Category Archives: rants

Oh No! App Mania Has Hit The Supply Chain!

Prepare to be nickel-and-dimed one feature at a time. It’s coming.

Unlike the author of a recent post in the SCMR blogs (where “Highjump says there’s an app for that”), I am not pleasantly surprised by the amount of effort being put into smartphone app development right now. First of all, there’s only so much you can do on a smartphone screen. For the vast majority of analytical supply management applications, smartphones just don’t make sense. Secondly, unless you have constant access to free wifi, you’re not going to want to download megabytes of data and push your mobility bill through the roof. Thirdly, the real value in supply management systems materializes when data flows from one to the next — and all of the relevant data is available. Data stuck in a standalone app that doesn’t do much more than display that data isn’t very useful.

Plus, do you really need 100+ WMS apps? Really? No! There aren’t 100 WMS applications, and if you think there are, then what you are really buying is 100 different instances of a WMS workflow engine custom tailored to a specific situation. You’re paying for 90% of the same functionality 100 times over. I guess it’s good for the vendor if they can create 100 apps by only doing the work required to create 11 and charging you for each and every app, but it’s not good for you.

HighJump, one company that plans to release up to 100 apps a year, may try to tell you that it’s a great idea because it is a way to get new functionality in your system without waiting for a new release, but you don’t need apps for that. If you’re using a true multi-tenant SaaS application, then you get every update the vendor makes as soon as its available, and you get it all for one maintenance fee.

In other words, if you want to needlessly empty the corporate bank account, there’s an app for that.

Another Headline from the Land of D’oh! Financial Crisis of 2008 avoidable

According to this recent BBC article, which summarized a report from the US Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, Regulators, politicians and bankers were to blame for the 2008 US financial meltdown. Well, duh!

From page 17 of the report:

The captains of finance and the public stewards of our financial system ignored warnings and failed to question, understand, and manage evolving risks within a system essential to the well-being of the American public. Theirs was a big miss, not a stumble.

The only thing the report, and article, got wrong was that the cause of the crisis is the same fundamental cause of the financial crises for the last 30 years. Simply put, it was greed.

  • Greed (by the lenders and the regulators, who wanted to believe the market was strong) led to the tide of toxic mortgages
  • Greed led to reckless actions by executives
  • Greed led to households taking on too much debt
  • Greed led to fundamental breaches in accountability

And while the report may be correct when it states that to pin this crisis on mortal flaws like greed and hubris would be simplistic because it was the failure to account for human weakness that is
relevant to this crisis, the reality is that, despite the repeated financial crises of the past 30 years, federal regulators have yet to put checks in place for greed. And until regulators recognize that they have to be looking for greed whenever markets rise too fast (because that’s what produces unsustainable evaluations and toxic assets) and actually do so, their hubris is going to allow these crises to happen again and again. The boom and bust will repeat until the economy just can’t take it anymore and future historians discuss the fall of the great American Empire along side the fall of the great Roman Empire.

Does Verizon Have Its Head in the Clouds?

As we all know, Verizon recently acquired the right to offer iPhones on its network, a status symbol that mobile providers the world over have been vying for as they wait for the initial exclusivity agreements to expire. As the first provider given permission by the world’s fifth largest mobile phone manufacturer (Globe and Mail) to challenge AT&T in the United States, it is probably a little bit smug right now as it waits for its February 10th launch date. But is that any reason to leave its head in the clouds?

Needless to say I was a little shocked to hear that Verizon is paying $1.4 Billion for Terremark Worldwide (New York Times, January 29, 2011), a provider of cloud computing services. While it’s true that Terremark runs 13 global data centres, and data centres are valuable, 13 data centres are not $1.4 Billion valuable. Trust me. I can build you ten modular and scalable Green Data Centers for 1/10th of that with a lot more computing power than you might think you’d get for that price by going with high-density low-power 64-core servers from IBM or SUN which, by the way, cost less than 100K each, even maxed out on memory. You can easily fit 8 of those on a 20u rack. That’s the equivalent of 256 dual core servers on a single rack. Fill 8 racks with servers and 4 racks with SANs (Storage Area Networks) and you have a data centre — that fits in a small room — with the equivalent of 2,000 machines of processing power, that only costs you about 10 Million. I know Terremark also offers services and has a market cap of about 945M, but a 35% premium for something you can build yourself in a few months? I just don’t get it!