Category Archives: Marketplaces

How an Online Marketplace Can Improve Equipment Rental Procurement Part I

Today’s guest post is from Robin Salter, CMO of KWIPPED.

Today, when people are planning their vacations, they typically use an online marketplace like Travelocity or Expedia. Why? Because if you need to book a flight, hotel, rental car or some combination of the three, it’s much faster and easier to go to a single website that:

  • Displays availability
  • Provides ratings and descriptions
  • Offers pricing comparisons
  • Enables scheduling and booking

The cumbersome, time-consuming alternative is to research and compare each airline, hotel and car rental company individually before making a particular booking decision. The online marketplace model provides obvious benefits to the traveler in the form of convenience, simplicity and efficiency. Of course, the travel industry is just a single example. Online marketplaces have popped up across virtually every industry — and why wouldn’t they — the benefits they offer to buyers and sellers are undeniable.

Oddly, the B2B equipment rental industry has been slow to adopt the online marketplace model despite the fact that the granularity of the industry seems to make it a natural fit. There are more than 27,000 rental businesses in the U.S. and that number does not include many businesses that may not consider themselves rental businesses even though they do rent certain equipment.

It’s important to point out that there are currently a few online marketplaces that support the construction/heavy equipment industry; but equipment rental is estimated to be a $38 – $50 billion market, of which construction represents less than half. Businesses and organizations rent all kinds of equipment, for example:

  • Medical equipment
  • Laboratory equipment
  • Audio/Visual equipment
  • HVAC equipment
  • Farming equipment
  • Film production equipment
  • Electronic testing equipment
  • Environmental testing equipment
  • Materials handling equipment
  • Roadwork safety equipment

The list is practically endless, but the point is, equipment rental is big business and is ripe for an online marketplace that provides the technology to connect renters and suppliers across all industries in a more efficient and productive way.

In Part II we will discuss how an online equipment rental marketplace differs from traditional equipment rental sourcing and the advantages it brings.

Thanks, Robin.

Procurement Trend 04. Control Tower Model / Omni Channel Approach

Only one anti-trend remains. Once we finish this post, we complete our formidable burden, and hope that the sour taste in our mouths will soon depart now that we have shown those fictionally-focussed futurists in fine detail that the snake-oil trends they have been selling have no worth. We want to abash them for their apathy, but we will leave it up to LOLCat to decide their fate. While LOLCat thinks on it, he would like to point out to these Rip van Winkles that when it comes to sleeping through life, No One Out-sleeps a Cat!

So why do these analyst catfish keep churning out the same lousy predictions year after year? Besides the fact that light rarely penetrates down to where they are, it’s probably because they look around, see the laggard organizations still struggling with the best way to organize its operations, and assume they can still sell last decade’s playbook in this decade’s marketplace. Thus, if most organizations are still fighting to get beyond the de-centralized model, then the control tower model sounds quite futurish. Plus, we have the situation where its

  • different strokes benefit different folks
    as different models work well in different circumstances
  • integrated channels result in integrated data feeds
    and more data results in better decisions
  • regional differences not only provide opportunities,
    but can hinder success with the wrong model/approach

So what does this mean?

Understand the Primary Models

There are three traditional models of Supply Management: decentralized, centralized, and center-led. In the decentralized model, there is a Supply Management team in each organizational unit responsible for purchasing for that unit. This model has advantages, primarily along deep knowledge of supply market and needs, and deep disadvantages, primarily with respect to the inability to exploit organizational spend. In the centralized model, all spend is centralized through one Supply Management team. This model has its own set of advantages and disadvantages, many of them diametrically opposite to the decentralized model. In the center-led model, there is a central Supply Management team which defines the categories, identifies the best sourcing methods, executes the contracts, and guides each department on how to procure against the contract. It is supposed to combine the best features of each model.

Understand where Each Model Fits

Each model has its uses. In an organization where most buys don’t cross organizational units (with respect to product needs or supply base), decentralized can work. In an organization which has primarily indirect spend that is common across the organization with a strongly overlapping supply base, for example, a centralized model is a best. In an organization with a mix of common and uncommon categories and suppliers, a center-led model where some spend is centralized and some spend is left up to the individual organizational units is often the way to go.

Understand Centre-Led vs. Center of Excellence vs. Control Tower

They are all similar, but they are not the same. Center-led is where a central organization centralizes some spend but leaves other spend up to the individual departments. A Center of Excellence may do the same thing, but it centralizes sourcing knowledge and best practices and, where appropriate, works with and guides the organizational units on decentralized spend to make sure they always apply best practices and get the best results. A Control Tower is a next generation Center of Excellence that not only manages both centralized and decentralized spend, but continually re-evaluates centralization and sourcing strategy and adapts the model with the market to generate the maximum impact for the organization.

Pick the Model that is Right for Your Organization

Arguably, the Control Tower model is best in theory, but pick the model that best fits your organizational needs based on where it is with respect to Supply Maturity.

