Beware the Perils of Hyperspecialization

A recent article over on the Harvard Business Review on the age of hyperspecialization said that we are entering an era of hyperspecialization and that it will convey a pulsating, world-spanning flow of knowledge work. Heraliding it as the continuation of Adam’s Smith division of labour, it notes that hyperspecialization reduces costs most dramatically when a company can turn to an expert instead of having to reinvent the wheel and alow the company to achieve a better utilization of their own employees’ time.

However, there can be just as many perils, if not more. The article, which clocks in at seven pages, briefly passes over these five perils:

  • Digital Sweatshops
    In developing economies, enterprising industrialists might use hyperspecialization to create “digital sweatshops” where workers, sets of whom specialize in specific tasks, are exploited for low wages by those who have the means to do so.
  • Astroturfing
    If work is divided into small enough parts, it is possible that a worker may not know what they are working on and may be contributing to something counter to their personal beliefs, or even the law. For example, a mathematician could design a new lottery game or a “greeting card writer” could be creating text for e-mail spam.
  • Electronic Surveillance
    Not only can every aspect of the work be monitored, but it may even reach the point where the work in progress, and the person doing the work, is monitored from start to finish.
  • Dull & Meaningless Work
    Even Adam Smith noted the deleterious results when a person’s work was reduced to “a few very simple operations” back in 1776. If tasks become so refined that they become monotonous, there surely will be ill psychological effects.
  • No Guarantee of Payment
    While spec work is not new, today, most spec work is confined to proposals. In hyperspecialization, workers will actually be doing the work and whether or not they get paid could be at the whim of the company that issues the task.

But misses the most important peril of all:

  • Loss of Vision
    If everyone works on a tiny little piece of a puzzle, over time there will be fewer and fewer people who understand how a puzzle is to be put together. This will seriously stifle innovation as the creativity that results from exploring beyond your horizons diminishes as horizons shrink.

Why Should You Include Simulation In New Product Design?

As per this recent article in Industry week that proclaims that “the computer-aided-engineering revolution is here”, proper utilization of simulation in New Product Development:

  • creates products that are more sustainable and energy efficient,
  • enhances performance and ergonomics,
  • improves value and affordability,
  • provides options for differentiation, and
  • considerably reduces NPD timelines as simulations can be created and run much faster than prototypes can be built and tested.

It’s a great article, and simulation is a great counterpart to optimization, which will allow you to optimize costs and supply before the product is finalized.

For A Believable Vision Of Procurement 2020, Head Back To 2008

Long Before Ariba published their 20/30 Vision of the Future of Supply Management and Aberdeen took us back to 1999 with their vision of the next decade of Supply Management, the leading Supply Management minds at Hackett sat down and came up with their vision of Procurement in 2020 which was a heck of a lot better than most of the stuff I’ve seen this year (with a notable exception being Bob’s Next Level Supply Management).

In Hackett’s 2020 Vision For Procurement: A Revolution Through Evolution of Capabilities and Value (which was released as their Procurement Executive Insight on April 15, 2008 and followed by their 2020 Vision: Delivering on the Evolving Value Proposition of Procurement which was detailed in their 2008 Book of Numbers), Hackett identified the emerging trends that will define tomorrow’s world-class performance and help an organization move up the capability path. Realizing that transformation in most organizations is evolutionary, and not revolutionary, Hackett’s leading minds lay out an evolutionary path that takes organizational capability from reactive to strategic in a four-step process that passes through planning and alignment along the way.

The authors note that while an average Supply Management organization starts out with the goal of assuring supply, this is a very reactive strategy. Supply Management has to get to the point where it is harnessing the power of supply markets to maximize the value it is getting from its spend, to enable business strategy, and to optimize its tactical execution. Along the way, Supply Management will progress through TCO and demand management. As it progresses to harnessing the power of supply management, the organization will continually expand its circle of influence, dig deeper into its customers needs, and provide better service as time goes on.

In addition, it will also need to acquire the following strategic capabilities:

Business Process Sourcing
Supply Management will need to become the starting point of BPS activities and skillfully integrate disparate methodologies surrounding core competency analysis, resource management, service delivery models, business process management, and portfolio management into its overall supply management practice so that it is the first business unit consulted, and not the last, in any conversation surrounding business process (out)sourcing.

Supply Performance Management
Supply Management will go beyond simply managing the inbound supply chain to shaping strategies, goals, and objectives for the business as a whole based on its knowledge of global supply markets for materials, talent and technologies. It will need to seamlessly integrate supply planning with financial planning and operational planning so that each decision is best for the business overall.

Knowledge Management
It will need to master content-driven analytics which integrate external data into internal data models for supply prediction, planning, and risk mitigation that will allow it to build robust and agile (virtual) supply models that can be redesigned as needed in response to significant events.

Talent Management
Supply Management will need to adopt a cradle-to-grave talent management framework that includes knowledge management and advanced training models that allow it to advance its personnel to the next level. The framework will need to contain an innovative “brand management” model that will differentiate Supply Management as the career path of choice for new talent.

New Product Development and Introduction (NPD/NPI)
Supply Management will have to include advanced design-for-supply support that incorporates multi-tier cost modelling, scenario
planning and optimization that will allow the organization to understand the critical relationships between requirements, specifications, costs and constraints and make the best design decisions for the business overall.

Supplier Management
Supply Management will have to proactively engage suppliers and extend internal competencies and knowledge into suppliers’ operations
to increase their process capabilities, financial health and goodwill toward the buyer. Supply Management needs to progress to the point where it is able to detect a potential problem before the supplier detects the problem, and then step in to help the supplier resolve it before it materializes.

Next Level Strategic Sourcing
Strategic sourcing has to advance well beyond TCO modelling and the application of the best e-Sourcing tools to the point where it is using deep supply intelligence to identify unseen risks and anticipate supply capabilities that can deliver breakthrough improvements in innovation, environmental sustainability, new market entry, brand enhancement and other key business strategies. It will utilize scenario planning on the extended supply network to provide visibility of opportunities and risks that will guide Supply Management to the right buy for the organization every time.

How Do You Build a High Performance Supply Management Organization?

A recent study by Dr. Andre de Waal of the HPO Center that involved more than 3,500 organizations across 60 countries confirmed what leaders already know:

  • Leadership
    In High Performance Supply Management organizations, leaders lead with exemplary behaviour, make decisions, adopt a results focus, act with integrity, and coach staff. They don’t micromanage and do the work of their staff.
  • Talent
    Leading organizations have top talent that is diverse, complementary, and able to work well together. The talent is also flexible and resilient and committed to making the organization successful.
  • Openness and Action Orientation
    Everyone is involved in important processes through shared dialogue, change (for the better) is encouraged, and actions are taken to improve performance.
  • Continuous Improvement and Innovation
    There is an eternal focus on improvement and innovation.
  • Long Term Focus
    Long term success take precedence over short term profit. Management and employees are in it for the long haul and act that way.