Are You Doing It Wrong?

If you’ve been following the media, you know that we have reached a point were most major business publications are now putting focus on Supply Chain as your top risk and your top opportunity.

You also know that these same publications, and the solution providers that follow, and reference them, have been preaching the following solutions to not only tame the risk but increase the opportunity.

Comprehensive Category Management

Spot buying individual categories at market lows or evening running reverse auctions at opportune times is not category management. And for that matter, neither is an event that covers the entire category. At this point you probably think that the doctor is losing it a little, because how could it not be category management if you are addressing the whole category?

It’s Simple. Category Management isn’t just about grouping all seemingly related items and running an event, it’s grouping items that have related characteristics that allow the items to be sourced effectively under the same strategy. For example, while it might make theoretical sense to group printers, ink, and paper together — because you use them together, from a sourcing point of view, ink and paper often go better with office supplies and printers with hardware. You can probably get them thrown in for free with a server purchase. But that’s just the start. If you source a lot of metal parts, you should probably group them by primary metal, since the price of steel, aluminum, etc. will largely dictate their prices and it might even make sense to not only source all of the parts from the same supplier but even buy the metal on behalf of the supplier with your better negotiating power and/or credit rating.

Supply Chain Risk Monitoring

Natural and Man-Made disasters devastate supply chains when they result in raw material or product unavailability for weeks or months. When a company doesn’t understand their dependence on a single source or the risks that single source is subject too, they can figuratively get caught with their pants down to say the least.

As a result, most leading companies in the Risk Management arena are now tracking and monitoring their tier 1 supply base for not only missed deliveries, but late shipment dates and inquiring immediately when something is late shipping. However, by the time a shipment is late, it’s often too late to go to another source if the reason for the lateness is the lack of an important raw material. So the smarter companies also ask their suppliers to let them know when their suppliers miss a delivery. This is better, but sometimes this is still too late. You need to track the primary sources of the raw material and their ability to produce. Not only the companies, but their locations. All natural and man-made disasters in the region and then evaluated for impact and if the producer of the primary raw material or part is potentially at risk, they make sure, or ask their tier 1 supplier to make sure, that the raw material or product can still be delivered on time and if it can’t, these leading companies immediately seek a secondary source (or lock up available supply pre-emptively) — not two weeks after the tier 1 supplier required the raw material to meet the commit date.

Big Data

The only buzzword on par with big data is cloud. According to the converted, or should I say the diverted, better decision are made with better data — the more data the merrier. This sounds good in theory, but most algorithms predict demand, acquisition cost, projected sales prices, etc. based on trends. But these days the average market life of a CPG product, especially in electronics or fashion, is six months or less, and the reality is that there just isn’t enough data to predict meaningful trends on. Similarly, every disruption impacts the cost, and these disruptions are as unpredictable as future sales predicted using trend models with insufficient data.

You use all of the data available to validate your operations, procurement, and financial situation. Not to blindly predict future sales or prices. An over-reliance on big data is often more dangerous than not having data at all.

Once You Get the Three T’s, What’s the Next Step To Asia Pacific Dominance?

In our last post on Why There Are No World Class Procurement Organizations in Asia Pacific, we noted that the primary reason that no business head or CPO in Asia-Pacific reported their Procurement capabilities as great is the classic Triple-T problem — a lack of talent, technology, and transition management. When we reviewed the seven things that Bain indicated procurement teams lack, we noted that all were fundamentally an instantiation of a talent, technology, or transition management problem.

However, getting the three T’s in place is just the first step. The next step is to apply them properly. Where do you start? One place to start is with the six enablers outlined in the article. While the doctor thinks it is debatable that these enablers will help a company establish 4th generation Procurement, like the article suggests, it will definitely up an organization’s game and put them on par with their counterparts in the western world.

So what are these enablers?

1. Better Organization

This requires the organization to acquire a clear procurement mandate, a streamlined organization that appropriately delineates global vs. regional vs. local responsibilities, and clear roles and decision rights across Procurement. In addition, the organization needs to elevate critical decisions to senior management (to ensure they not only have senior management buy-in but support), implement a feedback loop from internal customers to end consumers, and establish effective reporting channels.

