Category Archives: Product Management

Supply Management in the Decade Ahead: Same Old, Same Old — Only the Pendulum Swings Part II

Almost 20 years ago, back in 2007, I wrote a 2-part series on Supply Management in the Decade Ahead: The Eight Major forces (Part 1 and Part 2) where I discussed the various external forces that will impact a company’s supply chain, as verified by CAPS, AT Kearney, and their clients.

And just like you don’t need to read another state of procurement report for five years! because, except for the tech-du-jour, nothing has really changed in the past five, ten, and even twenty years; you don’t really need to do an extensive study or survey to realize that the core supply chain issues are more or less the same, it’s just where the pendulum happens to be in it’s swing on each major issue.

Today we discuss the last 4.

Customer & Channel Dynamics

The downstream supply chain will continue to change rapidly due to economics and government policies in some industries. In other industries, supply chain dynamics will be influenced by the poor financial condition of major trading partners in the chain. The impact of private equity firms will also be significant, who will continue to take public companies private, slash costs, raise prices, and change business relationships. (PE, which currently controls between 15% and 20% of the US economy, continues to get more powerful by the day … in fact, it won’t be long before they are twice as powerful as the stock markets, which only generate between 8% and 12% of the GDP per year. They may have a market capitalization equal to 2X to 2.5X of the US GDP, but we all know that’s meaningless because some of that results from foreign investment and an AI-triggered crash is coming.)

The only difference between conducting business today and conducting business in the years ahead with respect to channel dynamics is that these changes will continue to come at an accelerating pace and you will have to continue to adapt faster than you do today. That will require Human Intelligence (HI!) and Human Experience to accomplish. AI can make recommendations, but these are generated based on probabilities generated on unknown training data and can be useful or as useless as the AI telling you to eat one rock a day and strawberries with 2 “r”s. (And I’m not sure what those are, FYI.)

Increased Product Variety & Shorter Life Cycles

Variety will continue to mean more models, brands, and products tailored to different geographies and price points. Consumer tastes in emerging and newly developing economies will be new and different from traditional markets. Traditional lines of competition will continue to blur as companies try new products and markets.

While I was right that you don’t want to browse the web on the screen the size of a credit card, that only goes for developed economies (and in economies where the only devices most people have and the only internet they can afford is their phone, they are quite happy with that), it’s still a fact that you don’t want your fridge to tell your local grocery store that you consumed six litres of rocky road this week, and that you don’t want the ability to cut yourself seven times in a jagged fashion simultaneously while shaving. Amongst the big winners will be the companies that realize sometimes you just want a phone, a fridge, and a straight razor – and not all the garbage Gen AI-based hallucinators are trying to shove into these products today. And, oh yeah, there comes a point where it doesn’t matter how many fractions of an ounce less it is than the previous product, how many extra cubic inches you squeezed into the door, or how fast it vibrates (at least in the case of the razor).

People will want better (faster) and cheaper, but they will want it to meet the need better than last gen tech, not just different, and they don’t want to sacrifice what they have just to get something different. And while Weird Al lamented that his computer was obsolete before I opened the box, we’ve entered an age where most products are obsolete once the first unit is produced … which could be months before it gets into the hands of consumers.

Social Responsibilities

Companies in developed economies will continue to be held to high standards wherever they do business in the world. Companies will have to monitor working conditions in their supply chains all the way back to basic extractive and farming practices. Supply management will have to ensure that the supply base meets environment standards. Commitments to a diversified supply-base will become more important in developed economies, and in a significant sub-set of those now insist on DEI requirements (while one country now insists on no DEI).

However, we are still in the age of CSR: Corporate Social Responsibility. While it’s been proven again and again that consumers won’t pay more (than 1% to 2% above the lowest price) for CSR brands, if products and prices more or less equal, they will generally choose the responsible brand over the irresponsible one.

Environmental Responsibilities

Twenty years ago we said that continuing the social responsibility theme, customers, consumers, shareholders, non-govermental organizations, and governmental bodies will all increase their scrutiny of corporate environmental practices in all regions of the world and demand that companies take environmentally friendly actions. Companies will be forced to meet the environmental expectations of the general populace. Environmental issues will become brand-related issues and influence how companies are viewed in the marketplace. And with the exception of the United States, which is rolling back environment legislation faster than Walmart is rolling back prices, ESG laws have continued to be rolled out … and with the damage that “AI” data centers are doing, in most countries, expect another round of legislation to come later this decade or early next decade.

