Category Archives: RFX

RFP Drafting Tips from DLA Piper

The SSON (Shared Services and Outsourcing Network) recently published an article by Kit Burden of DLA Piper, a legal services and business insights firm that represents emerging growth and high tech companies, on his Top Ten Tips for Drafting an RFP that are worth sharing, especially since some of them echo the tips this blog has given you in the past. The tips are:

  • Don’t Issue The RFP To Too Many Suppliers
    Otherwise, it will become unmanageable and drain your internal resources. Do your homework before issuing the RFP and only issue it to suppliers who are likely to be able to meet your requirements at an acceptable price level. If too many providers fall into this category, shortlist the providers with the most experience in your vertical and the most stability. Generally, the RFP should only be issued to three to six providers, unless you are in the public sector and are required to open it up to anyone who wants to submit a proposal.
  • Ask Questions That Allow for Genuine Differentiation
    As I’ve said again and again, don’t use a vendor “check-the-box” RFP template. Not only are they designed to make the vendor look good, but they don’t ask open-ended questions that will allow the respondents to genuinely differentiate themselves from their competition. Don’t ask “do you have invoice management”, instead ask “how does your application support our invoice processing function, which works as follows”.
  • Ensure the References and Case Studies are From Directly Comparable Projects or Customers
    If you’re in high-tech and the vendor only provides you with CPG client references, you’re not going to know the breadth of the provider’s capabilities and expertise in your vertical. You should do your homework and also contact the clients in your vertical that they don’t give as references. (A Google search on a few news sites and a quick review of their press releases should provide you with some good candidates quickly.)
  • Be Crystal Clear on Your Objectives
    Is your primary goal cost reduction, service improvement, support flexibility, etc? And are you looking for a product or a service? Everyone wants to save money, but the vendors need to know how you expect to achieve that goal, and what the provider’s role is to be.
  • Ensure the RFP Specifies the Ground Rules for the Entire Procurement Process
    Submission requirements, use of information, timeframes, points of contact, rules of engagement, etc. Although important in the private sector where a provider can call “foul” and file complaints, this is crucial in the public sector where government bodies are legally required to play “fair”.
  • Include a Draft Agreement or Contract
      (or the standard terms and conditions and key provisions at the very least)

    Understandings as to what has been agreed to at a commercial and business level can quickly unravel when you get to the contract drafting stage, especially if the provider thinks your “standard” terms and conditions are onerous.
  • Identify the Core Team and the Core Legal Team
    This is important for a number of reasons. If you leave out someone important in the initial stages, the whole project can grind to a halt if an executive later decides “it’s not right for our business”. And if it’s a large IT project or outsourcing project, the amount of work will be significant and not something that the project leads can do as part of their current “day job”. Big projects require serious up-front commitments to get right.
  • Be Clear on the Scoring
    Not only will secrecy on scoring lead to trouble if you’re in the public sector, but it will prevent the service providers from putting their best proposal forward as the scoring system serves to identify which functions are the most important, and what information you want first and foremost from the vendor.
  • Involve all Key Internal Stakeholders
    They need to be kept abreast of how the negotiations are going and given the opportunity to provide their input, otherwise you’ll run into resistance during project implementation every time they don’t like something because “they weren’t consulted on that and it’s wrong”.
  • Anticipate Questions and Gather the Information in Advance
    Due diligence is an essential process, and any supplier worth their salt will want to have a clear understanding of what they are being asked to take on. Furthermore, if the information provided is deficient, one can expect suppliers to argue for the inclusion of contractual assumptions/dependencies regarding the areas of uncertainty. The last thing you want to do before a negotiation is reduce your credibility and your leverage with a potential supplier.

As Kit says, the RFP process is a crucial part of the sourcing process and it is necessary to invest the utmost care and attention to it. Every hour and dollar spent during development will be reclaimed many times over during the project implementation as the project will flow smoothly and generate returns quickly. For more information on constructing a great spend management RFP, see the X-emplification and X-asperation series. Although the vendors won’t, you will thank me for it.

And just remember, you can always find RFP Help Here.

The Sourcing Maniacs 2008 Vendor Tour Part 20: Ketera

This post is a wee bit lengthy, so I’ve broken it into kidding and Ketera.