2. Better Processes

This requires better category management, vendor management, and information management. Sustainable savings come from holistic category management, not point commodity sourcing. Suppliers only improve when properly managed. And information quality is key to Sourcing, Procurement, and all related aspects of Supply Management.

3. Better Tools & Systems

Leaders have integrated and transparent data for both direct and indirect spending. Good decisions require good data. Good data can only be obtained from good tools.

4. Better P&L Effectiveness

Leading companies have pull-based demand management with enforced compliance and formalized budgeting for all categories. They employ sourcing platforms that allow a company to see the direct effect of a sourcing decision on the bottom line.

5. Better Talent Management

Just because you have talent today, this does not mean you have talent tomorrow. If you don’t continue to educate and advance your talent, they will leave you for a competitor who will. Plus, as your organization grows, you will need to add more talent. Without a proper talent management strategy, your talent equation can only be solved for a single point in time — if you are a lucky one.

It’s a hard climb, but a feasible one. And if you review the SI archives, you will find many posts about how to improve in each of these areas. Happy Hunting!

Why Are There No World Class Procurement Organizations in Asia Pacific?

A recent brief by Bain on Winning With Procurement in Asia, released last December, in which they summarize the results of interviews conducted with 60 business heads and CPOs throughout Asia-Pacific, stated that while many of these business heads and CPOs report their Procurement capabilities as fair, or even good, none report their Procurement capabilities as great. Why?

According to the article, procurement teams in Asia-Pacific often
(1) lack organizational support and prominence,

(2) tend to focus on short-term activities,

(3) rely on inadequate demand management processes, and

(4) struggle with underdeveloped supply bases and insufficient core procurement processes such as category management.

In addition, they lack

(5) systematic supplier management processes,

(6) reliable data systems and

(7) strong procurement talent. Moreover, even though some companies make a point of investing in procurement talent, they fail to take the critical move of defining a clear career path for procurement professionals.

In other words, it’s the classic Triple-T Problem — a lack of talent, technology, and transition management. If we go through the list, we see that (7) is the talent problem, (6) is the technology problem, and (1) though (5) are an example of a lack of transition management.

The lack of systematic supplier management processes in (5) is a result of not transitioning to modern supplier management processes driven off of modern supplier management systems.

As a result of the lack of systematic supplier management processes, which is a direct result of poor, or nonexistent, transition management, these organizations are (4) struggling with underdeveloped supply bases and insufficient core procurement processes.

As they haven’t transitioned to newer Supply Management processes, these organizations are still suffering from (3) inadequate demand management processes.

Furthermore, as a result of not transitioning to newer Supply Management processes, with a longer term outlook, they (2) tend to focus on short term activities.

And, finally, as they have not helped the organization as a whole transition to better supply-management inspired business processes, they still have to deal with (1) a lack organizational support and prominence.

At home or abroad, good Procurement and Supply Management starts with the 3 T’s — talent, technology and transition (management). Without meeting this necessary condition, an organization will never be great.

Are You Ready to Leave the Procurement Dark Ages? ScoutRFP Has a Simple Tool For You. Part II

In our last post, we noted that many organizations are still in the Procurement Dark Ages, conducting procurement using the age-old three-bids-and-a-buy technique and the fax machine running over a 64 kbit digital ISDN circuit. And that, in the low end of the mid-market in particular, this was the norm and not the exception. Scary!

We also noted that there were a number of reasons for this dismal state of affairs including, but not limited to, a lack of foresight and faith in Procurement by the organizations, the high price tag that used to be associated with these products, and the complexity of the suite solutions that were often thrust upon the technologically illiterate organizations that, sadly, were just not ready for sophisticated solutions.

Some companies need to take it one-step at a time, and like a kid on the beach for the first time, dip their toe in the open ocean before getting comfortable enough to walk, and eventually, dive in. To this end, Scout RFP has decided to launch a new RFP solution to help those companies, and other companies who are using RFP solutions that are overpriced or too advanced for their needs.

Does this make sense given that they are not the first company to offer a stand-alone RFX product, or at least a stand-alone RFX module, and that there are a number of companies on the market that have, or started with, this strategy? For example, EC Sourcing, ThomasNet, and PurchasingNet all offer low-end stand-alone RFX solutions that can be obtained at low cost.

