Category Archives: rants

Reverse Auctions Are Not Strategic. It Isn’t Always Strategic! Part III

This isn’t to say that they aren’t important, that they’re not one of the best methods at your disposal to quickly identify current market prices, to obtain products or services at market prices in a competitive market, and to increase transparency in your strategic sourcing efforts but, on their own, reverse auctions are not strategic.

A reverse auction is simply an electronic way of enabling a simple bidding opportunity that could just as easily be conducted in the real world (if your supplier representatives were willing to travel to the auction location to place their bids). Do you think strategic when you think of this type of public auction? No. And simply electrifying something does not make it strategic.

An online reverse auction (has the potential to) open up the auction to more potential suppliers, drive greater market transparency (if more suppliers choose to participate), and streamline your product or service acquisition, but nothing about this is strategic. It’s simply good tactics.

This isn’t to say that a reverse auction can’t be the end result of a true strategic sourcing effort. For example, if you are sourcing custom manufacturing services for a new, relatively unique, product that you are preparing to unleash on the marketplace and you have went through a supplier pre-qualification round to select a small group of suppliers you would be willing to jointly develop with (who have all received the confidential specs under NDA), you could decide to simply hold a reverse auction to streamline what could otherwise be a time-consuming multi-round RFX, but note that this is just the tactical implementation of a sourcing strategy for a strategic category. The reverse auction itself is not strategic!

And it’s definitely not strategic if you’re sourcing $1,800 worth of office supplies or store shelf inventory!

Share This on Linked In

Spend Analysis Is Not Strategic. It Isn’t Always Strategic! Part II

That’s right, in and of itself spend analysis is Not strategic. This isn’t to say that spend analysis isn’t one of the most important actions that your supply chain can take in its effort to reduce costs, improve efficiency, and make the most effective use of business resources, but that the art of simply doing a spend analysis is not strategic.

Spend analysis provides a picture of the products and services the organization is spending money on, whom the products and services are being bought from, the organizational buyers who are spending the money, where the products and services are being bought from, and where the products and services are being shipped to and/or utilized. But this process is not strategic — it’s tactical. Furthermore, this information alone is not strategic. Let’s say the organization is spending 2M on computing equipment. So what? On it’s own, this information is not strategic. And unless the spend is significant (at least 1% of organizational spend) and the number one goal is to reduce total organizational spend by 5%, or the equipment needs to be unique (the organization’s proprietary trading platform only runs on hardware that natively supports AIX Unix), it’s not going to be used strategically. If the analyst compares spend to market prices and determines that reasonable savings are available (5% to 15%), the decision might be to run a sourcing event, but if it’s just another cookie-cutter RFX/Reverse Auction and/or TCO optimization with the same supplier base, it’s not strategic.

And then there’s the most common use of spend analysis in an organization that knows how to use it. Ad-hoc queries to determine if a (duplicate) invoice is being paid twice, if the wrong amount was paid to a vendor, if a department is on budget, if a category has enough spend to warrant a sourcing event, etc. Not strategic. Very important, but not strategic.

The reality is that very few events are strategic, because very vew categories are strategic. Unless it’s a unique product or service, unless the spend is a significant percentage of organizational spend, unless the product or service directly relates to a (long-term) organizational goal, or unless you’re looking for a strategic-partner to share in development, production, costs, or risk (mitigation)s, it’s probably not strategic. It’s probably still important, because every cent and resource counts in today’s economy, but let’s stop confusing tactical with strategic.

Share This on Linked In

It Isn’t Always Strategic! Part I

There’s been a lot of debate about The Life and Death of Strategic Sourcing ever since Dalip Raheja claimed that Strategic Sourcing is Dead back in August (with numerous posts indexed at this link), and while most of it has been good, there’s been one major point missing in all of the debate to date:

Sourcing is NOT always Strategic!

That’s right! Sourcing is NOT always Strategic!

First of all, most of what you buy is not critical to operations.Consider all of the following which is bought by most businesses on the planet:

  • office supplies
  • office computing equipment
  • janitorial services
  • HR support
  • print material for marketing
  • electronic discovery for legal services
  • outsourced manufacturing for commodity products

Not Strategic!

  • office supplies

    who gives an albino rat’s behind who made your stapler and copier paper and where they came from

  • office computing equipment

    for 99% of companies out there, as long as it runs Microsoft Office and an internet browser, who made the machine is irrelevant

  • janitorial services

    it’s not too hard to wash a window, sweep a floor, or empty a trash basket

  • HR support

    there are at least six top-tier HR-support agencies out there whose services are essentially indistinguishable

  • print material for marketing

    any print shop that can print 8.5″ x 11″ brochures in 16M colours does the trick

  • electronic discovery for legal services

    there are a number of software packages out there that do exactly the same search on exactly the same file formats and thousands of monkeys who can use them

  • outsourced manufacturing for commodity products

    if you’re manufacturing office supplies, clone PCs, or children’s toys, there are hundreds of factories that can get the job done

Let’s look at the definitions of the word strategic:

  • Merriam-Webster: (a) a careful plan or method : a clever stratagem or (b) the art of devising or employing plans or stratagems toward a goal
  • Wikipedia: a word of military origin, refers to a plan of action designed to achieve a particular goal. In military usage strategy is distinct from tactics, which are concerned with the conduct of an engagement, while strategy is concerned with how different engagements are linked
  • Business Dictionary: Art and science of planning and marshalling resources for their most efficient and effective use

These say that strategy is

  • carefully thought out,
  • goal focussed,
  • efficient, and
  • distinct from its implementation, which is tactical.

Thus, if you simply jump to strategic sourcing techniques, you are not being strategic. If you’re not planning how to efficiently use all of the affected resources, you’re not being strategic. If you’re not thinking about why a certain plan of action is being considered, you’re not being strategic, and, most importantly, if what you are doing does not relate to a major business goal or objective, it’s not strategic.

Share This on Linked In