Category Archives: RFX

Tips on Drafting a Truly Unbiased RFP (Software Acquisition Insider Tips VI)

It’s not hard to draft an unbiased RFP, even though you might think otherwise when you consider the truly large numbers of RFPs that hit the wire every day. Many of them are biased toward a specific provider. The fact of the matter is that it doesn’t take much to bias an RFP, and it often happens without the intent of the author. But it doesn’t have to happen to you. Here are some tips to keep your RFPs unbiased.

  • Don’t use a (free) RFP template
    I’ve told you again and again. These are created by vendors to achieve one goal, and one goal only: to make their product, and only their product, look good.
  • Ignore the feature lists
    This is a free RFP template favorite; namely, features selected for their “differentiating” capability, that you’ll never use. It’s not the features that matter, it’s the functions. Specifically, the functions you need the product to perform for you.
  • Don’t use an interested party.
    That means no vendors, no solution providers who’ll be bidding on the business, no consultancies with partnerships or known relationships with vendors or solution providers who’ll be bidding on the business, and no one with an obvious agenda that’s not yours.
  • Describe the process you need to automate or support in your own words.
    The minute you use a vendor’s terminology is the minute you give them the edge to exploit the RFP and, in the public sector, ramrod the solution down your throat, whether or not it’s right for you.
  • Describe the goal state, not the current state
    You get what you ask for, and if you ask for a solution that supports the current state, which you presumably want to improve, you’re not going to end up with much of an improvement.
  • You’re probably not a technology expert, so don’t put technology in the RFP.
    Don’t make the error of assuming that you know what technology would be best.
    If it’s software you’re buying, be wary of opinions from your IT department.
    IT people are most likely not
    software developers, so they have at best a limited understanding
    of the technologies that software developers use. Even software developers tend
    to know only the technologies with which they are currently working, and they are
    often deeply biased toward a particular technology, for no rational reason. You are looking for a solution, not
    a technology. So spend your time focusing on the solution and what it does for you.
  • Make sure you control your data.
    If it’s software you’re buying, then no matter what solution you choose,
    make sure part of your RFP includes a requirement to get
    the data that you pumped
    into the product, back out of the product, easily and quickly, in a format that’s understandable to you (not
    XML or a proprietary database file, or some other idiosyncratic format that will cause pain — rather, an ordinary flat file,
    or set of related flat files). Your relationship with the vendor is not likely to be “until death do us part.” The
    software world moves extremely quickly, and a much better solution could present
    itself down the road. You want the ability to jump on it without a backwards glance.
  • Unbundle all the extras.
    Vendors will almost always muddy the water by “including” A with B, proposing some special deal that’s available
    for a limited time only, and so on. Make sure that your RFP unbundles maintenance from license fees or purchase price; clearly spells out the cost to upgrade; and clearly disambiguates services from product.
  • Demand multiple sources for services.
    Just because you’ve committed to Oracle ERP, for example, doesn’t mean that you have to use Oracle resources to
    implement the system. The same is true for other software products, and for many other commodities as well.
    The cost of services can dwarf the cost of the product; and the best deal for services is achievable
    when there are multiple services providers. When vendors are bundling services, and no matter who you choose it’s a one-stop shop,
    you will be helpless the moment you sign the deal. Would you buy a car that could only be serviced at one
    dealership?

A Great Guide to Outsourcing Risk Management, Part I

Not that long ago, SourcingMag.com published a great six part series, authored by Alsbridge on “managing risk in outsourcing” that covered a best-practice approach to reducing your outsourcing risk that is a must-read for anyone considering outsourcing as part of their procurement function, even if (and especially if) it is just the tactical part. Although the article, and the series, focusses primarily on the aspects of IT outsourcing, the reality is that tactical improvements primarily originate from automation and better systems, so you really need to understand the IT trade-offs before you can make an educated and informed decision.

It’s also important to remember that the reality is that even though there is little to be saved on tactical process automation or improvement relative to what can be saved from a well executed strategic sourcing event on a high-dollar category, the reality is that a botched automation of your tactical procurement processes, especially as part of an outsourcing project, can cost you dearly as your team will have to spend all their time fixing the mess … and the opportunity cost of doing such is phenomenal. Moreover, if your systems are not aligned, you’ll never capture all of the savings that your expert sourcerors negotiate. (There’s a reason that most companies capture less than 50% of negotiated cost savings … and that reason is inadequate systems and poor monitoring.) Thus, before you outsource any aspect of your procurement operation, which you should consider doing if an outsourcing provider can offer you better technologies and processes at a lower cost of operation, it’s important that you understand what you are going to outsource, how you’re going to get a return on your investment, and how you’re going to manage the outsourcing project to make sure the savings materialize. In other words, before you embark on a procurement outsourcing project, you need a good strategy.

