
* the doctor does not endorse the use of Prozac or any other anti-depressant, whether or not they are in the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor class, unless prescribed by a certified medical professional who has taken you under his or her care.

* the doctor does not endorse the use of Prozac or any other anti-depressant, whether or not they are in the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor class, unless prescribed by a certified medical professional who has taken you under his or her care.
In last Friday’s post, we asked if you were doing it wrong. In particular, we mentioned category management, supply chain risk monitoring, and big data, and asked if you were doing them wrong. We noted that even though a number of companies have jumped on these runaway bandwagons, most have yet to grasp the reigns and take control of the wagon and get it on the right track.
Why is that?
Fundamentally, it’s the same reason that there are no world class Procurement Organizations in Asia Pacific — the classic Triple-T problem.
Once the talent, technology, and transition management is in place, the organization has what it needs to fully embrace the initiative and take it to the next level. And do it right.
Where should your Supply Management Organization start? By identifying the core capabilities that are required in each “T” category and finding the right talent, technology, and transitions management for the initiative, the organization will be well on its way.
In the rest of this post, we’re going to talk about the requirements for an organization to get on the right category management track.
Talent for Big Data
Good big data scientists need the following hard and soft skills:
Technology for Big Data
Appropriate technology platforms for big data will have at least the following features:
Transition to Big Data
In order to transition to an organization that properly uses big data, the organization needs to hire someone with good change management skills and give that person the tools and C-suite support he or she needs to get it done. That person also needs to be a natural born leader and someone who can work with teams to get it done.
This isn’t a complete (laundry) list of what is required for big data, but it’s a good starting point. Get the right talent, technology, and transition management in place, and your organization will be well on its way to big data* success.
* Especially if you hire a good big data scientist who recognizes that sometimes the data doesn’t have to be all that big to derive a useful fact!
In last Friday’s post, we asked if you were doing it wrong. In particular, we mentioned category management, supply chain risk monitoring, and big data, and asked if you were doing them wrong. We noted that even though a number of companies have jumped on these runaway bandwagons, most have yet to grasp the reigns and take control of the wagon and get it on the right track.
Why is that?
Fundamentally, it’s the same reason that there are no world class Procurement Organizations in Asia Pacific — the classic Triple-T problem.
Once the talent, technology, and transition management is in place, the organization has what it needs to fully embrace the initiative and take it to the next level. And do it right.
Where should your Supply Management Organization start? By identifying the core capabilities that are required in each “T” category and finding the right talent, technology, and transition management for the initiative, the organization will be well on its way.
In the rest of this post, we’re going to talk about the requirements for an organization to get on the right supply chain risk monitoring track.
Talent for Supply Chain Risk Monitoring
Good risk managers need the following hard and soft skills:
Technology for Supply Chain Risk Monitoring
Appropriate technology platforms for risk monitoring will have at least the following features:
Transition to Supply Chain Risk Monitoring
In order to transition to a proper supply chain risk monitoring framework, the organization needs to hire someone with good change management skills and give that person the tools and C-suite support he or she needs to get it done. That person also needs to be a natural born leader and someone who can work with teams to get it done.
This isn’t a complete (laundry) list of what is required for proper supply chain risk monitoring, but it’s a good starting point. Get the right talent, technology, and transition management in place, and your organization will be well on its way to risk management success.
In last Friday’s post, we asked if you were doing it wrong. In particular, we mentioned category management, supply chain risk monitoring, and big data, and asked if you were doing these three thing wrong. We noted that even though a number of companies have jumped on these runaway bandwagons, most have yet to grasp the reigns and take control of the wagon and get it on the right track.
Why is that?
Fundamentally, it’s the same reason that there are no world class Procurement Organizations in Asia Pacific — the classic Triple-T problem.
Once the talent, technology, and transition management is in place, the organization has what it needs to fully embrace the initiative and take it to the next level. And do it right.
Where should your Supply Management Organization start? By identifying the core capabilities that are required in each “T” category and finding the right talent, technology, and transition management plan to support the initiative, the organization will be well on its way.
In the rest of this post, we’re going to talk about the requirements for an organization to get on the right category management track.
Talent for Category Management
Good category managers need at least the following hard and soft skills:
Technology for Category Management
Appropriate technology platforms for category management will have at least the following features:
Transition to Category Management
In order to transition to proper category management, the organization needs to hire someone with good change management skills and give that person the tools he or she needs to get it done. That person also needs to be a natural born leader and someone who can work with teams to get it done.
This isn’t a complete (laundry) list of what is required for proper category management, but it’s a good starting point. Get the right talent, technology, and transition management in place, and your organization will be well on its way to category management success.
As per our last post, SIM (Supplier Information Management) is a mature and stable technology with a large number of suppliers not only providing the tools and best practices to manage supplier life-cycles, but to manage risk, compliance, receivables, and even spend repositories for spend management. It’s almost a commodity in the Supply Management Space, and an acquisition thereof is not likely to get baby that new pair of shoes anytime soon. Or is it?
As great as they are, most SIM products — stand alone best-of-breed or integrated suite offerings, have at least one weakness — and often two. In particular, the data model and the workflow. Just like early spend analysis solutions were often tied to one, rigid, UNSPSC data model, most current SIM solutions are also tied to one, rather rigid, data model. In addition, most of those solutions with some SLM (Supplier Lifecycle Management) also have rigid workflows.
This worked well when business processes were predictable and stable and corresponded to products with long life-spans. But the times they-have-a-changed. These days, product life-spans are measured in quarters, and not years, if we are lucky. Associated processes change to not only accommodate the new product demands but to adapt to new technologies and new business requirements. If the workflow can’t adapt, the capability, and overall usefulness, of the tool is limited.
A SIM product that could not only allow a user to define, and redefine, data models as necessary but define, and redefine, workflows as necessary would offer more value than current SIM platforms. And if that product could also maintain full audit trails, which not only track data changes but model and workflow changes, and insure that old records and workflows can still be seamlessly accessed when the data model or workflow changes, then that would be even better.
And if that SIM product went even further and allowed for dynamic organizational, supply base, and user-defined hierarchies, that would be icing on the cake. Supply Chains are not boring because they are not static. They are constantly changing. The supply chain can not only change from product to product, but batch to batch as a primary raw material or part supplier runs out of material, becomes unreachable due to a political or natural disaster, or simply gets greedy and forces the higher tier supplier to find a new source. A good SIM solution will allow the supply chain map to evolve in real-time as the supply chain evolves. Moreover, with acquisitions, mergers, and spin-offs being the normal modus operandi for many businesses, a SIM solution that can easily adapt the organizational data model is also required. Finally, for maximum productivity, a user needs to be able to maintain their own view of the supply chain, back and front, relevant to them. They need to maintain their view of the relevant multi-tier supply base and the relevant hierarchies in their organization that they have to report to and serve.
In other words, a SIM tool that allowed for a truly dynamic data model, workflow, and supply chain organization map could bring a new wave of value to a modern Supply Management organization and the individual with the foresight to acquire such a tool might just get baby a new set of shoes. But is there such a solution?
Stay tuned!