Category Archives: Vendor Review

Vinimaya: Taking Their Procurement Marketplace Global, Part III

In Part I we noted that since we last covered Vinimaya, the B2B Search Engine that was the the next wave in product catalogue management with their ability to do real-time federated search across all of your supplier databases, catalogues, and punch-outs through a single consumer-like search and shop interface, they have continued building out their base platform, adding (more extensive) auditing capability, workflow-based catalog management, quick-quote (RFX) capability, e-Forms, deep analytics capability, mobile capabilities, and social integration on top of a base platform that supported content management, federated search, powerful connectivity options, personalization and customization, globalization, and an easy to use shopping cart. Then, in Part II, we focused in on their vTransport and their new quick-order and e-Forms functionality, known as vQuote. Today we’re going to dive a little deeper into five of the new capabilities added since our last major review, starting with vQuote.

vQuote
vQuote was specifically designed for the time when multiple bids is the right, or only, option but the situation does not warrant a full-scale sourcing event. For example, unless the organization is bundling the printer cartridge spend with the printers (which is generally NOT a good idea, by the way, since most printer manufacturers make their money off of ink that costs more than blood), running a full sourcing event to award next year’s printer cartridge buy is not worth the effort. Also, many small projects in the public sector, such as network support services at a small local government office, have to go to bid, but aren’t worth full scale sourcing events either. In this case, a quick quote — often to known suppliers already in the system, is typically the way to go. The Vinimaya vQuote solution was designed to make this process as quick, easy, and painless as possible — whether the request for quote was going to existing suppliers in the system or to new suppliers.

Since it was designed specifically for those categories of buys that fit between spot-buy from a catalog and full-fledged sourcing event, Vinimaya was able to streamline the solution significantly. Creating a quote request is as easy as giving a quote a name, specifying line items, selecting suppliers, and providing a due date – which can all be done on a single screen. If the line items are services, a SOW can be attached and quickly sent off. The buyer can see the status of the quote requests on a summary screen, review each quote as it is returned, compare them side-by-side in a summary report, and select a winner just by marking a quote, or line item from a quote, as awarded. It’s as quick and simple as a quoting solution can get and meet the needs of the quoting category they designed for.

vRank
vRank is the ability for a senior buyer or contract manager to ensure that contract items always appear first in the search results, that items from preferred suppliers always appear before items from non-preferred suppliers, and that prohibited items never appear. Basically, the administrator has the ability to assign each item that appears in a search result a rank between 1 (do not include) and 4 (show first), where 3 is (show ahead of other items) and 2 is (normal rank). It’s pretty simple, and it works based on the simple fact that almost half of all people who use search functionality click on the first link that is returned. (Recent Google statistics indicate that a whopping 47% of searchers click on the first search result.) The ranks can be applied to individual items or suppliers, with item ranks overriding supplier ranks). In addition, these ranks can be defined in real-time on every search and will take effect immediately on all future searches. This allows an administrator to define priorities as needed based upon what users are actually searching for and buying, saving a lot of up-front configuration to define ranks for products that might not even be searched for!

vCatalog
vCatalog updates the capability Vinimaya has always had to manage local catalogs in a manner that pushes all of the work back on the supplier. With vCatalog, a supplier that is not technical enough to, or that does not want to, maintain a punch-out or other on-line catalog can upload their entire catalog to the buyer through a web portal. The catalog file is completely validated, and any errors are pushed back to the supplier, with specific details on the error, for correction before it is allowed to be pushed to production.

vAudit
vAudit is what allows a buying organization to take advantage of vendor managed catalogs with confidence. It continuously monitors products and pricing from punch-out, vCatalog, and web-db suppliers to make sure that prices are compliant with contracted prices or original quotes. As soon as a price is detected that is above the contracted price, the appropriate buyer representative is alerted to the issue. The system can be configured in three different ways:

  1. block a purchase for a product over the contract amount
  2. allow the checkout to proceed, but don’t send the PO to the supplier until the price is corrected
    (and alert an administrator to contact the supplier to get the price fixed)
  3. allow the checkout to proceed at the current price, but tag the item for proactive cost recovery

