Category Archives: Economics

Primary ProcureTech Concern: Tightening Credit Conditions

The world runs on money, regardless of what form it comes in. Gold, cash, or credit. Credit is particularly important because it helps an organization bridge between cash cycles.

Why?

If economic downturns or inflationary pressures arise quickly, then credit will also tighten.

Impact Potential

If the organization, or its suppliers, needs credit to produce and distribute the goods for sale, the lack of interim credit could lead to reduced inventories and sales and even bankruptcies.

Major Challenges/Risks

Economic Market Prediction:
Predicting whether the economy is going to grow, stay flat, or recess (or depress) is the first challenge, as that’s a leading indicator of credit markets.

Credit Market Prediction:
Based on the projected economic changes, predicting the base and prime rate changes, availability of credit, and the future cost to your organization and your primary suppliers.

Alternative Credit Sources:
If your primary sources are projected to become considerably more expensive or restrict credit access, can you identify alternate sources? Moreover, how much will those cost, how long to establish the relationships, and how reliable will they be?

Alternative Credit Arrangements:
If right now you are just using loans or lines of credit, maybe you need to consider early payment discounts, invoice factoring, or alternative supply chain based credit arrangements.

Final Words

Credit conditions depend heavily on economic conditions, so this is yet another reason you need a good economist.

Dangerous Procurement Predictions Part II

As per our first post, if you read my predictions post, you know SI hates predictions posts. It fully despises them because the vast majority of these posts are pure optimistic fantasy and help no one. Why are the posts like this? Because no one wants to hear the sobering reality off of the bat in the new year and the influencers care more about clicks than actually helping you.

But the predictions are not only bad, they’re dangerous. And to make sure you don’t fall for them and make bad decision based on them, we’re going to tackle some of the most dangerous predictions, which include predictions that look innocuous at first glance (like the last prediction on how a big legacy suite will go out of business) but hide the dangerous consequences of what will actually happen if a big suite finds itself in big trouble. Today we tackle the next four, and you can be sure this won’t be the last post in our series. Feeds are still being flooded with prediction posts, and I’m done ignoring the insanity.

4. The jobs market will be tough for the first half of the year, but will start to pick up in Q3 and Q4.

The job market is tied to the economy, and everyone predicts the job market will rebound when the economy picks up. But here’s the thing. Even when the economy picks back up, the job market never does quite as well as the last time. And the economy isn’t going to magically improve half-way through the year. This is the exact same thing we’ve been told the last two years, and it hasn’t happened.

First off, most of the first world economies around the world are flat, borderline recession, or in recession. Secondly, the only thing propping the US economy up right now is AI, and the money circles keeping it afloat as all the AI, Hardware, and Software companies keep moving the same money around investing in each other to keep each other afloat. If the bubble bursts, the US is in trouble, and the economy will quickly flush itself down the toilet. And the job market will go with it.

Considering only the big tech giants who have been hoarding cash for the last few years are in good shape, and everyone else is trying to conserve cash to survive not only the current market but a potential recession, the last thing they are going to do is hire unless absolutely necessary to fill a critical role as a result of a departure. Remember, they’ve spent the last two years using AI as an excuse to lay people off and are always looking for the next excuse to lay people off, not hire them!

Jobs will continue to be super scarce, and only the best will have a chance to land one.

5. We’re in the early stages of a broader pushback (against unnecessary upgrades or technology investments).

A few companies smartening up and saying no to forced big provider upgrades, eight (8) figure consultancy projects, and big Gen-AI investments is not pushback. There have always been a few leaders who have broken away from the pack, did the math, and made the right decisions, but the pack is still charging ahead on Gen-AI. Every big software shop except IBM (who hired a CEO who can actually do math) has invested heavily in Gen-AI, which still loses four dollars for every dollar of revenue, despite any hopes of a real return in the near future and a 94% failure rate.

Let’s face reality. I warned this space about The Vendor In Black nineteen years ago and how he always Comes Back sixteen years ago, no one took heed then, and no one is taking heed now. The business model of the enterprise software space, which has not changed for the two decades I’ve been covering it, is to solve the problem created by the old sh!t by selling the customers the new sh!t that comes with new problems so they can sell even newer sh!t in three years to fix those (and so on). Same old story. Only the vendor names change.

6. We Won’t Buy Things; We’ll Orchestrate Ecosystems.

This prediction likely came straight from the A.S.S.H.O.L.E. and anyone who repeats it should be ashamed of themselves. There are no AI Employees. Claims to the contrary are false and anyone making those demeaning and degrading claims is simply dehumanizing you. And, as we have clearly explained, you definitely don’t want agentic buying because it will happily spend your money not only on stuff you don’t need but stuff that doesn’t exist and, if you’re super unlikely, stuff that is highly illegal. You need wood, it will buy up all the Minecraft wood because it’s cheap and call your problem solved. And that’s if you’re lucky. If you’re not, it will fulfill your resin need with an illegal purchase of hash (the drug) on the dark web (which is labelled resin so the poster can claim they never advertised an illegal drug). And so on.