Kidding

  the maniacs are enjoying themselves somewhere in Alberta
Wakko Hee Haw!
Dot That was a classic, wasn’t it. Did you know it had Canadian roots?
Wakko Yippie Ki Yo Yippie Yay!
Dot We’re in Alberta, not Texas, Wakko!
  ring, ring
Yakko Yakkos Yiddish Yamakas … cheery caps for cheery chaps!
Australian Accent G’day, Mates! You wanted a demo of Ketera?
  if you’ll recall, back in part 12 (Kinaxis) the maniacs asked Ketera for a demo … they were too busy at the time, but promised to get back to the maniacs
Yakko Yes, we did.
Australian Accent Ace! Could you do it now?
  neeiiggghh!
Australian Accent Is that a Brumby I hear? Is this a good time for you blokes?
Yakko It’s just fine. I’ll fire up the satellite and we’re good to go!
Australian Accent Bonzer!
Are you out in the bush, mate?
Yakko No, we’re just enjoying the ranch.
Australian Accent Texas?
Yakko Alberta.
Australian Accent You’re in the Back of Bourke, aren’t you?
Yakko I guess you could say that.
Australian Accent You’re sure it’s a Mickey Mouse time for you?
Yakko No problem. I’m ready.
Dot I’m ready.
Yakko We just need to wrangle Wakko. One sec.
Wakko!
Get your strides over here now!
Wakko Why?
Yakko It’s time for the Ketera demo!
Wakko Now? Here?
Yakko We got sattelite internet, remember?
Wakko glumly
o. k.
Dot You can get back to having fun as soon as we’re done!
Wakko cheering up
A’ight!
  Wakko moseys on over.
Yakko We’re ready to give it a fair go!



Ketera

Australian Accent switching to his best American for the demo
Today I’m going to run through our new e-Sourcing application. It’s pretty straight-forward, so it won’t take much time.
  unlike the maniacs’ walkabout …
Yakko No problem! Take it away.
Australian Accent I should start off by noting that what we noticed was that a lot of people were spending a lot of money on enterprise sourcing applications without using the full extent of their capabilities … most of our catalog, procurement, and supply network customers were just using e-RFX and e-Auction and most of those customers were just using single round RFXs and traditional reverse auctions … not the dozen or so variants that have sprung up over the last ten years.

We saw the need for a low-cost 80% solution that would give the market what we felt it needed most … a basic sourcing solution for small and mid-size companies without large budgets or sophisticated software needs. And that’s what we built.

Our e-Sourcing solution is just RFX and Reverse Auction … and unlike many enterprise applications that take hours, if not days, to set an event up … our solution allows an event to be configured in minutes using a very simple 3-step process.

Step 1: Create a new event.
Step 2: Specify the items and item details.
Step 3: Invite suppliers.
  Then you just sit back, and watch prices tumble.

Yakko If it’s that easy, is it really an 80% solution?
Australian Accent Think about it. How much does an e-RFX and e-Auction solution really have to do?
Yakko Well, one thing we learned from talking to Source One about WhyAbe is that, for many categories, and many small to mid-size companies, it doesn’t have to do that much.
Australian Accent Precisely. And their offering is actually a good starting point to understand our offering.
Yakko So how does your offering compare to theirs?
Australian Accent Quite good. We both have the bare minimum requirements for e-RFX and e-Auction, but whereas, in our view, they’re more of a 60% to 70% solution, we add a few features that, although they sound like bells and whistles, are actually necessary for an 80% solution in today’s global e-Sourcing marketplace.
Yakko Like what?
Australian Accent Localization. Contract tracking. Fine-grained scoring on RFX questionnaires. Microsoft Excel integration. Templates. Instant-Messaging and Alerts. Customizable dashboards. Supplier Master Management. Wizards for each step of the process. The little things that make it easy, useful, and a pleasure to use — all embedded in a streamlined application with a carefully designed UI that buyers want to use.

And, unlike many other e-Sourcing platforms, it’s a low-cost, self-service, pay-as-you-go platform.

Yakko How low?
Australian Accent $39.99/month for unlimited RFIs, RFPs, RFQs, and reverse auctions. Plus, you get instant access to thousands of suppliers in the Ketera network.
Yakko Beaut!
Australian Accent Too right!
Yakko Anything else we should know?
Australian Accent It’s very easy to administrate, and the item and supplier master views support numerous filters for quick location of the appropriate item or supplier. It’s straightforward to enter proxy bids on behalf of a supplier. All of the reports have decent graphic capabilities. We support the UNSPSC schema for item categorization. And it has basic project tracking capability — you can quickly see your open events, events requiring bid evaluation, and recently evaluated events at any time.
Yakko So it really is a decent sourcing solution for small and mid-size companies just starting out on their e-Sourcing journey, or those companies without sophisticated sourcing needs.
Australian Accent We think so. And, as I said before, very easy to set-up a sourcing event.
Wakko I’m out of baloney. How long to set up an event to source a 3-months supply?
Australian Accent Five minutes. Watch.
  five minutes pass as the salesperson demos the tool
Wakko That’s it?
Australian Accent That’s it!
Wakko Fair suck of the sav!
Apparently, Wakko has his Aussie down pat! If I didn’t know better, I’d say he was from the Never Never!
Yakko Well, thanks for the demo. It certainly is an interesting take on the e-Sourcing space. A sourcing tool that every business can afford.
Australian Accent Thank you. Hooroo, Journo!
Wakko Hooroo, mate.

