Category Archives: Spend Analysis

7 Sourcing Secrets More Than 2 People Should Know

A recent article over on Cracked listed “7 Secrets Only Two Living People Know” (for some reason … that the doctor must admit he doesn’t understand in a few of the cases). While entertaining, it did cause me to ask why there are so many truths in sourcing that most people still don’t seem to get. Since some days I feel like only 2 people know the following, I decided I should do my own post on 7 sourcing secrets more than 2 people should know. Because you really, really, really should know the following sourcing “secrets”. After all, they’re truths, even if no one’s bothering to tell you. So without further ado, here they are:

1. Spend Analysis is flexible Data Analysis, not canned reports on a data warehouse populated via automated classification

Real spend analysis is the ability to dive into your data and find out not just where your true spend is higher than it should be, but why. This requires you to have the ability to slice, dice, and cube your data on any dimension you can think of, because you’re never going to know where the losses are until you find them. (After all, if you knew where your holes were, wouldn’t you have plugged them already?) Canned reports on a static data warehouse can only tell you how fixes you’ve already implemented are working, not where the holes are. Furthermore, “automated classification” just doesn’t work. Any good consultant worth his salt can load your data into a real data analysis product and find two dozen mistakes in twelve minutes. You need the ability to define and redefine mapping rules on the fly as all automated classification can do is fix previously identified mistakes. It can’t identify new ones. Software isn’t intelligent. People are.

2. e-RFX is electronic support for the full information and quote gathering cycle, not just bid collection

If all your e-RFX does is allow you to collect bids, it’s not e-RFX. It’s e-RFQ, and a poor e-RFQ at that. It should allow you to create questionnaires, surveys, and entire RFX packages with closed and open-ended questions, allow you to compare responses side by side, and allow you to collect not only all of the pricing, but all of the discounts, rebates, and promotions the supplier offers. It should help you manage the process, guide you through it, and support data import and export in open formats so that you can also use analysis, optimization, and contract management tools.

3. A Reverse Auction is simply an online auction event, it’s not a substitute for proper sourcing project management

I follow the space closely and not a month goes by where I don’t see an article on how Company XYZ is now refusing to participate in online auctions. When you dig down, this is because they had a horrible experience. When you dig deeper still, you find out it is typically either because Company ABC simply threw an auction tool at the supplier and told they had to bid through the tool or lose all their business or Company ABC threw up an auction tool and said they’d award to the lowest bidder but ended up going with a different supplier, usually the incumbent, after the auction closed.

I find this appalling, because e-Auctions, like e-RFX, are not only a great time saver, but a great way to bring parties together from around the globe and allow them to participate in an e-Sourcing event that, when run right, is more transparent, educational, and profitable for all parties concerned than traditional methods of sourcing where you get bids by phone and fax until you find three bids you like and then meet in a room to “negotiate” until a deal is struck with a winner. (And I use the term “negotiate” loosely because old style purchasing methods usually boil down to the party with the most leverage beating up the party with the least leverage.) But this is only true if the event is run right. This takes proper project planning and management. Tools can facilitate the process, but they can’t replace it.

4. Decision Optimization is for everyone, not just for math geeks

I’ll admit this is my own personal bandwagon, but having seen savings of over 40% and ROIs of over 400 on a number of projects, and average savings in the 10% to 20% range and average ROIs of 5X to 10X or more, I think I have a good reason for riding it. Despite the fact that true self-service decision optimization for sourcing has now been around for almost a decade, it’s still the “black sheep” that almost no one uses — and it’s a real shame because now is the time you need it most. Furthermore, the new tools coming out of the leading providers are a lot more usable than the first generation tools and can be easily used by any college graduate who can build a cost model and specify some business constraints. In other words, if you have the pre-requisites for strategic sourcing, you can use these tools to save time, to save money, and make better, more informed, decisions.