Unless they do something different, definitely not. But the founders recognize this, and might find a way to brighten up the space just a little. (Time will tell.)

So what’s different about ScoutRFP? Especially considering the maturity of RFX technology? Not much, but when you consider the market they are going after, it probably doesn’t take much to make a difference to have an impact. (With the majority of players chasing the same Global 2000, there is still a big unexplored blue ocean when you move further down the corporate food chain.)

Scout RFP is currently focussed on differentiating themselves in the following ways:

1. Ease of Use

The solution is 100% web-based and designed to work with minimal inputs. Like all other modern RFX products, it guides the user through a minimal workflow to create the RFX, select the suppliers to receive the RFX, and evaluate the responses, side-by-side, when they are returned.

2. Flexibility

Whereas many solutions force the user to create an RFX section by section, question by question, the ScoutRFP solution allows the user to create the RFX at their desired level of detail. They can cut and paste entire sections from a Word document into an entire section, break it up into individual questions, or go somewhere in between.

3. Control & Visibility

It allows for the definition of hierarchical visibility and control that allows a CPO to view the work being done by his or her directors who can see the work betting done by his or her buyers.

Like other modern tools, ScoutRFX also has a dashboard view, supplier response and status tracking, and side-by-side comparisons.

And it’s brand new. The company has not officially been around for a year, and has accomplished quite a bit of development in that timeframe as well as landing over a dozen customers in that time as well. So it’s very likely that the next year will see quite a bit of new development, the creation of a knowledge and template library, and other useful advancements to jump start your dark-age Procurement enterprise.

If you’re a mid-size company without an RFX solution, it’s worth checking out. It doesn’t have all of the bells and whistles of some more established solutions, but it doesn’t have the price tag either. And the founders, who know what it’s like to be stuck without basic tools to do your job, won’t beat around the bush or try to shovel you a side of bullcrap with a modules, services, or license seats you don’t yet need. (After all, when you’re selling enterprise systems in the low five-figures, you can’t afford to!)

Are You Ready to Leave the Procurement Dark Ages? ScoutRFP Has a Simple Tool For You. Part I

In yesterday’s post we noted that even though the Procurement profession has went from zero to hero in those leading organizations that were forward looking enough to let Purchasers gain influence in both the inbound and outbound supply chain and raise the profile of the organization in the eyes of both customers and suppliers, it is still only a select group of leaders that have truly embraced Supply Management and leaped the pond.

The remaining organizations are still in the Procurement Dark Ages, conducting procurement using the age-old three-bids-and-a-buy technique and the fax machine running over a 64 kbit digital ISDN circuit. And, especially in the lower end of the mid-market, this is the norm and not the exception.

To this end, a new company has hit the Procurement Technology marketplace focussing only on RFX. That’s right, RFX. You’d think that the market would be saturated by now, given that RFX solutions have been on the market for a decade and a half, but it isn’t. There are a number of reasons for this:

1.As described above, a lack of foresight and faith in Procurement has held Procurement, and Procurement technology, back in a number of organizations.

2. The high price tag that was associated with such technology in the past. This technology used to be six figure technology. It’s far from that today, but when many companies first investigated this technology, they got such a sticker shock that they decided it would be out of their reach for years, if not decades, as used to be the case with MRP and ERP technology.

3. The complexity of the suite of products that were often forced upon them. A number of early Sourcing and Procurement Technology providers tried to sell entire suites, insisting that individual products were not valuable on their own, and most companies, still using phone and fax, were not ready for the breadth of technology being thrust upon them and so retreated to their dungeons.

The companies at the low-end of the technology and innovation spectrum need to take things one step at a time, and get comfortable with basic technology solutions, like RFX, before moving on to auction and spend analysis and even, if we’re lucky, optimization. And they want to be able to acquire these solutions one at a time.

That’s why Scout RFP has launched a new RFX solution that attempts to provide these companies with a simple, starting, technology solution that these companies can use to dip their toe in the modern age of Procurement at a low cost with little to no risk.

Is it needed? Is it worth it? Stay Tuned for Part II.