Where Do You Start?

Start by identifying all of the potential failure points in your plan, determining the probability of failure and the associated cost if a failure occurs, and then develop risk mitigating plans for those risks that have more than a slight chance of occurrence or a high recovery cost. Then you can move on to your search for a service provider partner.

So How Do You Select The Right Service Provider?

Do some research, starting with the industry leading blogs (like Sourcing Innovation) and the free resource sites (like the SI Resource Site) available to you to identify potential providers. Then embark upon an RFX project to help you identify the provider who can meet your needs at the best price point.

Make sure the RFP completely spells out what you want to outsource; the processes you want followed; the people, process, and system interactions you desire; the change management processes that you follow; the frequency with which you inspect system updates and innovation; current process cycle times; and the cycle-time and cost reductions you are expecting; the service levels you require; and the degree of year-over-year improvements that are expected from your service provider. It’s important that the RFP spells out everything the vendor needs to know, otherwise, they won’t be able to put their best foot forward and will have difficulty being successful. It’s not up to them to fret the details, it’s up to you. Penalty clause or not, it’s still your mess to clean up if your vendors don’t get paid the right amount on time or, even worse, they all get overpaid by 10% and you have to fight for refunds and it’s still your liability if financial statements are wrong because the provider screwed up. If you can prove complete ignorance and best-effort to insure financial statement accuracy, you might escape jail, but that will be of little consolation if the resulting fines bankrupt your company and you’re out on your ass without a job. The simple fact of the matter is that the more detail you can provide in your RFP, the better a potential partner can determine whether or not they can provide the solution you need and how much it will likely cost to do so. And if you don’t know how to put together a good RFP, you can always Get Help from an expert. Once the RFPs are in, you start with the evaluation, which is the subject of Part II of our series.

RFP Drafting Tips from DLA Piper

The SSON (Shared Services and Outsourcing Network) recently published an article by Kit Burden of DLA Piper, a legal services and business insights firm that represents emerging growth and high tech companies, on his Top Ten Tips for Drafting an RFP that are worth sharing, especially since some of them echo the tips this blog has given you in the past. The tips are:

  • Don’t Issue The RFP To Too Many Suppliers
    Otherwise, it will become unmanageable and drain your internal resources. Do your homework before issuing the RFP and only issue it to suppliers who are likely to be able to meet your requirements at an acceptable price level. If too many providers fall into this category, shortlist the providers with the most experience in your vertical and the most stability. Generally, the RFP should only be issued to three to six providers, unless you are in the public sector and are required to open it up to anyone who wants to submit a proposal.
  • Ask Questions That Allow for Genuine Differentiation
    As I’ve said again and again, don’t use a vendor “check-the-box” RFP template. Not only are they designed to make the vendor look good, but they don’t ask open-ended questions that will allow the respondents to genuinely differentiate themselves from their competition. Don’t ask “do you have invoice management”, instead ask “how does your application support our invoice processing function, which works as follows”.
  • Ensure the References and Case Studies are From Directly Comparable Projects or Customers
    If you’re in high-tech and the vendor only provides you with CPG client references, you’re not going to know the breadth of the provider’s capabilities and expertise in your vertical. You should do your homework and also contact the clients in your vertical that they don’t give as references. (A Google search on a few news sites and a quick review of their press releases should provide you with some good candidates quickly.)
  • Be Crystal Clear on Your Objectives
    Is your primary goal cost reduction, service improvement, support flexibility, etc? And are you looking for a product or a service? Everyone wants to save money, but the vendors need to know how you expect to achieve that goal, and what the provider’s role is to be.
  • Ensure the RFP Specifies the Ground Rules for the Entire Procurement Process
    Submission requirements, use of information, timeframes, points of contact, rules of engagement, etc. Although important in the private sector where a provider can call “foul” and file complaints, this is crucial in the public sector where government bodies are legally required to play “fair”.
  • Include a Draft Agreement or Contract
      (or the standard terms and conditions and key provisions at the very least)