Plus, as we have already noted, most of today’s “orchestration” platforms in Source-to-Pay are really ORCestration platforms and can barely connect a handful of major Source-to-Pay offerings. They’re nothing close to what is needed to orchestrate ecosystems.

7. Boards will Zero in on Supply Chain Security and Supplier Risk shifts from quarterly PowerPoints to continuous “signalops”.

Just like they won’t invest more in cybersecurity, they won’t invest more in supply chain security until they lose a shipment in the tens of millions. After all, they’ve got supply chain insurance, why should they care? Especially since their current security measures have been sufficient up until now.

But here’s the thing. When the economy goes down, jobs go down. And then two things happen. People get desperate and turn to crime. And criminals, when their investments in drugs, alcohol, gambling, prostitution, and other quasi-legal through illegal activities start losing money because unemployed people run out of money to spend on their vices, these criminals get desperate too — and high value theft becomes more attractive. A temporarily unguarded truck here. A container there. An entire warehouse. And so on.

If it’s critical raw materials they can move (like rare earths), in-demand finished electronics they can sell (like iPhones, where a single container will contain at least 20M worth), military equipment or weapon (component)s that are now in demand globally, they’ll take bigger and bigger chances, especially if there are weaknesses in security. It’s not just cyber attacks that are going to increase, it’s physical attacks, supply chains aren’t ready, and companies won’t even stop preparing them until they lose tens of millions, don’t recover it all through insurance, and risk losing their insurance entirely. No one likes the math of risk prevention because, when it works, you don’t see the return. Even though it’s so much cheaper than insurance! And that’s why, in the majority of organizations, nothing will change.

Primary ProcureTech Concern: Economic Downturn & Deflation/Recession

There have been recessionary fears for the last two years. They are not going away, because most countries are teetering on the brink of a major recession if not a depression!

Why?

This is a significant concern because it contributes to the top risk of spend pressure because economic downturns always result in job loss and a drop in consumer spending as many consumers have to tighten the belt. And this, of course, contributes to the #1 joint risk of rising cost/spend pressure.

Impact Potential

The impact potential is dependent on how bad the downturn is, how long it lasts, and how global the downturn is. It can result in anything from a slight drop in sales (if you are in a mostly recession proof business and have one of the most affordable price points) to a massive drop in sales if you’re selling “luxury” goods to average consumers who, being unemployed, have to cut all luxury products from their purchasing.

Major Challenges/Risks

Prediction
When will the next downturn hit? How long will it last? How bad will it be. Right now the markets, and the US in particular, are defying all logic. Trade wars usually depress markets. Considerable over-inflation (which is the case in AI right now) typically leads to rapid depressions when the myth fails to become reality.

Detection
Detecting when it’s starting. When it’s not just a temporary blip, but when a downturn, whether a shorter one (of a few months) or a longer one (of a few years) is starting and when your organization should be adjusting its operations and strategy.

Planning
Just like you should have mitigation plans for significant risks, you should have mitigation plans for the downturn, which might involve shifting or changing product lines, pausing all expansion efforts, putting hiring on hold and planning for attrition (as people retire or contracts end), and even reducing operations with respect to production and/or support. It might also mean, for an international organization, shifting focus to different markets.

Final Words

The nature of today’s markets that allow rampant over investment without sufficient regulation ensures that recessions are inevitable. Your job is to predict them, and this is yet another reason you need a top economist.

Primary ProcureTech Concern: High Inflation Pressure

The two decades of low inflation we experienced in the noughts and tens are two decades we won’t experience again in our lifetimes. Thus, this is a significant concern.

Why?

More precisely, this is a significant concern for two reasons. The first reason is that if costs rise too much, the cost of acquiring the necessary materials and services to make the products and/or deliver the services you sell rise, as well as the cost of MRO and day-by-day operations. If you’re in a thin margin business, inflation pressure is thus a significant concern.

Moreover, this is also a significant concern because wages never keep up with inflation (because, if they did, we wouldn’t see so many port and logistics strikes every time cost of living skyrockets while wages remain flat or indexed against an outdated cost of living increase as of the last contract negotiation that occurred two to five years ago), and if the inflation leads to substantial cost of living increases, the relative share of consumer spending that will be spent on the organization’s products and services will drop, giving them less cash on hand to deal with their rising costs, increasing the spend pressures of their top joint risk.

Impact Potential

The impact is straightforward.

  1. If costs rise too much, not only does profitability fall significantly, but after a point, so does the sustainability of business operations. Cuts could hav to be made with devastating future conferences.
  2. If sales drop too much, critical revenue stops coming in, and the same problems arise.

Major Challenges/Risks

Inflation Projection
Predicting expected inflation over time based upon typical trends as well as from the impact of significant economic events that can cause rapid increases in inflation.