With the vAudit solution, it’s quick and painless to retrieve a report of all items bought above contract or quoted price in a given timeframe, and just as simple to break it down by supplier to allow the AP department to go after suppliers for money owed.

vAnalytics
vAnalytics is Vinimaya’s new reporting engine that was designed to provide Procurement Directors with an understanding of what people were buying and how they were selecting the items they were buying. With the understanding that the purchase process cannot be optimized without a good understanding of shopper behaviour, Vinimaya built a platform that allowed a Procurement Director to understand not only the the top purchases, the top suppliers, and the top buyers, but also the top search terms, the items they led to, the failed search terms, and the actions the buyer took on a failed search.

vAnalytics, which includes a report builder, has all of the standard reporting package features you would expect in a Procurement reporting system and allows reports to be created by supplier, buyer, item, and even checkout process. Common report types include unique users, spend by supplier, line items by supplier, utilization by search time, and out of compliance check-outs (if they are permitted). Since these reports are against real-time data (and not cached in an OLAP system), some can take a few minutes to run, but those restricted to a single-user or supplier will typically be quite responsive. And, of course, all data in the entire Vinimaya platform is exportable.

Vinimaya has also made advancements in mobile and social, but these enhancements will be the subject of a future post on the Vinimaya Global Procurement Marketplace.

Arena – Taking PLM Deep Into the Supply Chain Part II

In Part I we noted that Arena, since we last covered The Arena Solution in 2007, extended their PLM solution that was built around BOM (Bill-of-Material) Management, Item Management, and Change Management to support (better) Document Management, Quality Management, and Compliance Management. We also noted that they added more enterprise integration capabilities to ensure that their PLM solution integrated with all of the major ERP and MRP solutions on the market. We briefly covered these solutions before noting that, on top of these additions, they just released four new capabilities on top of their existing platform that we are going to cover in depth today.

Arena Projects
Arena Projects is a fully-functional project management solution that is fully integrated with the rest of the Arena suite which adds the dimension of product data to Project Management and allows for product-level production schedules to be defined and integrated with the master project schedule. Like every other project management solution, every project can be attached to a program, given a manager, assigned a start date, given milestones (composed of tasks) and target dates, and updated when a task is completed or milestone is reached. In addition, as it was developed on top of a PLM solution to support NPD/NPI (New Product Development / New Product Introduction), projects can be broken down into the conception, planning, development, manufacturing release, and launch phases. Statements of work and other supporting documents, can be attached and participants can leave notes on projects and issues as the project progresses. And, most importantly, all of the schedules associated with all of the projects in a program can be rolled up to provide a program manager a master view of status. In addition, there is a user view that allows a user to see all of her assignments across projects, recent notifications, documents she has access to, and actions she has to complete.

The solution was also designed to support CAPA (Corrective and Preventive Action) projects and has a built-in understanding of the process that consists of team establishment, problem definition, interim containment actions, root cause identification, corrective action identification, corrective action implementation, best practices to prevent recurrence, and project closure (with the recognition of team efforts). This built-in template makes setting up a new CAPA project, which can be linked to products already in the system, a breeze. The Project module is also integrated with their new Reporting module that can access any and all data in the system, so it is easy for a manager to get a handle on all projects under her purview or for an engineer to see the status of all projects on which he is assigned tasks and prioritize his work appropriately.

Arena Demand
Arena Demand is their demand management solution. Like other demand solutions, it allows a user to enter a forecast against multiple BOMs, aggregates the total demand for required parts or materials against multiple products, and presents the user with the total demand for each part or raw material along with any cost and sourcing information in the system. It’s an obvious feature that, for the longest time, was missing from many PLM systems. And while basic demand management capability will often exist in the MRP that the PLM provider will assume the organization has, the PRM provider is actually making two assumptions here that aren’t always true. The first assumption is that the organization has a higher-end MRP (which isn’t always the case for mid-sized manufacturers with limited IT budgets) and the second assumption is that the customer can easily get the relevant PLM data in the relevant format out of the PLM solution and into the MRP (which can require IT expertise the manufacturing organization does not have). Plus, sourcing doesn’t want to deal with an MRP — they just want a report that, for each product or raw material, presents them with total aggregated demand for the relevant time period, historical cost data, and known sources of supply.

