Category Archives: Cost Reduction

Managing Indirect Spend: An In-Depth Review, Part III

In our last post, which ended the review of Part II of Managing Indirect Spend, a new book by William (Bill) Dorn and Joe Payne of Source One that takes you on an excellent adventure through the world of indirect sourcing (that they have been living in for the past two decades, well before Strategic Sourcing and Supply Management became cool), we discussed the non-software tools at a sourcing professional’s disposal, Procurement Services Providers (PSPs), and the (common) mistakes that can kill a sourcing project. This wrapped up our discussion of the capabilities at a sourcing professional’s disposal. Today, we’re going to discuss Part III, Examples from the Field, and focus on some of the results that can be obtained when applying the best practices discussed in the section.

The examples focussed around the gains that can be achieved by collaborating with suppliers, leveraging supplier feedback, and analyzing data — which, as SI outlined in Spend Visibility: An Implementation Guide, we know to be significant even before the application of additional tools and techniques. We’ll start with supplier collaboration.

As Bill and Joe point out, collaborating with your suppliers can produce surprising and profitable results. In fact, collaborating with your entire supply chain (including your suppliers’ suppliers) can often produce sustainable results that equate to large cost savings opportunities. Plus, it encourages partnerships with your suppliers, which may lead to your company being the first in line for new product developments or other supplier benefits.

Consider these examples from the text:

  • specifying printer models and toner requirements, instead of brand name toner cartridges, generally leads to savings north of 50% when suppliers are asked to propose low-cost (non-OEM) solutions
  • the cost of a simple chemical compound was reduced 39% when the buyer worked with the supplier to jointly source expensive regulatory valves at a higher volume
  • the willingness to work with a new supplier that produced a required solvent at an insufficient level of purity (and guarantee them a reasonable amount of business under the right circumstances) if the supplier was willing to refine their manufacturing process to get to the required level of purity convinced the supplier to make the infrastructure investment and saved the customer a considerable amount of money now that a third, lower-cost supplier, had entered the market

In addition to collaborating with suppliers, you can use the information they provide to your advantage. By leveraging the information that your supply chain provides, you can actually achieve deeper discounts in the products or services you are buying, and improve the overall relationship and integration with each of your suppliers. This can lead to results like the following:

  • by working with suppliers to find out what was possible, the buyer was able to approach the incumbent and ask for a new type of telecommunications infrastructure that reduced organizational cost by 35%
  • by working with the supplier to find out when the supplier wanted to make a sale, and the supplier representative, who was quite eager to make a bonus target, the customer was able to get a software product (only available through resellers) at cost with terms of net 30 days, allowing it to delay the purchase to the following quarter (while still allowing the supplier, and the representative, to recognize the sale this quarter)
  • a buyer which needed specialized multi-million dollar computer equipment that could only be supplied by one supplier was able to reduce its costs and get millions of free marketing by allowing the supplier to use its logo in its advertisements (which the supplier promised to spend millions on if the buyer allowed the use of its logo)

Lastly, there are great opportunities to be had through data analysis, including:

  • a detailed line analysis that will often identify a significant number of (secondary) phone lines that are not required that are costing the organization hundreds (or thousands) each
  • the appropriate segregation of MRO spend into the right buckets that will allow suppliers to be more competitive on the categories they are strong in, as this will decrease overall cost significantly
  • the identification of non-compliant spend and the top offenders as a few choice words from the CFO to these individuals (or their superiors) will considerably decrease maverick spend quickly increase realized savings 20% to 30%

There are plenty more examples, but considering that SI essentially co-wrote a book detailing what they are and how to find them in Spend Visibility: An Implementation Guide (free download, no registration required), we’re not going to go into them any further in this post, especially since the important lesson is that you should be leveraging the information provided by the supply chain (for analysis) and then working with your suppliers to implement the best solution(s) you identify.

Stay tuned. After another break, SI will conclude it’s review of Managing Indirect Spend later this month with Part IV: How to Do It.

Series to date:

A Primer on Private Equity for CPOs

Private Equity (PE) investment is on the rise in the EU and the US. However, most of us still don’t know very much about what PE is, how it works, or what Procurement’s role is when dealing with a PE firm. That’s why it was great to see this recent article over on CPO Agenda on “The Final Frontier for CPOs” that tried to create more transparency around the practices and importance of Procurement and Supply Chain in this field.