5. Contract Management is just a new name for document management with integrated monitoring, it’s not a replacement for contract managers

Lately I’ve noticed how contract management is coming into vogue. And while that’s a good thing, it’s important to understand what contract management is and isn’t because it seems that some vendors, and some publications, are promoting the new offerings as the latest and greatest tools to solve all your contract woes when the reality is that these tools are nothing more than document management tools with monitors and alerts. I won’t deny the importance of having a good contract management tool that can monitor expiration dates, contract pricing, and, most importantly, invoiced pricing against contracted rates, but these tools, even if they contain sophisticated contract creation capabilities, can’t replace a contract expert, a master negotiator, or a good spend analysis tool that can uncover devious work-arounds by less-than-reputable vendors looking for a way to make back that buck they gave up in negotiations. (For example, I’ve talked to a number of consultants who told me how they found that some office supply management vendors regularly changed SKUs to bill you twice as much for that pen as it’s really worth.)

6. e-Procurement is tactical, and not a substitute for e-Sourcing

There’s still a lot of confusion in the marketplace between what is e-Procurement (and how it relates to P2P, EIPP, and the other new acronyms old players are coining to differentiate their new, streamlined, offering) and what is e-Sourcing, even though it should be fairly clear cut (as I attempted to outline in this post on why it’s sourcing and procurement). A few of the e-Procurement vendors are even claiming that you don’t need sourcing at all if you use the wisdom of crowds (which is not the case because there’s a big difference between a great deal on a commodity office supply and a great deal on raw cocoa or custom circuit boards, which are not commodities). Sourcing is the strategic part of the purchasing cycle, procurement is the tactical. You need both, and one is not a substitute for the other.

7. It’s not what you know, it’s what you can learn

Plain and simple,

  • it doesn’t matter if you’ve been doing it that way for 20 years if it’s not optimal,
  • shift happens, and
  • whatever happens, the world of tomorrow will not be the world of today.

You have to keep learning. That’s why this blog is here.

Share This on Linked In

If You Truly Want Intelligent Decisions, Get a Real Data Analysis Tool

Share This on Linked In

And before we go any further, Excel DOES NOT Count!

Backing up, a recent article over on SupplyManagement.com on “intelligent decisions” notes that BP has set up a market intelligence team to make faster and better decisions and that, to date, it has helped them to save 20M while avoiding unnecessary expenditures of an additional 690M. And I have to admit that’s eye-catching. But just setting up a team isn’t going to get you that level of savings. You’re going to have to train them and give them the tools and resources they need. While one of those resources will be access to market data feeds and analysis channels, another will be a real data analysis tool.

The reality is that your team won’t be able to amalgamate and normalize all of the data sources, identify trends, and develop appropriate predictive models if they don’t have the right tool for the job. This is a significant analysis and modelling exercise, one that spreadsheets like Microsoft Excel are not equipped to handle. Just like a carpenter needs a hammer and a nail to attach two boards, an analyst needs the right software tool to properly combine and trend two distinct data feeds. Don’t forget that.

Service Leaders Speak: Bernard Gunther of Lexington Analytics on “Reducing Bypass Spend”

Share This on Linked In

Today’s guest post is from Bernard Gunther of Lexington Analytics, a leading provider of spend analytics services for global procurement organizations.

Savvy sourcing managers are finding ways to uncover new savings despite spending freezes and heavy workloads. Just because the economy is suffering and budgets are frozen, it doesn’t mean you have a pass when it comes to demonstrating your value to the organization. In fact, it’s the perfect opportunity to show your stuff. You just have to be smarter and more creative about it.

One sourcing pro managed to reduce bypass spending and save over $100,000 a year by investing a couple of days of her time. You can bet this didn’t go unnoticed, especially during this economy.

Any sourcing manager looking to deliver value to the organization can do the same thing. Here’s how.

We’ll make three assumptions:

  1. You have some sort of spend analysis system*. You should be able to do this analysis whether you have a first-generation style data warehouse, use a third party to analyze your spending, or have a modern spend analysis tool. You just need basic spending information.
  2. You have done a deal with a selected vendor where you are now getting better pricing and quality for the same services than you were previously. You may have done this deal with a paper RFP or a very sophisticated optimization engine. You just need to know the pricing for the new deal.
  3. Some users in your organization are not buying from your preferred vendor. If you are covering a range of categories and have 100% compliance to all your deals, congratulations! This is a very rare accomplishment. Most organizations have some level of bypass or maverick spending.