The Arena Demand solution is quite easy to use — for each product, the manufacturing (or marketing) organization can input the expected demand by month or quarter and the solution spits out a report of demand by component part or raw material for the same time period, augmented with known supplier part matches and historical costs, if desired. In addition, since the solution is also tightly integrated with the Reporting platform, the sourcing team can filter in to specific programs, categories, or parts, or even suppliers of interest (if the sourcing team is looking to potentially aggregate volume to preferred suppliers for additional savings).

Arena EI
Arena EI, short for Arena Enterprise Integration, as we noted yesterday, is a new Open RESTful API that can be used to push data into Arena from any system and pull any and all data out of the Arena solution that needs to be pushed into other organizational systems. Supporting JSON data transport over secure https with session ID authentication, the API is flexible, powerful, and secure. And since it has access to all of the data in the Arena platform, it is a powerful, complete solution for data interchange into and out of the Arena platform.

Arena Exchange
Arena Exchange, which is the most revolutionary of the new Arena offerings, introduces the ability for real-time supply chain collaboration to include all impacted parties across multiple tiers of the supply chain during new product introduction, and the solution does so with unprecedented ease. It paves the way for a paradigm shift in the way manufacturers can manage the design and development of new products in an inclusive, but still secured and controlled, fashion.

In the Arena Exchange solution, any one can invite supple representatives to view, comment on, and approve bid packages, sub-packages, or even individual components — as each user can limit the data that the invitee sees to only the data she needs to see. In addition, if the invitee doesn’t have all of the input required for her part of the bid-package, she can carve out a chunk and send that off to someone on her team or to her supplier representative if needed. The relevant parts of the PLM can go all the way down to the tier-3 supplier shop floor for rework if need be, and the business impact of this up-front visibility and collaboration will be better DFM (Design for Manufacturing), faster TTM (Time-to-Market) due to fewer errors, less scrap and rework, lower cost, and higher quality.

The platform, which can be put on top of any PLM solution (not just Arena’s) that stores its files in standard PDX (Product Data eXchange) format (an international electronics manufacturing initiative standard), has a very simple interface that allows the user to access the specifications, bill of materials, sourcing information attached files, and (change) history by item, manufacturer item, and vendor item. The user can then add comments, send (selected portions) of the BOM to an existing (or new) user, add reviewers, define due dates, submit approvals, and ask questions. Drill-down is easy, so the user can quickly get to the appropriate sub-assembly, component, part, or raw material. At any time, the user can see the (rolled-up) status of the raw materials, parts, components, sub-assemblies, and assemblies within her purview as well as which users didn’t respond. Arena Exchange is the solution the PLM industry has been missing and should be evaluated by any manufacturing organization wanting to take their NPD and NPI processes to the next level.

Arena – Taking PLM Deep Into the Supply Chain Part I

When we last covered The Arena Solution in 2007, we stated that Arena were the providers of an effective, on-demand, PLM solution that could manage the information associated with the entire lifecycle of a product from conception, through design and manufacture, to service and disposal, which, for a low margin manufacturing organization, could be the difference between costly inefficiency and profitable efficiency. One of the unique features of the solution was its support for collaboration between the buying organization and the supplying organization through an online portal.

Since the release of their first on-demand solution in 2007, which was focussed around BOM (Bill-of-Material) Management, Item Management and Change Management, over the last few years they added (better) Document Management, Quality Management, and Compliance Management. The Document Management capability, built on their change management and collaboration tools, streamlines the document management process, manages the revision process, supports privilege-based access for anyone who needs to access the document, be they employee or supplier representative, and supports the meta-data categorization required for advanced search and rapid retrieval.

