and investment as a procurement professional.
Last weekend I audited the online course “Savings Strategy Development” from Next Level Purchasing (now the NLPA, part of Certitrek), a course designed to introduce you to best practices that you can use to craft a top-notch savings strategy.
According to their website, this course is designed to help you learn a systematic method of establishing a cost savings strategy in your organization. In addition, you will learn how to identify sourcing and savings opportunities by analyzing your spend, plus…
Like the last course I reviewed, it also lived up to its promises. In addition, it also:
So, is this course also worth it? Absolutely. Not only would it take you days to attempt to amalgamate all of the content you would need to match this course, and weeks to extract and absorb the relative material, but it could take you (significantly) longer still to put together an equivalent ten phase approach that could be as successful as the one outlined in this course. (And, like the last course, it is another step in the completion of the certificate program that is likely to lead to a salary bump that is multiples of what you invest.)