Can You Solve the Compliance Challenge?

Regulatory compliance is usually defined by an organization’s adherence to laws, regulations, guidelines and specifications relevant to its business.

There are two primary categories:

  • Internal compliance that focusses on the policies and procedures of the organization (which must be followed to insure SOX compliance) and is focussed on personnel and procurement
  • External compliance that focusses on the (government) legislation and agreements that govern the operation of the organization and falls into the categories of:
    • financial/operational
    • import/export
    • environmental
    • private data / worker’s rights
    • insurance / liability

Non-compliance can be a very costly situation for an organization to find itself in as it can cost an organization hundreds of millions of dollars in some cases. Consider the following costs of external non-compliance:

Financial

  • SOX violations can cost up to 5M per violation; even Deloitte, known for its audits, had to pay 2 Million for a SOX violation
  • Anti-bribery violations have no ceiling; Aon paying £ 5.25 M in 2009, Wills Limited paying £ 6.9 M in 2011, and Macmillan Publishers paying £ 11.26 M in 2011
  • FCPA violations don’t have a ceiling either; Weatherford International paid $152.6 M in 2013, Alcoa paid $384 M in 2014, and Siemens paid $800 M in 2008

Import/Export

Meggitt paid 25 M in 2013 to settle charges of AECA & ITAR violations, Standard Chartered Bank paid 132 M in 2012 to settle charges of OFAC sanction violations, and ING Bank N.V. recently paid 619 M to settle charges of several OFAC sanction violations

Insurance

In 2012, Wal-Mart paid $8M to settle a workers’ compensation class action settlement, and in 2010 a jury awarded $82.5 in a workplace death lawsuit

Lack of compliance costs. Dearly. Why is there a lack of compliance in most organizations? Lack of knowledge, policy, visibility, analysis, and procurement technology. Knowledge can be addressed with training. Policy can be fixed with planning. But visibility, analysis, and procurement fixes require technology.

What kind of technology?

Supply Chain Visibility, Spend Analytics, and a Procurement Marketplace that captures, tracks, and maintains an audit trail of all of the relevant data to insure SOX and FCPA are not violated, import and export restrictions and requirements are adhered to, and that suppliers comply with insurance and regulatory compliance.

To find out how a Procurement Marketplace helps your organization solve the compliance challenge, reduce maverick spending, and enable organizational growth, download Sourcing Innovation’s latest white-paper on The
Procurement Marketplace and The Power of Compliance (registration required), sponsored by Vinimaya.

You’ve Negotiated – But Are You Realising Savings on Marketing Print?

You’ve Negotiated – But Are You Realising Savings on Marketing Print?

Spend Matters UK recently ran a two-part guest post by Santosh Reddy of GEP that asked if you were really realizing savings on marketing print (Part I and Part II) if you were using an outsourcing partner, such as a Print Management Company (PMC), to manage your marketing print.

In his posts he notes that the PMC comes with advantages, such as one or more pre-qualified vendors that can do all of the print jobs for all of their clients and who offer the PMC a preferential price for the guaranteed influx of work in addition to IT tools that can help your shop with digital asset management, etc. However, the PMC also comes with a disadvantage — the PMCs primary mission is to make money, not to save money for you. So the savings you get may not be as much as the savings you could get.

However, the key to savings in print is typically volume, so if you don’t use a PMC, then the category manager has to function as the PMC and make sure all print jobs get routed to the preferred vendor with preferred pricing and value-add benefits. But, as Santosh points out, this can be difficult to achieve since many internal departments, including marketing, retail, and HR, may not see the presence of Procurement as a benefit but instead view it as a loss-of-control or an unnecessary time-wasting step in the process. So how do you get the other departments on board?

Santosh presents four benefits you can sell and four less-friendly tactics you can employ if need be. Four of these suggestions in particular are quite powerful:

If these two benefits don’t get the job done:

  • one point of contact
    either the PMC or the category manager will be the sole point of contact for all internal customers – they won’t have to deal with five different print shops to find out who can do a rush print job
  • budget compliance
    it’s Procurement’s job to keep costs in line, not theirs, freeing up more of their time to do their jobs

then these two tactics will:

  • involve AP and inform them that policy states all invoices must be approved by you before being paid, as per the Procurement policy, then
  • incentivize compliance through gain or pain by rewarding those who use the process with faster services, more savings credited to their budget, etc. and punishing those won don’t by delaying invoice payments, reporting organizational losses from their actions to management, etc.

And he also gives you great advice on how to source, select the right technology to manage the process internally (whether or not you use a PMC), and establish a contract. This 2-part series is worth checking out. Given the cost of ink in North America, every penny counts!

1950 Years Ago Today

The Great Fire of Rome, which burned for 6 days, broke out in the merchant district and caused widespread devastation. It was an early example of how a natural disaster could bring a supply chain to its knees (as it wiped up most of the goods in Rome, which were then stored in shops).

The moral of the story is clear — Natural and Man-Made Disasters have always been with us and always will.