The Quality Management capability supports your CAPA (Corrective and Preventive Action) process and allows the organization to track progress on quality improvement processes over the long term. The Quality Management capability allows for the creation of issues, corrective action requests, and tasks necessary to resolve the issues identified by the corrective action requests. It also associates the issues to requests, BOMs, and associated documents and allows the process to be managed from beginning to end and the entire history to be archived for the institutionalization of knowledge.

The Compliance Management capability was designed to allow an organization to meet regulatory requirements and track compliance information for products and processes with BOM-level control to allow an organization to comply with medical, environmental, regulatory, safety, and process standards and regulations. From import restrictions to quality standards to safety standards to reporting regulations, a manufacturing organization often has more regulations to adhere to than it has items in its largest BOM (which can be quite large, especially if it’s manufacturing automobiles, airplanes, or automated control systems for nuclear power plants). This is not an easy task when the organization often has to track the materials in every item in its BOM, the insurance certificates for each supplier, and the third party certifications for each product. But with a proper solution that allows the suppliers to upload the relevant documents, and manage them, the process is a lot easier.

And, finally, they added more Enterprise Integration. A PLM solution that doesn’t integrate with your ERP/MRP solution has almost as many disadvantages as it has advantages. And those disadvantages revolve around data, and data entry. At some point, orders have to be placed, and those orders at some point have to flow through the ERP system that manages the payables, the inventory, and the demand tracking. If there is no integration, the BOMs for all of the existing products will have to be manually entered or loaded into the PLM solution and the BOMs for all of the New Product Introductions will have to be manually entered into the ERP. Not a pretty picture. That’s why Arena spent a lot of time integrating with all of the major ERP and MRP systems out there over the last few years. But Arena didn’t stop there. Realizing that, as they progressed up the supply chain capability curve, that demand needs to get into sourcing systems, that regular orders need to get into procurement systems, that compliance information needs to get into reporting systems, etc., they figured out that no matter how many systems you integrate with, it will never be enough so, in their current release that just came out this quarter (which contains a number of new capabilities on top of the capabilities discussed so far), they built a new Open RESTful API that can be used to push data into Arena from any system and pull any and all data out of the Arena solution that needs to be pushed into other organizational systems. We’ll discuss this more in Part II when we talk about the four new capabilities that were just released as part of the new Arena solution.

Bravo Business Center 2.0 – A Complete Category Solution for MRO: Part II.2

In Part II.1, after noting how BravoSolution transformed a solution that was a complete category management solution for nine (9) somewhat disparate categories, to a complete vertical solution for five different verticals (with more coming in the future) that was based on the collective decades of experience of their global sourcing team (working out of ten offices in four continents) in those verticals, we noted how in BravoSolution’s Business Center, the basic templates are loaded and ready to go. All that an organization has to do to get started with a basic event is upload its item list, market baskets, list pricing for each supplier (and current / previous bid discounts), and current contracts; define it’s service level equations and cost-vs-service level trade-offs; and define its bidding guidelines and key milestones, and a basic event is ready to go!

In addition to being able to capture all of the categories, sub-categories, and items of interest, the platform can also capture all of the buyer locations — organized by region, state, and city — and supplier service locations — also organized by region, state, and city — and the platform allows a buyer to restrict which service locations can service a buyer location and the supplier is still able to define further restrictions still based on the supplier’s capabilities. In addition, a supplier can also suggest alternate items, with alternate pricing, for each item (over those selected by the buyer) and a buyer can accept or reject the alternates that are proposed. These alternates can have their own pricing, discount, and shipping & handling rules as well. For any category, sub-category, or item with a price that is largely driven off of one or more market costs (like steel or energy), the supplier can specify the relevant price index(es) and the percent that the market cost is driven off of the index(es). So, if a steel part is 50% steel, 10% energy, 25% specialized labour, and 15% other, the supplier can indicate that steel, energy, and specialized labour are the primary cost drivers, link them to the buyer recognized indices, and indicate the threshold change at which a price will need to increase or decrease. The buyer can then accept, or reject, the bid and if accepted, do multi-year what-if scenarios and make optimized multi-year awards that take expected cost increases or decreases into account, reducing the number of sourcing events and freeing up its strategic sourcing team for more strategic value-add activities, such as supplier performance improvement.