Impact Mitigation
Finding ways to mitigate the expected impact through alternate sources of supply, currency exchanges, operational efficiency improvements, investments, etc.

Final Words

This is a tough nut to crack, especially for Procurement. The organization needs to hire a top economist to help it predict and prepare for inflationary times.

The Tariff Tax Is Coming – And There Ain’t Much You Can Do About It!

Since you have been ignoring the home-shoring/near-shoring that a few of us experts tried to warn you about almost a decade before the first of the predictable tragedies happened (with articles appearing in the late 2000s on the dangers of outsourcing and the advantages of near-shoring — here are 3 SI articles from 2009, 2011, and 2013), you will now have to pay the tariff tax.

(Note that we are now on the fourth predictable tragedy. The first was the COVID pandemic, which the WHO and WEF were warning us about for a good decade [even though they didn’t know what the pandemic would be, they knew a pandemic was inevitable]. The second was geo-political conflicts and sanctions that cut off entire markets. The third was the double whammy of Panamanian droughts and Houthis in the Red Sea, cutting off the fast shipping lanes and forcing a return to routes around the Capes. Now we have tariffs, a predictable result of home-first economic policies that always return in times of tense geo-political climates … and especially in countries run by leaders who believe they have autocratic power, even if they aren’t supposed to.)

So now you will get hit by tariffs. No ands, ifs, or buts about it. And there is nothing you can do to prevent it. Why?

  1. Tariffs are going to be applied across the board. Thus, changing locations isn’t going to prevent them, just minimize them.
  2. In most countries, tariffs on products don’t change weekly. But sales can based on the perceived economic situation, so stocking up on inventory can increase inventory costs beyond expectations as well as logistics costs if you have to expedite shipping.
  3. Locations with cheaper tariffs without supporting supply chain networks will actually cost more, especially if the average competency of the workforce is lower than other locations.
  4. Proclamations are not actualizations. Actual tariffs could be more or less. You could switch from a location expected to see tariff increases to one that sees even more tariff increases.

If you want to protect from tariffs, which are likely only going to get worse as time goes on, there is only one option — re-shore as close as you can! You want to be as close to home as you can to not only protect against tariffs, but to minimize other costs and risks. Logistics risks, and costs, are less. Re-supply times are less. Risk response is faster. And new development and innovation is easier.

So even though costs will increase in the short-term — as you build/upgrade/refine factories and production lines, retrain workforces, build new supply lines, design new distribution chains, and so on. Especially when you re-shore to a location with higher energy or workforce costs. However, over time, the workforce will become more skilled and productive, automation will improve, and supply and distribution lines will optimize. Costs will go down, and they will be more stable than costs half a world away you have no control over.

The key is figuring out what you should re-shore and what you shouldn’t. You should only re-shore what you can do cost-competitively unless you are certain you would lose access to supply otherwise. While the end goal should be that you only outsource for what you can’t get near, or at, home, the reality is that you have to stay in business, and that means staying competitive. So, at least in the short-term, you have to pick-and-choose. So how do you do that?

What-if cost modelling, optimization, and predictive analytics. You need to accurately model the costs associated with pulling acquisition and production back over time. First production batch, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, etc. Plot the costs over time and if the trend indicates the costs will match the outsourcing/offshoring costs within a few years, you go for it. These costs will require predicting all the component costs with predictive trend analytics, building detailed cost models, and optimizing them against all the different options. A lot of modelling, calculation, and what-if. But if you have the right advanced sourcing platform it can be done. (Although you will need to reach out to platform and modelling experts to figure out how.)

In the interim, for those of you panicking in the USA, just remember that some of the proposed tariffs is just posturing to force American allies to give into other US demands (more defence/border spending, less tariffs for US products). Others are promises to take revenge on countries that didn’t play nice or line certain pockets the last time the administration was in charge, unless those countries do exactly what is asked this time around. Thus, you don’t know exactly what will happen, all you know is that, since not everyone will meet the demands, more tariffs are coming. (And even if the worst don’t come now, who knows what the administration in four years will bring. Tariffs are coming!) That means you can’t select alternative locations ahead of time, or predict when to pre-buy. Moreover, you can only hold so much inventory, and can only get so much here so fast, so pre-buying wouldn’t help much anyway, if it helped at all.

The only sure fire way to minimize tariffs over time is to start re-shoring what you can relatively cost-effectively, as that will protect you no matter what, and even though it will take time, it will payoff in the long run. (And again, to be blunt, you should have started this fifteen years ago when Sourcing Innovation first started echoing the warnings of the inevitable disruptions that were going to come from too much off-shoring if a significant event happened, and now that we have had multiple — COVID, “special military operations” and sanctions, logistics challenges in Panama and the Red Sea, and now anti-trade policies in many countries — it’s time to act before even more disruptive events happen).