To meet environmental requirements, if you still don’t have across-functional team with executive leadership to monitor environmental concerns in the extended supply base, it’s time you get one. Carbon restrictions are going to come into effect in (more) countries, water restrictions will emerge, and other pollution control acts will also come into play. An organization will need to keep tabs on what’s being proposed, because, in many countries, proposed legislation eventually becomes reality (although it usually takes longer and gets watered down). It’s always cheaper to be in compliance before an Act comes into effect than scrambling later.

Product Design Must Align With Procurement And Supply Chain As Well!

Port strikes, border closings, tariffs, wars, strait and canal closings, factory fires, droughts, wild fires, volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, tsunamis, mine collapses, etc. There are now an innumerable number of natural and man-made ways your supply chains can come to a screeching halt and cut off your primary (or sole) supply of critical components, parts, and materials that you need to make the product(s) in your key product line(s).

When that happens, you need to so something. If you’re lucky, you have already identified an alternate supply and can switch to it or ramp it up. If you’re not, you have two choices: identify an alternate source quick or re-design to use less/none of the component/part/material in question.

The same way Japanese snack giant Calbee switched to black and white packaging when it could no longer get the coloured ink it needed because of the situation with the Strait of Hormuz, or the same way Tesla rewrote it’s software and firmware to use different chips during a semiconductor shortage, or IKEA reimagined the metal heavy lamp to use 60 precision cut birch veneer pieces to create a spherical lampshade.

But product design can only do this if they know they can get the alternative components or materials quickly and cost effectively. They need to be able to search supplier and product databases, logistics capabilities, and build realistic cost models to see if a an alternative design is worth pursuing before digging in deep, asking a supplier to provide a customized offering, and then having Procurement saying it will cost too much, sales saying the new price point will make the product unsaleable, supply chain say it can’t fulfill the product now because of a man-made or natural (disaster) supply chain issue, etc.

Plus, once it believes it has a workable, cost friendly, alternative it can immediately involve Procurement and Supply Chain, share the data, have its thesis validated, and prepare to update production lines with confidence.

One has to remember that there are two reasons the railroad barons became so rich. The first was their exploitation of workers (before unions and worker protection laws). The second was that they were built by engineers who built vertically integrated organizations that optimized every step and ensured every interaction that was required was executed to keep costs down and profitability high. Remember that vacuums are empty, and thus devoid of profit. So don’t create them between departments if you want to be successful.

Two and a Half Decades of Project Failure

  • 2024 Bain: 88% of business transformations fail to achieve their original ambitions (Source)
  • 2023 HBR: Some estimates place the failure rate as high as 80%.
  • 2023 Gartner: states that 85% of AI projects fail. As well, 87% of R&D projects never get to the production phase.
  • 2023 EY: 2/3 of senior leaders have experienced at least one underperforming [digital] transformations in the last 5 years (Source)
  • 2020 Standish Group: 66% of technology projects end in partial or total failure (based on the analysis of 50,000 projects globally). 31% of US IT projects were canceled outright and the performance of 53% ‘was so worrying that they were challenged.’ (Source)
  • 2020 McKinsey: 17% of large IT projects go so badly that they threaten the very existence of the company (Source)
  • 2020 BCG: 70% of digital transformation efforts fall short of meeting targets (Source)
  • 2020 KPMG: 70% of organizations have suffered at least one project failure in the prior 12 months (Source)
  • 2019 Everest Research Group: 78% of enterprises fail in their digital transformation initiatives (Source)
  • 2018 PWC: 75% of digital transformations fail to generate returns that exceed the original investment (Source)
  • 2018 Standish Group: only 29% of IT project implementations are successful, and 19 percent are considered utter failures (Source)
  • 2017 Gartner: 75% of all ERP projects fail (Source)
  • 2016 Innotas: 55 percent had a project fail in the last 12 months (Source)
  • 2015 Genpact: more than 66% of digital transformations fail to meet expectations (Source)
  • 2013 Innotas: 50 percent had a project fail in the last 12 months (Source)
  • 2012 McKinsey: large IT projects run 45 percent over budget and 7 percent over time, while delivering 56 percent less value than predicted (Source)
  • 2011 HBR: average project cost overrun is 27%, 1/6 projects is a black swan with a cost overrun of 200% or more Source
  • 2011 Forrester: 70% failure rate of change management initiatives (Source)
  • 2010 Deloitte: only 37% of projects delivered the functionality on time and budget meaning that 63% of projects failed to some degree (if not entirely) (Source)
  • 2009 Standish Group: failure in 68% of projects is probable (because success in 68% of projects is “improbable”) Source
  • 2001 Standish Group: 52.7% of projects will cost 189% of their original estimates and 31.1% of projects will be canceled before they ever get completed (Source)
  • 2001 Robbins-Gioia Survey: 51% viewed their ERP implementations as unsuccessful while 46% did not feel the organization understood how to use the system (Source)
  • 2001 Conference Board Survey: 40% of the projects failed to achieve their business results within one year of going live those that did achieve benefits had to wait (at least) six months longer than expected (Source)
  • 1999 Gartner: 75% of e-business projects will fail to meet the business objectives through 2002 (Source)