And the best thing about the solution is that the entire workflow is mapped out and easy to follow by even the most novice buyer on the sourcing team. First, the buyer is walked through setting up the guidelines for the supplier and customizing the workflow. This involves sending out an intent to respond (to avoid wasting time creating RFX sheets for uninterested suppliers), creating the general instructions for the event, identifying the milestones (steps) and target dates for completing each milestone (step), drafting the announcements for the various milestones and tracking their distribution, and selecting/creating the appropriate training materials for download by the suppliers (which can include step-by-step instructional videos for each step of the process).

Then the RFI is initiated to collect basic supplier information, product and service capabilities, service history, and standard pricing practices. Based on this, a basic product and service level evaluation is conducted (which insures that minimum required service levels can be met and that minimum quality levels are achievable), and any suppliers that don’t meet the minimum requirements are eliminated before the RFQ. At this point, the required service areas are defined (based upon the uploaded and/or historical service areas that can be defined at the region, state, and/or city level), the market baskets (and the component categories, sub-categories, and items and their mappings to default, pre-approved, supplier items) are finalized, discount categories are created, and any required shipping & handling rules are created.

The RFQ is then sent out and the suppliers can either enter their bids through the supplier portal, or download an Excel sheet, which can include their historical bids (if they bid in a previous event) that they can complete offline and upload if it’s easier. The suppliers can then define any general or (basket specific) discounts through the portal in a powerful and flexible manner on their list-price bids (which makes bidding for them as easy as cutting and pasting their list-price bid-sheet into the Excel sheet and then defining their discount categories, versus having to create multiple pricing sheets for each type of discount). Finally, the suppliers can fill in their shipping and handling costs and requirements (such as minimum order size, service location restrictions, etc.) and submit their bid. Optionally, the suppliers can also specify the dependence of high-dollar, or variable, categories on price-indices and additional discounts for alternate payment terms.

When all of the suppliers have bid, or the cut-off date is reached, the buyer can then push all of the bids into BravoSolution’s Collaborative Sourcing Solution into a pre-built, ready-to-go, optimization model that, based on the predefined service rules, cost trade-offs, and preferred contract length, will compute the optimal solution. The buyer can then create multiple what-if scenarios to determine the cost dependency on service level (or vice versa) or the potential savings with different contract terms. Once an award scenario is chosen, it can be saved, pushed into the contract management solution, and template contracts generated for each supplier in the award scenario.

It’s a very well thought out solution for MRO optimized to make sourcing, and re-sourcing, as quick, easy, painless, and error-free as possible so that, if needed, it can be driven by a junior buyer (under the guidance of a senior buyer) and free up the senior buyer in the organization for more value-add or strategic activities. And with the decades upon decades of experience in BravoSolution’s Global Team, they can get it up, running, and customized to your specific organizational needs in a matter of weeks. If you are an MRO organization, or an organization with a large MRO spend, BravoSolution’s MRO Business Center is definitely a solution to look at closely.

Bravo Business Center 2.0 – A Complete Category Solution for MRO: Part II.1

In Part I, we discussed how BravoSolution, realizing the limitations in their original, ground-breaking business center solution, enhanced the solution to be a complete solution for certain verticals that have standardized, predictable workflow-driven processes at the heart of their categories. We discussed how they transformed a solution that was a complete category management solution for nine (9) somewhat disparate categories, to a complete vertical solution for five different verticals (with more coming in the future) that was based on the collective decades of experience of their global sourcing team (working out of ten offices in four continents) in those verticals.