    Understandings as to what has been agreed to at a commercial and business level can quickly unravel when you get to the contract drafting stage, especially if the provider thinks your “standard” terms and conditions are onerous.
  • Identify the Core Team and the Core Legal Team
    This is important for a number of reasons. If you leave out someone important in the initial stages, the whole project can grind to a halt if an executive later decides “it’s not right for our business”. And if it’s a large IT project or outsourcing project, the amount of work will be significant and not something that the project leads can do as part of their current “day job”. Big projects require serious up-front commitments to get right.
  • Be Clear on the Scoring
    Not only will secrecy on scoring lead to trouble if you’re in the public sector, but it will prevent the service providers from putting their best proposal forward as the scoring system serves to identify which functions are the most important, and what information you want first and foremost from the vendor.
  • Involve all Key Internal Stakeholders
    They need to be kept abreast of how the negotiations are going and given the opportunity to provide their input, otherwise you’ll run into resistance during project implementation every time they don’t like something because “they weren’t consulted on that and it’s wrong”.
  • Anticipate Questions and Gather the Information in Advance
    Due diligence is an essential process, and any supplier worth their salt will want to have a clear understanding of what they are being asked to take on. Furthermore, if the information provided is deficient, one can expect suppliers to argue for the inclusion of contractual assumptions/dependencies regarding the areas of uncertainty. The last thing you want to do before a negotiation is reduce your credibility and your leverage with a potential supplier.

As Kit says, the RFP process is a crucial part of the sourcing process and it is necessary to invest the utmost care and attention to it. Every hour and dollar spent during development will be reclaimed many times over during the project implementation as the project will flow smoothly and generate returns quickly. For more information on constructing a great spend management RFP, see the X-emplification and X-asperation series. Although the vendors won’t, you will thank me for it.

And just remember, you can always find RFP Help Here.

The Sourcing Maniacs 2008 Vendor Tour Part 20: Ketera

This post is a wee bit lengthy, so I’ve broken it into kidding and Ketera.


Kidding

  the maniacs are enjoying themselves somewhere in Alberta
Wakko Hee Haw!
Dot That was a classic, wasn’t it. Did you know it had Canadian roots?
Wakko Yippie Ki Yo Yippie Yay!
Dot We’re in Alberta, not Texas, Wakko!
  ring, ring
Yakko Yakkos Yiddish Yamakas … cheery caps for cheery chaps!
Australian Accent G’day, Mates! You wanted a demo of Ketera?
  if you’ll recall, back in part 12 (Kinaxis) the maniacs asked Ketera for a demo … they were too busy at the time, but promised to get back to the maniacs
Yakko Yes, we did.
Australian Accent Ace! Could you do it now?
  neeiiggghh!
Australian Accent Is that a Brumby I hear? Is this a good time for you blokes?
Yakko It’s just fine. I’ll fire up the satellite and we’re good to go!
Australian Accent Bonzer!
Are you out in the bush, mate?
Yakko No, we’re just enjoying the ranch.
Australian Accent Texas?
Yakko Alberta.
Australian Accent You’re in the Back of Bourke, aren’t you?
Yakko I guess you could say that.
Australian Accent You’re sure it’s a Mickey Mouse time for you?
Yakko No problem. I’m ready.
Dot I’m ready.
Yakko We just need to wrangle Wakko. One sec.
Wakko!
Get your strides over here now!
Wakko Why?
Yakko It’s time for the Ketera demo!
Wakko Now? Here?
Yakko We got sattelite internet, remember?
Wakko glumly
o. k.
Dot You can get back to having fun as soon as we’re done!
Wakko cheering up
A’ight!
  Wakko moseys on over.
Yakko We’re ready to give it a fair go!



Ketera

Australian Accent switching to his best American for the demo
Today I’m going to run through our new e-Sourcing application. It’s pretty straight-forward, so it won’t take much time.
  unlike the maniacs’ walkabout …
Yakko No problem! Take it away.
Australian Accent I should start off by noting that what we noticed was that a lot of people were spending a lot of money on enterprise sourcing applications without using the full extent of their capabilities … most of our catalog, procurement, and supply network customers were just using e-RFX and e-Auction and most of those customers were just using single round RFXs and traditional reverse auctions … not the dozen or so variants that have sprung up over the last ten years.

We saw the need for a low-cost 80% solution that would give the market what we felt it needed most … a basic sourcing solution for small and mid-size companies without large budgets or sophisticated software needs. And that’s what we built.

Our e-Sourcing solution is just RFX and Reverse Auction … and unlike many enterprise applications that take hours, if not days, to set an event up … our solution allows an event to be configured in minutes using a very simple 3-step process.

Step 1: Create a new event.
Step 2: Specify the items and item details.
Step 3: Invite suppliers.
  Then you just sit back, and watch prices tumble.

Yakko If it’s that easy, is it really an 80% solution?
Australian Accent Think about it. How much does an e-RFX and e-Auction solution really have to do?
Yakko Well, one thing we learned from talking to Source One about WhyAbe is that, for many categories, and many small to mid-size companies, it doesn’t have to do that much.
Australian Accent Precisely. And their offering is actually a good starting point to understand our offering.
Yakko So how does your offering compare to theirs?
Australian Accent Quite good. We both have the bare minimum requirements for e-RFX and e-Auction, but whereas, in our view, they’re more of a 60% to 70% solution, we add a few features that, although they sound like bells and whistles, are actually necessary for an 80% solution in today’s global e-Sourcing marketplace.
Yakko Like what?
Australian Accent Localization. Contract tracking. Fine-grained scoring on RFX questionnaires. Microsoft Excel integration. Templates. Instant-Messaging and Alerts. Customizable dashboards. Supplier Master Management. Wizards for each step of the process. The little things that make it easy, useful, and a pleasure to use — all embedded in a streamlined application with a carefully designed UI that buyers want to use.