Is it just me, or is it the case that:

  • many of the firms who have been chronicling project failures for over two decades are also
  • many of the firms that have been guiding IT projects for over two decades?

Proper Project Planning is Key to Procurement Project Prosperity! Part 3

In Part 1 we noted that we wrote about the importance of Project Assurance, and how it was a methodology for keeping your Supply Management Project on track, ten years ago and that this typically ignored area of project management is becoming more important than ever given that the procurement technology failure rate, as well as the technology failure rate as a whole, hasn’t improved in the last decade, and is still as high as 80% (or more) depending on the study you select.

Then, in Part 2, we told you that even before we dove into the project steps for which both assurance, and guidance (because assurance isn’t enough if the project [plan] isn’t right), is needed, we were going to give you one critical action that you needed to undertake to ensure everything starts off, and stays right. And that particular action is to:

  • engage an independent expert to guide you through the entire process and help where needed

because the complexity of Procurement and Procurement Technology has reached a point where it just overwhelms the average Procurement professional. It’s been more than two decades since global conditions impacting Procurement have been so complex and technology has reached the point where even experts are struggling to make sense of the market madness, meaningless buzzwords, and the overwhelming onslaught of Hogwash.

We also pointed out that this expert must be truly independent and cannot be:

  • a resource of the company,
  • a resource of the vendor, or
  • a resource of the implementation provider.

This resource is critical in each of the phases we described in our original Project Assurance series (Part I, Part II, Part III, Part IV, and Part V). Here’s a high level description of why.

  • Strategy: the first step is a “health assessment” that pinpoints where the organization is in Procurement Maturity, and what it should be looking for to get to the next level (otherwise, what’s the point?), and this is where an expert can do a maturity and gap analysis
  • Acquisition: the expert can help craft the right RFP for the organization, identify which vendors have the appropriate technology (to ensure every response received would at least address some of the key pain points, and that the responses would be comparable), and help with the evaluation and review (acting as sale-speak to plain English translators)
  • Planning: once one or more solution (and implementation) vendors are selected, the expert is key in the creation of a realistic, and logical, project plan that ensures the organization doesn’t agree to a “big-bang” implementation proposal (which always results in a “big-bang” and has led to major supply chain failures), that the resource requirements won’t be too strenuous on the organization, and that the most critical capabilities are implemented first
  • Design/Plan Review: the plan is compared to the strategy, RFP, and overall business goals to make sure everything is aligned before the project progresses
  • Development/Implementation: the expert ensures each phase starts, completes, and is properly tested and verified on time; uncovers the reasons for delays and the root causes to prevent future problems; and when changes are required, helps to define and supervise change management (plans)
  • Testing & Training: the expert will not only ensure that the proper tests are designed, but that they are properly implemented and repeated until complete success is the result

In other words, the right expert is your guide to ensuring each step is designed right as well as conducted right, who can also take over any tasks you don’t have the expertise to do so in house. And, most importantly, the right expert is your key to Procurement Project Prosperity!