On the Sixth Day of X-Mas … (Cost Reduction Strategic Sourcing Strategies)

On the sixth day of X-Mas

my blogger gave to me
tactics for saving,
five golden rings,
four little words,
tri-focal lens,
two boxing gloves
and a lesson in strategy.

Six tactics that you can use to save in today’s marketplace are:

  • Reverse Auctions on Commodity Categories in Competitive Markets
  • Sealed Bids on Strategic Purchases of Custom Goods or Services
  • Decision Optimization on High Value Goods
  • Process Re-engineering with Strategic Partners
  • Lane Optimization
  • Distribution Center Optimization

Reverse Auctions on Commodity Categories in Competitive Markets

A recent post on Supply Excellence asks “if you are not sourcing, why not?” … and it’s a good question. Many key commodities that go into the parts you buy, and the energy your suppliers are using to convert raw materials into finished goods, recently hit two, three, and, in some cases, four year lows thanks to the recent decline in global demand. For some categories, it’s the best sourcing market we have seen in years as far as reverse auctions are concerned. So review the reverse auction selection criteria over on e-Sourcing Forum, where you can also find details on reverse auction strategy and reverse auction basics, brush up on the key steps to successful e-auctions, and get sourcing!

Sealed Bids on Strategic Purchases of Custom Goods or Services

If the category is strategic, and you can not use a reverse auction or open-bid methodology and have suppliers compete solely on price, because quality will be just as important, use a sealed bid.

Decision Optimization on High Value Goods

As outlined in my recent posts on e-Sourcing Forum and here on Sourcing Innovation where I asked if you can really afford to leave millions on the table, strategic sourcing decision optimization typically saves you 12% above and beyond what you will save with your best reverse auction, and, even today, still saves you up to 40% on some categories … which is an awful lot of bling if we’re talking about a 100 Million category. So review the decision optimization wiki-paper, select an appropriate solution, and start saving.

Process Re-engineering with Strategic Partners

Streamline processes and increase productivity. This allows you to increase spend under management and the savings you can generate. And if you’re worried about resistance, check out this post on overcoming worker resistance in process improvements.

Lane Optimization

Make sure you are using the right lanes at the right service levels from the right carriers. Otherwise, you could be considerably overspending on your transportation. As Dan Kowal pointed out in his recent Supply Excellence “sourcing opportunities during recession direct indirect logistics” post, the Baltic Panamax Freight Index has dropped 90% since May of this year. The market is rife with opportunities.

Distribution Center Optimization

An inefficient distribution network is costly. Save big by optimizing your network. For details on how, see my post on Bob’s Unique Talents.

See Box, c Box Bid

I was recently alerted to a new niche play in the sourcing market by the name of cBoxBid for buyers and sellers of, you guessed it, cardboard boxes. And just like you’re asking now, the first thing I asked is why would we need a marketplace just for boxes … after all, we have a large number of generic marketplaces already, not to mention a plethora of e-Sourcing applications that can be used to source boxes to your heart’s content.

The answer is we don’t, as there are dozens of ways to source boxes, unless you are a buyer who wants to get the best price possible on your box order. Cardboard boxes, and RSC boxes in particular, are the commodities of commodities … there are over 5,000 plants in the US alone that can make that RSC box for you. Some cities, like Atlanta, have 60 – 70 manufacturers in the local area that can make your box. And unless you’re an expert in the cardboard box marketplace, which you’re probably not if your job is to strategically source critical parts and materials, you’re probably not going to know which manufacturers are going to be able to give you the best quote, which is largely based on their current capacity utilization, at any one time.

Plus, it benefits the supplier, who is able to find more opportunities to increase production without having to spend thousands of dollars on potential client site visits. The average manufacturer is currently operating at 48 to 55% capacity, and spends an average of $700 to $1,000 for every three site visits by its sales force in its local area. A marketplace will bring it dozens, and maybe hundreds, of opportunities for the same price.