If you have a good information system, the following should get done in a few days over a few weeks. If it takes you longer to get this done, you may look at your information systems. There is a great deal that can be done to make this faster and easier.

Here’s the process and some illustrative results:

  1. Pick a category where you have a preferred vendor with favorable pricing.
  2. Find the past year’s spending for this category. For illustration, let’s assume the category spending is $3 million.
  3. Estimate the opportunity. Let’s assume you have 70% compliance with your program. This means that there is a bypass rate of 30% (or $900,000). When you sourced this category, your preferred vendor saved you 15% on your rates. 15% savings on $900,000 is $135,000 — money worth going after. In addition, your incumbent could increase their business by over 40% — something that any vendor would be happy to do. If the opportunity is large enough, continue.
  4. Get the spending by vendor. Find the largest bypass vendor. Let’s assume this vendor represents one third of the bypass or $300,000 of spending. If you could move this bypass spending to your preferred vendors, you would save 15% of $300,000 or $45,000.
  5. Verify the opportunity. Obtain a few invoices for this bypass vendor. In the ideal world, you would be able to get a detailed file with all the specifications, quantities and pricing for this bypass vendor to make this analysis quick and comprehensive. But you don’t need to live in this world of perfect information to get results. Price out the invoices using your preferred vendor. If your pricing grid doesn’t cover the items in question, talk to your preferred vendor and see if they sell the items and can give you firm pricing. You may need to call this bypass vendor to understand the specifications and ensure you have an apples-to-apples comparison. At the end of the day, one of the vendors will have a lower price. If your preferred vendor is lower, you have the information to go to the business unit. If your preferred vendor is higher priced than this bypass vendor, you should use this information to get the preferred vendor to lower their price, generating savings on the rest of your spending.
  6. Estimate the savings for the largest business unit. Use your spending information to calculate savings for this business unit. Let’s assume this business unit represents half of the bypass spending with this vendor. This means shifting the spending would save $22,500 for this one business unit.
  7. Talk to the people in the business unit who used the other vendor. Find out why they use the bypass vendor and ask what it would take to use the preferred vendor in the future. Ask them if this extra money would be useful. (If they aren’t concerned about the money, perhaps the budget pressures aren’t as serious as you thought. Keep a log of “wasted spending”. When the next round of budget pressure comes around, you can haul out the list.)
  8. Reduce the bypass. Develop a plan to eliminate this bypass in the future. If this business unit regularly buys from the bypass vendor, this is straightforward. If you have tight and centralized ordering, work through the system. If this is an episodic purchase done by many units, you may need to let more people know about this preferred vendor and the savings opportunity.

If you did this once a month, you’d save $22,500 x 12, or around one quarter of a million dollars every year — easy money for a few days of work a month. And you still have 90% of your time left to do what you normally do.

So what’s stopping you?

Thanks, Bernard.

Simulation and Modeling Can Help You Go Lean AND Save

Share This on Linked In

As regular readers know, I’m a strong proponent of analysis, modeling, and optimization because I know from experience the significant cost reductions these technologies can bring to any procurement department when properly applied. That’s why I was delighted to see this recent article in Industry Week on “leveraging lean designs” that illustrated the effectiveness of 3-D models.

The article noted how Chrysler Group LLC used 3-D simulation software to model it’s Toledo North Assembly plant during the design phase and came up with a model that cost only $54 per square foot, about 30% less than the industry average (at the time) of $75 per square foot. Not only can modeling software help you find plant designs that are more efficient and that allow your workers to be more productive, but it can help you save considerable dollars in their construction.

The Benefits of Business Intelligence … With or Without SaaS

Share This on Linked In

A recent article in Industry Week on “making the move to SaaS” listed 7 ways that SaaS BI can help manufacturers. I found the article amusing because these key insights hold true whether or not you deploy your BI on SaaS.

So, here are seven ways BI can help you:

  • identification of demand trends
  • analysis of supplier costs and delivery histories
  • identification of customer buying patterns
  • channel team empowerment via full visibility into sales history
  • increased profitability through better cost controls and inventory levels
  • improved customer satisfaction through better service levels
  • continuous operational improvement

And, even better, you can do all this with a good “spend analysis” tool that was designed for more general “data analysis”. So go do it.