A recent Logistics Management Article on The State of Procurement in 2024, starts off with Procurement is fundamental. It spans everything from day-to-day purchases to measuring sustainability to future-proofing operations for long-term growth. It’s a wide spectrum of mission-critical responsibilities, spanning all business functions.

As we noted in our recent article on The Future of Procurement is the Past, Procurement is at the heart of the business. It’s always been a core function and always will be. And once businesses realize that the key to sustained profitability going forward is getting back to basics, it will be again.

And while the article says “Procurement is transforming at lightning speed“, it’s only partially right … leading Procurement departments are transforming their technological baseline at lightning speed to become more efficient and effective, but they are not changing the core, strategic function they perform, they are just implementing processes and tools that allow them to perform those core, strategic functions more efficiently and effectively.

Why? According to the article, which quotes Gartner, its due to the intersection of accelerating changes in risk management, ESG, and technology and the complexity and challenges of keeping up. The internal challenges — such as system complexity, a wide range of vendors and products, and compliance requirements — and the external challenges — rising costs, unexpected economic changes and CSR mandates, and changing digital procurement needs — are increasing by the day.

As a result, many Procurement departments have been going through transformations, sometimes two or three at a times, but not all are turning out as planned. This is because, as the article notes, most of these projects focus on implementation, and not the reason for; relies too heavy on staff(‘s lack of) experience and implementer inexperience; buys into the vendor’s “one size fits all” approach; and leaves workflows incomplete. Digital is not an option, but how you approach it is. The article emphasizes simplicity, quoting Gartner’s statistic that organizations that employ design simplicity have a 42% increase in success, but that’s just part of the picture.

As per our previous articles, it’s not just simplicity, it’s focus on what is needed, why, and vetting the platform and the vendor against both. It’s putting the real need first, not the technology, and selecting the right technology for the job. Sometimes it might be AI, but most of the time it will be classic tech that’s been on the market for 10, or 20, years that has been honed over the years by a vendor laser focused on solving a subset of Procurement problems in the best way possible for companies in the industries, market size, and geography the vendor is focussed on. As the article notes, there’s no AI roadmap and, as such, significant care should be taken with any AI initiative.

It’s more critical as the article notes, to focus on better data analysis, efficiency, and system (and data stream) interconnection. The more insight you get, the better decisions you can make on system selection.

In other words, the current state is a challenging one, but that’s no different than what Procurement has been going through since the first commercial telephone interchange began operations in 1878. Procurement has always had to deal with change, the only difference now is that it’s coming harder and faster than it ever has. But it’s not like Procurement hasn’t always had to deal with or adapt to change, and it’s not like the best Procurement departments haven’t always done so, it’s just that the challenge has reached a new height. But as long as Procurement employs the same best practices they’ve always employed and does the right due diligence on any solutions they are considering, they will do just fine.