Moreover, because the marketplace is built around one commodity, the template is built in. This makes it trivial for a buyer to create a new request, and even more trivial for a supplier to find the requests that best matches their particular capabilities and production lines, and the requests that they can manufacturer cheapest. All a buyer has to do is define the production date, printing, style, wall, board weight/flute, board color, glue tab, dimensions, panel printing, warehousing requirements, quantity, delivery requirements, and bid-by date and the quote is ready to go. All the supplier has to do is enter a price. And the true market price is revealed.

The platform also offers buyers anonymity, suppliers accurate contact information of interested buyers, and both parties the opportunity to explore a potential transaction without a binding contract. A buyer places a bid, suppliers respond, and then a buyer releases her information to the supplier(s) that submit acceptable bids. At this point, an award can be made through the system, through the buyer’s in-house e-Sourcing system, or either party can walk away if a conversation uncovers a misunderstanding.

The tool also supports buyer feedback, and captures ratings from other buyers who have used a supplier.

The tool is free to buyers, and suppliers pay a monthly fee for unlimited use of the system.

Reminder: (e-Sourcing, e-Procurement, and e-Supply Chain) RFP Help Is Here

I wanted to remind you that, I as indicated last month during the summer slumber, you can find RFP Help Here. When trying to piece together an RFP for your new e-sourcing, e-procurement, or e-supply chain solution, you’ll need to navigate a minefield filled with fine-print, unnecessary and useless features, maintenance and upgrade charges, and extraneous user licenses (thrown in to produce an artificially-low “per license” price) — not to mention enticing offers involving long-term commitments that you absolutely should not be making. As outlined in What Does the doctor Do … For You, one of the services I offer is RFx Construction Help, including, if necessary, a full blown Needs Assessment.

As I have indicated many times in my X-emplification series, my X-asperation series, and in various RFx posts, including Don’t Put the Cart Before the Horse, you should never — ever — use an RFI or RFP “template” from a vendor when going out to bid, regardless of what the solution is for. This isn’t to say that you shouldn’t download them and look at them, but it’s unwise to use them or base your RFx upon them. For example, the Ariba RFP template for an RFx solution consists of page after page of feature-focused questions like “does the product integrate with Business Objects”, “please list your best practice event templates”, and “does the product qualify new suppliers” — the answers to which are most likely of no use to you. Not everyone uses Business Objects, and, more importantly, if the product is good, shouldn’t it be self-contained? If you’re in food service, you don’t give a hoot about best practice templates for petro-chemical manufacturing. Furthermore, an automated tool can never qualify a supplier — only an intelligent human can.

The usefulness of a vendor RFP template for a software solution is usually limited to the headings on the functionality pages, which can help you to identify features commonly found in that solution category. For example, looking at Ariba’s proposed RFP for an RFx solution, you can be pretty confident that RFx solutions might have some type of navigation, integration support for third party systems, project management capability, supplier tracking, survey creation, reporting, RFx creation, and auction event-management capabilities — and, more specifically, that the features available from Ariba will match the questions perfectly! But that’s all you can tell. You don’t know if the features mesh in such a way to provide the actual functionality you need, or whether the whole RFP is completely off base with respect to what you’re trying to accomplish. You need to ask use-case-based questions that reflect your business and your normal operating procedures. For example, is the reporting module included with the RFx system, or is it an added-cost item? Is the solution a tar baby of interrelated modules, such that you can’t really buy one without springing for all the others, in order to get the “complete” functionality? Has the vendor focused on eye-candy gee-whiz features, to the detriment of core functionality that you’ll really need?

RFx software itself is great example of what should be a mature, smoothly-working technology. eRFx has been around for 10+ years — so it’s easy to reason that surely every vendor has to have gotten it right by now. None of the analysts or major commentators in our space even question this point. Yet, I’m aware of recent RFx efforts using “mature” technology that have nearly failed due to very basic software limitations.

As per my last post, I believe that I am in a unique position to help, given my dual background in technology and sourcing/procurement. I am able to work with you to:

  • understand what you need and do a proper Needs Assessment
  • put together an RFx that outlines the important functionality you really need, not simply produce an exhaustive list of useless features
  • review the initial RFx responses and help you identify the follow-up questions that you need to ask
  • review a potential contract in order to identify:
    • unnecessary modules
    • missing functionality
    • missing cost definitions (so you don’t get burned later on)
    • and other potential weaknesses
  • if necessary, help you select a third party to assist with implementation or associated services

So if you need help with that needs assessment, RFx, or contract, feel free to reach out at any time. See the contact information in the FAQ.

Note to anyone who doesn’t understand category tagging: yes, this is an advertisement.