The first thing to note is that PE groups generally make their money by increasing the value of their portfolio companies while retaining part of the generated value by the time they exit the investment in the company at a higher financial valuation. The acquisition of a portfolio company is financed from funds that are raised from private and institutional investors that give the PE group the task of investing the money, managing the portfolio companies and returning an appropriate profit on the investments.

Given the pivotal role that Procurement and Supply Management have in a company’s competitiveness, product innovation and environmental and social footprint, Procurement and Supply Management serve two important tasks in a corporate context from a PE viewpoint:

  • a strong cash flow contribution to meeting debt obligations under the financing terms in the short term
  • a dedicated and measurable effort to swiftly and sustainably improve EBIT and company valuation in the medium term

Remembering that cash is king in a PE buy-out, cash-flow is crucial. Giving Supply Management’s razor-sharp focus on cost reduction and cost control, Supply Management improves cash-flow that is the vital blood of a PE turn-around. It does this by

  • releasing supply-chain related working capital tied up in unnecessary inventories or unfavourable payment terms
  • achieving like-for-like annual company spend reductions of 3% to 6% though the establishment of price competitive with the most suitable suppliers

Plus, Supply Management’s focus on sustainability helps PE since

  • a lasting and recognizable improvement of the procurement and supply chain capabilities can have a considerable positiveeffect on the sale price of the company
  • the benefits of cost engineering, supplier development and supply chain relocation can be harnessed within the typical investment period of four to five years

And Supply Management can benefit from PE and their support for the establishment of procurement platforms they strive to harness spend synergies (mostly in indirect materials) and best practice across the portfolio companies. In other words, done right, PE and Supply Management can be a win-win relationship.

#9 e-Auction

Yesterday saw the release of SI’s new sponsored white-paper on the “Top 10 Technologies for Supply Management Savings Today”. Sponsored by BravoSolution, this new whitepaper introduces the top 10 technologies that can help a company realize the goldmine of untapped savings opportunities it is sitting on. Properly employed, these technologies could help an organization tap cost reduction and savings opportunities that could collectively add up to 30%, or more, of spend across major direct and indirect categories.

e-Auction technology, which stands for electronic reverse auction technology, is typically the second entry point for a company moving from a paper-based sourcing process to a modern technology-enabled supply management solution and an organization’s second stop to supply management savings.

The savings from e-Auction technology are essentially the same direct savings, from goods and services cost reductions, and indirect savings, from process efficiency and value generated from supply base expansion, found in RFX technology, with the major difference being the speed at which the event can be conducted.

With electronic auctions, once the sourcing manager creates the specifications and sets up the auction, including the weighting and award rules, the process drives itself. The suppliers sign on at the appropriate time and place their bids. When a time-limit or bid floor is reached, the auction ends and the award is made.


The major advantages of e-Auctions are the ability to define precise lot requirements and acceptable bid ranges, which can ensure cost reductions meet a minimal threshold; the ability to define different auction types, which can drive more competitive behaviour in the supply base if properly selected; and the extreme efficiency that can allow a large number of non-strategic or low-value categories to be brought under management.

Properly applied on the right categories at the right time, e-Auctions have been generating savings for over a decade. Back in 2003, in one of the first significant studies on e-Auctions, CAPS Research found that direct cost reductions usually averaged between 10% and 20%, that cycle time reductions could be as much as 40%, and that there could be a “power shift” from strong suppliers to weaker buyers not previously attainable. One company realized 165 Million of savings on 912 Million of spend, a major service provider estimated average savings of 20% on 30 Billion of reverse auctions, and a recent report from the IBM Centre is estimating that the Federal Government could save 8.9 Billion annually through reverse auctions alone.

And this technology is only #9 on the list of the Top 10 Technologies for Supply Management Savings Today. Imagine what could be saved with the top technology, or even the third best technology. Or better yet, instead of imagining, download Top 10 Technologies for Supply Management Savings Today and find out! (Registration is required for this one but the doctor believes it’s worth it!)

Managing Indirect Spend: An In-Depth Review, Part I.1

Late last year, Joe Payne and William (Bill) Dorn of Source One released their first book on Managing Indirect Spend (Amazon) which is a culmination of everything they have learned while doing nothing but Strategic Sourcing since 1992 — before it was cool. Clocking in at 422 pages, this is an incredible resource for anyone who wants to get a handle on indirect spend, which has increased significantly since outsourcing and right-sizing rose to fame in the 1990s.

This book, which should be on the desk of everyone looking to get a handle on indirect spend, is loaded with so much information that there’s no way SI could do it justice in just a post or two — so it’s not going to even try. Just like the book is broken down into four parts, our review, over the next few weeks, will be broken down into four parts — and then into sub-parts where there is just too much to comment in with a single post.

