Category Archives: Sustainability

BioPlastics – Another Easy Way to Conserve Petroleum Supply

There are two easy ways to conserve petroleum supply by over 10% annually in the US (and higher still in countries where petroleum is used as a major energy source for electricity production). The first is to stop burning oil for electricity. There is just no need to be using petroleum (products) for electricity production given the plethora of alternate options available, including natural gas, (clean) coal, nuclear, wind, hydro, and waste. If we didn’t burn oil for electricity production, oil refinement, process heat, and heat for industrial buildings, a good 13% of annual usage could be conserved.

The second way is a full-out switch to bioplastics. Right now, plastics consume at least 1 of every 10 barrels of oil in the US every day. That’s a lot. And considering that we can now produce a 100% plant-based PET product made from fully renewable sources that has a molecular structure identical to petroleum-based PET products, there is no reason not to switch to bioplastics. The only reason they are currently more expensive than petroleum based plastics is economy of scale. If everyone started investing in them, the costs would come down as the resulting investment would fuel R&D which would, in turn, create better materials that can be synthesized quicker, easier, and more cost effectively.

But it’s not going to happen until, as the author of this recent article in Environmental Leader on “turning plants into plastics” hints at, one of two things happen:

  • Supply Chain Sustainability Catches On in a Big Way
    And the leaders decide to move to bioplastics en-masse before oil-based plastics become prohibitively expensive. Or
  • Government Mandates the Move to BioPlastics
    The tax credits suggested by the author won’t be enough. The government has to mandate it, because, unless the tax credits make bioplastics significantly cheaper, the average organization will hold off on the switch.

Personally, I’d like to see the government ban non-bioplastics for all common uses in industry and retail. Just like I’d like to see them ban the use of oil for electricity production. Reserving oil for transportation (where electricity still isn’t an option most of the time), agricultural and construction machinery, and (family) home heating, where it would cost too much to retrofit millions of homes, would decrease petroleum need by about 25%. That’s 1 in 4 barrels saved for future use. This would not only extend the life-span of our oil supply, but keep costs down as well.

Apple Dominates The Portables Market Because

Apple dominates the supply chain. While Sony and RIM had to delay products, Apple trucked ahead with the iPad2 right on time, and even though the backlog was a little bigger than they expected, they’re still doing fine. But how can you argue with over 60 Billion in Cash? Especially when “Apple could survive on current cash alone until 2018” (TUAW.com).

And that’s another reason why your company needs to be a supply chain leader.

Sustainability is a Long Term Goal

I enjoyed a recent post over on the HBR Blogs on “Ford’s Impressive Sustainability Strategy” that noted that a real sustainability effort requires both a short term and a long term sustainability challenge.

As the article notes, if we are running out of resources at less than 7 Billion people, imagine the situation when we get to 9 Billion people in less than 40 years. Sustainability can no longer be a fad, it must be a way of doing business. And it’s not going to be obtained with short-term quick fixes. And even if you eliminate 90% of waste from the production process, that still leaves one tenth the waste to be eliminated and, most importantly, the process is probably still using too much energy and water, which are becoming increasingly scarce resources.

Plus, market saturation is not always sustainable. Sometimes the right level of market penetration is less, not more, and sometimes users should pay a premium for the privilege of the product, or a penalty for overusing a product or service.

And, most importantly, sustainability is more than strategy. As the post points out, it’s execution.

You Don’t Have To Be Big To Be Sustainable

It’s nice to see a big publication like Inc. address the issue of sustainability in supply chains. It’s even nicer when it says that smaller supply chains without the financial means to make an aggressive push towards sustainability can still take gradual steps to be more socially, economically, and environmentally responsible, as it did in a recent article that addressed How to Build Sustainability Into Your Supply Chain.

Going after the low-hanging frutit of transportation and sourcing efficiency is a big step. Transportation is among the most unsustainable processes in an average supply chain as there are no viable long-distance shipping options that don’t rely on fossil fuels. While plants can be powered by wind, hydro, and solar energy, trucks, planes, and trains still require fossil fuelds. Thus, minimizing shiping distance, and the need for shipping in the first place, takes a lot of waste out of the operation and makes it sustainable.

Another easy step, as the article points out, is to minimize waste. Many manufacturing by-products can be reused or recycled, and can often even be resold to companies that can reuse or recyle them, turning (the) cost (of waste disposal) into profit.

Yet another easy step, not pointed out in the article, is to install timers and motion sensors and automatically turn off lights, heat, cooling, etc. when it’s not needed. A considerable amount of your energy is wasted heating and cooling space that no one is using.

Even if you can’t transform your operation overnight, you can still green it considerably taking baby steps.

You Know Your Country is Falling Behind On Sustainability When …

The dirtiest country, energy wise, on the planet will almost equal you in Wind Energy Production per capita within five years. Sustainability is a big part of China’s new five year plan, and the goal is to increase wind energy production to 90 Gigawatts (GW) of power by 2016 from current production level of 40 GW. (Source: “The Next Five Years” SupplyChains.com) Currently, the US, the world leader in wind power production, produces a meare 35 GW of electricity from wind.

But more important is China’s commitment to reduce energy intensity per unit of GDP by 16%, cut carbon intensity per unit of GDP by 17%, and have non fossil fuels increase to 11.4% of primary energy mix by 2015. For a country that currently relies on dirty coal (whch is 70% of the energy mix), this is an aggressive goal. And even more aggressive are its 2020 goals of reducing carbon intensity per unit of GDP by 40% and increasing sustainable energy production to 15%. Considering that China tends to accomplish tasks it puts its minds to, this is an impressive start to a sustainability effort, which it has been in dire need of.