And, unlike many other e-Sourcing platforms, it’s a low-cost, self-service, pay-as-you-go platform.

Yakko How low?
Australian Accent $39.99/month for unlimited RFIs, RFPs, RFQs, and reverse auctions. Plus, you get instant access to thousands of suppliers in the Ketera network.
Yakko Beaut!
Australian Accent Too right!
Yakko Anything else we should know?
Australian Accent It’s very easy to administrate, and the item and supplier master views support numerous filters for quick location of the appropriate item or supplier. It’s straightforward to enter proxy bids on behalf of a supplier. All of the reports have decent graphic capabilities. We support the UNSPSC schema for item categorization. And it has basic project tracking capability — you can quickly see your open events, events requiring bid evaluation, and recently evaluated events at any time.
Yakko So it really is a decent sourcing solution for small and mid-size companies just starting out on their e-Sourcing journey, or those companies without sophisticated sourcing needs.
Australian Accent We think so. And, as I said before, very easy to set-up a sourcing event.
Wakko I’m out of baloney. How long to set up an event to source a 3-months supply?
Australian Accent Five minutes. Watch.
  five minutes pass as the salesperson demos the tool
Wakko That’s it?
Australian Accent That’s it!
Wakko Fair suck of the sav!
Apparently, Wakko has his Aussie down pat! If I didn’t know better, I’d say he was from the Never Never!
Yakko Well, thanks for the demo. It certainly is an interesting take on the e-Sourcing space. A sourcing tool that every business can afford.
Australian Accent Thank you. Hooroo, Journo!
Wakko Hooroo, mate.

On the Sixth Day of X-Mas … (Cost Reduction Strategic Sourcing Strategies)

On the sixth day of X-Mas

my blogger gave to me
tactics for saving,
five golden rings,
four little words,
tri-focal lens,
two boxing gloves
and a lesson in strategy.

Six tactics that you can use to save in today’s marketplace are:

  • Reverse Auctions on Commodity Categories in Competitive Markets
  • Sealed Bids on Strategic Purchases of Custom Goods or Services
  • Decision Optimization on High Value Goods
  • Process Re-engineering with Strategic Partners
  • Lane Optimization
  • Distribution Center Optimization

Reverse Auctions on Commodity Categories in Competitive Markets

A recent post on Supply Excellence asks “if you are not sourcing, why not?” … and it’s a good question. Many key commodities that go into the parts you buy, and the energy your suppliers are using to convert raw materials into finished goods, recently hit two, three, and, in some cases, four year lows thanks to the recent decline in global demand. For some categories, it’s the best sourcing market we have seen in years as far as reverse auctions are concerned. So review the reverse auction selection criteria over on e-Sourcing Forum, where you can also find details on reverse auction strategy and reverse auction basics, brush up on the key steps to successful e-auctions, and get sourcing!

Sealed Bids on Strategic Purchases of Custom Goods or Services

If the category is strategic, and you can not use a reverse auction or open-bid methodology and have suppliers compete solely on price, because quality will be just as important, use a sealed bid.

Decision Optimization on High Value Goods

As outlined in my recent posts on e-Sourcing Forum and here on Sourcing Innovation where I asked if you can really afford to leave millions on the table, strategic sourcing decision optimization typically saves you 12% above and beyond what you will save with your best reverse auction, and, even today, still saves you up to 40% on some categories … which is an awful lot of bling if we’re talking about a 100 Million category. So review the decision optimization wiki-paper, select an appropriate solution, and start saving.

Process Re-engineering with Strategic Partners

Streamline processes and increase productivity. This allows you to increase spend under management and the savings you can generate. And if you’re worried about resistance, check out this post on overcoming worker resistance in process improvements.

Lane Optimization

Make sure you are using the right lanes at the right service levels from the right carriers. Otherwise, you could be considerably overspending on your transportation. As Dan Kowal pointed out in his recent Supply Excellence “sourcing opportunities during recession direct indirect logistics” post, the Baltic Panamax Freight Index has dropped 90% since May of this year. The market is rife with opportunities.

Distribution Center Optimization

An inefficient distribution network is costly. Save big by optimizing your network. For details on how, see my post on Bob’s Unique Talents.