MRO, short for Maintenance, Repair and Operations, is a vertical that’s almost tailor-made for a business center solution. Even though, as a category, it is one of the broadest categories imaginable as it has to deal with whatever is required to keep any and all electrical, mechanical, hydraulic, telecommunication, or other physical system operating at normal levels — be it a production line, telecommunication backbone, power center, water plant, ventilation system, or office building — from both an (emergency) repair perspective and preventative maintenance perspective. As a result, depending on the company in question, the category could include just about any product or service under the sun. However, unlike CPG categories, the organization is generally not sourcing in volume and not looking for production capabilities, innovation capabilities, partnerships, or other value-adds that are required for success in those CPG categories.

As a result, MRO success often depends not on identifying the supplier who can give you the best price at the best service level on a part, but on identifying the supplier who can give you the best average price at the best average service level over a large market basket of parts, or the supplier who can bundle the services associated with installing a related market basket of parts (as part of preventative maintenance) at a competitive rate (which not only reduces the direct costs of having to deal with two different suppliers for parts and services, but the indirect administration and communication costs).

In addition, MRO suppliers tend to quote differently than volume-based manufacturing production facilities. Manufacturers will often quote based on production tiers, or give flat discounts or rebates based on production volumes for a single product, whereas MRO providers provide list pricing, and then quote discounts based on total dollar commitments across a market basket (as individual volumes for most categories aren’t enough to merit much of a discount).

Other complexities with MRO revolve around the sheer amount of data that needs to be captured, the creation of the right market basets, defining the qualitative metrics to appropriately capture the service levels of interest, defining the equations that appropriately trade off cost vs. quality vs. service level, and defining the cost drivers for the high-priced categories that will define when costs can change in a multi-year contract.

At a large MRO company, there will be thousands of products and services that need to be quoted from dozens, if not hundreds, of suppliers. Just creating all of the required data sheets that need to be distributed to the suppliers will be a challenge, breaking them down into baskets, sub-baskets, or items with alternate specifications for the sub-set of suppliers who will only bid on a sub-set of the RFX a nightmare. For some categories, service metrics are more important than cost. For example, if an automotive production line goes down, that can cost a large automotive manufacturer seven figures a day. In this case, spending an extra $10 an hour for a service provider with a guaranteed on-site service time of 4 hours vs 8 hours is a no-brainer. Even if their cost is substantially lower, service providers who cannot guarantee a required response time can not be considered for an award in some categories. In other categories, service levels, while important, can be traded off against cost. Consider warranty repairs. A five day turnaround vs. a seven day turnaround for a returned consumer item makes very little difference to a consumer that is out of a provided product for almost a week anyway, and trade-offs can be made in cost and service level. However, these trade-offs need to be evaluated in an appropriately defined equation. While a five day vs. seven day turnaround is almost equal, a five day vs. a twenty-one day is not. Unless the twenty-one day repair cost was high double-digit percentage cheaper than the five day, an organization wouldn’t risk the customer animosity that could result. And, in some categories, costs are driven by market conditions. If the service provider is supplying mostly steel parts (of 50% or more purity) that it has to source every year, and the steel index rises 10%, then the supplier will have to raise its prices (by at least 5%) to break even. Such a supplier cannot enter into a multi-year contract and give you it’s absolute best price today unless there is a cost-correction built-into the pricing model (as it would have to eat the loss otherwise).

In other words, the MRO category has some unique peculiarities that can make using a traditional sourcing solution a royal pain in the backside as the huge amount of set-up alone can be daunting. And if the solution doesn’t allow at least some of the work to be templated and re-used, the buyers will soon revert to the classic three-bids-and-a-buy through an auction just to “git-r-done“. But with BravoSolution’s Business Center, the basic templates are ready to go and once an organization uploads its item list, market baskets, list pricing for each supplier (and current / previous bid discounts), and current contracts; defines it’s service level equations and cost-vs-service level trade-offs; and defines its bidding guidelines and key milestones, a basic event is ready to go — and incumbent suppliers don’t even have to provide a price list (if the current price list in the system is still accurate), just their discounts for being awarded certain market baskets or dollar levels. In tomorrow’s post, we will dive into the BravoSolution MRO Business Center.