Today we’re going to review the first part of Part One – The Process, and, specifically, the chapters that cover the first three parts of their six part process, namely:

  • Data Collection & Spend Analysis
  • Research
  • The RFx Process

We’re all familiar with the basic process, and if you are a regular reader who has downloaded the free e-book, no registration required, Spend Visibility: An Implementation Guide, then you are very familiar with the data collection and spend analysis process. However, the chapter still makes some good points that need to be reiterated, particularly in regards to building sponsorship and understanding the category. Lack of sponsorship will kill your project faster than a minnow can swim a dipper, and to get it you need the end user’s support as well as senior management. As Joe and Bill state, this will require sitting down with the users and letting them know that they are not being singled out by your spend project, that your project’s success depends on them and is their success as well, and that your project is designed to tie to their objectives (as it should be). In addition, the following is a great checklist of information you will have to review with your users before starting a serious sourcing project on the category:

  • business relationship (with current suppliers)
  • product or service utilization specifics
  • location impact
  • financial implications
  • contractual obligations
  • reports, requirements and actual utilization
  • service requirements and expectations
  • supplier ranking

Joe and Bill also provide some great advice on how to handle the three different types of responses that you will encounter when requesting data from incumbent suppliers — acceptance, avoidance, and pushback — and questions to consider during supplier interviews.

Moving on to the research phase, they provide a breakdown of the eight (8) elements that need to be researched during any sourcing initiative (that you want to be lucky) as well as some great tips for collecting market intelligence through the RFI process. While modern tools, including Source One’s own WhyAbe, make the creation of RFIs drop-dead simple, getting responses and, in particular, the responses you want can be challenging for a variety of reasons. Suppliers might not think you’re serious, might not want to expose what they consider to be sensitive data, or might not be comfortable with the tool. A carefully constructed process has to be put in place, followed, and sometimes augmented by other approaches for the research phase to be truly successful. Joe and Bill lay out their advice, garnered from almost twenty years of experience dedicated to sourcing projects, in detail and offer a blueprint for your success.

Then they jump into the full RFX process, which might consist of an RFP and / or an RFQ/RFB and dive into the typical elements of a good RFP and RFQ as well as the evaluation process that should be followed and the response that should be provided if you want your suppliers to participate in the process again. One point that they make that most other resources miss is the need to include disclosure and liability sections in the RFx document. This is critically important when inviting new, unknown, suppliers to an open event. If these suppliers aren’t awarded the business, they may sue you on the premise that the invitation for bid was in fact an invitation to do business and that the RFx constituted an MOU to be replaced by a future PO or contract once the information was provided. Slimy and shady to say the least, but this has happened. They also discuss the reverse auction process and when it is preferable to an RFX. Finally, they end their discussion of the first half of the sourcing process with a discussion around the need for flexibility and creativity in the sourcing process, a discussion that’s often overlooked. Significant savings are never found by doing the same-old, same-old or just applying one or two sourcing technologies. They are found when the parties come to the table, broaden their horizons, and look for new, creative, and innovative ways to meet organizational needs. And, as Bill and Joe state, suppliers are often much more motivated and engaged when buyers take an alternative approach. So be flexible — and stay tuned. Part I.2 is coming!

The Basics of Information Technology Cost Management

It’s a simple five-step process:

  1. Get a handle on the TCO of IT to the business
    How many units have IT support staff? How much are you paying in maintenance and software licenses each year? How much are you paying in hardware leases and upgrades? What about consultants and outsourced support? The data center(s)? Hosting? And don’t forget the “device propagation” that results every time a new application is added to the data center or a CXO gets a new toy (like an iPad).
  2. Focus on the Cost Drivers
    Energy? Hardware? Software? Projects? Where’s the money going, and why? Treat the IT organization like it is a business and balance the supply and demand.
  3. Be relentless in Valuing IT services
    Examine the cost structure through the eyes of your customers and segregate functions and services into value-add and commodity categories and drive the associated costs accordingly.
  4. Be creative in meeting demand and sourcing work
    Examine the people, process, and technology infrastructure carefully to determine if there is a more cost effective way to deliver the necessary services.
  5. Bring in an expert to re-source the hardware, software, and support you need
    Don’t negotiate multi-million dollar deals on your own if you’re not an expert in IT systems and the current state of the market. If you try, chances are that you’ll overpay by a lot more than 10%!